Abstract

Emerging sources of mobile location data such as Strava and other phone-based apps may provide useful information for assessing bicycle activity on each link of a network. Despite their potential to complement traditional bike count programs, the representativeness and suitability of these emerging sources for producing bicycle volume estimates remain unclear. This study investigates the challenges and opportunities by fusing Strava data with short-term and permanent conventional count program data to produce bicycle volume estimations using clustering and nonparametric modeling. Analysis indicates that the concentration of permanent counters at high bicycle volume locations presents a significant challenge to produce network-wide daily volume estimations even though Strava data demonstrate potential in mitigating the estimation bias at lower-volume sites. Despite the contribution of Strava to develop reliable and spatially and temporally transferable bicycle volume estimations, significant challenges remain to rely on Strava counts alone to characterize network-level activities due to sampling bias and spatial representations. This study will help planners discern and assess the challenges and opportunities of using emerging data in bicycle planning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The programming code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may be provided only with restrictions, including Strava data used in the modeling. Other data generated by the authors or analyzed during the study are available as follows. Weather data was derived from Weather Underground, available at https://www.wunderground.com/history (Weather History & Data Archive 2021). Sociodemographic data is available at National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS), Steven et al. (2020) https://www.nhgis.org/. Major generator, network, bicycle facilities, and road functional class data sets utilized to support the findings of this paper are derived from PortlandMaps Open Data, City of Portland, Oregon (2021) (https://gis-pdx.opendata.arcgis.com/) and CivicApps for greater Portland (CivicApps.org 2020).

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC-1269), a US DOT University Transportation Center, though a Pooled-Fund in partnership with the following contributors: Oregon DOT, Virginia DOT, Colorado DOT, Central Lane MPO, Portland Bureau of Transportation, District DOT, and Utah DOT. The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Miah, Hyun, Mattingly; data collection: Kothuri, Broach, McNeil, Miah; analysis and interpretation of results: Miah, Hyun, Mattingly; draft manuscript preparation: all authors. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. The authors confirm sole responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.

References

Boss, D., T. Nelson, M. Winters, and C. J. Ferster. 2018. “Using crowdsourced data to monitor change in spatial patterns of bicycle ridership.” J. Transp. Health 9 (Feb): 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.02.008.
Brubaker, K., B. Jacobsen, A. Iltis, J. Skrivanek, and C. Zhou. 2018. Strava metro data analysis summary. Denver: Colorado DOT.
CDM Research. 2018. “How reliable is Strava? | CDM research.” Accessed November 25, 2020. http://cdmresearch.com.au/post/how-reliable-is-strava/.
Chen, C., H. Wang, J. Roll, K. Nordback, and Y. Wang. 2020. “Using bicycle app data to develop Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) for bicyclists at intersections: A generic framework.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 132 (Dec): 1034–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.034.
Chen, P., J. Zhou, and F. Sun. 2017. “Built environment determinants of bicycle volume: A longitudinal analysis.” J. Transp. Land Use 10 (1): 655–674.
City of Portland, Oregon. 2021. “PortlandMaps—Open data.” Accessed March 27, 2021. https://gis-pdx.opendata.arcgis.com/.
CivicApps.org. 2021. “Making public data easy to find and easy to use.” Accessed March 27, 2021. http://civicapps.org/.
Conrow, L., E. Wentz, T. Nelson, and C. Pettit. 2018. “Comparing spatial patterns of crowdsourced and conventional bicycling datasets.” Appl. Geogr. 92 (Oct): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.01.009.
Dadashova, B., and G. P. Griffin. 2020. “Random parameter models for estimating statewide daily bicycle counts using crowdsourced data.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 84 (Jul): 102368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102368.
Dadashova, B., G. P. Griffin, S. Das, S. Turner, and M. Graham. 2018. “Guide for seasonal adjustment and crowdsourced data scalingscaling (Cooperative research program technical report No. 0-6927-P6). Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation.” Accessed November 13, 2021. https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6927-P6.pdf%0Ahttp://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6927-P6.pdf.
