Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2024

A Numerical Investigation of Longitudinal Track–Bridge Interaction in Simply Supported Precast Concrete Girder Railway Bridges

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 3

Abstract

In railway tracks, additional stresses occur in rails due to interaction between the rail and the bridge superstructure, which is a phenomenon known as track–bridge interaction (TBI). The additional rail stresses (ARSs) develop primarily as a result of temperature effect, vertical bending of bridge superstructure, and braking/acceleration of trains traveling over the bridge. One of the major parameters affecting the TBI response is the behavior of interface elements simulating the coupling between the bridge superstructure and the rail. In TBI analysis this coupling is defined by the so-called longitudinal resistance-displacement curves (RDCs). The present study deals with the longitudinal aspect of TBI though a numerical investigation. The numerical modeling approach was verified with available analytical solutions and data obtained from bridge monitoring. The primary interest was to illustrate how sensitive the TBI response is to changes in RDCs with both separate and sequential analysis approaches, which has not been investigated thoroughly earlier. The parametric study was extended to investigate the effects of expansion length and substructure stiffness, in addition to RDC type. For simply supported precast girder bridges, RDCs that are experimentally proven specific to ballastless railway bridges can be used as an economic alternative to those specified by provisions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Alijani, A., M. Abadi, and S. Ghyasvand. 2022. “Numerical and experimental analysis of intact and cracked railway bridges.” Structures 38 (2): 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.040.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2002. Railway applications—Track—Rail—Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46  kg/m and above. EN 13674-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2003. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. Traffic loads on bridges (Part 2). EN 1991-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chellini, G., L. Nardini, and W. Salvatore. 2011. “Dynamical identification and modelling of steel-concrete composite high-speed railway bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (11): 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470903017240.
Chen, R., P. Wang, and X. Wei. 2013. “Track-bridge longitudinal interaction of continuous welded rails on arch bridge.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2013 (Jan): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/494137.
Cheng, Y. S., F. T. K. Au, and Y. K. Cheung. 2001. “Vibration of railway bridges under a moving train by using bridge-track-vehicle element.” Eng. Struct. 23 (12): 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00058-X.
Chinese National Standards. 2012. Code for design of railway continuous welded rail. TB 10015-2012. Beijing: Chinese National Standards.
Dai, G., G. Chen, R. Zheng, and Y. F. Chen. 2020. “A new bilinear resistance algorithm to analyze the track-bridge interaction on long-span steel bridge under thermal action.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (2): 04019138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001505.
DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V). 2003. “DIN-Fachbericht 101.” In Einkwirkungen auf bracken. Berlin: DIN.
Enshaeian, A., and P. Rizzo. 2021. “Stability of continuous welded rails: A state-of-the-art review of structural modeling and nondestructive evaluation.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 235 (10): 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409720986661.
Eroglu, M., M. A. Koc, I. Esen, and R. Kozan. 2023. “Realistic modelling for analysis of train-structure and ballasted-track interaction for high-speed trains.” J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2023 (Jun): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01029-w.
Frýba, L. 1996. Dynamics of railway bridges. London: Thomas Telford.
Galvín, P., A. Romero, E. Moliner, and M. D. Martínez-Rodrigo. 2018. “Two FE models to analyze the dynamic response of short span simply-supported oblique high-speed railway bridges: Comparison and experimental validation.” Eng. Struct. 167 (Aug): 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.052.
Guo, W. W., H. Xia, G. D. Roeck, and K. Liu. 2012. “Integral model for train-track-bridge interaction on the Sesia viaduct: Dynamic simulation and critical assessment.” Comput. Struct. 112–113 (Dec): 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.001.
