Technical Papers
Jul 15, 2024

Behavior of RC Buildings Located on Hill Slopes under Earthquake Shaking

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

Buildings on hill slopes have suffered significant damage from past earthquakes due to poor design and construction practices. Therefore, Indian building code restricts the natural period of building on slopes based on their shortest height. Different building configurations located on hill slopes perform differently in the event of an earthquake, making it necessary to check the applicability of provisions using elastic and inelastic analyses. This study investigated a spectrum of two-dimensional (2D) RC moment frame building configurations (with or without including infill walls as an equivalent strut), including (1) type of building configuration; (2) angle of slope; (3) boundary conditions; and (4) varying height of buildings using modal analysis, equivalent static analysis, and response spectrum analysis. Mass participation (from 80% to 37%) and base shear decrease due to extreme short columns, which demand massive forces; interstory drift decreases for buildings on hill slopes, but increases drastically by varying the boundary conditions. The responses from nonlinear static and dynamic time-history analyses were studied based on the capacity curve, performance point, and level of damage toto structural elements under the maximum considered earthquake (MCE). The presence of struts increases lateral stiffness and lateral strength for building on slopes, resulting in less damage to structural elements than regular buildings (BC1). However, damage to beams and columns is more common in bare-frame buildings than in buildings with struts, because the struts sustain more damage. Although a few building configurations on slopes incurred less damage (e.g., step-back setback buildings, due to decreased stiffness along the height), more damage is evident in the struts of other buildings on slopes. Thus, strut failure may cause a building to behave like a bare-frame building under MCE demand, sustaining more damage; this also was demonstrated with a three-dimensional (3D) building on slope. Thus, designing buildings based on code-based natural periods by assuming the sloped region to be rigid may not be valid for all building configurations. It is necessary to account for other critical parameters while placing restrictions on the building code provisions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Aggarwal, Y., and S. K. Saha. 2021. “Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete hilly buildings with open story.” Structures 34 (Dec): 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.069.
Arjun, S., and S. Arathi. 2016. “A study on dynamic characteristics of RC buildings on hill slopes.” Int. J. Sci. Res. 5 (7): 1116–1119.
Asteris, P. G., S. T. Antoniou, D. S. Sophianopoulos, and C. Z. Chrysostomou. 2011. “Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (12): 1508–1517. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000384.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Birajdar, B. G., and S. S. Nalawade. 2004. “Seismic analysis of buildings resting on sloping ground.” In Vol. 1472 of Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–11. Vancouver, BC, Canada: WCEE Secretariat.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete–code of practice. IS 456:2000. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016a. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1 General provisions and buildings. IS 1893:2016-Part 1. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016b. Ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces–code of practice. IS 13920:2016. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Daniel, J. A., and S. Sivakamasundari. 2014. “Seismic behaviour of stiffness irregular building on hill slope.” Int. J. Aerosp. Lightweight Struct. 4 (4): 281–300.
Daniel, J. A., and S. Sivakamasundari. 2016. “Seismic vulnerability of building on hill slope.” Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 9 (5): 1892–1899.
Demir, F., and M. Sivri. 2002. “Earthquake response of masonry infilled frames.” In Vol. 14 of Proc., ECAS 2002 Int. Symp. on Structural and Earthquake Engineering, edited by C. Balkaya, 151–158. Kültür ve Kongre Merkezi, Ankara: Middle East Technical Univ.
Dimri, M., and A. Kumar. 2022. “Seismic performance evaluation of step back RC buildings with and without infill walls.” In Recent Advances in Computational and Experimental Mechanics, Vol—I: Select Proc., ICRACEM 2020, 505–516. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6738-1_41.
Duran, B., O. Tunaboyu, and O. Avsar. 2020. “Structural failure evaluation of a substandard RC building due to basement story short-column damage.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (4): 04020053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001455.
FEMA. 2000. Pre-standard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Hareen, C. H. B. V., and S. C. Mohan. 2021. “Evaluation of seismic torsional response of ductile RC buildings with soft first story.” Structures 29: 1640–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.031.
Kaushik, H. B., and K. Dasgupta. 2013. “Assessment of seismic vulnerability of structures in Sikkim, India, based on damage observation during two recent earthquakes.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (6): 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000380.
Khadiranaikar, R. B., and A. Masali. 2015. “Seismic performance of buildings resting on sloping ground.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 11 (3): 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2193-7_63.
Kulariya, M., and S. K. Saha. 2022a. “Multi-hazard performance evaluation of hillside buildings under earthquakes and landslides.” Struct. Build. 117 (2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.22.00132.
