Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2024

Autonomous Vehicle–Pedestrian Interaction Modeling Platform: A Case Study in Four Major Cities

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150, Issue 9

Abstract

Accurately evaluating the safety effects of autonomous vehicles (AVs) has become more pressing with the increased adoption rate of AVs. This study utilizes a multiagent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (MAAIRL) framework for modeling the interactions between AVs and pedestrians in four different cities: Boston, Las Vegas, Pittsburgh, and Singapore. Multiagent actor-critic with Kronecker factors deep reinforcement learning (MACK DRL), a paradigm that extends deep reinforcement learning (DRL), was used to model the behavior of both AVs and pedestrians and to determine their policies and collision avoidance strategies. Simulated trajectories are compared to actual trajectories and the results are evaluated to analyze the behavior of both AVs and pedestrians in terms of their evasive actions such as swerving, accelerating, or decelerating. The multiagent model provides a more comprehensive insight into how road users act in situations of conflict and accounts for changes in the environment. The study also shows that the level of competition between AVs and pedestrians varies significantly across different cities. Las Vegas has the most competitive relationship between AVs and pedestrians, while Singapore has the least competitive environment. The study also highlights the importance of cooperative behavior, particularly in yielding to pedestrians, in reducing the level of competition between AVs and pedestrians. In summary, this research provides valuable insights into the behavior of AVs and pedestrians and can be used to inform the development of more efficient and safe autonomous mobility systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Alozi, A. R., and M. Hussein. 2022. “Evaluating the safety of autonomous vehicle–pedestrian interactions: An extreme value theory approach.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 35 (Sep): 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2022.100230.
Alozi, A. R., and M. Hussein. 2023. “Active road user interactions with autonomous vehicles: Proactive safety assessment.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2677 (7): 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221151032.
Alsaleh, R., and T. Sayed. 2020. “Modeling pedestrian-cyclist interactions in shared space using inverse reinforcement learning.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 70 (Apr): 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.02.007.
Alsaleh, R., and T. Sayed. 2021. “Markov-game modeling of cyclist-pedestrian interactions in shared spaces: A multi-agent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning approach.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 128 (Jul): 103191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103191.
Alsaleh, R., and T. Sayed. 2022. “Microscopic modeling of cyclists interactions with pedestrians in shared spaces: A Gaussian process inverse reinforcement learning approach.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 18 (3): 828–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2021.1898487.
Amundsen, F. H., and C. Hyden. 1977. “Traffic conflict technique—Status in Norway.” In Proc., 1st Workshop on Traffic Conflicts. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Armstrong, A., M. Shoman, V. Mandal, S. Davami, Y. Adu-Gyamfi, and A. Sharma. 2021. “A vision-based system for traffic anomaly detection using deep learning and decision trees.” In Vol. 202 of Proc., IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, 4207–4212. New York: IEEE.
Beauchamp, É., H. Nishiuchi, and M. Cloutier. 2022. “Study of automated shuttle interactions in city traffic using surrogate measures of safety.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 135 (Feb): 103465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103465.
Bhattacharyya, R., B. Wulfe, D. Phillips, J. Kuefler, J. Morton, R. Senanayake, and M. Kochenderfer. 2020. Modeling human driving behavior through generative adversarial imitation learning.” Preprint, submitted March 14, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06412.
Blue, V. J., and J. L. Adler. 2001. “Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 35 (3): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00052-1.
Caesar, H., et al. 2021. “NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehicles.” Preprint, submitted June 22, 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11810.
Caliendo, C., and M. Guida. 2012. “Microsimulation approach for predicting crashes at unsignalized intersections using traffic conflicts.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (12): 1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000473.
Chowdhury, M., and K. Dey. 2016. “Intelligent transportation systems—A frontier for breaking boundaries of traditional academic engineering disciplines.” IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 8 (1): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2015.2503199.
Cohen, J., E. J. Dearnaley, and C. E. M. Hansel. 1955. “The risk taken in crossing a road.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 6 (3): 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1955.15.
Connor, S. 2016. “First self-driving cars will be unmarked so that other drivers don’t try to bully them.” Accessed January 3, 2023 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/30/volvo-self-driving-car-autonomous.
Das, S. 2021. “Autonomous vehicle safety: Understanding perceptions of pedestrians and bicyclists.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 81 (Aug): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.018.
Dias, C., M. Iryo-Asano, H. Nishiuchi, and T. Todoroki. 2018. “Calibrating a social force based model for simulating personal mobility vehicles and pedestrian mixed traffic.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 87 (Sep): 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.08.002.
