Case Studies
Nov 16, 2023

Bayesian Probabilistic Approaches for Developing the Empirical Model for Debris-Flow Sediment Volume Using Limited Site Investigation Data

Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 25, Issue 1

Abstract

Many empirical relationships have been proposed to relate the sediment volume to various influencing factors. However, the accuracy of such empirical relationships generally requires a large number of observation data, which is difficult to guarantee at a specific site. Moreover, based on the limited investigation data, a complicated empirical model with more input factors may be an overfitted equation. Therefore, how to develop a reliable prediction model of debris-flow sediment volume still remains a great challenge. This paper develops a probabilistic method to establish the most appropriate empirical model for predicting the debris-flow volume based on Bayesian inference. First, the limited site investigation data are preprocessed by a series of multicollinearity analysis to select the candidate input variables. Then, a Bayesian framework is developed to select the most appropriate model among alternatives and identify its corresponding model parameters based on the site investigation data and prior knowledge. To address the multidimensional issues in Bayesian inference, a multichain method, specifically the DREAM(ZS) algorithm, is used to obtain the posterior distribution of model parameters of a candidate model to overcome the inefficient sampling problems of single-chain Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (e.g., Metropolis–Hastings algorithm). The DREAM(ZS) algorithm is subsequently integrated with Gaussian copula to calculate the evidence of a candidate model, making it feasible in the model selection problem. Results show that compared with the preexisting empirical relationship, the proposed approaches can provide a more accurate and simpler empirical model by reasonably considering the balance between data fitting and model uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 52009037), Outstanding Young and middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Hubei Province (T2022010), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (Project No. 2020CFB291), and the Wuhan Knowledge Innovation Special Project (No. 2022020801020268). The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and advice.

