Influence of Sulfuric Acid Exposure on Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Concrete
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 3
Abstract
This study focuses on investigating the relationship between binder chemical composition, microstructure development in alkali-activated paste (AAP), and the sulfuric acid resistance of alkali-activated concrete (AAC). Experimental analyses, including x-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests, were performed on the AAP to understand the impact of critical chemical compositions on the formation of hydrotalcite, portlandite, CSH, and CASH during the alkali-activation process. The sulfuric acid resistance of AAC was evaluated through various tests, including compressive strength, porosity, chemical titration analysis, and weight loss tests. These tests aimed to assess the ability of AAC to withstand sulfuric acid attacks and investigate how the binder’s chemical composition influenced its resistance to acid exposure. The results revealed that higher alumino-silicate ratios (Al/Si) and magnesium oxide (MgO) content in the binder composition led to increased amounts of hydrotalcite and CASH in the alkali-activated system when zeolite and metakaolin were used as replacement materials for slag. The AAC specimens with slag and metakaolin showed lower porosity at the same replacement ratio. The increased amounts of hydrotalcite and CASH in the AAC microstructure contributed to a reduction in the concentration of sulfate ions penetrating the AAC, leading to improved sulfuric acid resistance. This information can contribute to optimizing binder formulations for improving AAC’s mechanical properties and durability in corrosive environments.
Practical Applications
Concrete samples containing metakaolin and synthetic zeolite tested throughout this research project can be utilized in different construction and civil engineering applications, all with differing degrees of suitability. Metakaolin and synthetic zeolites can be used as a slag replacement in concrete samples and used in masonry bricks, commonly used in masonry walls, columns, and partitions. Furthermore, load-bearing or nonload-bearing masonry structures for building and civil engineering can also adopt the incorporation of AAC. Metakaolin and synthetic zeolite types utilized in this research project could also be applied to produce slag granular mixtures for use in the construction of roads and airfields. The requirements for the relevant constituents, composition and laboratory performance classification are specified in BS EN 12390-1:2019.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Ababneh, F. A., A. I. Alakhras, M. Heikal, and S. M. Ibrahim. 2019. “Stabilization of lead bearing sludge by utilization in fly ash-slag based geopolymer.” Constr. Build. Mater. 227 (Dec): 116694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116694.
Aiken, T. A., J. Kwasny, W. Sha, and M. N. Soutsos. 2018. “Effect of slag content and activator dosage on the resistance of fly ash geopolymer binders to sulfuric acid attack.” Cem. Concr. Res. 111 (Sep): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.011.
Al Menhosh, A. A. 2018. An experimental study of high-performance concrete using metakaolin additive and polymer admixture. Salford, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Amer, I., M. Kohail, M. S. El-Feky, A. Rashad, and M. A. Khalaf. 2021. “A review on alkali-activated slag concrete.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 12 (2): 1475–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.12.003.
ASTM. 2022. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM C642-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bakharev, T. 2005. “Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (4): 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005.
Bernal, S. A., E. D. Rodríguez, R. M. de Gutiérrez, and J. L. Provis. 2012. “Performance of alkali-activated slag mortars exposed to acids.” J. Sustainable Cem. Based Mater. 1 (3): 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2012.747235.
Blanco Varela, M. T., S. Martínez Ramírez, I. Ereña, M. Gener, and P. Carmona. 2006. “Characterization and pozzolanicity of zeolitic rocks from two Cuban deposits.” Appl. Clay Sci. 33 (2): 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2006.04.006.
Bouguermouh, K., N. Bouzidi, L. Mahtout, L. Pérez-Villarejo, and M. L. Martínez-Cartas. 2017. “Effect of acid attack on microstructure and composition of metakaolin-based geopolymers: The role of alkaline activator.” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 463 (May): 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.03.011.
Buchwald, A., H. Hilbig, and C. H. Kaps. 2007. “Alkali-activated metakaolin-slag blends—Performance and structure in dependence of their composition.” J. Mater. Sci. 42 (9): 3024–3032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0525-6.
Chen, S., Y. Zhang, D. Yan, J. Jin, Y. Tian, Y. Liu, X. Qian, Y. Peng, and S. Fujitsu. 2020. “The influence of Si/Al ratio on sulfate durability of metakaolin-based geopolymer.” Constr. Build. Mater. 265 (Dec): 120735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120735.
