Wind-Induced Structural Response of Skylights: A Eurocode-Based Assessment
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 1
Abstract
The installation of structural glass systems, such as skylights and curtain walls, may improve the aesthetic and functional value of a building. These attractive systems have practical benefits like increased efficiency and lower maintenance costs. The importance of structural analysis and design in developing safe and dependable structural glass systems is underscored by this study, which thoroughly evaluates various skylights installed at a height of 15 m located in Doha while subjecting them to a 1.6 kPa wind load. The temperature loading is determined by assuming an initial temperature of 10°C and an ultimate temperature of 50°C. Therefore, the temperature variation is . Several acceptance requirements have been met. It is crucial to adhere to design requirements and execute extensive performance testing and verification to guarantee the safety of structural glass buildings. The research also highlights the significance of using sound foundation design and anchoring methods on-site. The findings of this study might serve as a helpful reference for façade engineers responsible for designing structural glass structures, as it highlights the significance of careful analysis, design, and verification in ensuring the safe and dependable performance of such architectural features in a wide range of buildings. The study indicates that proper design regulations and standards, coupled with the use of specialist software tools, precise three-dimensional (3D) models and simulations, and extensive performance testing and verification, are essential in guaranteeing the safety and dependability of skylights. It has been found that the final design of the skylights is safe and structurally sound; this includes the use of fully tempered double glazed unit (DGU) glass of 6 mm (inner lite) + 16 (air gap) + 13.52 ( outer laminated lite), 120 mm deep Mullions and transoms, and appropriate anchoring mechanisms using chemical anchors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the published article.
References
Ansari, A. A., S. Khoso, I. A. Jamro, I. Ali, Z. Soomro, H. Hassan, S. G. M. Jeelani, and M. T. Naqash. 2023. “Structural behavior of novel reinforced baked clay sandwiched slab panels under concentric loading: A sustainable and cost-effective alternative.” Int. J. Energy Environ. Econ. 29 (3): 313–328.
ASCE. 2021. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415788.
Azmat, S., et al. 2021. “Effects of fiber reinforcements on the strength of shotcrete.” Civ. Eng. Archit. 9 (1): 176–183. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090115.
Bhatti, A. Q., and M. T. Naqash. 2017. “Performance base design of multi-storey steel structures considering dynamic loads originated by geological agents.” J. Steel Struct. Constr. 3 (2): 2017. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-0437.1000134.
Bheel, N., S. Khoso, M. H. Baloch, O. Benjeddou, and M. Alwetaishi. 2022. “Use of waste recycling coal bottom ash and sugarcane bagasse ash as cement and sand replacement material to produce sustainable concrete.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 (35): 52399–52411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19478-3.
BSI (British Standard Institute). 1965. The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings. CP 114. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standard Institute). 1972. The structural use of concrete’, Part-I, design, materials and workmanship. CP-110. London: BSI.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1993. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-8: Design of joints. EN 1993-1-8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 1-4: General actions -Wind actions. EN 1991-1-4. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2007. Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures—Part 1-1: General structural rules. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Jamro, I. A., S. Khoso, S. A. R. Shah, S. Ali, F. Ali, and H. Hassan. 2022. “Investigation of thermal decomposition and gases release from pre-drying municipal solid waste (PMSW) via pyrolysis technology.” J. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. ACEE 15 (4): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2022-0043.
Jamro, I. A., A. Raheem, S. Khoso, H. A. Baloch, A. Kumar, G. Chen, W. A. Bhagat, T. Wenga, and W. Ma. 2023. “Investigation of enhanced H2 production from municipal solid waste gasification via artificial neural network with data on tar compounds.” J. Environ. Manage. 328 (Feb): 117014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117014.
Jovanović, M., and G. Radoičić. 2018. “A human crowd effect modelled by the discrete-time fourier series.” In Facta universitatis, series: Working and living environmental protection. Niš, Serbia: Univ. of Niš. https://doi.org/10.22190/fuwlep1702139j.
Khan, J., N. K. Bhatti, A. A. Ansari, S. Khoso, and F. Wagan. 2014. “Qualitative analysis of baked clay bricks available in Larkana region, Pakistan.” Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 7 (2): 41–50.
Khoso, S., A. Keerio, A. A. Ansari, J. Shahzeb, and D. K. Bangwar. 2017. “Effects of rice husk ash and recycled aggregates on mechanical properties of concrete.” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 8 (Mar): 1832–1835.
