Technical Papers
Feb 3, 2022

Propensity toward Ridesourcing: The Impacts of Previous Experience and Mode Dependency

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper presents a study that aims to investigate the role of experience in the mode choice of using ridesourcing services. Factors that impact users’ mode choice between traditional modes (i.e., private vehicles and public transit) and ridesourcing modes (i.e., exclusive and shared rides) were examined using stated preference (SP) survey data. This study focuses on understanding the differences between two groups (those that used and never used ridesourcing services) in terms of their attitudes and perceptions toward ridesourcing services and how these attitudes might influence their mode choice behavior. Two separate error component nested logit modes were applied for individuals with and without ridesourcing experiences. Model results supported our hypothesis that people with and without ridesourcing experience have different attitudes and perceptions toward these services. Individuals without ridesourcing experience displayed more concerns about using ridesourcing and were more attached to their vehicles than those with experience. In particular, trust issues with traveling with strangers, higher travel time concerns, and being a fan of private vehicles significantly reduced the probability of using ridesourcing services for those without ridesourcing experience. Car dependency and preferences for private vehicles could also be addressed by exposing travelers to ridesourcing services through promotion strategies and free-trial programs. The suggested policies and strategies could better address travelers’ needs and concerns, encourage them to switch from private vehicles to shared mobility, and promote more sustainable and environmentally friendly transportation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The survey data used in this study can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the Florida Department of Transportation (BDV29 977-47). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation or the US Department of Transportation.

