Longitudinal Multiple Presence of Trucks on Continuous Bridge Spans
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 2
Abstract
In designing and evaluating roadway bridges in the surface transportation infrastructure, truck load is a major variable to account for. For daily operation, truck load also is a primary factor. Trucks on continuous spans were studied, with a focus on their behavior of longitudinal multiple presence in the same lane(s). Current US specifications include provisions for how to account for such multiple presence, and these provisions have evolved over the years. However, the basis for the provisions and their changes have not been well documented. An unprecedentedly large number of high-quality in-motion truck weight data were gathered in eight states across the US and used to investigate trucks’ longitudinal multiple presence behavior. A new approach to analyzing each platoon of trucks recorded in traffic was developed for this purpose. Each random platoon’s total load effect was identified, covering every truck in the platoon, to obtain reliable statistics of the maximum load effects. Results show that longitudinal multiple presence increases with truck volume and span length. Relevant current AASHTO provisions therefore were found to be conservative or overconservative. Accordingly, it was concluded that lower longitudinal multiple presence factor values for evaluation and design are more justifiable. These results may be used by bridge owners and engineers for realistic load rating and design, for more-uniform structural safety and cost effectiveness. This is consistent with the top two goals of the AASHTO Committee on Bridges and Structures’ strategic plan for extending bridge service life and assessing bridge condition.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Illinois Institute of Technology for its funding for the second author’s Ph.D. studies, during which most work presented here was conducted.
References
AASHTO. 1994a. LRFD bridge design specifications. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 1994b. Manual for condition evaluation of bridges. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2002. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2003. Guide manual for condition evaluation and load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) of highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2015. Manual for bridge evaluation, 2015 interim revision. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018a. Manual for bridge evaluation. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018b. “Strategic plan for the Committee on Bridges and Structures.” Accessed March 3, 2023. https://bridges.transportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2020/05/2018-Bridges-and-Structures-Strategic-Plan-Approved.pdf.
AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
China DOT. 2015. General code for design of highway bridges and culverts. JTG D60-2015. Corvallis, OR: People’s Transportation Publisher.
CSA Group. 2014. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (2014) 11th edition of CSA S6. Toronto: CSA Group.
European Committee. 2003. EuroCode 1, part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee.
Fu, G. 2013. Bridge design and evaluation: LRFD and LRFR. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fu, G., J. Chi, and Q. Wang. 2019. Illinois-specific live load factors based on truck data. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
Fu, G., and O. Hag-Elsafi. 2000. “Vehicular overloads: Load model, bridge safety, and permit checking.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (Feb): 49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(49).
Fu, G., L. Liu, and M. Bowman. 2013. “Multiple presence factor for truck load on highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (3): 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000330.
Fu, G., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2006. LRFD load calibration for state of Michigan Trunkline bridges. Research Report RC-1466. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
Fu, G., and J. You. 2011. “Extrapolation for future maximum load statistics.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (Jul): 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000175.
Ghosn, M., B. Sivakumar, and F. Miao. 2011. Load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) in NYS. New York: City University of New York.
Gumbel, E. J. 1958. Statistics of extreme. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kinney, T., and C. Higgins. 2009. Oregon specific truck live load factors for rating state-owned bridges—2008: Recalculation of live load truck factors using 2008 weigh-in-motion data for rating Oregon state-owned bridges. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State Univ.
Kulicki, J. M., Z. Prucz, C. M. Clancy, D. R. Mertz, and A. S. Nowak. 2007. Updating the calibration report for AASHTO LRFD code. NCHRP 20-07/186. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kwon, O-S., E. Kim, S. Orton, H. Salim, and T. Hazlett. 2011. Calibration of the live load factor in LRFD design guidelines. Columbia, MO: Missouri Dept. of Transportation, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Univ. of Missouri.
Mertz, D. R. 2008. Gerald desmond bridge replacement project site-specific vehicular live load study. Los Angeles: Draft Report to Port of Long Beach.
Moses, F. 2001. Calibration of load factors for LRFR bridge evaluation. NCHRP Report 454. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications. 1983. Ontario highway bridge design code. Toronto: Ministry of Transportation of Ontario.
Sivakumar, B., and M. Ghosn. 2011. Recalibration of LRFR live load factors in the AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: NCHRP.
Sivakumar, B., M. Ghosn, and F. Moses. 2011. Protocols for collecting and using traffic data in bridge design. NCHRP Report 683. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Uddin, N., H. Zhao, C. Waldron, L. Dong, and S. Greer. 2011. Weigh-in-motion (WIM) data for site-specific LRFR bridge load rating. Birmingham, AL: Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 27, 2022
Accepted: Jan 21, 2023
Published online: Mar 13, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 13, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.