Technical Papers
Nov 14, 2022

Optimally Locating Weigh-in-Motion Stations and Truck-Prohibited Roads for Mitigating the Impact of Overweight Trucks

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

Weigh-in-motion (WIM) stations are effective but expensive tools for the monitoring and enforcement of truck weight regulations. Faced with the increasing challenges of maintaining highways with ever shrinking financial resources, traffic authorities may need to couple WIM stations with other cost-effective measures for regulating truck weights. This study explores the idea of integrating WIM stations and truck-prohibited roads to reduce the impact of overloaded trucks on highway pavements and bridges. The problem of optimally locating WIM stations and truck-prohibited roads is formulated as a bilevel programming model. The upper-level model mimics the decision-making behavior of the traffic authority, whose aim is to determine the optimal locations for the deployment of WIM stations and the selection of truck-prohibited roads so as to minimize the total cost while considering route choices of overweight trucks. The lower-level models are used to determine the least cost paths for the overweight trucks of different origin–destination (OD) pairs in response to the authority’s decisions in the upper-level model. A heuristic that iteratively solves the upper-level and the lower-level models is developed to efficiently solve the bilevel model, which is characterized as NP-hard. The proposed model and heuristic were evaluated using test instances generated based on the Nevada road network. The results demonstrate the advantage of using hybrid or multiple enforcement measures to prevent damage to the road network by overweight trucks in comparison with the traditional WIM-only approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants (MOST-110-2221-E-008-025-MY3 and MOST-110-2221-E-008-026) from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