References

Beck, J. L., and S.-K. Au. 2002. “Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo Simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (4): 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380).
Beck, J. L., and L. S. Katafygiotis. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455).
Beck, J. L., and K.-V. Yuen. 2004. “Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (2): 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192).
Berti, M., and A. Simoni. 2007. “Prediction of debris flow inundation areas using empirical mobility relationships.” Geomorphology 90 (1–2): 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.01.014.
Bianco, G., and L. Franzi. 2000. “Estimation of debris flow volumes from storm events.” In Debris-flow hazards mitigation: Mechanics, prediction, and assessment, edited by G. F. Wieczorek and N. D. Naeser, 441–448. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Bovis, M. J., and M. Jakob. 1999. “The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 24 (11): 1039–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199910)24:11%3C1039::AID-ESP29%3E3.0.CO;2-U.
Calvo, B., and F. Savi. 2009. “A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment.” Comput. Geosci. 35 (5): 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.04.002.
Cannon, S. H., J. E. Gartner, M. G. Rupert, J. A. Michael, A. H. Rea, and C. Parrett. 2010. “Predicting the probability and volume of postwildfire debris flows in the intermountain western United States.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 122 (1–2): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26459.1.
Cao, Z., Y. Wang, and D. Li. 2016. “Quantification of prior knowledge in geotechnical site characterization.” Eng. Geol. 203 (Mar): 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.018.
Chang, C.-W., P.-S. Lin, and C.-L. Tsai. 2011. “Estimation of sediment volume of debris flow caused by extreme rainfall in Taiwan.” Eng. Geol. 123 (1–2): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.07.004.
Chang, T.-C., and Y.-H. Chien. 2007. “The application of genetic algorithm in debris flows prediction.” Environ. Geol. 53 (Oct): 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0649-2.
Ching, J., S.-S. Wu, and K.-K. Phoon. 2016. “Statistical characterization of random field parameters using frequentist and Bayesian approaches.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (2): 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0094.
Craiu, R. V., J. Rosenthal, and C. Yang. 2009. “Learn from thy neighbor: Parallel-chain and regional adaptive MCMC.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 104 (488): 1454–1466. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08393.
D’Agostino, V. 1996. Analisi quantitativa e qualitativa del trasporto solido torrentizio nei bacini montani de Trentino Orientale [quantitative and qualitative analysis of sediment transport in torrents of mountainous catchments of eastern Trentino], Scritti dedicati a Giovanni Tournon. [In Italian.] Rome: Associazione Idrotecnica Italiana, Sezione Liguria Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta.
D’Agostino, V., and L. Marchi. 2001. “Debris flow magnitude in the Eastern Italian Alps: Data collection and analysis.” Phys. Chem. Earth Part C 26 (9): 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1917(01)00064-2.
de Haas, T., and A. L. Densmore. 2019. “Debris-flow volume quantile prediction from catchment morphometry.” Geology 47 (8): 791–794. https://doi.org/10.1130/G45950.1.
Deng, Q.-X., J. He, Z.-J. Cao, I. Papaioannou, D.-Q. Li, and K.-K. Phoon. 2022. “Bayesian learning of Gaussian mixture model for calculating debris flow exceedance probability.” Georisk 16 (1): 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2022.2028849.
Dong, J.-J., C.-T. Lee, Y.-H. Tung, C.-N. Liu, K.-P. Lin, and J.-Y. Lee. 2009. “The role of the sediment budget in understanding debris flow susceptibility.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 34 (12): 1612–1624. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1850.
Franzi, L., and G. Bianco. 2001. “A statistical method to predict debris flow deposited volumes on a debris fan.” Phys. Chem. Earth Part C 26 (9): 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1917(01)00067-8.
Gartner, J. E., S. H. Cannon, P. M. Santi, and V. G. DeWolfe. 2008. “Empirical models to predict the volumes of debris flows generated by recently burned basins in the western US.” Geomorphology 96 (3–4): 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.033.
Griswold, J. P., and R. M. Iverson. 2008. Mobility and statistics and automated hazard mapping for debris flows and rock avalanches. Reston, VA: USGS.
Hungr, O. 1995. “A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches.” Can. Geotech. J. 32 (4): 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1139/t95-063.
Hungr, O., S. McDougall, M. Wise, and M. Cullen. 2008. “Magnitude–frequency relationships of debris flows and debris avalanches in relation to slope relief.” Geomorphology 96 (3–4): 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.03.020.
Hungr, O., G. C. Morgan, and R. Kellerhals. 1984. “Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures.” Can. Geotech. J. 21 (4): 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-073.
Hürlimann, M., R. Copons, and J. Altimir. 2006. “Detailed debris flow hazard assessment in Andorra: A multidisciplinary approach.” Geomorphology 78 (3–4): 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.02.003.
Iverson, R. M. 1997. “The physics of debris flows.” Rev. Geophys. 35 (3): 245–296. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00426.
Iverson, R. M., and D. L. George. 2016. “Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster.” Géotechnique 66 (3): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.LM.004.
Iverson, R. M., S. P. Schilling, and J. W. Vallance. 1998. “Objective delineation of lahar-inundation hazard zones.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 110 (8): 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110%3C0972:ODOLIH%3E2.3.CO;2.
Jakob, M., and O. Hungr. 2005. Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Berlin: Springer.
Kwan, J. S. H., and H. W. Sun. 2007. “Benchmarking exercise on landslide mobility modelling—Runout analyses using 3dDMM.” In Proc., 2007 Int. Forum on Landslide Disaster Management, 945–966. Kowloon, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Geotechnical Engineering Office.
Lee, J.-H., M. I. Sameen, B. Pradhan, and H.-J. Park. 2018. “Modeling landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments using optimized data mining and statistical methods.” Geomorphology 303 (Feb): 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.12.007.
Li, X., and J. Zhao. 2018. “A unified CFD-DEM approach for modeling of debris flow impacts on flexible barriers.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods 42 (14): 1643–1670. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2806.
Lin, P.-S., J.-Y. Lin, J.-C. Huang, and M.-D. Yang. 2002. “Assessing debris-flow hazard in a watershed in Taiwan.” Eng. Geol. 66 (3–4): 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00105-9.
Liu, C.-N., J.-J. Dong, Y.-F. Peng, and H.-F. Huang. 2009. “Effects of strong ground motion on the susceptibility of gully type debris flows.” Eng. Geol. 104 (3–4): 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.012.
Ma, C., K. Hu, and M. Tian. 2013. “Comparison of debris-flow volume and activity under different formation conditions.” Nat. Hazards 67 (2): 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0557-6.
Marchi, L., M. T. Brunetti, M. Cavalli, and S. Crema. 2019. “Debris-flow volumes in northeastern Italy: Relationship with drainage area and size probability.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 44 (4): 933–943. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4546.
Marchi, L., and V. D’Agostino. 2004. “Estimation of debris-flow magnitude in the Eastern Italian Alps.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 29 (2): 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1027.
