Machine Learning for Predicting Prehurricane Structural Damage
Abstract
This study proposes a novel framework for the prediction of structural damages caused by extreme weather and climate events. In current practice, following a weather event, inspectors manually evaluate damaged structures and assign a damage state classification according to FEMA guidelines. The application of machine learning methods to postevent damage classification has received significant attention in the past decade. Current state-of-the-art applications in automating the assigning of damage states have focused on postevent unmanned aerial system (UAS)-driven image classification. These works have achieved moderate success using damage classes with varying similarities to established FEMA guidelines. This work proposes a framework for predicting FEMA damage states at a single structure level prior to an event. Using a precurated data set of structural characteristics and predicted best track storm data, a novel approach can be used to optimize postevent response efforts. The methodology was validated using a data set of structural features and best track storm data gathered following Hurricanes Harvey, Michael, Irma, and Dorian. The trained model achieved a 48.08% single damage state classification accuracy and an class damage state classification accuracy. These results show that the proposed framework can perform pre-event damage prediction with performance on par with the current postevent damage classification methods.
Practical Applications
This study provides a framework for the prediction of hurricane-induced structural damage states prior to an event. Based on a lightweight artificial intelligence model, the framework is designed to be accessible to homeowners, municipalities, and relief organizations that do not have access to sophisticated hardware. The framework utilizes structural characteristics and storm information to generate structure-by-structure damage predictions based on FEMA hurricane damage states. A data set consisting of structures impacted by Hurricanes Harvey, Michael, Irma, and Dorian was used to validate the framework and provide an estimate of its capabilities. The trained model achieved an overall single state classification accuracy of 48.08% and a class accuracy of 84.24%. These results show that the proposed framework can provide homeowners with prehurricane predictions of the damage state their unique home is likely to suffer with the same level of performance as current state-of-the-art image-based postevent damage classification artificial intelligence models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data set and all code generated in this work are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This material is based in part on work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE:1746932. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
References
Abdeljaber, O., O. Avci, S. Kiranyaz, M. Gabbouj, and D. J. Inman. 2017. “Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks.” J. Sound Vib. 388 (Feb): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.043.
Amini, M., and A. M. Memari. 2020. “Review of literature on performance of coastal residential buildings under hurricane conditions and lessons learned.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (6): 04020102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001509.
Berezina, P., and D. Liu. 2022. “Hurricane damage assessment using coupled convolutional neural networks: A case study of hurricane Michael.” Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 13 (1): 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2030414.
Breiman, L. 1996. “Bagging predictors.” Mach. Learn. 24 (2): 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Cao, Q. D., and Y. Choe. 2020. “Building damage annotation on post-hurricane satellite imagery based on convolutional neural networks.” Nat. Hazards 103 (3): 3357–3376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04133-2.
Cheng, C. S., A. H. Behzadan, and A. Noshadravan. 2021. “Deep learning for post-hurricane aerial damage assessment of buildings.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 36 (6): 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12658.
Doshi, J., S. Basu, and G. Pang. 2018. “From satellite imagery to disaster insights.” Preprint, submitted December 17, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07033.
FEMA. 2021. Hazus hurricane model technical manual: Hazus 4.2 service pack 3. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Friedland, C. J., and M. L. Levitan. 2011. “Development of a loss-consistent wind and flood damage scale for residential buildings.” In Proc., Solutions to Coastal Disasters 2011, 666–677. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Gao, Y., and K. M. Mosalam. 2018. “Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (9): 748–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12363.
Ghosh Mondal, T., M. R. Jahanshahi, R. T. Wu, and Z. Y. Wu. 2020. “Deep learning-based multi-class damage detection for autonomous post-disaster reconnaissance.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 27 (4): e2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2507.
Gupta, R., R. Hosfelt, S. Sajeev, N. Patel, B. Goodman, J. Doshi, E. Heim, H. Choset, and M. Gaston. 2019. “xBD: A dataset for assessing building damage from satellite imagery.” Preprint, submitted November 21, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09296.
Ho, T. K. 1995. “Random decision forests.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition. New York: IEEE.
Iizuka, K., M. Itoh, S. Shiodera, T. Matsubara, M. Dohar, and K. Watanabe. 2018. “Advantages of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry for landscape analysis compared with satellite data: A case study of postmining sites in Indonesia.” Cogent Geosci. 4 (1): 1498180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312041.2018.1498180.
Jadhav, A., D. Pramod, and K. Ramanathan. 2019. “Comparison of performance of data imputation methods for numeric dataset.” Appl. Artif. Intell. 33 (10): 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1637138.
Jäger, S., A. Allhorn, and F. Bießmann. 2021. “A benchmark for data imputation methods.” Front. Big Data 4 (Jul): 693674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.693674.
Kang, D., and Y.-J. Cha. 2018. “Autonomous UAVs for structural health monitoring using deep learning and an ultrasonic beacon system with geo-tagging.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (10): 885–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12375.
