Reliability-Based Assessment of a Masonry Arch Bridge Considering Random Stereotomy
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 4
Abstract
The stereotomy (bricklaying pattern) of masonry arches is not only a characteristic of the architecture of these structures, but also an important revealing element of mechanical safety when degradations appear in the complex material of masonry. This paper presents the effect of randomness of this parameter on the bearing capacity of masonry arch bridges based on reliability of structures. Different mechanical models that are classically used for the analysis of the bearing capacity of masonry arches can support a reliability analysis. In this paper, a rigid block model and finite-element model are presented and compared. Then, focusing on the rigid block method, stereotomy has been integrated as a geometrical parameter influencing the mechanical behavior. To this end, the stereotomy function is presented as a parameter that can be influenced by the possible degradations affecting the blocks and/or mortar joints, thus justifying its randomness and consequently integrating it in a reliability study. The reliability study carried out in this work focused on the case of a single-span masonry arch bridge located in Morocco. The reliability analysis demonstrated the importance of joints orientation and the possible perturbations that it can undergo around the classical radial configuration. The effect of these perturbations is shown for the failure multiplier, which represents the bearing capacity of the studied arch.
Practical Applications
Masonry arch bridges are a heritage of great architectural and economic importance for many countries worldwide. This is due to the historical value of these ancient constructions, but also to their durability that allowed them to still fulfil their economic role. Nevertheless, the preservation of the safety of masonry arch bridges depends on a good maintenance approach that takes into account the different hazards affecting these constructions. The uncertainties affecting the geometry are among the hazards to be taken into account by the roadway and railway managers. In this paper, the authors study the effects of uncertainties related to the bricklaying pattern of masonry blocks on the mechanical behavior of the arch bridge. For this purpose, probability-based methods are applied in conjunction with mechanical calculation techniques. The results obtained highlight the importance of considering the stereotomy parameter, which represents the bricklaying pattern of masonry blocks in the arch in maintenance operations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Akaike, H. 1992. “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle.” In Breakthroughs in statistics, edited by S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson. New York: Springer.
Altunisik, A. C., B. Kanbur, and A. F. Genc. 2015. “The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges.” Smart Struct. Syst. 16 (6): 1069–1089. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1069.
Arteaga, I. D., and P. Morer. 2012. “The effect of geometry on the structural capacity of masonry arch bridges.” Constr. Build. Mater. 34 (Sep): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.037.
Bourinet, J.-M. 2010. “FERUM 4.1 user’s guide.” Accessed September 3, 2022. https://www.sigma-clermont.fr/en/ferum.
Brencich, A., and U. De Francesco. 2004. “Assessment of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Part I: A simplified approach. Part II: Examples and applications.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (6): 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(582).
Buhan P. D. 2007. Plasticity and yield design. [In French.] Paris: Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées.
Calvagli, N., V. Gusella, and L. Severini. 2017. “The safety of masonry arches with uncertain geometry.” Comput. Struct. 188 (Aug): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.04.003.
Cannizzaro, F., B. Pantò, S. Caddemi, and I. Caliò. 2018. “A discrete macro-element method (DMEM) for the nonlinear structural assessment of masonry arches.” Eng. Struct. 168 (Aug): 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.006.
Casas, J. R. 2011. “Reliability-based assessment of masonry arch bridges.” Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (4): 1621–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.10.011.
Casas, J. R., D. F. Wisniewski, J. Cervenka, V. Cervenka, R. Pukl, E. Bruwhiler, A. Herwig, G. Holm, P. E. Bengtsson, and M. Plos. 2007. “Safety and probabilistic modeling: Sustainable bridges background document D4.4.” In Sustainable bridges—assessment for future traffic demands and longer lives. ZAG, Slovenia: European Commission DG Research.
Castellazzi, G., S. De Miranda, and C. Mazzotti. 2012. “Finite element modelling tuned on experimental testing for the structural health assessment of an ancient masonry arch bridge.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2012 (Oct): 495019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/495019.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2002. Eurocode 0—Basis of structural design. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2003. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. EN 1991-2 2003. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Conde, B., J. C. Matos, D. V. Oliveira, and B. Riveiro. 2021. “Probabilistic-based structural assessment of a historic stone arch bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 17 (3): 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1752261.
