Technical Papers
Feb 23, 2024

Influence of Subseasonal-to-Annual Water Supply Forecasts on Many-Objective Water System Robustness under Long-Term Change

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150, Issue 5

Abstract

The sensitivity of forecast-informed reservoir operating policies to forecast attributes (lead-time and skill) in many-objective water systems has been well-established. However, the viability of forecast-informed operations as a climate change adaptation strategy remains underexplored, especially in many-objective systems with complex trade-offs across interests. Little is known about the relationships between forecast attribute and policy robustness under deep uncertainty in future conditions and the relationships between forecast-informed performance and future hydrologic state. This study explores the sensitivity of forecast-informed policy robustness to forecast lead-time and skill in the outflow management plan of the Lake Ontario basin. We create water supply forecasts at four different subseasonal-to-annual lead-times and two levels of skill and further employ a many-objective evolutionary algorithm to discover policies tailored for each forecast case, historical supply conditions, and six objectives. We also leverage a partnership with decision-makers to identify a subset of candidate policies, which are reevaluated under a large set of plausible hydrologic conditions that reflect stationary and nonstationary climates. Scenario discovery techniques are used to map attributes of future hydrology to forecast-informed policy performance. Results show policy robustness is directly related to forecast lead-time, where policies conditioned on 12-month forecasts were more robust under future hydrology. Policies tailored for noisier long-lead forecasts were more robust under a wide range of plausible futures compared with policies trained to perfect forecasts, which highlights the potential to overfit control policies to historical information, even for a forecast-informed policy with perfect foresight. The relationship between performance and the hydrologic regime is dependent on the complexity of the interactions between control decisions and objectives. A threshold of objective performance as a function of supply conditions can support adaptive management of the system. However, more complex interactions make it difficult to identify simple hydrologic indicators that can serve as triggers for dynamic management.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All models and code generated or used during the study are available in an online repository at github.com/ksemmendinger/Plan-2014-Python.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River Adaptive Management Committee for providing feedback on this work to align study outcomes with decision-making needs. This work was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, which is managed by the USGS National Climate Adaptation Science Center, under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G21AC10601-00, and also by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CBET-2144332 and through the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1650441. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center or the USGS.