Khajwal, A. B., C. S. Cheng, and A. Noshadravan. 2022. “Post-disaster damage classification based on deep multi-view image fusion.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 38 (4): 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12890.
Kijewski-Correa, T., et al. 2018a. Hurricane Harvey (Texas) supplement—Collaborative research: Geotechnical extreme events reconnaissance (GEER) association: Turning disaster into knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: DesignSafe-CI.
Kijewski-Correa, T., K. Mosalam, D. O. Prevatt, and I. Robertson. 2019a. Virtual assessment structural team (VAST) handbook: Data enrichment and quality control (DE/QC) for US windstorms. London: StEER Network, StEER Structural Extreme Events Reconnaissance.
Kijewski-Correa, T., K. Mosalam, D. O. Prevatt, I. Robertson, and D. Roueche. 2019b. Field assessment structural team (FAST) handbook. London: StEER Network, StEER Structural Extreme Events Reconnaissance.
Kijewski-Correa, T., D. Roueche, J. P. Pinelli, D. Prevatt, I. Zisis, K. Gurley, M. Refan, J. F. Haan, S. Pei, and A. Rasouli. 2018b. RAPID: A coordinated structural engineering response to hurricane Irma (in Florida). West Lafayette, IN: DesignSafe-CI.
Landsea, C. W., and J. L. Franklin. 2013. “Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format.” Mon. Weather Rev. 141 (10): 3576–3592. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00254.1.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 28 (7): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
Marshall, J., et al. 2022. “Field assessment structural teams: FAST-1, FAST-2.” In StEER—Hurricane Dorian: Field assessment structural team (FAST) dataset. West Lafayette, IN: DesignSafe-CI.
Masoomi, H., J. W. van de Lindt, M. R. Ameri, T. Q. Do, and B. M. Webb. 2019. “Combined wind-wave-surge hurricane-induced damage prediction for buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (1): 04018227. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002241.
NHC (National Hurricane Center). 2012. “Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale.” Accessed April 27, 2023. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsshws.php.
NHC (National Hurricane Center). 2015. “National storm surge risk maps—Version 3.” Accessed May 26, 2023. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/nationalsurge/.
NHC (National Hurricane Center). 2019. “NHC track and intensity models.” Accessed June 11, 2019. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/modelsummary.shtml.
NIST. 2016. Guide brief 4—Determining anticipated performance. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
NIST. 2021. “Coastal inundation: Hazard characterization and structural design.” Accessed September 7, 2023. https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/coastal-inundation-hazard-characterization-and-structural-design.
NOAA NCEI (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Centers for Environmental Information). 2022. “U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters.” Accessed September 7, 2023. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/.
NOAA Office for Coastal Management (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2021. “Hurricane costs.” Accessed March 20, 2022. https://coast.noaa.gov/states/fast-facts/hurricane-costs.html.
Pinelli, J.-P., G. Pita, K. Gurley, B. Torkian, S. Hamid, and C. Subramanian. 2011. “Damage characterization: Application to Florida public hurricane loss model.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 12 (4): 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000051.
Pinelli, J.-P., E. Simiu, K. Gurley, C. Subramanian, L. Zhang, A. Cope, J. J. Filliben, and S. Hamid. 2004. “Hurricane damage prediction model for residential structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (11): 1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1685).
Rafiei, M. H., and H. Adeli. 2017. “A novel machine learning-based algorithm to detect damage in high-rise building structures.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 26 (18): e1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1400.
Rafiei, M. H., and H. Adeli. 2018. “A novel unsupervised deep learning model for global and local health condition assessment of structures.” Eng. Struct. 156 (Feb): 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.070.
Roueche, D., et al. 2020. “StEER field assessment structural team (FAST).” In StEER—Hurricane Michael. West Lafayette, IN: DesignSafe-CI.
Texas Department of Insurance. 2019. “Final compilation of Hurricane Harvey data.” Accessed March 20, 2022. https://www.tdi.texas.gov/reports/documents/harvey-dc-final-06302019.pdf.
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, J. Lin, L. A. Twisdale Jr., M. A. Young, and F. M. Lavelle. 2006. “HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 7 (2): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94).
Wang, N., Q. Zhao, S. Li, X. Zhao, and P. Zhao. 2018. “Damage classification for masonry historic structures using convolutional neural networks based on still images.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (12): 1073–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12411.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 30, 2023
Accepted: Mar 15, 2024
Published online: Aug 30, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 30, 2025
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning
- Automation and robotics
- Business management
- Climates
- Computer programming
- Computing in civil engineering
- Engineering fundamentals
- Environmental engineering
- Federal government
- Government
- Meteorology
- Methodology (by type)
- Model accuracy
- Models (by type)
- Organizations
- Practice and Profession
- Precipitation
- Research methods (by type)
- Storms
- Systems engineering
- Validation
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.