Conde, B., L. F. Ramos, D. V. Oliveira, B. Riveiro, and M. Solla. 2017. “Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova Bridge.” Eng. Struct. 148 (Oct): 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011.
Crisfield, M. A., and A. J. Packham. 1987. “A mechanism program for computing the strength of masonry arch bridges.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Civil and Structural Engineering Computing. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
De Santis, S., and G. de Felice. 2014. “Overview of railway masonry bridges with a safety factor estimate.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 8 (3): 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2013.826298.
Direction des Routes et de la Circulation Routière. 2002. Bridges of Morocco. [In French.] Rabat, Morocco: Direction des Routes et de la Circulation Routière.
Drosopoulos, G. A., G. E. Stavroulakis, and C. V. Massalas. 2006. “Limit analysis of a single span masonry bridge with unilateral frictional contact interfaces.” Eng. Struct. 28 (13): 1864–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.016.
Fanning, P. J., and T. E. Boothby. 2001. “Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges.” Comput. Struct. 79 (29–30): 2645–2662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00109-2.
Gáspár, O., I. Sajtos, and A. A. Sipos. 2021. “Friction as a geometric constraint on stereotomy in the minimum thickness analysis of circular and elliptical masonry arches.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 225 (Aug): 111056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111056.
Gáspár, O., A. A. Sipos, and I. Sajtos. 2018. “Effect of stereotomy on the lower bound value of minimum thickness of semi-circular masonry arches.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 12 (6): 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1422572.
Gilbert, M. 2007. “Limit analysis applied to masonry arch bridges: State of-the-art and recent developments.” In Proc., 5th ARCH Int. Conf. on Arch Bridges. Madeira, Portugal: Universidade da Madeira.
Grandjean, A. 2009. “Load bearing capacity of natural-stone masonry arch bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC-EPFL).
Heyman, J. 1969. “The safety of masonry arches.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 11 (4): 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(69)90070-8.
Heyman, J. 1998. Structural analysis: A historical approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ISO. 2010. Bases for design of structures—Assessment of existing structures. ISO 13822. Geneva: ISO.
Jacinto, L., L. C. Neves, and L. O. Santos. 2015. “Bayesian assessment of an existing bridge: A case study.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.995105.
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). 2001. “Probabilistic model code.” Accessed September 22, 2022. https://www.jcss.byg.dtu.dk/Publications/Probabilistic_Model_Code.
Kooharian, A. 1952. “Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 49 (12): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.14359/11822.
Krabbenhoft, K., A. Lyamin, and J. Krabbenhoft. 2015. “Optum computational engineering (OptumG2).” Accessed May 24, 2022. https://www.optumce.com.
Lemaire, M., A. Chateauneuf, and J.-C. Mitteau. 2009. Structural reliability. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lemos, J. V. 2007. “Discrete element modeling of masonry structures.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 1 (2): 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050601176868.
LimitState. 2014. RING manual version 3.1.b. Sheffield, UK: LimitState.
Liversley, R. K. 1978. “Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 12 (12): 1853–1871. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620121207.
Makris, N., and H. Alexakis. 2013. “The effect of stereotomy on the shape of the thrust-line and the minimum thickness of semicircular masonry arches.” Arch. Appl. Mech. 83 (10): 1511–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-013-0763-4.
Matos, J. C., V. N. Moreira, I. B. Valente, P. J. Cruz, L. C. Neves, and N. Galvão. 2019. “Probabilistic-based assessment of existing steel-concrete composite bridges–Application to Sousa River Bridge.” Eng. Struct. 181 (Feb): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.006.
Melbourne, C., G. Holm, J. Bien, J. R. Casas, A. Tommor, P. E. Bengtsson, T. Kaminski, P. Rawa, P. Roca, and C. Molins. 2007. “Masonry arch bridges sustainable bridges background document D4.7.” Sustainable development global change & ecosystems integrated project, sustainable bridges. ZAG, Slovenia: European Commission DG Research.
Melchers, R. E., and A. T. Beck. 2018. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Mery, E. 1840. “Mémoire sur l’équilibre des voûtes en berceau.” In Annales des ponts et chaussées: Partie technique. Mémoires et documents relatifs à l’art des constructions et au service de l’ingénieur, 1ère série, 1er semestre, 50–70. Paris: Nabu Press.
Milani, G., and P. B. Lourenço. 2012. “3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges.” Comput. Struct. 110 (Nov): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.008.