Crank, J. 1979. The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Criado, M., A. Fernández-Jiménez, A. G. De La Torre, M. A. G. Aranda, and A. Palomo. 2007. “An XRD study of the effect of the ratio on the alkali activation of fly ash.” Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (5): 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.013.
Cristelo, N., J. Coelho, T. Miranda, Á. Palomo, and A. Fernández-Jiménez. 2019. “Alkali activated composites—An innovative concept using iron and steel slag as both precursor and aggregate.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 103 (Oct): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.024.
Davidovits, J. 2005. “Geopolymer chemistry and sustainable development.” In The poly (Sialate) terminology: A very useful and simple model for the promotion and understanding of green-chemistry, 9–15. Saint-Quentin, France: Geopolymer Institute.
Davidovits, J. 2013. “Geopolymer cement.” Rev. Geopolymer Inst. 21 (Jan): 1–11.
Deb, P. S., P. K. Sarker, and S. Barbhuiya. 2016. “Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 72 (Sep): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.017.
Elyamany, H. E., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and A. R. A. Diab. 2021. “Sulphuric acid resistance of slag geopolymer concrete modified with fly ash and silica fume.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 45 (4): 2297–2315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00515-5.
Erfanimanesh, A., and M. K. Sharbatdar. 2020. “Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of geopolymer paste, mortar, and concrete containing local zeolite and slag activated by sodium carbonate.” J. Build. Eng. 32 (Nov): 101781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101781.
Feng, N., X. Feng, T. Hao, and F. Xing. 2002. “Effect of ultrafine mineral powder on the charge passed of the concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (4): 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00731-1.
Gruskovnjak, A., B. Lothenbach, F. Winnefeld, R. Figi, S. C. Ko, M. Adler, and U. Mäder. 2008. “Hydration mechanisms of super sulphated slag cement.” Cem. Concr. Res. 38 (7): 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.004.
Habib, A. O., I. Aiad, F. I. El-Hosiny, and A. M. Abd El-Aziz. 2018. “Development of the fire resistance and mechanical characteristics of silica fume-blended cement pastes using some chemical admixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 181 (Aug): 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.051.
Haha, M. B., G. Le Saout, F. Winnefeld, and B. Lothenbach. 2011a. “Influence of activator type on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of alkali activated blast-furnace slags.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (3): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.016.
Haha, M. B., B. Lothenbach, G. Le Saout, and F. Winnefeld. 2012. “Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag—Part II: Effect of .” Cem. Concr. Res. 42 (1): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.08.005.
Haha, M. B., B. Lothenbach, G. L. Le Saout, and F. Winnefeld. 2011b. “Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag—Part I: Effect of MgO.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (9): 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.05.002.
Huseien, G. F., and K. W. Shah. 2020. “Durability and life cycle evaluation of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash as GBFS replacement with alkali activation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 235 (Feb): 117458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117458.
Kabir, S. M. A., U. J. Alengaram, M. Z. Jumaat, S. Yusoff, A. Sharmin, and I. I. Bashar. 2017. “Performance evaluation and some durability characteristics of environmental friendly palm oil clinker based geopolymer concrete.” J. Cleaner Prod. 161 (Sep): 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.002.
Khaled, Z., A. Mohsen, A. Soltan, and M. Kohail. 2023. “Optimization of kaolin into Metakaolin: Calcination Conditions, mix design and curing temperature to develop alkali activated binder.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 14 (6): 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102142.
Kim, B., and S. Lee. 2020. “Review on characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer and fast setting.” J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 57 (4): 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43207-020-00043-y.
Lecomte, I., C. Henrist, M. Liégeois, F. Maseri, A. Rulmont, and R. Cloots. 2006. “(Micro)-structural comparison between geopolymers, alkali-activated slag cement and Portland cement.” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26 (16): 3789–3797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.12.021.
Lee, W. H., J. H. Wang, Y. C. Ding, and T. W. Cheng. 2019. “A study on the characteristics and microstructures of GGBS/FA based geopolymer paste and concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 211 (Jun): 807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.291.
Liew, Y. M., H. Kamarudin, A. M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Bnhussain, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C. M. Ruzaidi, and C. Y. Heah. 2012. “Optimization of solids-to-liquid and alkali activator ratios of calcined kaolin geopolymeric powder.” Constr. Build. Mater. 37 (Dec): 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.075.
Lloyd, R. R., J. L. Provis, and J. S. J. van Deventer. 2009. “Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 2: The gel binder.” J. Mater. Sci. 44 (2): 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3078-z.
