Technical Papers
Sep 4, 2023

Pedestrian Waiting Delay at Signalized Midblock Crosswalks under Mixed Traffic Conditions

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149, Issue 11

Abstract

This study proposes a new approach for measuring field pedestrian waiting delay and developed a new pedestrian waiting delay model for signalized midblock crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. Eight signalized midblock crosswalks were selected in the southern part of India, and data were collected using videographic technique. Pedestrian characteristics, cycle time, and phase lengths were extracted using frame-by-frame extraction technique with a least count of 0.03 s. In the current study, field pedestrian waiting delay was measured by plotting queue length against cycle time. The proposed approach was validated using the conventional approach for measuring field waiting delay. A new pedestrian waiting delay model was developed for signalized midblock crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. Two new coefficients, i.e., the coefficient of nonuniform arrival rate (Δ1) and the coefficient of noncompliance behavior (Δ2), were incorporated into the existing Webster delay model. The former is modeled using regression analysis, and the latter is calculated as the proportion of violators. The proposed pedestrian waiting delay model was validated with the field waiting delay. The proposed new approach for measuring field waiting delay had an error of 5% compared with the conventional approach for measuring waiting delay. Hence the proposed approach for measuring pedestrian waiting can replace the conventional method for measuring field waiting delay because the new method minimizes the data extraction time. The proposed pedestrian delay model was found to be accurate in estimating the pedestrian waiting delay at signalized midblock crosswalks. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) value of the new pedestrian waiting delay was found to be less than 12%. The proposed waiting delay model can be used to define the level of service (LOS) at signalized midblock crosswalks, and will aid traffic engineers and urban planners in improving pedestrian facilities and safety.

Practical Applications

This paper presents a new approach for measuring field waiting delay and a new pedestrian waiting delay model that addresses the nonuniform and noncompliance behavior of pedestrians at signalized midblock crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. The proposed methodology of field waiting delay minimizes the data extraction time and effort required to measure the field waiting delay. This method eliminates tracing individual pedestrian’s arrivals and departures for the calculation of field waiting delay. The average pedestrian waiting delay is computed using the pedestrian queue length calculated for every subphase interval i. The researchers and other academicians who are working on pedestrian safety and delay models can use the proposed methodology to measure the actual field waiting delay of pedestrians. The time and supervision required for the pedestrian data extraction by the proposed method are comparatively less than those of the conventional method. In addition to the new field waiting delay technique, a new pedestrian waiting delay model is proposed in this. The new waiting delay model considers the conditions of signalized midblock crosswalks by addressing the longer duration of the pedestrian red phase and the nonuniform arrival pattern and noncompliance behavior of pedestrians. The proposed method estimates pedestrian waiting delay accurately for signalized midblock crosswalk conditions. It can be a useful tool for decision makers and planners for assessing the conditions of signalized midblock facilities and improving them to enhance the safety of pedestrians.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Traffic Police department, Hyderabad, India, for their assistance in collecting data, and the Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi, India, and Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, for granting funding for the research. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for providing key input for the improvement of manuscript.