Khoso, S., J. Raad, and A. Parvin. 2019. “Experimental investigation on the properties of recycled concrete using hybrid fibers.” Open J. Compos. Mater. 9 (2): 183. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2019.92009.
Khoso, S., Z. Soomro, T. Ali, F. A. Cheema, T. Ali, and I. A. Jamro. 2022. “Experimental study of the effect of lathe steel fiber on the mechanical properties of concrete.” Webology 19 (2): 4821–4832.
Memon, M., and A. A. Ansari. 1998. “A study of occupancy loads in residential and public buildings in Pakistan.” Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 17 (4): 145–150.
Mumtaz, M., J. Mendoza, A. S. Vosoughi, A. S. Unger, and V. K. Goel. 2021. “A Comparative biomechanical analysis of various rod configurations following anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy.” Neurospine 18 (3): 587–596. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142450.225.
Naqash, M. T. 2012. Optimum design of steel moment resisting frames. Pescara: Univ. of Chiete and Pescara.
Naqash, M. T. 2014a. “Seismic design of steel moment resisting frames.” NED Univ. J. Res. 1 (Mar): 29–38.
Naqash, M. T. 2014b. “Study on the fundamental period of vibration of steel moment resisting frames.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Geotech. Eng. 3 (1): 2319–5347.
Naqash, M. T. 2017. “Codal comparisons for the seismic resistance of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs). Part B: Design approach.” Int. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 6 (6): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijcem.20170606.05.
Naqash, M. T. 2020. “Pushover response of multi degree of freedom steel frames.” Civ. Eng. J. 6 (Dec): 86–97. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-SP(EMCE)-08.
Naqash, M. T., M. H. Aburamadan, O. Harireche, A. AlKassem, and Q. U. Farooq. 2021. “The Potential of wind energy and design implications on wind farms in Saudi Arabia.” Int. J. Renewable Energy Dev. 10 (4): 839–856. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2021.38238.
Naqash, M. T., and A. Alluqmani. 2018. “Codal requirements using capacity design philosophy, and their applications in the design of steel structures in seismic zones.” Open J. Earthquake Res. 7 (2): 88–107. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2018.72006.
Naqash, M. T., Q. U. Farooq, and O. Harireche. 2019. “Seismic evaluation of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs)—Supported by loose granular soil.” Open J. Earthquake Res. 8 (2): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2019.82003.
Naqash, M. T., K. Mahmood, and S. Khoso. 2014. “An overview on the seismic design of braced frames.” Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2 (2): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15.
Naqash, M. T. M., G. D. Matteis, and D. A. Luca. 2012. “Seismic design of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs)—European versus American practice.” NED Univ. J. Res. 9 (2): 45–60.
Paulay, T., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: Wiley.
Plumier, A. 2000. “General report on local ductility.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 55 (1): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00079-6.
Sohoo, N., S. Khoso, I. A. Jamro, F. A. Cheema, N. U. Kareem, M. T. N. Bhatti, and A. A. Ansari. 2022. “Utilization of sugarcane bagasse ash to improve mechanical properties and producing a sustainable concrete.” IJCSNS 22 (4): 804–808. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.4.96.
Soltani, A., S. Khoso, M. A. Keerio, and A. Formisano. 2019. “Assessment of physical and mechanical properties of concrete produced from various Portland cement brands.” Open J. Compos. Mater. 9 (4): 327. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2019.94020.
Soomro, Z., S. Khoso, T. Ali, S. A. Abbasi, A. A. Ansari, and M. T. Naqash. 2022. “Realistic determination of live loads on various reinforced concrete structures.” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 12 (3): 8506–8511. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4783.
Umar, M., S. A. A. Shah, K. Shahzada, M. T. Naqash, and W. Ali. 2020. “Assessment of seismic capacity for reinforced concrete frames with perforated unreinforced brick masonry infill wall.” Civ. Eng. J. 6 (12): 2397–2415. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091625.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29 • Issue 1 • February 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 3, 2023
Accepted: Sep 6, 2023
Published online: Oct 24, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Tayyab Naqash, Antonio Formisano, Ehsan Noroozinejad Farsangi, Parisa Ziaesaeidi, Toward Sustainable Architecture: Structural Analysis and Energy Efficiency of Vertical Sun Control Systems, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1477, 29, 3, (2024).