Milankovitch, C. 1907. “Theorie der Druckkurven [Theory of line of thrust].” [In German.] Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 55: 1–27.
Moreira, V. N., J. Fernandes, J. C. Matos, and D. V. Oliveira. 2016. “Reliability-based assessment of existing masonry arch railway bridges.” Constr. Build. Mater. 115 (Jul): 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.030.
Moreira, V. N., J. C. Matos, and D. V. Oliveira. 2017. “Probabilistic based assessment of a masonry arch bridge considering inferential procedures.” Eng. Struct. 134 (Mar): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.067.
MOSEK ApS. 2019. “The MOSEK optimization toolbox for MATLAB manual. Version 9.0.” Accessed January 27, 2022. http://docs.mosek.com/9.0/toolbox/index.html.
Nodargi, N. A., and P. Bisegna. 2020a. “Thrust line analysis revisited and applied to optimization of masonry arches.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 179 (Aug): 105690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105690.
Nodargi, N. A., and P. Bisegna. 2020b. “A unifying computational approach for the lower-bound limit analysis of systems of masonry arches and buttresses.” Eng. Struct. 221 (Oct): 110999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110999.
Page, J. 1993. Masonry arch bridges. State of art review. London: HMSO, Dept. of Transport, Transport Research Laboratory.
Pintucchi, B., and N. Zani. 2009. “Effects of material and geometric non-linearities on the collapse load of masonry arches.” Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 28 (1): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.02.007.
Pouraminian, M., S. Pourbakhshian, and M. Moahammad Hosseini. 2019. “Reliability analysis of Pole Kheshti historical arch bridge under service loads using SFEM.” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 4 (1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-019-0060-x.
Pouraminian, M., S. Pourbakhshian, E. Noroozinejad Farsangi, S. Berenji, S. Borujeni Keyani, M. Moosavi Asl, and M. Mohammad Hosseini. 2020. “Reliability-based safety evaluation of the BISTOON historic masonry arch bridge.” Civ. Environ. Eng. Rep. 30 (1): 87–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/ceer-2020-0008.
Pouraminian, M., S. Pourbakhshian, H. Yousefzadeh, and E. Noroozinejad Farsangi. 2021. “Reliability-based linear analysis of low-rise RC frames under earthquake excitation.” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 6 (1): 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-021-00128-z.
Proske, D., and P. van Gelder. 2009. Safety of historical stone arch bridges. Berlin: Springer.
Salencon, J. 2013. Yield design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sarhosis, V., D. V. Oliveira, J. V. Lemos, and P. B. Lourenco. 2014. “The effect of skew angle on the mechanical behaviour of masonry arches.” Mech. Res. Commun. 61 (Oct): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.07.008.
Schueremans, L. 2006. “Assessing the safety of existing structures using a reliability based framework: Possibilities and limitations.” Restor. Build. Monuments 12 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/rbm-2006-6025.
Séjourné, P. 1913. Large vaults. [In French.] Bourges, France: Imprimerie Veuve Tardy-Pigelet et fils.
Tubaldi, E., E. Minga, L. Macorini, and B. A. Izzuddin. 2020. “Mesoscale analysis of multi-span masonry arch bridges.” Eng. Struct. 225 (Dec): 111137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111137.
Wisniewski, D. 2007. “Safety formats for the assessment of concrete bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Universidade do Minho.
Zanaz, A., S. Yotte, F. Fouchal, and A. Chateauneuf. 2016. “Efficient masonry vault inspection by Monte Carlo simulations: Case of hidden defect.” Case Stud. Struct. Eng. 5 (Jun): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2015.12.001.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28 • Issue 4 • November 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 12, 2022
Accepted: Jun 7, 2023
Published online: Aug 11, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Arch bridges
- Bridge engineering
- Bridge tests
- Bridges
- Bridges (by type)
- Construction (by type)
- Construction engineering
- Design (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Field tests
- Finite element method
- Foundation design
- Foundations
- Geotechnical engineering
- Load bearing capacity
- Masonry
- Mathematics
- Methodology (by type)
- Numerical methods
- Parameters (statistics)
- Span bridges
- Statistics
- Structural design
- Structural engineering
- Structural reliability
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Abhijeet Dey, Arjun Sil, Application of ANN for Estimating Time-Variant Structural Reliability of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Approximate Approach, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1412, 29, 2, (2024).