Hu, Z., B. Wei, L. Jiang, S. Li, and H. Min. 2022a. “Track structural damage index for high-speed railway girder bridges considering residual deformations due to earthquake.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 20 (12): 6587–6609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01448-2.
Hu, Z., B. Wei, L. Jiang, S. Li, Y. Yu, and C. Xiao. 2022b. “Assessment of optimal ground motion intensity measure for high-speed railway girder bridge (HRGB) based on spectral acceleration.” Eng. Struct. 252 (11): 113728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113728.
Huang, Y., J. Wang, W. Le, L. Zhang, and J. Su. 2021. “Study on mechanical behaviours of rail fasteners and effects on seismic performance of Urban Rail Viaduct.” Structures 33 (Oct): 3822–3834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.105.
Jin, Z., W. Liu, and S. Pei. 2022. “Probabilistic evaluation of railway vehicle’s safety on bridges under random earthquake and track irregularity excitations.” Eng. Struct. 266 (Sep): 114527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114527.
Kang, C., S. Schneider, M. Wenner, and S. Marx. 2018. “Development of design and construction of high-speed railway bridges in Germany.” Eng. Struct. 163 (May): 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.059.
Kang, C., M. Wenner, and S. Marx. 2021. “Background investigation on the permissible additional stresses due to track/bridge interaction.” Eng. Struct. 228 (Feb): 111505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111505.
Karoumi, R., J. Wiberg, and A. Liljencrantz. 2005. “Monitoring traffic loads and dynamic effects using an instrumented railway bridge.” Eng. Struct. 27 (12): 1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.022.
Kašpárek, J., P. Ryjáček, T. Rotter, M. Polák, and R. Calçada. 2020. “Long-term monitoring of the track–bridge interaction on an extremely skew steel arch bridge.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 10 (Jul): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00389-1.
Kim, H. B., J. Lee, and D. H. Lee. 2010. “Extracting modal parameters of high-speed railway bridge using the TDD technique.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24 (3): 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.11.010.
Kohl, A. M., K. D. Clement, J. Schneider, A. Firus, and G. Lombaert. 2023. “An investigation of dynamic vehicle-bridge interaction effects based on a comprehensive set of trains and bridges.” Eng. Struct. 279 (Mar): 115555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115555.
Korea Rail Network Authority. 2014. Track-bridge longitudinal interaction analysis (in Korean). KR C08080. Daejeon, Korea: Korea Rail Network Authority.
Kwark, J. W., E. S. Choi, Y. J. Kim, B. S. Kim, and S. I. Kim. 2004. “Dynamic behavior of two-span continuous concrete bridges under moving high-speed train.” Comput. Struct. 82 (Jun): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00054-3.
Li, S., B. Wei, H. Tan, C. Li, and X. Zhao. 2021. “Equivalence of friction and viscous damping in a spring-friction system with concave friction distribution.” J. Test. Eval. 49 (1): 20190885. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20190885.
Liu, K., E. Reynders, G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert. 2009. “Experimental and numerical analysis of a composite bridge for high-speed trains.” J. Sound Vib. 320 (1–2): 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.010.
Liu, W., H. Lai, G. Dai, S. Rao, D. Wang, and B. Wu. 2021. “Numerical study on track–bridge interaction of integral railway rigid-frame bridge.” Appl. Sci. 11 (3): 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11030922.
MIDAS Information Technology. 2012. Midas civil: Analysis reference manual. Seongnam-si, Korea: MIDAS Information Technology.
Mirković, N. B., J. P. Popović, A. P. Pustovgar, L. M. Lazarević, and A. V. Zhuravlev. 2018. “Management of stresses in the rails on railway bridges.” FME Trans. 46 (Jun): 636–643.
Mirza, O., S. Kaewunruen, C. Dinh, and E. Pervanic. 2016. “Numerical investigation into thermal load responses of railway transom bridge.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 60 (Jun): 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.054.
Peixer, M. A., P. A. Montenegro, H. Carvalho, D. Ribeiro, and T. N. Bittencourt. 2021. “Running safety evaluation of a train moving over a high-speed railway viaduct under different track conditions.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 121 (Mar): 105133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105133.
Petrangeli, M., C. Tamagno, and P. Tortolini. 2008. “Numerical analysis of track: Structure interaction and time domain resonance.” J. Rail Rapid Transit 222 (4): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT168.
Ramos, Ó., F. Schanack, G. Carreras, and J. de Vena Retuerto. 2019. “Bridge length limits due to track-structure interaction in continuous girder prestressed concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct. 196 (Oct): 109310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109310.