References

Abley, S., D. Smith, and S. Rendall. 2015. Development of the Australasian pedestrian facility selection tool. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Austroads.
Akçelik, R. 1995. Signal timing analysis for vehicle-actuated control. Canberra, Australia: Australian Road Research Board.
Akyol, G., I. G. Erdagi, M. A. Silgu, and H. B. Celikoglu. 2020. “Adaptive signal control to enhance effective green times for pedestrians: A case study.” Transp. Res. Procedia 47 (Jan): 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.150.
Akyol, G., M. A. Silgu, and H. B. Celikoglu. 2019. “Pedestrian-friendly traffic signal control using Eclipse SUMO.” In Proc., SUMO User Conf. Manchester, UK: EasyChair.
Ali Silgu, M., G. Akyol, and H. Berk Celikoglu. 2020. “Analysis on pedestrian green time period: Preliminary findings from a case study.” In Proc., Computer Aided Systems Theory–EUROCAST 2019: 17th Int. Conf. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Braun, R. R., and M. F. Roddin. 1978. Quantifying the benefits of separating pedestrians and vehicles. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Cai, L., and J. Chen. 2013. “Model of pedestrian delay differences between exclusive pedestrian phase and car-shared pedestrian phase.” In Proc., ICTE 2013: Safety, Speediness, Intelligence, Low-Carbon, Innovation, 2162–2168. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chaudhari, A., N. Gore, S. Arkatkar, G. Joshi, and S. Pulugurtha. 2020. “Pedestrian crossing warrants for urban midblock crossings under mixed-traffic environment.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 146 (5): 04020031. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000338.
Chen, K.-M., X.-Q. Luo, H. Ji, and Y.-D. Zhao. 2010. “Towards the pedestrian delay estimation at intersections under vehicular platoon caused conflicts.” Sci. Res. Essays 5 (9): 941–947.
Chen, W., F. Zhu, X. Shi, and Z. Ye. 2022. “Modeling the pedestrian delay at signalized intersections with two-stage crossing: Considering physical queuing length.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 148 (11): 04022099. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000753.
Chilukuri, V., and M. R. Virkler. 2005. “Validation of HCM pedestrian delay model for interrupted facilities.” J. Transp. Eng. 131 (12): 939–945. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:12(939).
Chowdhury, T. A., T. Islam, A. A. Mujahid, and M. B. Ahmed. 2021. “The periodicity of the accuracy of numerical integration methods for the solution of different engineering problems.” J. Eng. Adv. 2 (4): 203–216. https://doi.org/10.38032/jea.2021.04.006.
Hussein, M., T. Sayed, P. Reyad, and L. Kim. 2015. “Automated pedestrian safety analysis at a signalized intersection in New York City: Automated data extraction for safety diagnosis and behavioral study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2519 (1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2519-03.
Jain, U., and R. Rastogi. 2018. “Development of guidelines for the selection of pedestrian crossing facilities—A relook on IRC: 103-2012.” J. Indian Roads Congr. 79 (4): 39–48.
Kruszyna, M., P. Mackiewicz, and A. Szydlo. 2006. “Influence of pedestrians’ entry process on pedestrian delays at signal-controlled crosswalks.” J. Transp. Eng. 132 (11): 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:11(855).
Kutela, B., and H. H. Teng. 2020. “Assessment of methodological alternatives for modeling the spatiotemporal crossing compliance of pedestrians at signalized midblock crosswalks.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 146 (2): 04019062. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000300.
Lawrence, K. D., and M. D. Geurts. 2006. Advances in business and management forecasting. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Li, Q., Z. Wang, J. Yang, and J. Wang. 2005. “Pedestrian delay estimation at signalized intersections in developing cities.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 39 (1): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.11.002.
Lipovac, K., M. Vujanic, B. Maric, and M. Nesic. 2013. “Pedestrian behavior at signalized pedestrian crossings.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (2): 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000491.
Manthirikul, S., V. T. Amshala, and U. Jain. 2022a. “Modeling vehicular and pedestrian delays at signalized midblock crosswalk under mixed traffic conditions.” Transp. Lett. 15 (1): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.2019487.
Manthirikul, S., U. Jain, and V. T. Amshala. 2022b. “A critical review of grade-separated pedestrian crossing facilities.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 148 (10): 03122003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000711.
Manthirikul, S., U. Jain, A. Saha, and S. Marisamynathan. 2023. “Comparison of pedestrian delay models at signalized midblock crossings under mixed traffic conditions.” Transp. Res. Procedia 69 (Jan): 894–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.250.
Marisamynathan, S., and P. Vedagiri. 2018. “A new approach to estimate pedestrian delay at signalized intersections.” Transport 33 (1): 249–259. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2016.1158208.
Mettle, F. O., E. N. Quaye, L. Asiedu, and K. A. Darkwah. 2016. “A proposed method for numerical integration.” J. Adv. Math. Comput. Sci. 17 (1): 1–15.
Nagraj, R., and P. Vedagiri. 2013. “Modeling pedestrian delay and level of service at signalized intersection crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2394 (1): 70–76. https://doi.org/10.3141/2394-09.
Oh, H., and V. P. Sisiopiku. 2000. “Probabilistic models for pedestrian capacity and delay at roundabouts.” In Vol. 27 of Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity, 459–470. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
OriginLab. 2021a. “Bradley.” Accessed April 26, 2022. https://www.originlab.com/doc/Origin-Help/Bradley-FitFunc#Function.
Sadeghpour, M., K. Sanajou, and K. S. Öğüt. 2017. “Determination of pedestrian arrival headway distribution at signalized crosswalks in Istanbul.” Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 8 (4): 325–337.
Saha, A., S. Chandra, and I. Ghosh. 2017. “Delay at signalized intersections under mixed traffic conditions.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 143 (8): 04017041. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000070.
Sastry, S. S. 2012. Introductory methods of numerical analysis. New Delhi, India: PHI Learning.
Sheng, F., Y. F. Ma, and J. Lu. 2012. “Research on pedestrian crossing characteristics of mid-block crosswalks controlled by push-button signal.” In Proc., CICTP 2012: Multimodal Transportation Systems—Convenient, Safe, Cost-Effective, Efficient, 520–532. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Tall, D. 1986. “A graphical approach to integration and the fundamental theorem.” Math. Teach. 113: 48–51.
Tang, L., Y. Liu, J. Li, R. Qi, S. Zheng, B. Chen, and H. Yang. 2020. “Pedestrian crossing design and analysis for symmetric intersections: Efficiency and safety.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 142 (Dec): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.012.
Transportation Research Board. 2010. Highway capacity manual. 5th ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academies Press.
Transportation Research Board. 2016. Highway capacity manual: A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academies Press.
Virkler, M. R. 1998. “Pedestrian compliance effects on signal delay.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1636 (1): 88–91. https://doi.org/10.3141/1636-14.
Wang, X., and Z. Tian. 2010. “Pedestrian delay at signalized intersections with a two-stage crossing design.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2173 (1): 133–138. https://doi.org/10.3141/2173-16.
Webster, F. V. 1958. Traffic signal settings. London: Road Research Laboratory.
Wei, D., H. Liu, and Z. Tian. 2015. “Vehicle delay estimation at unsignalised pedestrian crosswalks with probabilistic yielding behaviour.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Sci. 11 (2): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2014.928758.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149Issue 11November 2023

History

Received: May 20, 2022
Accepted: Jun 29, 2023
Published online: Sep 4, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 4, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440010, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-1312. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440010, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-9060. Email: [email protected]
Sankaran Marisamynathan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Trichy, Tamil Nadu 620015, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share