Case Studies
Mar 23, 2023

Rural and Urban Difference in the Acceptance of Alternative Water Management Strategies: Case Study of Idaho Residents

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149, Issue 6

Abstract

Idaho is one of the fastest-growing states in the US. The stressors of population growth and climate change are increasing the strain on its water resources, emphasizing the need for water management strategies. Public support, however, can vary by a range of factors, including geography. This study aims to assess the rural and urban distinctions of support for water resource management. In 2014, 401 people from Idaho’s general public responded to an online survey, with 375 of the respondents georeferenced into three groups: urban areas; urban clusters (small towns); and rural. The responses showed similarities in support among the groups; however, there were some notable differences. Water conservation received the most support for all groups, but there was a significant difference around land use regulations. The majority of respondents supported land use regulations, with urban clusters having the highest level of support. These findings can assist water managers throughout the United States with respect to recognizing public preferences in different geographies of residence.

Practical Applications

The findings from this study are relevant to water managers and decision-makers as they develop strategies to address water shortages. Results show that individuals in rural and urban communities alike share strong support for water conservation, including the reuse of water. Land use planning and regulation can be controversial; however, there is support to regulate development in order to protect water resources. Elected officials, decision-makers, and managers should understand that, on the surface, it may appear there is strong support for the development of new infrastructure, including dams and pipelines, but the results here show that support all but dries up when these efforts involve moving water from one community to another. Overall, this study showed that individuals in rural and urban communities support water conservation and land use planning to address water shortages. They do not, however, support the transfer, sale, or movement of water from one area to another. This is relevant, as water transfers are increasingly being used in the West to address water shortages. Most importantly, water managers and elected officials need understand that, when it comes to water, rural and urban communities are more alike than different.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (data used in Tables 2 and 3).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Reese Randall, Dr. Jillian Moroney, Dr. Vanessa Fry, and Dr. Eric Lindquist for their assistance. Funding provided by Boise State University.