Kulariya, M., and S. K. Saha. 2022b. “Performance evaluation of hillside buildings under blast and blast-induced ground motion.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 36 (5): 04022043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001754.
Kumar, S., V. Garg, and A. Sharma. 2014. “Effect of sloping ground on structural performance of RCC building under seismic load.” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2 (6): 1310–1321.
Liu, C., D. Fang, and L. Zhao. 2021. “Reflection on earthquake damage of buildings in 2015 Nepal earthquake and seismic measures for post-earthquake reconstruction.” Structures 30 (Apr): 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.089.
Mander, J. B., M. N. J. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mohammad, Z. 2019. “Effect of un-reinforced masonry infills on seismic performance of hill buildings.” VW Appl. Sci. 1 (1): 37–47.
Murty, C. V. R., et al. 2012. “The Mw 6.9 Sikkim-Nepal border earthquake of September 18, 2011.” EERI Newsletter, February, 2012.
Narayanan, A. R., R. Goswami, and C. V. R. Murty. 2012. “Performance of RC buildings along hill slopes of Himalayas during 2011 Sikkim earthquake.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Ohsumi, T., Y. Mukai, and H. Fujitani. 2016. “Investigation of damage in and around Kathmandu Valley related to the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake and beyond.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 34 (4): 1223–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0023-9.
Panagiotakos, T. B., and M. N. Fardis. 1996. “Seismic response of infilled RC frames structures.” In Vol. 28 of Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Earthquake, 28. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Patil, R. T., and M. Raghunandan. 2019. “Seismic performance assessment of buildings located on hillside slope.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering ICASP13. Seoul: Seoul National Univ. https://doi.org/10.22725/ICASP13.204.
Rai, D. C., G. Mondal, V. Singhal, N. Parool, and T. Pradhan. 2012. “Sikkim Earthquake: Effects on building stocks and perspective on growing seismic risk.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Reyes, J. C., A. C. Riaño, E. Kalkan, O. A. Quintero, and C. M. Arango. 2014. “Assessment of spectrum matching procedure for nonlinear analysis of symmetric- and asymmetric-plan buildings.” Eng. Struct. 72 (Aug): 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.035.
Roback, K., M. K. Clark, A. W. Joshua, D. Zekkos, G. Li, S. F. Gallen, D. Chamlagain, and J. W. Godt. 2018. “The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake.” Geomorphology 301 (Jan): 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.030.
Rossetto, T., and N. Peiris. 2009. “Observations of damage due to the Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005 and study of current seismic provisions for buildings in Pakistan.” Bull. Earthquke Eng. 7 (3): 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9118-5.
Sharma, M. L., B. K. Maheshwari, Y. Singh, and A. Sinvhal. 2012. “Damage pattern during Sikkim, India earthquake of September 18, 2011.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, 1–10. Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Singh, Y., P. Gade, D. H. Lang, and E. Erduran. 2011. “Seismic behavior of buildings located on slopes—An analytical study and some observations from Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Sreerama, A. K., K. Ramancharla, A. K. Sreerama, and P. K. Ramancharla. 2013. “Earthquake behavior of reinforced concrete framed buildings on hill slopes.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia (USMCA 2013). Hyderabad, India: Centre for Earthquake Engineering International Institute of Information Technology.
Sunitha, P., R. Goswami, and C. V. R. Murty. 2016. “Idealized bilinear moment-curvature curves of RC sections for pushover analysis of RC frame buildings.” Indian Concr. J. 90 (4): 43–54.
Surana, M., Y. Singh, and D. H. Lang. 2015. “Seismic fragility analysis of hill-buildings in Indian Himalayas.” In Proc., Conf.: Earthquake Risk and Engineering towards a Resilient World. Cambridge, UK: Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics.
Surana, M., Y. Singh, and D. H. Lang. 2018. “Fragility analysis of hillside buildings designed for modern seismic design codes.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 27 (14): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1500.
Tanyas, H., et al. 2017. “Presentation and analysis of a worldwide database of earthquake induced landslide inventories.” J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 122 (10): 1991–2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004236.
Varum, H., R. Dumaru, A. Furtado, A. R. Barbosa, D. Gautam, and H. Rodrigues. 2018. “Seismic performance of buildings in Nepal after the Gorkha earthquake.” In Impacts and insights of the Gorkha earthquake, 47–63. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812808-4.00003-1.
Vecchio, F. J., and M. B. Emara. 1992. “Shear deformations in reinforced concrete frames.” ACI Struct. J. 89 (1): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.14359/1283.
Vijayanarayanan, A. R., R. Goswami, and C. V. R. Murty. 2017. “Estimation of storey stiffness in multistorey buildings.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake. Santiago, Chile: Chilean Association on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.
Welsh-Huggins, S. J. 2016. “Seismic vulnerability of hillside buildings in Northeast India.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUniv. of Colorado at Boulder.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Oct 27, 2023
Accepted: Jan 24, 2024
Published online: Jul 15, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-3765. Email: [email protected]
G. Tamizharasi [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share