El-Basyouny, K., and T. Sayed. 2013. “Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts.” Saf. Sci. 51 (1): 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015.
Emory, K., F. Douma, and J. Cao. 2022. “Autonomous vehicle policies with equity implications: Patterns and gaps.” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 13 (Mar): 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100521.
Essa, M., and T. Sayed. 2015. “Simulated traffic conflicts: Do they accurately represent field-measured conflicts?” Transp. Res. Rec. 2514 (1): 48–57. https://doi.org/10.3141/2514-06.
Favarò, F., S. Eurich, and N. Nader. 2018. “Autonomous vehicles’ disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 110 (Jan): 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.001.
Finn, C., S. Levine, and P. Abbeel. 2016. “Guided cost learning: Deep inverse optimal control via policy optimization.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 33rd Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, ICML 2016, 95–107. London: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research.
Fu, J., K. Luo, and S. Levine. 2017. “Learning robust rewards with adversarial inverse reinforcement learning.” Preprint, submitted October 30, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.11248.
Goodfellow, I., J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. 2014. “Generative adversarial networks.” Commun. ACM 63 (11): 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622.
Guéguen, N., S. Meineri, and C. Eyssartier. 2015. “A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: A field experiment at the pedestrian crossing.” Saf. Sci. 75 (Jun): 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.018.
Guo, Y., M. Essa, T. Sayed, M. M. Haque, and S. Washington. 2019. “A comparison between simulated and field-measured conflicts for safety assessment of signalized intersections in Australia.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 101 (Apr): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.009.
Hamed, M. M. 2001. “Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings.” Saf. Sci. 38 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00058-8.
Harrell, W. A. 1991. “Factors influencing pedestrian cautiousness in crossing streets.” J. Soc. Psychol. 131 (3): 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9713863.
Heijden, V., S. Dietzel, T. Leinmüller, and F. Kargl. 2019. “Survey on misbehavior detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems.” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 21 (1): 779–811. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2873088.
Huang, F., P. Liu, H. Yu, and W. Wang. 2013. “Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prevent. 50 (Jan): 1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.018.
Hubmann, C., J. Schulz, M. Becker, D. Althoff, and C. Stiller. 2018. “Automated driving in uncertain environments: Planning with interaction and uncertain maneuver prediction.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 3 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2017.2788208.
Hulse, L. M., H. Xie, and E. R. Galea. 2018. “Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age.” Saf. Sci. 102 (Feb): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001.
Iryo-Asano, M., and W. K. M. Alhajyaseen. 2017. “Modeling pedestrian crossing speed profiles considering speed change behavior for the safety assessment of signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prevent. 108 (Nov): 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.028.
Ishaque, M. M., and R. B. Noland. 2008. “Behavioural issues in pedestrian speed choice and street crossing behaviour: A review.” Transp. Rev. 28 (1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701365239.
Jiang, X., W. Wang, K. Bengler, and W. Guo. 2015. “Analyses of pedestrian behavior on mid-block unsignalized crosswalk comparing Chinese and German cases.” Adv. Mech. Eng. 7 (11): 168781401561046. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015610468.
Lanzaro, G., T. Sayed, and R. Alsaleh. 2022. “Modeling motorcyclist–pedestrian near misses: A multiagent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning approach.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 36 (6): 04022038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001053.
Lanzaro, G., T. Sayed, and C. Fu. 2023. “A comparison of pedestrian behavior in interactions with autonomous and human-driven vehicles: An extreme value theory approach.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 99 (Nov): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.006.
Lee, S., K. M. Jang, N. Kang, J. Kim, M. Oh, and Y. Kim. 2022. “Redesigning urban elements and structures considering autonomous vehicles: Preparing design strategies for wide implementation cities.” Cities 123 (Apr): 103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103595.
Madigan, R., T. Louw, M. Dziennus, T. Graindorge, E. Ortega, M. Graindorge, and N. Merat. 2019. “Understanding interactions between automated road transport systems and other road users: A video analysis.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 66 (Oct): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006.
Moody, J., N. Bailey, and J. Zhao. 2020. “Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison.” Saf. Sci. 121 (Jan): 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.022.
Nagel, K., and M. Schreckenberg. 1992. “A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic.” J. Phys. I 2 (12): 2221–2229. https://doi.org/10.1051/jp1:1992277.
Nasernejad, P., T. Sayed, and R. Alsaleh. 2023. “Multiagent modeling of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 19 (3): 2061081. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2022.2061081.