References

Anderson, J. E. 2014. Public policymaking. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Attari, S. Z. 2014. “Perceptions of water use.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (14): 5129–5134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316402111.
Awad, K., A. Maas, and C. Wardropper. 2021. “Preferences for alternative water supplies in the Pacific Northwest: A discrete choice experiment.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (4): 04021007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001342.
Bates, S. 2012. “Bridging the governance gap: Emerging strategies to integrate water and land use planning.” Nat. Resour. J. 52 (1): 61–97.
BBC Research. 2013. Public opinions, attitudes and awareness regarding water in Colorado. Denver: Colorado Water Conservation Board.
Bell, M. 1992. “The fruit of difference: The rural-urban continuum as a system of identity.” Rural Sociol. 57 (1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00457.x.
Braga, B. P. F. 2001. “Integrated urban water resources management: A challenge into the 21st century.” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 17 (4): 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620120094127.
Brown, D. L., and K. A. Schafft. 2011. Rural people and communities in the 21st century: Resilience and transformation. Malden, MA: Polity.
Callison, C., and D. Holland. 2017. “Impact of political identity and past crisis experience on water attitudes.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 161 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2017.3249.x.
Cattaneo, A., A. Adukia, D. L. Brown, L. Christiaensen, D. K. Evans, A. Haakenstad, T. McMenomy, M. Partridge, S. Vaz, and D. J. Weiss. 2021. Economic and social development along the urban-rural continuum: New opportunities to inform policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Cromartie, J., and S. Bucholtz. 2008. “Defining the ‘rural’ in rural America.” Amber Waves 6 (3): 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025507.
Crowe, J. 2011. “Rural perceptions of growth management legislation on rural economic development: Welcoming comrade or hostile foe?” Soc. Nat. Resour. 24 (3): 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903580243.
de França Doria, M. 2010. “Factors influencing public perception of drinking water quality.” Water Policy 12 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2009.051.
Dieter, C. A., M. A. Maupin, R. R. Caldwell, M. A. Harris, T. I. Invahnenko, J. K. Lovelace, N. L. Barber, and K. S. Linsey. 2018. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2015. Reston, VA: USGS.
Duram, L. A., and K. G. Brown. 1999. “Insights and applications assessing public participation in U.S. watershed planning initiatives.” Soc. Nat. Resour. 12 (5): 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419299279533.
Fedak, R., S. Sommer, D. Hannon, D. Beckwith, A. Nuding, and L. Stitzer. 2018. Integrating land use and water resources: Planning to support water supply diversification. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Feldman, D. L. 2017. Water politics: Governing our most precious resource. Malden, MA: Polity.
Flint, C. G., X. Dai, D. Jackson-Smith, J. Endter-Wada, S. K. Yeo, R. Hale, and M. K. Dolan. 2017. “Social and geographic contexts of water concerns in Utah.” Soc. Nat. Resour. 30 (8): 885–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1264653.
Garcia-Cuerva, L., E. Z. Berglund, and A. R. Binder. 2016. “Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the US.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 113 (Oct): 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006.
Gardezi, M., and J. G. Arbuckle. 2020. “Techno-optimism and farmers’ attitudes toward climate change adaptation.” Environ. Behav. 52 (1): 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518793482.
Gober, P., K. L. Larson, R. Quay, C. Polsky, H. Chang, and V. Shandas. 2013. “Why land planners and water managers don’t talk to one another and why they should!” Soc. Nat. Resour. 26 (3): 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.713448.
Grafton, R. Q., et al. 2018. “The paradox of irrigation efficiency.” Science 361 (6404): 748–750. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9314.
Hamilton, L. C., C. R. Colocousis, and C. M. Duncan. 2010. “Place effects on environmental views.” Rural Sociol. 75 (2): 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00013.x.
Hou, C., Y. Wen, Y. He, X. Liu, M. Wang, Z. Zhang, and H. Fu. 2021. “Public stereotypes of recycled water end uses with different human contact: Evidence from event-related potential (ERP).” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168 (May): 105464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105464.
Hubbard, M. L. 2020a. “The risky business of water resources management: Assessment of the public’s risk perception of Oregon’s water resources.” Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 26 (7): 1970–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1632167.
Hubbard, M. L. 2020b. “The role of knowledge in water resource management: An assessment of the Oregon general public.” Soc. Sci. J. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782635.
Humes, K., R. Walters, J. Ryu, R. Mahler, and C. Woodruff. 2021. Water report: Idaho climate-economy impacts assessment. Boise, ID: James A. & Louise McClure Center for Public Policy Research.
Idaho Division of Public Health. 2016. 2014 Idaho vital statistics. Boise, ID: Idaho Division of Public Health.
Jezdimirovic, J., and E. Hanak. 2016. How is California spending the water bond? San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Keenan, S. P., R. S. Krannich, and M. S. Walker. 1999. “Public perceptions of water transfers and markets: Describing differences in water use communities.” Soc. Nat. Resour. 12 (4): 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419299279605.
Leach, W. D., and N. W. Pelkey. 2001. “Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 127 (6): 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378).
Leonard, B., C. Costello, and G. D. Libecap. 2019. “Expanding water markets in the Western United States: Barriers and lessons from other natural resource markets.” Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13 (1): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey014.
Lobao, L. 2004. “Continuity and change in place stratification: Spatial inequality and middle-range territorial units.” Rural Sociol. 69 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601104322919883.
Lund, J. R. 2021. “Approaches to planning water resources.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (9). 04021058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001417.
