Technical Papers
May 16, 2024

Effects of Fineness Modulus Variation in Preheated Sand on Geopolymer Material Properties

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 3

Abstract

The fineness modulus (FM) denotes the average particle size of fine aggregates. The FM of the sand, and other constituent qualities, have a major effect on the strength and durability of geopolymer mortar. Finer particle size increases the surface area, influencing heat absorption and emission, impacting the mechanical strength of geopolymer concrete. Heat energy notably accelerates reaction kinetics, accelerate geopolymerization processes. The purpose of this study is to ascertain how the compressive strength (CS) of fly ash (FA) and Ground granulated blast-furnace slag (Slag) based geopolymer material (GPM) is affected by the fineness modulus (FM) of sand that has been heated to 100°C±5°C. To make the paste for the geopolymer material, natural river sands with FM of 1.85, 2.41, 2.79, and 3.32 were used. For the investigation, 36 samples of a 50×50×50  mm3 cube were hot cured at 50°C for 3 h to determine the CS of GPM paste after 3 h, 1 day, and 7 days. The study’s conclusions show that sand FM has a large effect on the flow rate (%) of GPM. In particular, a greater flow rate (%) of GPM paste was connected to a higher sand FM. Notably, the most pronounced improvements in CS growth rate (%) were seen in GPM paste made with heated sand that had FM values of 1.85 (fine sand) and 2.79 (medium sand). Furthermore, when heated sand was utilized, the FM had a substantial impact on the CS of GPM matrix. The mineral composition, including unreacted FA and Slag components, underwent assessment using energy dispersive X-Ray analysis (EDX) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). These analyses revealed that fine aggregates, with increased surface area content, contributed to higher concrete strength compared with those with a higher concentration of coarse aggregates. It follows that when attempting to create geopolymer material with strong early-strength qualities, fine sand, well graded sand ideal match to the ASTM upper and lower bound limits are the best options for fine aggregates.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available on genuine request.