Ng, A. Y., and S. J. Russell. 2000. “Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning.” In Proc., ICML. San Marcos, CA: ACM Digital Library.
Nuñez Velasco, J. P., H. Farah, B. Van Arem, and M. P. Hagenzieker. 2019. “Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 66 (Oct): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.015.
Radtke, H., H. Bey, M. Sackmann, and T. Schön. 2023. “Predicting driver behavior on the highway with multi-agent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning.” In Proc., 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV), 1–8. New York: IEEE.
Rahman, M., K. Dey, S. Das, and M. Sherfinski. 2021. “Sharing the road with autonomous vehicles: A qualitative analysis of the perceptions of pedestrians and bicyclists.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 78 (Apr): 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.008.
Rasouli, A., I. Kotseruba, and J. K. Tsotsos. 2017. “Are they going to cross? A benchmark dataset and baseline for pedestrian crosswalk behavior.” In Proc., 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW). New York: IEEE.
Razmi Rad, S., G. Homem de Almeida Correia, and M. Hagenzieker. 2020. “Pedestrians’ road crossing behaviour in front of automated vehicles: Results from a pedestrian simulation experiment using agent-based modeling.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 69 (Feb): 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.014.
Rodríguez Palmeiro, A., S. van der Kint, L. Vissers, H. Farah, J. de Winter, and M. Hagenzieker. 2018. “Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment.” Transp. Res. Part F 58 (Oct): 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.020.
Sayed, T., and S. Zein. 1999. “Traffic conflict standards for intersections.” Transp. Plann. Technol. 22 (4): 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069908717634.
Schneemann, F., and I. Gohl. 2016. “Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments.” In Proc., 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.018.
Shoman, M., M. Amo-Boateng, and Y. Adu-Gyamfi. 2022. “Multi-purpose, multi-step deep learning framework for network-level traffic flow prediction.” Adv. Data Sci. Adaptive Anal. 14 (03n04): 2250010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X24500013.
So, J., B. Park, S. M. Wolfe, and G. Dedes. 2015. “Development and validation of a vehicle dynamics integrated traffic simulation environment assessing surrogate safety.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (5): 04014080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000403.
Song, J., H. Ren, S. Ermon, and D. Sadigh. 2018. “Multi-agent generative adversarial imitation learning.” In Vol. 32 of Proc., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Šucha, M. 2014. “Road users’ strategies and communication: Driver pedestrian interaction.” In Proc., 5th Conference Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment. Paris: Transport Research Arena.
Sutton, R. S., and A. G. Barto. 2018. “Reinforcement learning: An introduction.” In IEEE transactions on neural networks. New York: IEEE.
Tageldin, A., and T. Sayed. 2019. “Models to evaluate the severity of pedestrian—Vehicle conflicts in five cities.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 15 (2): 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1477853.
Toghi, B., R. Valiente, D. Sadigh, R. Pedarsani, and Y. P. Fallah. 2021. “Altruistic maneuver planning for cooperative autonomous vehicles using multi-agent advantage actor-critic.” Preprint, submitted July 12, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05664.
Willis, A., N. Gjersoe, C. Havard, J. Kerridge, and R. Kukla. 2004. “Human movement behaviour in urban spaces: Implications for the design and modelling of effective pedestrian environments.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 31 (6): 805–828. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3060.
Woodman, R., K. Lu, M. D. Higgins, S. Brewerton, P. A. Jennings, and S. Birrell. 2019. “Gap acceptance study of pedestrians crossing between platooning autonomous vehicles in a virtual environment.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 67 (Nov): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.017.
Wu, Y., E. Mansimov, S. Liao, R. Grosse, and J. Ba. 2017. “Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximation.” In Vol. 30 of Proc., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yang, J., W. Deng, J. Wang, Q. Li, and Z. Wang. 2006. “Modeling pedestrians’ road crossing behavior in traffic system micro-simulation in China.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 40 (3): 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.001.
Yu, L., J. Song, and S. Ermon. 2019. “Multi-agent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 7194–7201. London: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research.
Zheng, L., T. Sayed, and F. Mannering. 2021. “Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review of analytic methods and future directions.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 29 (Mar): 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2020.100142.
Ziebart, B. D., A. L. Maas, J. A. Bagnell, and A. K. Dey. 2008. “Maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning.” In Proc., 23rd AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 1433–1438. Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 150Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: May 23, 2023
Accepted: Mar 22, 2024
Published online: Jun 18, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-071X. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Gabriel Lanzaro [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]
Tarek Sayed [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]
Suliman Gargoum [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share