Technical Papers
Apr 14, 2022

Optimization Model of Life Cycle Repair Decisions for Track Network

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 6

Abstract

The track is the basis of railway and subway train operations. Under the repeated action of traffic load and the influence of line structure, geographical environment, and other factors, the condition of the track facility deteriorates, affecting driving safety, shortening the service life of the facility, and increasing maintenance costs. Therefore, it is of great significance to investigate the optimization of rail facility network life cycle repair decisions and devise a reasonable repair plan for scientifically controlling the repair cost under the prerequisite of ensuring operational safety. This study focused on optimizing track facility network life cycle repair decisions comprehensively considering the heterogeneity, uncertainty, and linkage of rail facility degradation. The minimum life cycle cost of the facility network was considered as the optimization objective, and an adaptive learning (AL) mechanism-based maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method was developed. A network-level life cycle repair decision optimization model based on an AL-Markov decision process (AL-MDP) was constructed and solved by using the Lpsolve toolkit in MATLAB. The Beijing Metro facility network, which is composed of small-radius curved rail units, was considered as an example, and based on a simulation of the network state using the Monte Carlo method, the proposed network-level AL-MDP model and network-level MDP model without AL were used to optimize repair decisions with a planning cycle of 10 years. The results were compared and analyzed, demonstrating that the proposed network-level AL-MDP model can effectively improve the quality of facility network repair decisions compared with the MDP model and that it has higher practicability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including:
Rail wear condition data.
Repair activity record.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the National Key R&D Program of China 2020YFB1600700, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2020JBM033, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 71801010.