Rocha, J. M., A. A. Henriques, and R. Calçada. 2012. “Safety assessment of a short span railway bridge for high-speed traffic using simulation techniques.” Eng. Struct. 40 (Jul): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.024.
Ruge, P., and C. Birk. 2007. “Longitudinal forces in continuously welded rails on bridge decks due to nonlinear track–bridge interaction.” Comput. Struct. 85 (7–8): 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.09.008.
Ryjáček, P., and M. Vokáč. 2014. “Long-term monitoring of steel railway bridge interaction with continuous welded rail.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 99 (Aug): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.009.
Sanguino, M. C., and P. G. Requejo. 2009. “Numerical methods for the analysis of longitudinal interaction between track and structure.” In Track bridge interaction on high-speed railways, edited by R. Calçada, R. Delgado, A. C. Matos, and J. M. Goicocela, 95–108. London: Taylor & Francis.
Song, M. K., H. C. Noh, and C. K. Choi. 2003. “A new three-dimensional finite element analysis model of high-speed train-bridge interactions.” Eng. Struct. 25 (13): 1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00133-0.
Stokes, G. G. 1867. “Discussion of a differential equation related to the breaking of railway bridges.” Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 8 (5): 707–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00133-0.
Strauss, A., S. Karimi, M. Šomodíková, D. Lehký, D. Novák, D. M. Frangopol, and K. Bergmeister. 2018. “Monitoring based nonlinear system modeling of bridge–continuous welded rail interaction.” Eng. Struct. 155 (Jan): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.053.
Sung, D., and S. Chang. 2019. “Nonlinear behavior of rail fastening system on slab track at railway bridge ends: FEA and experimental study.” Eng. Struct. 195 (Sep): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.098.
Tzepushelov, A., and L. Troyitzky. 1974. “Design, laying, maintenance and repair of continuously welded rails on the USSR railways.” Rail Int. 1974 (Sep): 589–605.
UIC (Union Internationale des Chemins de fer). 2001. “774-3R Track/bridge interaction.” In Recommendations for calculations. Paris: UIC.
Wang, Z., L. Jiang, L. Jiang, W. Zhou, and Y. Du. 2022. “Seismic response of high-speed railway simple-supported girder track-bridge system considering spatial effect at near-fault region.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 158 (Jul): 107283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107283.
Wenner, M., T. Meier, F. Wedel, G. Schacht, and S. Marx. 2019. “Experimental determination of the longitudinal pier stiffness of a long railway viaduct.” Front. Built Environ. 5 (Apr): 45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00045.
Widarda, D. R. 2009. “Longitudinal forces in continuously welded rails due to nonlinear track-bridge interaction for loading sequences.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Dresden Technical Univ.
Yan, B., G. Dai, and H. Zhang. 2012. “Beam-track interaction of high-speed railway bridge with ballast track.” J. Central South Univ. 19 (5): 1447–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1161-8.
Yang, S. C., and S. Y. Jang. 2016. “Track–Bridge interaction analysis using interface elements adaptive to various loading cases.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000916.
Yun, K.-M., H.-U. Bae, J. Moon, J.-J. Kim, J.-C. Park, and N.-H. Lim. 2019. “Quantification of ballasted track-bridge interaction behavior due to the temperature variation through field measurements.” NDT & E Int. 103 (Apr): 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.01.009.
Zhang, J.-L., D. J. Wu, and Q. Li. 2015. “Loading-history-based track–bridge interaction analysis with experimental fastener resistance.” Eng. Struct. 83 (Jan): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.002.
Zhang, Y., L. Jiang, W. Zhou, Y. Feng, Z. Tan, and X. Chai. 2020. “Study of bridge-subgrade longitudinal constraint range for high-speed railway simply-supported beam bridge with CRTSII ballastless track under earthquake excitation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 241 (Apr): 118026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118026.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 3August 2024

History

Received: Sep 29, 2023
Accepted: Jan 9, 2024
Published online: Apr 11, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06800, Turkiye (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-0955. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06800, Turkiye. Email: [email protected]
Aysegul Askan [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06800, Turkiye. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share