References

Alexander, S., G. Yang, G. Addisu, and P. Block. 2021. “Forecast-informed reservoir operations to guide hydropower and agriculture allocations in the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia.” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 37 (2): 208–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1745159.
Anghileri, D., N. Voisin, A. Castelletti, F. Pianosi, B. Nijssen, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2016. “Value of long-term streamflow forecasts to reservoir operations for water supply in snow-dominated river catchments.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (6): 4209–4225. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017864.
Arango-Aramburo, S., S. W. D. Turner, K. Daenzer, J. P. Ríos-Ocampo, M. I. Hejazi, T. Kober, A. C. Álvarez-Espinosa, G. D. Romero-Otalora, and B. van der Zwaan. 2019. “Climate impacts on hydropower in Colombia: A multi-model assessment of power sector adaptation pathways.” Energy Policy 128 (May): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.057.
Badham, J., et al. 2019. “Effective modeling for integrated water resource management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities.” Environ. Modell. Software 116 (Jun): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013.
Bryant, B. P., and R. J. Lempert. 2010. “Thinking inside the box: A participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery.” Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 77 (1): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.002.
Christensen, N. S., A. W. Wood, N. Voisin, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. N. Palmer. 2004. “The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin.” Clim. Change 62 (1–3): 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013684.13621.1f.
Cohen, J. S., H. B. Zeff, and J. D. Herman. 2020. “Adaptation of multiobjective reservoir operations to snowpack decline in the Western United States.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (12): 04020091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001300.
Cradock-Henry, N. A., P. Blackett, M. Hall, P. Johnstone, E. Teixeira, and A. Wreford. 2020. “Climate adaptation pathways for agriculture: Insights from a participatory process.” Environ. Sci. Policy 107 (May): 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.020.
Culley, S., S. Noble, A. Yates, M. Timbs, S. Westra, H. R. Maier, M. Giuliani, and A. Castelletti. 2016. “A bottom-up approach to identifying the maximum operational adaptive capacity of water resource systems to a changing climate.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (9): 6751–6768. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018253.
Delaney, C. J., et al. 2020. “Forecast informed reservoir operations using ensemble streamflow predictions for a multipurpose reservoir in Northern California.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (9): e2019WR026604. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026604.
Denaro, S., D. Anghileri, M. Giuliani, and A. Castelletti. 2017. “Informing the operations of water reservoirs over multiple temporal scales by direct use of hydro-meteorological data.” Adv. Water Resour. 103 (May): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.02.012.
Doering, K., J. Quinn, P. M. Reed, and S. Steinschneider. 2021. “Diagnosing the time-varying value of forecasts in multiobjective reservoir control.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (7): 04021031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001386.
Eyring, V., S. Bony, G. A. Meehl, C. A. Senior, B. Stevens, R. J. Stouffer, and K. E. Taylor. 2016. “Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization.” Geosci. Model Dev. 9 (5): 1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.
Faber, B. A., and J. R. Stedinger. 2001. “Reservoir optimization using sampling SDP with ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) forecasts.” J. Hydrol. 249 (1–4): 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00419-X.
Fagherazzi, L., D. Fay, and J. Salas. 2007. “Synthetic hydrology and climate change scenarios to improve multi-purpose complex water resource systems management. The Lake Ontario–St Lawrence River study of the International Canada and US joint commission.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 103 (May): 171. https://doi.org/10.2495/WRM070171.
Fayaz, N., L. E. Condon, and D. G. Chandler. 2020. “Evaluating the sensitivity of projected reservoir reliability to the choice of climate projection: A case study of bull run watershed, Portland, Oregon.” Water Resour. Manage. 34 (6): 1991–2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02542-3.
Goulart, H. M. D. 2019. Assessing the operational value of forecast information under climate change. Milan, Italy: Politecnico di Milano.
Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River Adaptive Management Committee. 2021. “Expedited review of plan 2014, Phase 1: Informing plan 2014 deviation decisions under extreme conditions.” Report to the international joint commission. Accessed January 31, 2023. https://www.ijc.org/sites/default/files/GLAM_ExpeditedReview_Phase1Report_2021-11-19.pdf.
Groves, D. G., and R. J. Lempert. 2007. “A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios.” Global Environ. Change 17 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.006.