References

Aît-Mokhtar, A., R. Belarbi, F. Benboudjema, N. Burlion, B. Capra, M. Carcassès, J.-B. Colliat, F. Cussigh, F. Deby, and F. Jacquemot. 2013. “Experimental investigation of the variability of concrete durability properties.” Cem. Concr. Res. 45 (Mar): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.11.002.
Aldawsari, S., R. Kampmann, J. Harnisch, and C. Rohde. 2022. “Setting time, microstructure, and durability properties of low calcium fly ash/slag geopolymer: A review.” Materials 15 (3): 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030876.
Ali, M., R. Saidur, and M. Hossain. 2011. “A review on emission analysis in cement industries.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 15 (5): 2252–2261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014.
Assi, L. N., E. E. Deaver, M. K. ElBatanouny, and P. Ziehl. 2016. “Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 112 (Jun): 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.008.
ASTM. 1999. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use as a mineral admixture in concrete. ASTM 618. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2001. Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. ASTM C136. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for density and void content of hardened pervious concrete. ASTM 1754. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM 33. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM 1437. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars [using 2 -in. or (50-mm) cube specimens]. ASTM C109/C109M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Benhelal, E., G. Zahedi, E. Shamsaei, and A. Bahadori. 2013. “Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 51 (Jul): 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049.
Bobadilla-Sánchez, E., G. Martínez-Barrera, W. Brostow, and T. Datashvili. 2009. “Effects of polyester fibers and gamma irradiation on mechanical properties of polymer concrete containing CaCO3 and silica sand.” eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 3 (10): 615–620. https://doi.org/0.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.77.
Bondar, D., C. Lynsdale, N. Milestone, and N. Hassani. 2015. “Sulfate resistance of alkali activated pozzolans.” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 9 (Jun): 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-014-0093-0.
Bozkurt, O., and M. İslamoğlu. 2013. “Comparison of cement-based and polymer-based concrete pipes for analysis of cost assessment.” Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013 (Jan). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/921076.
Davidovits, J. 1976. “Solid-Phase synthesis of a mineral blockpolymer by low temperature polycondensation of alumino-silicate polymers presented before the.” In Proc., IUPAC Int. Symp. on Macromolecules, Topic III, New Polymers of High Stability. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.
Davidovits, J. 1991. “Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials.” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 37 (8): 1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01912193.
Domone, P., and J. Illston. 2010. Construction materials: Their nature and behavior. London: CRC Press.
Donza, H., O. Cabrera, and E. Irassar. 2002. “High-strength concrete with different fine aggregate.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (11): 1755–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00860-8.
Elyamany, H. E., M. Abd Elmoaty, and A. M. Elshaboury. 2018. “Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 187 (Oct): 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.025.
Ferraris, C. F., P. Billberg, R. Ferron, D. Feys, J. Hu, S. Kawashima, J. Tanesi, and N. Tregger. 2017. Role of rheology in achieving successful concrete performance Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
Ferreira, R. L., M. Medeiros, J. E. Pereira, G. F. Henriques, J. C. Tavares, M. T. Marvila, and A. R. de Azevedo. 2023. “Effects of particle size distribution of standard sands on the physical-mechanical properties of mortars.” Materials 16 (2): 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020844.
Galloway, J. 1994. “Grading, shape, and surface properties.” ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 169 (Jun): 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP36434S.
González-Peñaloza, F. A., L. M. Zavala, A. Jordán, N. Bellinfante, G. Bárcenas-Moreno, J. Mataix-Solera, A. J. Granged, F. M. Granja-Martins, and H. M. Neto-Paixão. 2013. “Water repellency as conditioned by particle size and drying in hydrophobized sand.” Geoderma 209 (Nov): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.05.022.
Hewlett, P. C. 1998. Chemistry of cement and concrete. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Ismail, I., S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, R. San Nicolas, S. Hamdan, and J. S. van Deventer. 2014. “Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 45 (Jan): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.006.
Khater, H. 2014. “Studying the effect of thermal and acid exposure on alkali-activated slag geopolymer.” Adv. Cem. Res. 26 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.11.00052.
Kosmatka, S. H., W. C. Panarese, and B. Kerkhoff. 2002. Design and control of concrete mixtures. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association.
Kumaravel, S., S. Thirugnanasambandam, and C. A. Jeyasehar. 2014. “Flexural behavior of geopolymer concrete beams with GGBS.” IUP J. Struct. Eng. 7 (1): 45–54.
Kusbiantoro, A., M. F. Nuruddin, N. Shafiq, and S. A. Qazi. 2012. “The effect of microwave incinerated rice husk ash on the compressive and bond strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 36 (Nov): 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.064.
Li, C., X. Z. Gong, S. P. Cui, Z. H. Wang, Y. Zheng, and B. C. Chi. 2011. “CO2 emissions due to cement manufacture.” In Proc., Materials Science Forum. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.685.181.
Li, L., B. J. Zhan, J. Lu, and C. S. Poon. 2019. “Systematic evaluation of the effect of replacing river sand by different particle size ranges of fine recycled concrete aggregates (FRCA) in cement mortars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 209 (Jun): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.044.