Dadashova, B., G. P. Griffin, S. Das, S. Turner, and B. Sherman. 2020. “Estimation of average annual daily bicycle counts using crowdsourced strava data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (11): 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120946016.
Data Clustering Algorithms. 2018. “Data clustering algorithms—k-means clustering algorithm.” Accessed November 23, 2020. https://sites.google.com/site/dataclusteringalgorithms/k-means-clustering-algorithm.
de Juan, A., and R. Tauler. 2019. “Data fusion by multivariate curve resolution.” In Data handling in science and technology, 205–233. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63984-4.00008-9.
Dill, J., and K. Voros. 2007. “Factors affecting bicycling demand.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2031 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.3141/2031-02.
Eco Counter. 2019. “Bike counters: How do they work?—Eco-counter.” Accessed October 31, 2020. https://www.eco-compteur.com/en/blog/bike-counters-how-do-they-work/.
El Esawey, M. 2014. “Estimation of annual average daily bicycle traffic with adjustment factors.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2443 (1): 106–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2443-12.
El Esawey, M. 2018. “Daily bicycle traffic volume estimation: Comparison of historical average and count models.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (2): 04018011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000443.
El Esawey, M., A. I. Mosa, and K. Nasr. 2015. “Estimation of daily bicycle traffic volumes using sparse data.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54: 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.002.
Ermagun, A., G. Lindsey, and T. Hadden Loh. 2018. “Bicycle, pedestrian, and mixed-mode trail traffic: A performance assessment of demand models.” Landscape Urban Plann. 177 (May): 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.006.
Fagnant, D. J., and K. Kockelman. 2016. “A direct-demand model for bicycle counts: The impacts of level of service and other factors.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 43 (1): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515602568.
Greg, L., W. Jueyu, H. Steven, and M. Pterka. 2018. “Modeling bicyclist exposure to risk and crash risk: Some exploratory studies, 2018.” Accessed July 29, 2020. https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/199776.
Griffin, G. P., and J. Jiao. 2015a. “Crowdsourcing bicycle volumes: Exploring the role of volunteered geographic information and established monitoring methods.” URISA J. 27 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e3hbc.
Griffin, G. P., and J. Jiao. 2015b. “Where does bicycling for health happen? Analysing volunteered geographic information through place and plexus.” J. Transp. Health 2 (2): 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.12.001.
Griswold, J., A. Medury, and R. Schneider. 2011. “Pilot models for estimating bicycle intersection volumes.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2247 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3141/2247-01.
Hankey, S., and G. Lindsey. 2016. “Facility-demand models of peak period pedestrian and bicycle traffic: Comparison of fully specified and reduced-form models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2586 (1): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2586-06.
Hankey, S., G. Lindsey, and J. Marshall. 2014. “Day-of-year scaling factors and design considerations for nonmotorized traffic monitoring programs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2468 (1): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-08.
Hankey, S., G. Lindsey, X. Wang, J. Borah, K. Hoff, B. Utecht, and Z. Xu. 2012. “Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN.” Landscape Urban Plann. 107 (3): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.005.
Hankey, S., A. Mondschein, T. Lu, and R. Buehler. 2017. “Spatial models of active travel in small communities: Merging the goals of traffic monitoring and direct-demand modeling.” J. Transp. Health 7 (Aug): 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.08.009.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. “Springer series in statistics the elements of statistical learning.” Math. Intelligencer 27 (2): 83–85.
Heesch, K. C., and M. Langdon. 2016. “The usefulness of GPS bicycle tracking data for evaluating the impact of infrastructure change on cycling behavior.” Health Promot. J. Aust. 27 (3): 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE16032.