Haasnoot, M., J. Kwadijk, J. Van Alphen, D. Le Bars, B. Van Den Hurk, F. Diermanse, A. Van Der Spek, G. Oude Essink, J. Delsman, and M. Mens. 2020. “Adaptation to uncertain sea-level rise: How uncertainty in Antarctic mass-loss impacts the coastal adaptation strategy of the Netherlands.” Environ. Res. Lett. 15 (3): 034007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab666c.
Hadjimichael, A., J. Quinn, E. Wilson, P. Reed, L. Basdekas, D. Yates, and M. Garrison. 2020. “Defining robustness, vulnerabilities, and consequential scenarios for diverse stakeholder interests in institutionally complex river basins.” Earth’s Future 8 (7): e2020EF001503. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001503.
Hadka, D., and P. Reed. 2013. “Borg: An auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework.” Evol. Comput. 21 (2): 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1162/EVCO_a_00075.
Hall, J. W., H. Harvey, and L. J. Manning. 2019. “Adaptation thresholds and pathways for tidal flood risk management in London.” Clim. Risk Manage. 24 (Jan): 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.04.001.
Hamlet, A. F., D. Huppert, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2002. “Economic value of long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia River hydropower.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 128 (2): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2002)128:2(91).
Herman, J. D., and M. Giuliani. 2018. “Policy tree optimization for threshold-based water resources management over multiple timescales.” Environ. Modell. Software 99 (Jan): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.016.
Herman, J. D., J. D. Quinn, S. Steinschneider, M. Giuliani, and S. Fletcher. 2020. “Climate adaptation as a control problem: Review and perspectives on dynamic water resources planning under uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (2): e24389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025502.
Herman, J. D., P. M. Reed, H. B. Zeff, and G. W. Characklis. 2015. “How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change?” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (10): 04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000509.
International Joint Commission. 2014. Lake Ontario St. Lawrence River Plan 2014: Protecting against extreme water levels, restoring wetlands and preparing for climate change. Washington, DC: International Joint Commission.
International Joint Commission. 2016. Regulation Plan 2014 for Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River: Compendium document. Washington, DC: International Joint Commission.
International Lake Ontario–St. Lawrence River Board. 2018. Observed conditions regulated outflows in 2017. Washington, DC: International Joint Commission.
International Lake Ontario–St. Lawrence River Study Board. 2006. “Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels and flows.” Report to the International Joint Commission. Accessed January 31, 2023. https://ijc.org/sites/default/files/L40.pdf.
Khatun, A., B. Sahoo, and C. Chatterjee. 2023. “Two novel error-updating model frameworks for short-to-medium range streamflow forecasting using bias-corrected rainfall inputs: Development and comparative assessment.” J. Hydrol. 618 (Mar): 129199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129199.
Lam, R., et al. 2022. “GraphCast: Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting.” Preprint, submitted December 24, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12794.
Mejia, J. M., and J. Rousselle. 1976. “Disaggregation models in hydrology revisited.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (2): 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i002p00185.
Mereu, S., J. Sušnik, A. Trabucco, A. Daccache, L. Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, S. Renoldi, A. Virdis, D. Savić, and D. Assimacopoulos. 2016. “Operational resilience of reservoirs to climate change, agricultural demand, and tourism: A case study from Sardinia.” Sci. Total Environ. 543 (Feb): 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.066.
Nayak, M. A., J. D. Herman, and S. Steinschneider. 2018. “Balancing flood risk and water supply in California: Policy search integrating short-term forecast ensembles with conjunctive use.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (10): 7557–7576. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023177.
Pedregosa, F., et al. 2011. “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (Nov): 2825–2830.
Quinn, J. D., P. M. Reed, M. Giuliani, and A. Castelletti. 2017a. “Rival framings: A framework for discovering how problem formulation uncertainties shape risk management trade-offs in water resources systems.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (8): 7208–7233. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020524.
Quinn, J. D., P. M. Reed, and K. Keller. 2017b. “Direct policy search for robust multi-objective management of deeply uncertain socio-ecological tipping points.” Environ. Modell. Software 92 (Jun): 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.017.
Rayner, S., D. Lach, and H. Ingram. 2005. “Weather forecasts are for wimps: Why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts.” Clim. Change 69 (2–3): 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-3148-z.
Russell, S. O., and W. F. Caselton. 1971. “Reservoir operation with imperfect flow forecasts.” J. Hydraul. Div. 97 (2): 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1061/jyceaj.0002873.
Schapire, R. E. 2009. “A short introduction to boosting.” Society 14 (5): 1612. https://doi.org/10.1.1.112.5912.
