Technical Papers
Jul 29, 2022

Safety Effectiveness and the Role of Geometric, Traffic, and Crash History–Related Factors in Converting a Stop-Controlled Intersection to a Miniroundabout

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 10

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on evaluating the safety effectiveness of converting a stop-controlled intersection with a speed limit56.3  km/h (35  mi/h) to a miniroundabout and examining the role of influencing factors on their safety effectiveness in the United States. Crash, traffic volume, and geometry data for 25 miniroundabouts in eight states was collected to conduct before–after analysis using the empirical Bayes (EB) method. In addition, crash and traffic volume data for 723 reference intersections were gathered and used for computing the calibration factors and developing jurisdiction-specific safety performance functions (SPFs). A 19.63% and 60.55% reduction in the number of total crashes and fatal and injury (FI) crashes but an 7.72% increase in property damage only (PDO) crashes was observed when a two-way/one-way stop-controlled (TWSC/OWSC) intersection was converted to a miniroundabout. A 224.76%, 74.30%, and 282.71% increase in the number of total crashes, FI crashes, and PDO crashes was observed when an all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersection was converted to a miniroundabout. Converting a TWSC/OWSC intersection to a miniroundabout has better safety benefits than converting an AWSC intersection to a miniroundabout. The recommended crash modification factors (CMFs) for converting a TWSC/OWSC intersection to a miniroundabout are 0.80, 0.39, and 1.08 for total, FI, and PDO crashes. The recommended CMFs for converting an AWSC intersection to a miniroundabout are 3.25, 1.74, and 3.83 for total, FI, and PDO crashes. The number of crashes in the before period, cross-street traffic volume, speed limit at major street and cross-street, and intersection skewness have a statistically significant influence on the safety effectiveness of miniroundabouts at a 90% confidence level. These findings are useful to researchers and practitioners for conducting safety benefit analysis and making informed decisions pertaining to converting a stop-controlled intersection to a miniroundabout.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the research are available from the authors by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the NCDOT for providing financial support for this project. Special thanks are extended to James H. Dunlop, Joseph E. Hummer, Carrie L. Simpson, Brian Mayhew, Lisa E. Penny, Mustansir A. Kadibhai, Curtis Bradley, and John W. Kirby for providing excellent support, guidance, and valuable inputs for successful completion of this project. The authors acknowledge the support and response from the staff of Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), Iowa Department of Transportation (IOWADOT), Michigan State Police, Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), Washtenaw County Road Commission, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), NCDOT, Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and Highway Safety Information System (HSIS) for sharing data required for this research. They also acknowledge initial efforts by V. R. Duddu and data collection efforts by other graduate students of the IDEAS Center.

Disclaimer

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNC Charlotte) or the NCDOT. The authors are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of either UNC Charlotte, NCDOT, or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) at the time of publication. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