Lloyd, R. R., J. L. Provis, and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 2010. “Pore solution composition and alkali diffusion in inorganic polymer cement.” Cem. Concr. Res. 40 (9): 1386–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.04.008.
Machner, A., M. Zajac, M. Ben Haha, K. O. Kjellsen, M. R. Geiker, and K. D. Weerdt. 2018. “Chloride-binding capacity of hydrotalcite in cement pastes containing dolomite and metakaolin.” Cem. Concr. Res. 107 (May): 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.002.
Mehta, A., and R. Siddique. 2017. “Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 146 (Aug): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.077.
Mohsen, A., M. S. El-Feky, A. M. El-Tair, and M. Kohail. 2021. “Effect of delayed microwaving on the strength progress of Green alkali activated cement composites.” J. Build. Eng. 43 (Nov): 103135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103135.
Mozgawa, W., and J. Deja. 2009. “Spectroscopic studies of alkaline activated slag geopolymers.” J. Mol. Struct. 924 (Apr): 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2008.12.026.
Ozturk, M., U. K. Sevim, M. B. Bankir, and O. S. Bolukbasi. 2019. “Investigation of mechanical and microstructural performance of alkali activated electrical arc furnace slag mortars.” Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. 3 (1): 55–59.
Provis, J. L., R. J. Myers, C. E. White, V. Rose, and J. S. J. van Deventer. 2012. “X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders.” Cem. Concr. Res. 42 (6): 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.004.
Puertas, F., A. Fernández-Jiménez, and M. T. Blanco-Varela. 2004. “Pore solution in alkali-activated slag cement pastes. Relation to the composition and structure of calcium silicate hydrate.” Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (1): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00254-0.
Reddy, K. C., C. Gudur, and K. V. L. Subramaniam. 2020. “Study on the influences of silica and sodium in the alkali-activation of ground granulated blast furnace slag.” Constr. Build. Mater. 257 (Nov): 119514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119514.
Renaudin, G., J. Russias, F. Leroux, F. Frizon, and C. Cau-dit-Coumes. 2009. “Structural characterization of C–S–H and C–A–S–H samples—Part I: Long-range order investigated by Rietveld analyses.” J. Solid State Chem. 182 (12): 3312–3319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2009.09.026.
Sakulich, A. R., E. Anderson, C. L. Schauer, and M. W. Barsoum. 2010. “Influence of Si: Al ratio on the microstructural and mechanical properties of a fine-limestone aggregate alkali-activated slag concrete.” Mater. Struct. 43 (Aug): 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9563-2.
Shalan, A. H., and M. M. El-Gohary. 2022. “Long-term sulfate resistance of blended cement concrete with waste glass powder.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 27 (4): 04022047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000731.
Sturm, P., G. J. G. Gluth, C. Jäger, H. J. H. Brouwers, and H. C. Kühne. 2018. “Sulfuric acid resistance of one-part alkali-activated mortars.” Cem. Concr. Res. 109 (Jul): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.009.
Tänzer, R., A. Buchwald, and D. Stephan. 2015. “Effect of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag.” Mater. Struct. 48 (3): 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0461-x.
Van Jaarsveld, J. G. S., and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 1999. “Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymers.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (10): 3932–3941. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980804b.
Wang, S. D., and K. L. Scrivener. 2003. “29Si and 27Al NMR study of alkali-activated slag.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (5): 769–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01044-X.
Wang, S. D., K. L. Scrivener, and P. L. Pratt. 1994. “Factors affecting the strength of alkali-activated slag.” Cem. Concr. Res. 24 (6): 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90026-4.
Ye, H., and L. Huang. 2020. “Degradation mechanisms of alkali-activated binders in sulfuric acid: The role of calcium and aluminum availability.” Constr. Build. Mater. 246 (Jun): 118477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118477.
Zhang, R., H. He, Y. Song, X. Zhi, and F. Fan. 2023. “Influence of mix proportioning parameters and curing regimes on the properties of ultra-high strength alkali-activated concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 393 (Aug): 132139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132139.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29 • Issue 3 • August 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 1, 2023
Accepted: Feb 21, 2024
Published online: May 30, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Acids
- Alkalinity and acidity
- Binders (material)
- Chemical compounds
- Chemical elements
- Chemical properties
- Chemicals
- Chemistry
- Design (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Environmental engineering
- Load and resistance factor design
- Load factors
- Materials engineering
- Pollutants
- Slag
- Structural design
- Structural engineering
- Sulfur
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.