Abstract

This paper provides an observational before/after evaluation of the safety effects of edge-lane road (ELR) (also known as advisory bike lanes or advisory shoulders) installations in the United States. An ELR is a class of roadway that supports two-way automobile traffic within a single center lane and vulnerable road users (VRUs), i.e., bicyclists or pedestrians, in the edge lanes on either side. The use of a single lane by automobile users traveling in both directions is often a cause of potential safety concerns among the general public. This study employs a project-level empirical Bayes (EB) approach to before/after safety analysis for all US ELR sites where requisite crash data and other relevant characteristics were available. The analysis at 11 sites was performed with 8 years of crash data and more than approximately 60 million motor vehicle trips. Project-level EB analysis based on safety performance functions (SPFs) showed 8 of 11 ELR sites experienced a reduction in crash experience since installation. There was a 44% reduction in crashes among all sites compared to the expected crashes on the traditional two-lane two-way design that existed before ELR installation. This estimation assumed the calibration factor for all SPFs used in the EB analysis was 1.0. Because of the geographical spread of the ELRs being analyzed in this study, estimation of specific calibration factors for all 11 sites was beyond the scope of this work. To address this limitation, we conservatively assumed the SPF calibration factors to be 0.50 for locations for which calibration factors were not available. This assumption was made for 7 of the 11 sites. Even with this conservative assumption, the ELRs were estimated to have a 36% crash reduction. The results from this comprehensive evaluation of existing US ELRs should alleviate concerns the general public often has about the safety of ELRs for automobile users.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of a study funded by California SB1 funds provided via the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI). Funding and final editing of a report published by MTI were the only roles performed by MTI on this project. The data collection effort was assisted by the following students: Abigail Matheny, Blake Thomas, Emily Lin, Eza Gaigalas, Ashley Yao, and Jacob Hamada. Help with obtaining crash data on US facilities was kindly provided by Derek Leuer and Ian Saari of the State of Minnesota; Stephen Buckley of Scarborough, Maine; Scott Robinson and Michael Stewart of Bloomington, Indiana; Kelly Campbell of the State of Idaho; and Andrew Hogle of the State of Colorado. Calibration factors for SPFs rural two-lane roads in Maine were provided by Mr. Dennis E. Emidy, who is a safety engineer in the Office of Safety and Mobility at Maine DOT. Dr. Karen Dixon of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute created, and commented on the use of, the spreadsheets that implemented the HSM worksheets used in the EB analysis. Mr. Nick Sauciur provided support for the final formatting of the paper.

References

AASHTO. 2010. Vol. 1 of Highway safety manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Alluri, P., D. Saha, and A. Gan. 2016. “Minimum sample sizes for estimating reliable highway safety manual (HSM) calibration factors.” J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 8 (1): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2014.978963.
Bowen, A. 2022. “Cyclists fear Mira Mesa backlash could derail ‘advisory’ bike lanes elsewhere.” Accessed April 7, 2022. https://www.kpbs.org/news/local/2022/04/06/cyclists-mira-mesa-backlash-advisory-bike-lanes-gold-coast-drive.
City of Portland, Bureau of Transportation. 2010. “Portland bicycle plan for 2030.” Accessed July 20, 2020. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/699453.
CMF Clearinghouse. n.d. “About the star quality rating.” Accessed July 30, 2020. http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/sqr.cfm.
Cycling, Health, and Safety. 2013. “[Research]. International transport forum.”Accessed July 25, 2020. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/cycling-health-safety.pdf.
Dickman, D., et al. 2016. Small town and rural multimodal networks. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Dixon, K. 2012. Vol. 715 of Highway safety manual training materials. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). n.d. “Official rulings.” Accessed July 31, 2020. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/orsearch.asp.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2009. Manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD). Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. “Bicycle facilities and the manual on uniform traffic control devices.” Accessed July 31, 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/mutcd/dashed_bike_lanes.cfm.
Gilpin, J., N. Falbo, and M. Williams. 2017. “Lessons learned: Advisory bike lanes in North America.” Accessed July 20, 2020. https://altaplanning.com/resources/advisory-bike-lanes-north-america/.
Harwood, D. W., K. M. Bauer, K. R. Richard, D. K. Gilmore, J. L. Graham, I. B. Potts, D. J. Torbic, and E. Hauer. 2008. Methodology to predict the safety performance of urban and suburban arterials. NCHRP Rep. No. 17–26. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hauer, E., D. W. Harwood, F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith. 2002. “Estimating safety by the empirical Bayes method: A tutorial.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1784 (1): 126–131. https://doi.org/10.3141/1784-16.
Herbel, S., L. Laing, and C. McGovern. 2010. Highway safety improvement program manual: The focus is results. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Institute for Road Safety Research. 2007. SWOV fact sheet. Leidschendam, Netherlands: Institute for Road Safety Research.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2020. Trip generation manual. 10th ed. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
Kay, J., P. T. Savolainen, T. J. Gates, T. K. Datta, J. Finkelman, and B. Hamadeh. 2015. “Safety impacts of a statewide centerline rumble strip installation program.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2515 (1): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.3141/2515-05.
Montella, A. 2009. “Safety evaluation of curve delineation improvements: Empirical Bayes observational before-and-after study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2103 (1): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.3141/2103-09.
Park, J., and M. Abdel-Aty. 2015. “Development of adjustment functions to assess combined safety effects of multiple treatments on rural two-lane roadways.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 75 (Feb): 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.012.
Saleem, T., R. Srinivasan, and M. Vann. 2021. Updated and regional calibration factors for highway safety manual crash prediction models (2016–2019). Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina.
van der Kooi, R. M., and A. Dijkstra. 2003. Some behavioural effects of non-compulsory (bicycle) lanes on narrow rural roads. Leidschendam, Netherlands: Institute for Road Safety Research.
Williams, M. n.d. “Rural edge lane roads.” Accessed July 22, 2020. https://www.advisorybikelanes.com/rural-edge-lane-roads.html.
Williams, M. M. 2019. “Advisory bike lanes and shoulders: Current status and future possibilities.” Inst. Transp. Eng. ITE J. 89 (12): 44–49.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Sep 19, 2021
Accepted: Jun 2, 2022
Published online: Aug 31, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Principal, Michael Williams Consulting, 411 Ackley Ave. Mt., Shasta, CA 96067. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-9761. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-7932. Email: [email protected]
Marcial Lamera [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo, CA 93407. Email: [email protected]
Aleksandar Bauranov [email protected]
Doctoral Student, Harvard Graduate School of Design, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA 02138. Email: [email protected]
Carole Voulgaris, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning, Harvard Graduate School of Design, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA 02138. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share