Marchi, L., and P. R. Tecca. 1996. “Magnitudo delle colate detritiche nelle Alpi Orientali Italiane.” [In Italian.] Geoingegneria Ambientale Mineraria 33 (2–3): 79–86.
Mathworks. 2019. “MATLAB—The language of technical computing.” Accessed March 8, 2019. http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
McDougall, S. 2017. “2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis—Current practice and challenges.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (5): 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0104.
McDougall, S., and O. Hungr. 2004. “A model for the analysis of rapid landslide motion across three-dimensional terrain.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (6): 1084–1097. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-052.
Medina, V., M. Hürlimann, and A. Bateman. 2008. “Application of FLATModel, a 2D finite volume code, to debris flows in the northeastern part of the Iberian Peninsula.” Landslides 5 (1): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0102-3.
Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines.” J. Chem. Phys. 21 (6): 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114.
Nelsen, R. B. 2006. An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.
Nolde, N., and H. Joe. 2013. “A Bayesian extreme value analysis of debris flows.” Water Resour Res. 49: 7009–7022. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20494.
Owen, A. B., and S. D. Tribble. 2005. “A quasi-Monte Carlo metropolis algorithm.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 (25): 8844–8849. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409596102.
Pellegrino, A. M., A. S. di Santolo, and L. Schippa. 2015. “An integrated procedure to evaluate rheological parameters to model debris flows.” Eng. Geol. 196 (Sep): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.07.002.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999a. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999b. “Evaluation of geotechnical property variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-039.
Pirulli, M. 2010. “On the use of the calibration-based approach for debris-flow forward-analyses.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (5): 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1009-2010.
Rickenmann, D. 1999. “Empirical relationships for debris flows.” Nat. Hazards 19 (1): 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008064220727.
Rickenmann, D. 2005. “Runout prediction methods.” In Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena, edited by M. Jakob and O. Hungr, 305–324. Chichester, UK: Praxis.
Rickenmann, D., and A. Koschni. 2010. “Sediment loads due to fluvial transport and debris flows during the 2005 flood events in Switzerland.” Hydrol. Processes 24 (8): 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7536.
Robert, C., and G. Casella. 2004. Monte Carlo statistical methods. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Simoni, A., M. Mammoliti, and M. Berti. 2011. “Uncertainty of debris flow mobility relationships and its influence on the prediction of inundated areas.” Geomorphology 132 (3–4): 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.013.
Takahashi, T. 1991. Debris flows. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Takei, A. 1984. “Interdipendence of sediment budget between individual torrents and a river-system.” In Proc., Int. Symp. Interpraevent, 35–48. Klagenfurt, Austria: International Research Society Interpraevent.
Tang, X.-S., D.-Q. Li, C.-B. Zhou, and K.-K. Phoon. 2015. “Copula-based approaches for evaluating slope reliability under incomplete probability information.” Struct. Saf. 52 (Jan): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.09.007.
ter Braak, C. J. F., and J. A. Vrugt. 2008. “Differential evolution Markov chain with snooker updater and fewer chains.” Stat. Comput. 18 (Dec): 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-008-9104-9.
Tian, M., D.-Q. Li, Z.-J. Cao, K.-K. Phoon, and Y. Wang. 2016. “Bayesian identification of random field model using indirect test data.” Eng. Geol. 210 (Aug): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.05.013.
Tian, M., and X.-T. Sheng. 2022. “Copula-based probabilistic approaches for predicting debris-flow runout distances in the Wenchuan earthquake zone.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (1): 04021070. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001197.
Vagnon, F., M. Pirulli, A. Yague, and M. Pastor. 2019. “Comparison of two depth-averaged numerical models for debris flow runout estimation.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (1): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0455.
Van Dine, D. F. 1985. “Debris flows and debris torrents in the Southern Canadian Cordillera.” Can. Geotech. J. 22 (1): 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-006.
Van Steijn, H. 1996. “Debris-flow magnitude—Frequency relationships for mountainous regions of central and northwest Europe.” Geomorphology 15 (3–4): 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(95)00074-F.
Vrugt, J. A. 2016. “Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation.” Environ. Modell. Software 75 (Jan): 273–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013.
Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, M. P. Clark, J. M. Hyman, and B. A. Robinson. 2008. “Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (12): W00B09. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006720.
Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, C. G. H. Diks, D. Higdon, B. A. Robinson, and J. M. Hyman. 2009. “Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling.” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. 10 (3): 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273.
Wang, J., S. N. Ward, and L. Xiao. 2015. “Numerical simulation of the December 4, 2007 landslide-generated tsunami in Chehalis Lake, Canada.” Geophys. J. Int. 201 (1): 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv026.
Wang, L., Z.-J. Cao, D.-Q. Li, K.-K. Phoon, and S.-K. Au. 2018. “Determination of site-specific soil-water characteristic curve from a limited number of test data—A Bayesian perspective.” Geosci. Front. 9 (6): 1665–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.10.014.
Wang, Y., and Z. Cao. 2013. “Probabilistic characterization of Young’s modulus of soil using equivalent samples.” Eng. Geol. 159 (Jun): 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.017.
Wang, Y., Z. Cao, and D. Li. 2016. “Bayesian perspective on geotechnical variability and site characterization.” Eng. Geol. 203 (Mar): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.017.
Yan, W. M., K.-V. Yuen, and G. L. Yoon. 2009. “Bayesian probabilistic approach for the correlations of compression index for marine clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1932–1940. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000157.
Yuen, K.-V. 2010. “Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering.” Struct. Saf. 32 (5): 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.03.011.
Zhang, J., L. M. Zhang, and W. H. Tang. 2009. “Bayesian framework for characterizing geotechnical model uncertainty.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (7): 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000018.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 25Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Dec 20, 2022
Accepted: Aug 8, 2023
Published online: Nov 16, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, 28 Nanli Rd., Wuhan 430068, PR China; Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Environment, Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Wuhan 430068, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Xiaotao Sheng [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Institute of Smart Water, Wuhan Univ., 8 Donghu South Rd., Wuhan 430072, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Chunju Zhao [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, 28 Nanli Rd., Wuhan 430068, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Huawei Zhou [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, 28 Nanli Rd., Wuhan 430068, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share