Hochmair, H. H., E. Bardin, and A. Ahmouda. 2019. “Estimating bicycle trip volume for Miami-Dade county from Strava tracking data.” J. Transp. Geogr. 75 (Nov): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.013.
Jestico, B., T. Nelson, and M. Winters. 2016. “Mapping ridership using crowdsourced cycling data.” J. Transp. Geogr. 52: 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.03.006.
Johnstone, D., K. Nordback, and M. Lowry. 2017. “Research—Collecting network-wide bicycle and pedestrian data: A guidebook for when and where to count | WSDOT.” Accessed November 25, 2020. https://wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/800/collecting-network-wide-bicycle-and-pedestrian-data-guidebook-when-and-where.
Jones, M. G., S. Ryan, J. Donlon, L. Ledbetter, D. R. Ragland, and L. S. Arnold. 2010. “Seamless travel: Measuring bicycle and pedestrian activity in San Diego county and its relationship to land use, transportation, safety, and facility type.” https://merritt.cdlib.org/d/ark%3A%2F13030%2Fm54f1sft/2/producer%2FPRR-2010-12.pdf%0Ahttps://trid.trb.org/view/919880.
Kwigizile, V., J. Oh, and K. Kwayu. 2019. Integrating crowdsourced data with traditionally collected data to enhance estimation of bicycle exposure measure. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan Univ.
Lin, Z., and W. (David) Fan. 2020. “Modeling bicycle volume using crowdsourced data from Strava smartphone application.” Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 9 (4): 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.03.003.
Lindsey, G., K. Hoff, S. Hankey, and X. Wang. 2012. Understanding the use of non-motorized transportation facilities. Minneapolis: Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute, Center for Transportation Studies, Univ. of Minnesota.
Lindsey, G. H. 2011. Forecasting use of nonmotorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Livingston, M., D. McArthur, J. Hong, and K. English. 2021. “Predicting cycling volumes using crowdsourced activity data.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 48 (5): 1228–1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320925822.
Lu, T., et al. 2017. “Designing a bicycle and pedestrian traffic monitoring program to estimate annual average daily traffic in a small rural college town.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 53: 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.017.
Lu, T., A. Mondschein, R. Buehler, and S. Hankey. 2018. “Adding temporal information to direct-demand models: Hourly estimation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Blacksburg, VA.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 63 (Aug): 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.05.011.
Miranda-Moreno, L., T. Nosal, R. Schneider, and F. Proulx. 2013. “Classification of bicycle traffic patterns in five North American cities.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2339 (1): 68–79. https://doi.org/10.3141/2339-08.
Munira, S., and I. N. Sener. 2017. “Use of direct-demand modeling in estimating nonmotorized activity: A meta-analysis.” Accessed April 2, 2018. https://www.vtti.vt.edu/utc/safe-d/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/UTC-Safe-D_Direct-Demand-Model-for-PedBike_TTI-Report_12Oct17_Final.pdf.
Nelson, T., A. Roy, C. Ferster, J. Fischer, V. Brum-Bastos, K. Laberee, H. Yu, and M. Winters. 2021. “Generalized model for mapping bicycle ridership with crowdsourced data.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 125 (Apr): 102981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.102981.
Nickkar, A., S. Banerjee, C. Chavis, I. A. Bhuyan, and P. Barnes. 2019. “A spatial-temporal gender and land use analysis of bikeshare ridership: The case study of Baltimore City.” City, Culture Society 18 (Sep): 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100291.
Niemeier, D. A. 1996. “Longitudinal analysis of bicycle count variability: Results and modeling implications.” J. Transp. Eng. 122 (3): 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1996)122:3(200).
Nordback, K., S. Kothuri, D. Johnstone, G. Lindsey, S. Ryan, and J. Raw. 2019. “Minimizing annual average daily nonmotorized traffic estimation errors: How many counters are needed per factor group?” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (10): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119848699.