Li, L. G., J.-J. Feng, B.-F. Xiao, S.-H. Chu, and A. K. H. Kwan. 2021. “Roles of mortar volume in porosity, permeability and strength of pervious concrete.” J. Infrastruct. Preserv. Resilience 2 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-021-00033-2.
McLellan, B. C., R. P. Williams, J. Lay, A. Van Riessen, and G. D. Corder. 2011. “Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 19 (9–10): 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010.
Mehta, A., and R. Siddique. 2017. “Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash.” Constr. Build. Mater. 150 (Sep): 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.067.
Mehta, P. K., and P. J. Monteiro. 2014. Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miller, S. A., A. Horvath, and P. J. Monteiro. 2016. “Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%.” Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (7): 074029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074029.
Mindess, S., J. F. Young, and D. Darwin. 1981. Concrete. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nagalia, G., Y. Park, A. Abolmaali, and P. Aswath. 2016. “Compressive strength and microstructural properties of fly ash–based geopolymer concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (12): 04016144. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001656.
Neville, A. M. 2011. Properties of concrete. 4th ed., 444. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Neville, A. M., and J. Brooks. 2010. Concrete technology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson Education.
Nguyen, K. T., T. A. Le, J. Lee, D. Lee, and K. Lee. 2017. “Investigation on properties of geopolymer mortar using preheated materials and thermogenetic admixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 130 (Jan): 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.110.
Okonkwo, V., and E. Arinze Emmanuel. 2018. “A study of the effect of aggregate proportioning on concrete properties.” Am. J. Eng. Res. 7 (Jun): 61–67.
Phoo-ngernkham, T., A. Maegawa, N. Mishima, S. Hatanaka, and P. Chindaprasirt. 2015. “Effects of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions on compressive and shear bond strengths of FA—GBFS geopolymer.” Constr. Build. Mater. 91 (Aug): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.001.
Prusty, J. K., and B. Pradhan. 2022. “Investigation on effect of precursor materials and sand-to-binder ratio on strength development, acid resistance and microstructure evolution of geopolymer mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater. 346 (Sep): 128501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128501.
Rafeet, A., R. Vinai, M. Soutsos, and W. Sha. 2019. “Effects of slag substitution on physical and mechanical properties of fly ash-based alkali activated binders (AABs).” Cem. Concr. Res. 122 (Aug): 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.003.
Rangaraju, P. R., M. Balitsaris, and H. Kizhakkumodom. 2013. Impact of aggregate gradation on properties of Portland cement concrete. Washington, DC: DOT.
Rudin, A., and P. Choi. 2013. “Polymer reaction engineering.” In The elements of polymer science & engineering, 495–520. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382178-2.00012-2.
Sabih, G., R. A. Tarefder, and S. M. Jamil. 2016. “Optimization of gradation and fineness modulus of naturally fine sands for improved performance as fine aggregate in concrete.” Procedia Eng. 145 (Jan): 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.016.
Seif, E., and E. Sedek. 2013. “Performance of cement mortar made with fine aggregates of dune sand, Kharga Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt: An experimental study.” Jordan J. Civ. Eng. 7 (3): 270–284.
Standard, A. C. I. 1996. “Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete.” ACI Man. Concr. Pract (1996): 1–38.
Temuujin, J., R. Williams, and A. Van Riessen. 2009. “Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature.” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (12–13): 5276–5280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.016.
Verma, M., N. Dev, I. Rahman, M. Nigam, M. Ahmed, and J. Mallick. 2022. “Geopolymer concrete: A material for sustainable development in Indian construction industries.” Crystals 12 (4): 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040514.
Vijai, K., R. Kumutha, and B. Vishnuram. 2010. “Effect of types of curing on strength of geopolymer concrete.” Int. J. Phys. Sci. 5 (9): 1419–1423.
Waseem, S. A., N. Thakur, S. U. Islam, M. Kumar, and J. Saini. 2021. “Cupola slag as partial replacement of fine aggregate in concrete—An experimental study.” J. Build. Eng. 44 (Dec): 103343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103343.
Wongpa, J., K. Kiattikomol, C. Jaturapitakkul, and P. Chindaprasirt. 2010. “Compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and water permeability of inorganic polymer concrete.” Mater. Des. 31 (10): 4748–4754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.012.
Yuli, W., H. Hang, and L. Xiaoxing. 2019. “Influences of aggregate micro fines on the packing of fresh mortar and the performances of mortar.” Composites, Part B 164 (May): 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.073.
Zhang, Z., L. Li, X. Ma, and H. Wang. 2016. “Compositional, microstructural and mechanical properties of ambient condition cured alkali-activated cement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 113 (Jun): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.043.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 3August 2024

History

Received: Sep 1, 2023
Accepted: Feb 12, 2024
Published online: May 16, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung Univ., Tainan City 701, Taiwan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-6620. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung Univ., Tainan City 701, Taiwan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-7444. Email: [email protected]
John-Eric Hsin Yu Hu [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung Univ., Tainan City 701, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]
Chih-Ta Tsai [email protected]
Project Associate Research Fellow, Sustainable Environment Research Laboratories (SERL), National Cheng Kung Univ., Tainan City 709015, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share