References

An, R., Q. Sun, F. Wang, W. Bai, X. Zhu, and R. Liu. 2018. “Improved railway track geometry degradation modeling for tamping cycle prediction.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A. Syst. 144 (7): 04018025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000149.
Andrade, A. R., and P. F. Teixeira. 2011. “Biobjective optimization model for maintenance and renewal decisions related to rail track geometry.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2261 (1): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.3141/2261-19.
Arasteh Khouy, I., P.-O. Larsson-Kråik, A. Nissen, and U. Kumar. 2014. “Cost-effective track geometry maintenance limits.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 230 (2): 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409714542859.
Bai, W., Q. Sun, F. Wang, R. Liu, and R. Au. 2018. “A segmental evaluation model for determining residual rail service life based on a discrete-state conditional probabilistic method.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 233 (2): 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X18768916.
Barone, G., and D. M. Frangopol. 2014. “Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost.” Struct. Saf. 48 (May): 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.02.002.
BMOC (Beijing Metro Operation Co.). 2009. Beijing metro maintenance rules. Beijing: Beijing Metro Operation.
Budai, G., D. Huisman, and R. Dekker. 2006. “Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (9): 1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602085.
Buttrey, S. E., J. D. Leeuw, and A. Zeileis. 2003. “Calling the lp_solve linear program software from R, S-PLUS and Excel.” J. Stat. Software 14 (4): 406–417. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i04.
Caetano, L. F., and P. F. Teixeira. 2013. “Availability approach to optimizing railway track renewal operations.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (9): 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000575.
Caetano, L. F., and P. F. Teixeira. 2015. “Optimisation model to schedule railway track renewal operations: A life-cycle cost approach.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (11): 1524–1536. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.982133.
Caetano, L. F., and P. F. Teixeira. 2016. “Predictive maintenance model for ballast tamping.” J. Transp. Eng. 142 (4): 04016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000825.
Carnahan, J. V., W. J. Davis, M. Y. Shahin, P. L. Keane, and M. I. Wu. 1987. “Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management.” J. Transp. Eng. 113 (5): 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1987)113:5(554).
CSRG (China State Railway Group). 2013. China railway yearbook. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House.
Dekker, R., R. E. Wildeman, and F. A. Van der Duyn Schouten. 1997. “A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence.” Math. Methods Oper. Res. 45 (3): 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194788.
Durango, P. L., and S. M. Madanat. 2002. “Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: An adaptive control approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 36 (9): 763–778.
Famurewa, S. M., U. Juntti, A. Nissen, and U. Kumar. 2015. “Augmented utilisation of possession time: Analysis for track geometry maintenance.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 230 (4): 1118–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715583890.
Famurewa, S. M., T. Xin, M. Rantatalo, and U. Kumar. 2014. “Optimisation of maintenance track possession time: A tamping case study.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 229 (1): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713495667.
Guler, H. 2013. “Decision support system for railway track maintenance and renewal management.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (3): 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000221.
Gustavsson, E. 2015. “Scheduling tamping operations on railway tracks using mixed integer linear programming.” EURO J. Transp. Logist. 4 (1): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-014-0067-z.
He, Q., H. Li, D. Bhattacharjya, D. P. Parikh, and A. Hampapur. 2014. “Track geometry defect rectification based on track deterioration modelling and derailment risk assessment.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66 (3): 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.7.
Higgins, A., L. Ferreira, and M. Lake. 1999. “Scheduling rail track maintenance to minimise overall delays.” In Proc., 14th Int. Symp. on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Jerusalem, Israel.
Khouzani, A., A. Golroo, and M. Bagheri. 2017. “Railway maintenance management using a stochastic geometrical degradation model.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A: Syst. 143 (1): 04016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000002.
Kim, H.-G. 2010. “A connection method of LPSolve and Excel for network optimization problem.” J. Korea Ind. Inf. Syst. Res. 15 (5): 187–196.
Kobayashi, K., K. Kaito, and N. Lethanh. 2012. “A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46 (4): 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.11.008.
Kuhn, K. D., and S. M. Madanat. 2005. “Model uncertainty and the management of a system of infrastructure facilities.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 13 (5–6): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2006.02.001.
Lee, J. S., S. H. Hwang, I. Y. Choi, and I. K. Kim. 2018. “Prediction of track deterioration using maintenance data and machine learning schemes.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 144 (9): 04018045. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000173.
Letot, C., I. Soleimanmeigouni, A. Ahmadi, and P. Dehombreux. 2016. “An adaptive opportunistic maintenance model based on railway track condition prediction.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (28): 120–125.
Lyngby, N., P. Hokstad, and J. Vatn. 2008. RAMS management of railway tracks. London: Springer.
Macedo, R., R. Benmansour, A. Artiba, N. Mladenovi, and D. Uroševi. 2017. “Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities with resource constraints.” Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 58 (Apr): 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endm.2017.03.028.
Madanat, S., S. Park, and K. Kuhn. 2006. “Adaptive optimization and systematic probing of infrastructure system maintenance policies under model uncertainty.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (3): 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:3(192).
Medury, A., and S. Madanat. 2014. “Simultaneous network optimization approach for pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (3): 04014010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000149.
Oyama, T., and M. Miwa. 2006. “Mathematical modeling analyses for obtaining an optimal railway track maintenance schedule.” Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 23 (2): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167551.
Peng, F., S. Kang, X. Li, Y. Ouyang, K. Somani, and D. Acharya. 2011. “A heuristic approach to the railroad track maintenance scheduling problem.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 26 (2): 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00670.x.
Peng, F., and Y. Ouyang. 2012. “Track maintenance production team scheduling in railroad networks.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 46 (10): 1474–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.07.004.
Peralta, D., C. Bergmeir, M. Krone, M. Galende, M. Menéndez, G. I. Sainz-Palmero, C. Martinez Bertrand, F. Klawonn, and J. M. Benitez. 2018. “Multiobjective optimization for railway maintenance plans.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (3): 04018014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000757.
Powell, W. B. 2007. Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Rahimikelarijani, B., A. Mohassel, and M. Hamidi. 2020. “Railroad track geometric degradation analysis: A BNSF case study.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A. Syst. 146 (2): 04019068. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000303.
Rashedi, R., and T. Hegazy. 2016. “Holistic analysis of infrastructure deterioration and rehabilitation using system dynamics.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (1): 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000273.
Santos, R., P. F. Teixeira, and A. P. Antunes. 2015. “Planning and scheduling efficient heavy rail track maintenance through a decision rules model.” Res. Transp. Econ. 54 (Dec): 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.022.
Soleimanmeigouni, I., A. Ahmadi, and U. Kumar. 2018. “Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: A review.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 232 (1): 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716657849.
Su, Z., A. Jamshidi, A. Núñez, S. Baldi, and B. De Schutter. 2017. “Multi-level condition-based maintenance planning for railway infrastructures—A scenario-based chance-constrained approach.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 84 (Nov): 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.018.
Vale, C., and I. M. Ribeiro. 2014. “Railway condition-based maintenance model with stochastic deterioration.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 20 (5): 686–692. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802711.
Vandoorne, R., and P. J. Gräbe. 2017. “Stochastic modelling for the maintenance of life cycle cost of rails using Monte Carlo simulation.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit. 232 (4): 1240–1251.
Wang, F., and R. K. Liu. 2014. Theory and implementation technology of high speed railway grid management. Beijing: China Railway Press.
Yeo, H., Y. Yoon, and S. Madanat. 2013. “Algorithms for bottom-up maintenance optimisation for heterogeneous infrastructure systems.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (4): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.657649.
Zhang, Y.-J., M. Murray, and L. Ferreira. 2000. “Modelling rail track performance: An integrated approach.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 141 (4): 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.2000.141.4.187.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Sep 29, 2021
Accepted: Jan 5, 2022
Published online: Apr 14, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 14, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bai Wenfei, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Beijing Key Laboratory of Subway Operation Safety Technology, Beijing Subway Operation Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, China. Email: [email protected]
Wei Yun, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professorate Senior Engineer, Beijing Key Laboratory of Subway Operation Safety Technology, Beijing Subway Operation Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Liu Rengkui, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong Univ., Beijing 100044, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Measuring and Optimizing for Infrastructure Endurance, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4749, 38, 4, (2024).
  • Stochastic Evaluation of Railway Track Buckling Using Monte-Carlo Simulations, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1353, 10, 4, (2024).
  • Analysis of the mechanism of corrugation based on the scale test model, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 10.1007/s12206-024-0209-7, 38, 3, (1113-1122), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share