Semmendinger, K., D. Lee, L. Fry, and S. Steinschneider. 2022. “Establishing opportunities and limitations of forecast use in the operational management of highly constrained multiobjective water systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (8): 04022044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001585.
Stedinger, J. R., B. F. Sule, and D. P. Loucks. 1984. “Stochastic dynamic programming models for reservoir operation optimization.” Water Resour. Res. 20 (11): 1499–1505. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i011p01499.
Steinschneider, S. 2022. Using hydroclimate modeling and social science to enhance flood resilience on Lake Ontario through the climate smart communities program (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Honolulu, HI: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7186904.
Steinschneider, S., and C. Brown. 2012. “Dynamic reservoir management with real-option risk hedging as a robust adaptation to nonstationary climate.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (5): 12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011540.
Sveinsson, Ó. G. B., and J. D. Salas. 2006. “Multivariate shifting mean plus persistence model for simulating the Great Lakes net basin supplies.” In Proc., 2006 Annual AGU Hydrology Days, 173–184. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State Univ.
Syme, G. J., and B. S. Sadler. 1994. “Evaluation of public involvement in water resources planning: A researcher-practitioner dialogue.” Eval. Rev. 18 (5): 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9401800501.
Trindade, B. C., P. M. Reed, and G. W. Characklis. 2019. “Deeply uncertain pathways: Integrated multi-city regional water supply infrastructure investment and portfolio management.” Adv. Water Resour. 134 (Dec): 103442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103442.
Turner, S. W. D., J. C. Bennett, D. E. Robertson, and S. Galelli. 2017. “Complex relationship between seasonal streamflow forecast skill and value in reservoir operations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (9): 4841–4859. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4841-2017.
Van Der Beken, A., G. L. Vandewiele, J. Tiberghien, J. Marien, J. Marivort, and M. Meersseman. 1980. “On-line flow forecasting for automatic operation of a flood reservoir.” In Proc., Oxford Symp. Hydrological forecasting, April 1980, (Int. Association of Hydrological Sciences. Washington, DC: IAHS-AISH Publication.
Wilcox, D. A., and J. A. Bateman. 2018. “Photointerpretation analysis of plant communities in Lake Ontario wetlands following 65 years of lake-level regulation.” J. Great Lakes Res. 44 (6): 1306–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.08.007.
Wilcox, D. A., and Y. Xie. 2007. “Predicting wetland plant community responses to proposed water-level-regulation plans for Lake Ontario: GIS-based modeling.” J. Great Lakes Res. 33 (4): 751–773. https://doi.org/10.3394/0380-1330(2007)33[751:PWPCRT]2.0.CO;2.
Wilson, A., R. Cifelli, F. Munoz-Arriola, J. Giovannettone, J. Vano, T. Parzybok, A. Dufour, J. Jasperse, K. Mahoney, and B. McCormick. 2021. “Efforts to build infrastructure resiliency to future hydroclimate extremes.” In Geo-extreme 2021: Climatic extremes and earthquake modeling, edited by C. L. Meehan, M. A. Pando, B. A. Leshchinsky, and N. H. Jafari, 222–223. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Wilson, T. T., and E. Kirdar. 1970. “Use of runoff forecasting in reservoir operations.” J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 96 (3): 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1061/jrcea4.0000732.
Woodside, G. D., A. S. Hutchinson, F. M. Ralph, C. Talbot, R. Hartman, and C. Delaney. 2022. “Increasing stormwater capture and recharge using forecast informed reservoir operations, Prado Dam.” Ground Water 60 (5): 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13162.
Yang, G., S. Guo, P. Liu, and P. Block. 2021. “Sensitivity of forecast value in multiobjective reservoir operation to forecast lead time and reservoir characteristics.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (6): 04021027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001384.
Yao, H., and A. Georgakakos. 2001. “Assessment of Folsom Lake response to historical and potential future climate scenarios 2. Reservoir management.” J. Hydrol. 249 (1–4): 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00418-8.
Zarei, M., O. Bozorg-Haddad, S. Baghban, M. Delpasand, E. Goharian, and H. A. Loáiciga. 2021. “Machine-learning algorithms for forecast-informed reservoir operation (FIRO) to reduce flood damages.” Sci. Rep. 11 (1): 24295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03699-6.
Zhao, T., X. Cai, and D. Yang. 2011. “Effect of streamflow forecast uncertainty on real-time reservoir operation.” Adv. Water Resour. 34 (4): 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.004.
Zhao, T., and J. Zhao. 2014. “Joint and respective effects of long- and short-term forecast uncertainties on reservoir operations.” J. Hydrol. 517 (Sep): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.063.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150Issue 5May 2024

History

Received: Mar 31, 2023
Accepted: Dec 3, 2023
Published online: Feb 23, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jul 23, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0976-0140. Email: [email protected]
Scott Steinschneider, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share