References

AlGadhi, S. A. 2002. “Optimizing truck weigh stations’ locations on the highway network of Saudi Arabia.” J. King Saud Univ. 14 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30750-5.
Bard, J. F. 1998. Practical bilevel optimization: Applications and algorithms. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Bard, J. F., and J. E. Falk. 1982. “An explicit solution to the multilevel programming problem.” Comput. Oper. Res. 9 (1): 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(82)90007-7.
Barnes, G., and P. Langworthy. 2003. The per-mile costs of operating automobiles and trucks. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota.
Besinovic, N., N. Markovia, and P. Schonfeld. 2013. “Optimal allocation of truck inspection stations based on k-shortest paths.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 92th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Chou, C. P., and Y. H. Chen. 2002. “Recent development and implementation of weigh-in-motion in some Asian countries.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Weigh-in-Motion (ICWIM3). Ames, IA: Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State Univ. Orlando, FL.
Colson, B., P. Marcotte, and G. Savard. 2005. “Bilevel programming: A survey.” 4OR 3 (2): 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-005-0071-0.
Cottrell, B. H., Jr. 1992. The avoidance of weigh stations in Virginia by overweight trucks. Technical Rep. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Dey, K., M. Chowdhury, W. Pang, B. Putman, and L. Chen. 2014. “Estimation of pavement and bridge damage costs due to overweight trucks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2411 (1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.3141/2411-08.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2007. Effective use of weigh-in-motion data: The Netherlands case study. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Filippi, F., A. Nuzzolo, A. Comi, and P. Delle Site. 2010. “Ex-ante assessment of urban freight transport policies.” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 2 (3): 6332–6342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.042.
Forkenbrock, D. J. 1999. “External costs of intercity truck freight transportation.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 33 (7–8): 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00068-8.
Gao, Z., H. Sun, and L. Shan. 2004. “A continuous equilibrium network design model and algorithm for transit systems.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 38 (3): 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00011-0.
Han, L. D., S.-S. Ko, Z. Gu, and M. K. Jeong. 2012. “Adaptive weigh-in-motion algorithms for truck weight enforcement.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 24 (Oct): 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.01.010.
Holguín-Veras, J., C. A. Torres, and B. Xuegang. 2013. “On the comparative performance of urban delivery vehicle classes.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 9 (1): 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.523029.
Jacob, B., and H. van Loo. 2008. “Weigh-in-motion for enforcement in Europe.” In Proc., Fifth Int. Conf. on Weigh-In-Motion. New York: Wiley.
Jacon, B., and V. F. Beaumelle. 2010. “Improving truck safety: Potential of weigh-in-motion technology.” IATSS Res. 34 (1): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2010.06.003.
Jeroslow, R. G. 1985. “The polynomial hierarchy and a simple model for competitive analysis.” Math. Program. 32 (2): 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01586088.
LeBlanc, L. J., and D. E. Boyce. 1986. “A bilevel programming algorithm for exact solution of the network design problem with user-optimal flows.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 20 (3): 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(86)90021-4.
Lu, C. C., X. Zhou, and K. Zhang. 2013. “Dynamic origin-destination demand flow estimation under congested traffic conditions.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 34 (Sep): 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.05.006.
Lu, C.-C., S. Yan, H.-C. Ko, and H.-J. Chen. 2018. “A bilevel model with a solution algorithm for locating weigh-in-motion stations.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19 (2): 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2696046.
Lu, Q., J. Harvey, T. Le, J. Lea, R. Quinley, D. Redo, and J. Avis. 2002. Truck traffic analysis using weigh-in-motion (WIM) data in California. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Lyons, L., A. Lozano, F. Granados, and A. Guzmán. 2017. “Impacts of time restriction on heavy truck corridors: The case study of Mexico City.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 102 (Aug): 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.012.
Lyons, L., A. Lozano, F. Granados, A. Guzmán, and J. P. Antún. 2012. “Impact of the recent environmental policies on the freight transportation in Mexico City.” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 39 (Jan): 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.120.
Mahmoudabadi, A., and S. M. Seyedhosseini. 2013. “Improving the efficiency of weigh in motion systems through optimized allocating truck checking oriented procedure.” IATSS Res. 36 (2): 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.08.002.
Markovic, N., I. O. Ryzhov, and P. Schonfeld. 2015. “Evasive flow capture: Optimal location of weigh-in-motion systems, tollbooths, and security checkpoints.” Networks 65 (1): 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21581.
Markovic, N., I. O. Ryzhov, and P. Schonfeld. 2017. “Evasive flow capture: A multi-period stochastic facility location problem with independent demand.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 257 (2): 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.020.
Martin, A., V. Keathley, J. Kissick, and J. Walton. 2014. Coordinating the use and location of weigh-in-motion technology for Kentucky. Lexington, KY: Univ. of Kentucky.
Mirchandani, P. B., R. Rebello, and A. Agnetis. 1995. “The inspection station location problem in hazardous material transportation: Some heuristics and bounds.” INFOR: Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 33 (2): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1995.11732271.
Nakamura, Y., E. Taniguchi, T. Yamada, and N. A. Ando. 2008. “Macroscopic traffic simulator for evaluating urban transport measures for heavy vehicles.” In Innovations in city logistics, edited by E. Taniguchi and R. Thompson, 185–196. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Quak, H., and M. De Koster. 2007. “Exploring retailers’ sensitivity to local sustainability policies.” J. Oper. Manage. 25 (6): 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.020.
Šelmi´c, M., N. Bešinovi´c, and D. Teodorovi´c. 2011. “Locating weigh-in-motion checkpoints in traffic networks using genetic algorithm.” E-Soc. J. 2 (1): 55–66.
Stephens, J., and J. Carson. 2003. An evaluation of Montana’s state truck activities reporting system (STARS). Missoula, MT: Montana DOT.
Sujon, M., and F. Dai. 2021. “Application of weigh-in-motion technologies for pavement and bridge response monitoring: State-of-the-art review.” Autom. Constr. 130 (Oct): 103844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103844.
Szary, J., and A. Maher. 2009. Implementation of weigh-in-motion (WIM) systems. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Szeto, W., and Y. Jiang. 2014. “Transit route and frequency design: Bi-level modeling and hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm approach.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 67 (Sep): 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.05.008.
TRB (Transportation Research Board) and National Research Council. 1990. Truck weight limits: Issues and options, committee for the truck weight study. Washington, DC: TRB.
Wei, T., and J. D. Fricker. 2003. Weigh-in-motion data checking and imputation. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Yang, H., and M. G. H. Bell. 1997. “Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 31 (4): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00030-6.
Yang, H., T. Sasaki, Y. Iida, and Y. Asakura. 1992. “Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 26 (6): 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(92)90008-K.
Yu, B., L. Kong, Y. Sun, B. Yao, and Z. Gao. 2015. “A bi-level programming for bus lane network design.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 55 (Jun): 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.014.
Zhou, X., and H. S. Mahmassani. 2006. “Dynamic OD demand estimation using automatic vehicle identification data.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 (1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2006.869629.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 149Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Apr 7, 2022
Accepted: Sep 14, 2022
Published online: Nov 14, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 14, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Transportation and Logistics Management, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ., 1001 Da-Hsueh Rd., Hsinchu 300, Taiwan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-4193. Email: [email protected]
Shangyao Yan [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Central Univ., 300 Zhongda Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Tzu-Hao Chen [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Central Univ., 300 Zhongda Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share