Technical Notes
Nov 16, 2023

The Impact of Wind Characteristics on the Spatial Distribution of Damage to the Built Environment during Wildfire Events: The 2022 Marshall Fire

Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 25, Issue 1

Abstract

In recent years, several places all over the world have experienced devastating wildfire events that have resulted in exorbitant losses. With the climate warming every year, the trend of destructive fires is expected to continue in the future as well. To be better prepared for such events, an understanding of interaction between wildfires and the built environment is required. In this study, a graph-based approach is utilized to predict the damage to individual buildings in a test area selected from the 2022 Marshall Fire–affected region. The validity of the graph model is first shown by comparing the predicted damage with the observed damaged patterns, showing 72% accuracy. The model is further utilized to investigate the sensitivity of the damage patterns to wind conditions to better understand the correlation between wind characteristics and the resulting damage. For two wind speeds, 12 and 25  m/s, polar fragilities are developed by evaluating the damage for different wind directions. The results showed the variation in damage distribution among all wind directions for 25  m/s to be more than twice that for 12  m/s, highlighting the fact that the impact of wind conditions is nonlinear and needs to be carefully considered for wildfire risk assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Ager, A. A., C. Evers, M. A. Day, H. K. Preisler, A. M. G. Barros, and M. Nielsen-Pincus. 2017. “Network analysis of wildfire transmission and implications for risk governance.” PLoS One 12 (Jun): e0172867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172867.
Almaatouq, A., A. Noriega-Campero, A. Alotaibi, P. M. Krafft, M. Moussaid, and A. Pentland. 2020. “Adaptive social networks promote the wisdom of crowds.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117 (21): 11379–11386. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191768711.
Calkin, D. E., J. D. Cohen, M. A. Finney, and M. P. Thomson. 2014. “How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 (2): 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.131508811.
Change, N. C. 2017. “Spreading like wildfire.” Nat. Clim. Change 7 (11): 755. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3432.
Chulahwat, A., H. Mahmoud, S. Monedero, F. J. D. Vizcaíno, J. Ramirez, D. Buckley, and A. C. Forradellas. 2022. “Integrated graph measures reveal survival likelihood for buildings in wildfire events.” Sci. Rep. 12 (1): 15954. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19875-1.
Finney, M. A. 2006. “An overview of FlamMap fire modeling capabilities.” In Proc., Fuels Management-How to Measure Success, edited by Andrews, L. Patricia, Butler, and W. Bret, 213–220. Fort Collins, CO: USDA.
Forrister, A., X. Yan, Z. Yin, X. Zhao, T. Cova, R. Lovreglio, D. Nilsson, and E. Kuligowski. 2022. “Survey of evacuation behavior in the 2021 Marshall Fire, Colorado.” In Natural hazards center quick response grant report series, 349. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center.
Hoover, K. 2017. Wildfire management funding: Background, issues, and FY2018 appropriations. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Jankowski, C., K. Isaacson, M. Larsen, C. Ley, M. Cook, and A. Whelton. 2023. “Wildfire damage and contamination to private drinking water wells.” AWWA Water Sci. 5 (1): e1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1319.
Juliano, T. W., N. Lareau, M. E. Frediani, K. Shamsaei, M. Eghdami, K. Kosiba, J. Wurman, A. DeCastro, B. Kosović, and H. Ebrahimian. 2023. “Toward a better understanding of wildfire behavior in the wildland-urban interface: A case study of the 2021 Marshall Fire.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 50 (10): e2022GL101557. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101557.
LANDFIRE. 2016. Existing vegetation type layer. Washington, DC: US Dept. of the Interior.
Lovett, R. A. 2021. “Pyrocumulonimbus: When fires create their own weather.” Weatherwise 74 (6): 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.2021.1973860.
Mahmoud, H. 2023. “The causes of wildfires are clear. How they burn through communities is not.” Nature 620 (923): e923. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02687-2.
Mahmoud, H., and A. Chulahwat. 2018. “Unraveling the complexity of wildland urban interface fires.” Sci. Rep. 8 (Jun): 9315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27215-5.
Mahmoud, H., and A. Chulahwat. 2020. “Assessing wildland-urban interface fire risk.” R. Soc. Open Sci. 7 (8): 201183. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201183.
McGrattan, K., S. Hostikka, J. Floyd, C. Weinschenk, and K. Overholt. 2013. Fire dynamics simulator, user’s guide. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Pilkington, S., and H. Mahmoud. 2020. “Interpreting the socio-technical interactions within a wind damage-artificial neural network model for community resilience.” R. Soc. Open Sci. 7 (11): 200922. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200922.
QGIS Development Team. 2022. “QGIS geographic information system.” Accessed October 22, 2021. https://www.qgis.org.
Rothermel, R. C. A. 1972. Mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Washington, DC: USDA.
Russo, L., P. Russo, and C. I. Siettos. 2016. “A complex network theory approach for the spatial distribution of fire breaks in heterogeneous forest landscapes for the control of wildland fires.” PLoS One 11 (6): e0163226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163226.
Schoennagel, T., et al. 2017. “Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 (Jun): 4582–4590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617464114.
Schulze, S. S., E. C. Fischer, and M. Hamideh. 2020. “Wildfire impacts on schools and hospitals following the 2018 California camp fire.” Nat. Hazards 104 (20): 901–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04197-0.
Scott, J. H., and R. E. Burgan. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: A comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. Washington, DC: Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 25Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Mar 6, 2023
Accepted: Sep 13, 2023
Published online: Nov 16, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Akshat Chulahwat
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523.
George T. Abell Professor in Infrastructure and Director, Structural Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-6067. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share