References

Acheampong, R. A., A. D. K. SiibaOkyere, D. K. Okyere, and J. P. Tuffour. 2020. “Mobility-on-demand: An empirical study of internet-based ride-hailing adoption factors, travel characteristics and mode substitution effects.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 115 (Jun): 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102638.
Alemi, F., G. Circella, S. Handy, and P. Mokhtarian. 2018. “What influences travelers to use uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California.” Travel Behav. Soc. 13 (Oct): 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.06.002.
Alemi, F., G. Circella, P. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. 2019. “What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 102 (May): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.016.
Asgari, H., and X. Jin. 2020. “Incorporating habitual behavior into mode choice modeling in light of emerging mobility services.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 52 (3): 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101735.
Asgari, H., X. Jin, and T. Corkery. 2018. “A stated preference survey approach to understanding mobility choices in light of shared mobility services and automated vehicle technologies in the US.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (47): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790124.
Azimi, G., A. H. Rahimi, H. Asgari, and X. Jin. 2020. Transit and nontransit users’ mode choice of ridesourcing: The role of attitudes. Washington, DC: Transporation Researh Record.
Bartle, N. C., and K. Harvey. 2017. “Explaining infant feeding: The role of previous personal and vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norms, self-efficacy, and breastfeeding outcomes.” Br. J. Health Psychol. 22 (4): 763–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12254.
Brown, B. B., C. M. Werner, and N. Kim. 2003. “Personal and contextual factors supporting the switch to transit use: Evaluating a natural transit intervention.” Anal. Social Issues Public Policy 3 (1): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00019.x.
Bunce, L., M. Harris, and M. Burgess. 2014. “Charge up then charge out? Drivers’ perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 59 (Jan): 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.001.
Burgess, M., M. Harris, C. Walsh, S. Carroll, S. Mansbridge, and N. King. 2013. “A longitudinal assessment of the viability of electric vehicles for daily use.” In Proc., The Institution of Engineering and Technology Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Conf., 1–5. London: Institution of Engineering and Technology.
Chen, T., J. Drennan, L. Andrews, and L. Hollebeek. 2018. “User experience sharing: Understanding customer initiation of value co-creation in online communities.” Eur. J. Marketing 52 5/6): 1154–1184.
Clewlow, R. R., and G. S. Mishra. 2017. Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Comblain, C., A. D’Argembeau, and M. Van der Linden. 2005. “Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults.” Exp. Aging Res. 31 (2): 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730590915010.
Deka, D., and D. Fei. 2019. “A comparison of the personal and neighborhood characteristics associated with ridesourcing, transit use, and driving with NHTS data.” J. Transp. Geogr. 76 (Apr): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.001.
Dias, F. F., P. S. Lavieri, V. M. Garikapati, S. Astroza, R. M. Pendyala, and C. R. Bhat. 2017. “A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services.” Transportation 44 (6): 1307–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9797-8.
Dill, J., and N. McNeil. 2013. “Four types of cyclists? Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behavior and potential.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2387 (1): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-15.
Dill, J., and K. Voros. 2007. “Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, region.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2031 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.3141/2031-02.
DiStefano, C., M. Zhu, and D. Mindrila. 2009. “Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher.” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 14 (1): 20. https://doi.org/10.7275/da8t-4g52.
Feigon, S., and C. Murphy. 2016. Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1977. “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.” Philos. Rhetoric 10 (2): 177–188.
Franke, T., P. Cocron, F. Bühler, I. Neumann, and J. F. Krems. 2012. “Adapting to the range of an electric vehicle–the relation of experience to subjectively available mobility resources.” In edited by P. Valero Mora, J. F. Pace, and L. Mendoza, Proc., European Conf., on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 95–103. Lyon, France: Humanist Publications.
Fujii, S., T. Gärling, and R. Kitamura. 2001. “Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: Effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma.” Environ. Behav. 33 (6): 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973241.
Fujii, S., and R. Kitamura. 2003. “What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change.” Transportation 30 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021234607980.
Füller, J., and V. Bilgram. 2017. “The moderating effect of personal features on the consequences of an enjoyable co-creation experience.” J. Prod. Brand Manage. 26 (4): 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2016-1122.
Füller, J., K. Hutter, and R. Faullant. 2011. “Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions.” R&D Manage. 41 (3): 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00640.x.
Fung, B. 2016. “Why so many Americans have never even heard of Uber or Lyft.” The Washington Post, May 20, 2016.
Gehrke, S., A. Felix, and T. Reardon. 2018. Fare choices: A survey of ride-hailing passengers in metro Boston. Boston: Metropolitan Area Planning Council.
Goode, M. R., D. W. Dahl, and C. P. Moreau. 2010. “The effect of experiential analogies on consumer perceptions and attitudes.” J. Marketing Res. 47 (2): 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.274.
Gu, G., T. Feng, C. Zhong, X. Cai, and J. Li. 2021. “The effects of life course events on car ownership and sustainable mobility tools adoption decisions: Results of an error component random parameter logit model.” Sustainability 13 (12): 6816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126816.
Haboucha, C. J., R. Ishaq, and Y. Shiftan. 2017. “User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 78 (May): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010.
Heinen, E., K. Maat, and B. Van Wee. 2011. “The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 16 (2): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010.
Hensher, D. A., S. Jones, and W. H. Greene. 2007. “An error component logit analysis of corporate bankruptcy and insolvency risk in Australia.” Econ. Rec. 83 (260): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2007.00378.x.
Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene. 2005. Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jiang, J. 2019. More Americans are using ride-hailing apps. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Lavieri, P. S., and C. R. Bhat. 2019. “Investigating objective and subjective factors influencing the adoption, frequency, and characteristics of ride-hailing trips.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 105 (Aug): 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.037.
Lavieri, P. S., F. F. Dias, N. R. Juri, J. Kuhr, and C. R. Bhat. 2018. “A model of ridesourcing demand generation and distribution.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (46): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756628.
Leong, L. W., O. Ibrahim, M. Dalvi-Esfahani, H. Shahbazi, and M. Nilashi. 2018. “The moderating effect of experience on the intention to adopt mobile social network sites for pedagogical purposes: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Educ. Inf. Technol. 23 (6): 2477–2498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9726-2.
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., F. Muñoz-Leiva, J. Sánchez-Fernández, and M. I. Viedma-del Jesús. 2016. “The moderating effect of user experience on satisfaction with electronic banking: Empirical evidence from the Spanish case.” Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manage. 14 (1): 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0277-4.
Ma, L., X. Zhang, X. Ding, and G. Wang. 2019. “Risk perception and intention to discontinue use of ride-hailing services in China: Taking the example of DiDi Chuxing.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psych. Behav. 66 (Oct): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.021.
Malik, J., F. Alemi, and G. Circella. 2021. “Exploring the factors that affect the frequency of use of ridehailing and the adoption of shared ridehailing in California.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2675 (5): 0361198120985151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120985151.
Malokin, A., G. Circella, and P.L. Mokhtarian. 2019. “How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 124 (Jun): 82–114.
McFadden, D. L. 1973. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Wiley.
Namgung, M., and H. J. Jun. 2019. “The influence of attitudes on university bicycle commuting: Considering bicycling experience levels.” Int. J. Sust. Transp. 13 (5): 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1471557.
Nilsson, M. 2011a. “Electric vehicles: An interview study investigating the phenomenon of range anxiety.” Accessed May 7, 2015. https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/projects/cnect/5/249105/080/deliverables/001-AninterviewstudyinvestigatingthephenomenonofrangeanxietyELVIRE21.pdf.
Nilsson, M. 2011b. “Electric vehicles: The phenomenon of range anxiety.” Accessed April, 24, 2017. http://e-mobility-nsr.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/info-pool/the_phenomenon_of_range_anxiety_elvire.pdf.
Pappas, I. O., A. G. Pateli, M. N. Giannakos, and V. Chrissikopoulos. 2014. “Moderating effects of online shopping experience on customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions.” Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manage. 42 (3): 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2012-0034.
Rather, R., and L. Hollebeek. 2021. “Customers’ service-related engagement, experience, and behavioral intent: Moderating role of age.” J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 6 (3): 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102453.
Rauh, N., T. Franke, and J. F. Krems. 2015. “Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety.” Hum. Factors 57 (1): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814546372.
Rayle, L., D. Dai, N. Chan, R. Cervero, and S. Shaheen. 2016. “Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco.” Transp. Policy 45 (Jan): 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
Ribeiro, R. 2014. “The role of experience in perception.” Hum. Stud. 37 (4): 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9318-0.
Scarpa, R., S. Ferrini, and K. Willis. 2005. “Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments.” In Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics, 247–273. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Sikder, S. 2019. “Who uses ride-hailing services in the United States?” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (12): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119859302.
Simmons, R. O. B. 2018. “Disruptive digital technology services: The case of Uber Car ridesharing in Ghana.” Accessed August 16, 2018. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2018/OrgTrasfm/Presentations/11/10.
Smith, A. 2016. Shared, collaborative and on demand: The new digital economy. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Staats, B. R., D. S. Kc, and F. Gino. 2018. “Maintaining beliefs in the face of negative news: The moderating role of experience.” Manage. Sci. 64 (2): 804–824. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2640.
Thøgersen, J., and B. Møller. 2008. “Breaking car use habits: The effectiveness of a free one-month travelcard.” Transportation 35 (3): 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9160-1.
Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zhen, C. 2015. “Impact of ride-sourcing services on travel habits and transportation planning.” Ph.D. thesis, Swanson School of Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 4April 2022

History

Received: Jun 5, 2021
Accepted: Dec 1, 2021
Published online: Feb 3, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 3, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ghazaleh Azimi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flagler St., EC3725, Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]
Xia Jin, Ph.D. [email protected]
AICP
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flagler St., EC 3603, Miami, FL 33174 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share