References

AASHTO. 2010. Highway safety manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Austroads. 2015. Improving the performance of safe system infrastructure. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Austroads.
Avelar, R., K. Dixon, and P. Escobar. 2015. “Evaluation of signalized-intersection crash screening methods based on distance from intersection.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2514 (1): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.3141/2514-19.
Brilon, W. 2011. “Studies on roundabouts in Germany: Lessons learned.” In Proc., 3rd Int. TRB-Roundabout Conf. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Cowhig, M. 2019. Traffic safety monitoring report—3 Years. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina DOT.
Delbosc, A., R. Shafi, D. Wanninayake, and J. Mascaro. 2017. “Understanding safety and driver behaviour impacts of mini-roundabouts on local roads.” In Proc., Australasian Transport Research Forum. Auckland, New Zealand: Australasian Transport Research Forum.
Department for Transport and the County Surveyors Society. 2006. “Mini roundabouts, good practice guidance.” Accessed December 15, 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/561491/mini-roundabouts-report.pdf.
Elvik, R. 2003. “Effects on road safety of converting intersections to roundabouts: Review of evidence from non-US studies.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1847 (Jan): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/1847-01.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2010. “Technical summary mini-roundabouts.” Accessed December 15, 2019. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/innovative/roundabouts/fhwasa10007/fhwasa10007.pdf.
Green, H. 1997. Accidents at off-side priority roundabouts with mini or small islands. Berkshire, UK: Dept. of Transport, TRRL.
Hauer, E. 1997. Observational before–after studies in road safety. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
HNTB. 2017. “Mini-roundabouts overland park Kansas.” Accessed December 15, 2019. https://www.marc2.org/tr_cfp/UploadedFiles/962_ProjID-OP%20Mini%20Roundabouts_DRAFT%20v%209-1-17.pdf.
Ibrahim, K. B., and A. V. Metcalfe. 1993. “Bayesian overview for evaluation of mini-roundabouts as a road safety measure.” J. R. Stat. Soc. D 42 (5): 525–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348677.
Isebrands, H. 2009. “Crash analysis of roundabouts at high-speed rural intersections.” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2096 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3141/2096-01.
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2019. “Roundabouts database: The online inventory database of roundabouts and other circular intersections.” Accessed December 15, 2019. https://roundabouts.kittelson.com/.
Lalani, N. 1975. “Roundabouts: Impact on accidents.” In Greater London intelligence quarterly. London: Greater London Council.
Mandavilli, S., A. T. McCartt, and R. A. Retting. 2009. “Crash patterns and potential engineering countermeasures at Maryland roundabouts.” Traffic Inj. Prev. 10 (1): 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580802485938.
Montella, A. 2007. “Roundabout in-service safety reviews: Safety assessment procedure.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2019 (1): 40–50. https://doi.org/10.3141/2019-06.
Montella, A. 2011. “Identifying crash contributory factors at urban roundabouts and using association rules to explore their relationships to different crash types.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (4): 1451–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.023.
Persaud, B. N., R. A. Retting, P. E. Garder, and D. Lord. 2001. “Safety effect of roundabout conversions in the United States: Empirical Bayes observational before-after study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1751 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/1751-01.
Qin, X., A. Bill, M. Chitturi, and D. Noyce. 2013. “Evaluation of roundabout safety.” In Proc., 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Robinson, B. W., et al. 2000. Roundabouts: An informational guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
Rodegerdts, L., et al. 2010. Roundabouts: An informational guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Waddell, E., and J. Albertson. 2005. “The Dimondale mini: America’s first mini-roundabout.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Roundabouts. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Walker, J. S., and S. R. Pittam. 1989. Accidents at mini-roundabouts: Frequencies and rates. Berkshire, UK: Dept. of Transport.
Wang, X., M. Abdel-Aty, A. Nevarez, and J. B. Santos. 2008. “Investigation of safety influence area for four-legged signalized intersections: Nationwide survey and empirical inquiry.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2083 (1): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2083-10.
Wilkinson, B. 2020. “Compact and mini-roundabouts: Maximized safety at minimum size.” Accessed May 15, 2021. https://www.msa-ps.com/compact-and-mini-roundabouts-maximized-safety-at-minimum-size/.
Zhang, W., J. Bared, and R. Jaganathan. n.d. “Mini-roundabouts.” Accessed December 15, 2019. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/trafficsafety/roundabout/fhwa-brochure.pdf.
Zhang, W., and N. Kronprasert. 2014. “Mini-roundabout case studies.” In Proc., 4th Int. Roundabout Conf. Seattle: Transportation Research Board Committee on Roundabouts.
Zito, R., and M. A. P. Taylor. 1996. “Speed profiles and vehicles fuel consumption at LATM devices.” In Proc., ARRB Conf., 391–406. Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Road Research Board Transport Research.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 10October 2022

History

Received: Nov 24, 2021
Accepted: May 12, 2022
Published online: Jul 29, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student of Infrastructure and Environmental Systems (INES) Program, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-9020. Email: [email protected]
Srinivas S. Pulugurtha, Ph.D., F.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-7227 [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and Research Director of Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, Director of Infrastructure, Design, Environment, and Sustainability (IDEAS) Center, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-7227. Email: [email protected]
Sonu Mathew, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher of IDEAS Center, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share