Mayer, A., S. K. Olson-Hazboun, and S. Malin. 2018. “Fracking fortunes: Economic well-being and oil and gas development along the urban-rural continuum.” Rural Sociol. 83 (3): 532–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12198.
McClaran, N., B. K. Behe, P. Huddleston, and R. T. Fernandez. 2020. “Recycled or reclaimed? The effect of terminology on water reuse perceptions.” J. Environ. Manage. 261 (May): 110144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110144.
Metz, D., and M. Everitt. 2018. Washington voter views of wild salmon and snake river dams. Los Angeles: FM3 Research.
Moroney, J. L., and R. Som Castellano. 2018. “Farmland loss and concern in the Treasure Valley.” Agric. Hum. Values 35: 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9847-7.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2019. “Water management.” Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/water/manage/.
OWRD (Oregon Water Resources Department). 2012. Oregon’s integrated water resources strategy executive summary. Salem, OR: OWRD.
Pahl-Wostl, C., G. Holtz, B. Kastens, and C. Knieper. 2010. “Analyzing complex water governance regimes: The management and transition framework.” Environ. Sci. Policy 13 (7): 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006.
Pew Research Center. 2016. The politics of climate. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Pidgeon, N., and B. Fischhoff. 2011. “The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks.” Nat. Clim. Change 1 (1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1080.
Quay, R., K. Lawless, and K. Ryder. 2018. Assessing the connection between land use planning and water resource planning. Tempe, AZ: Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability.
Qviström, M. 2007. “Landscapes out of order: Studying the inner urban fringe beyond the rural–urban divide.” Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. 89 (3): 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00253.x.
Ratcliffe, M., C. Burd, K. Holder, and A. Fields. 2016. Defining rural at the US census bureau. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Redman, S., K. J. Ormerod, and S. Kelley. 2019. “Reclaiming suburbia: Differences in local identity and public perceptions of potable water reuse.” Sustainability 11 (3): 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030564.
Rice, M. L., and D. McCool. 2022. “Collaboration and the criteria for success: A case study and a proposed framework for analysis.” Administration Soc. 54 (4): 714–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211042564.
Rohatyn, S., E. Rotenberg, E. Ramati, F. Tatarinov, E. Tas, and D. Yakir. 2018. “Differential impacts of land use and precipitation on ‘ecosystem water yield’.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (8): 5457–5470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022267.
Rozin, P., B. Haddad, C. Nemeroff, and P. Slovic. 2015. “Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust.” Judgment Decis. Making 10 (1): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000317X.
Scala, D. J., and K. M. Johnson. 2017. “Political polarization along the rural-urban continuum? The geography of the presidential vote, 2000–2016.” Ann. Am. Acad. Political Social Sci. 672 (1): 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217712696.
Slocombe, D. S. 1998. “Defining goals and criteria for ecosystem-based management.” Environ. Manage. 22 (4): 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900121.
Smith, H. M., S. Brouwer, P. Jeffrey, and J. Frijns. 2018. “Public responses to water reuse: Understanding the evidence.” J. Environ. Manage. 207 (Feb): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.021.
Stone, J., M. Costanigro, and C. Goemans. 2018. “Public opinion on Colorado water rights transfers: Are policy preferences consistent with concerns over impacts?” J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 43 (3): 403–422. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.276502.
Tavlian, A. 2020. “What’s happened since Trump visited the Valley? Quite a bit.” The San Joaquin Valley Sun, March 1, 2020.
USACE. 2016. Boise river feasibility study. Walla Walla, WA: USACE.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2017. “New Boise River system feasibility study launched.” Accessed February 18, 2021. https://www.usbr.gov/newsroom/newsrelease/detail.cfm?RecordID=60759.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2020. “Shasta Dam and reservoir enlargement project.” Accessed February 18, 2021. https://www.usbr.gov/mp/ncao/shasta-enlargement.html.
US Census Bureau. 2012. 2010 census of population and housing, population and housing unit counts. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
US Census Bureau. 2014. 2010-2014 American community survey 5-year estimates. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
US Census Bureau. 2017. Idaho is nation’s fastest-growing state, Census Bureau reports. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
US Census Bureau. 2021. “Estimates show slowest growth on record for the nation’s population.” Accessed January 5, 2022. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/2021-population-estimates.html.
USDA. 2019. 2017 census of agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA.
Vaske, J. J. 2008. Survey research and analysis: Application in parks, recreation, and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture.
Welsh, L. W., and J. Endter-Wada. 2017. “Piping water from rural counties to fuel growth in Las Vegas, NV: Water transfer risks in the arid USA West.” Water Altern. 10 (2): 420–426.
Wittenberg, A. 2019. “Lawmakers spar over Western woes.” E&E News, April 3, 2019.
Wolters, E. A., and M. L. Hubbard. 2014. “Oregon water: Assessing differences between the old and new wests.” Social Sci. J. 51 (2): 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.10.013.
Womble, P., and W. M. Hanemann. 2020. “Water markets, water courts, and transaction costs in Colorado.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (4): e2019WR025507. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025507.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149Issue 6June 2023

History

Received: Aug 2, 2021
Accepted: Jan 21, 2023
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, School of Public Service, Boise State Univ., 1910 University Dr., Boise, ID 83725 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-313X. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Sociology, Boise State Univ., 910 University Dr., Boise, ID 83725. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4219-0714. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share