Nordback, K., W. Marshall, B. Janson, and E. Stolz. 2013. “Estimating annual average daily bicyclists: Error and accuracy.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2339 (1): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.3141/2339-10.
Nordback, K., S. O’Brien, and K. Blank. 2018. Bicycle and pedestrian count programs: summary of practice and key resources. Chapel Hill, NC: Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center.
Nosal, T., L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and Z. Krstulic. 2014. “Incorporating weather: Comparative analysis of annual average daily bicyclist traffic estimation methods.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2468 (1): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-12.
Proulx, F. R., and A. Pozdnukhov. 2017. “Bicycle traffic volume estimation using geographically weighted data fusion.” J. Transp. Geogr. 1–14.
Roll, J. 2018. Bicycle count data: What is it good for? A study of bicycle travel activity in central lane metropolitan planning organization. Salem, OR: Oregon DOT.
Romanillos, G., M. Zaltz Austwick, D. Ettema, and J. De Kruijf. 2016. “Big data and cycling.” Transp. Rev. 36 (1): 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1084067.
Roy, A., T. A. Nelson, A. S. Fotheringham, and M. Winters. 2019. Correcting bias in crowdsourced data to map bicycle ridership of all bicyclists. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI.
Ryus, P., E. Ferguson, K. M. Laustsen, R. J. Schneider, F. R. Proulx, T. Hull, and L. Miranda-Moreno. 2014. Guidebook on pedestrian and bicycle volume data collection. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Sanders, R. L., A. Frackelton, S. Gardner, R. Schneider, and M. Hintze. 2017. “Ballpark method for estimating pedestrian and bicyclist exposure in Seattle, Washington: Potential option for resource-constrained cities in an age of big data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2605 (1): 32–44. https://doi.org/10.3141/2605-03.
Steven, M., J. Schroeder, D. Van Riper, T. Kugler, and S. Ruggles. 2020. IPUMS national historical geographic information system: Version 15.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis: IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V15.0.
Strauss, J., and L. F. Miranda-Moreno. 2013. “Spatial modeling of bicycle activity at signalized intersections.” J. Transp. Land Use 6 (2): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.296.
Strauss, J., L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and P. Morency. 2013. “Cyclist activity and injury risk analysis at signalized intersections: A Bayesian modelling approach.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 6 (2): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.037.
Strauss, J., L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and P. Morency. 2015. “Mapping cyclist activity and injury risk in a network combining smartphone GPS data and bicycle counts.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 83: 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.014.
Tabeshian, M., and L. Kattan. 2014. “Modeling nonmotorized travel demand at intersections in Calgary, Canada.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2430 (1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2430-05.
Turner, S., et al. 2017. “Synthesis of methods for estimating pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to risk at areawide levels and on specific transportation facilities—Safety | Federal Highway Administration, United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety.” Accessed November 25, 2020. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/fhwasa17041/index.cfm.
Turner, S., R. Benz, J. Hudson, G. P. Griffin, P. Lasley, B. Dadashova, and S. Das. 2018. Improving the amount and availability of pedestrian and bicyclist count data in Texas. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute and Texas A&M Univ. System.
Unnikrishnan, A., M. Figliozzi, M. Moughari, and S. Urbina. 2018. A method to estimate annual average daily traffic for minor facilities for MAP-21 reporting and statewide safety analysis—Literature review and analysis of data sources. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service. https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Programs/ResearchDocuments/SPR_804_Final_Report.pdf.
Wang, J., S. Hankey, X. Wu, and A. G. Lindsey. 2016. “Monitoring and modeling of urban trail traffic: Validation of direct demand models in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Columbus, Ohio.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2593 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.3141/2593-06.
Wang, X., G. Lindsey, S. Hankey, and K. Hoff. 2014. “Estimating mixed-mode urban trail traffic using negative binomial regression models.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 140 (1): 04013006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000157.
Watkins, K., R. Ammanamanchi, J. LaMondia, and C. A. Le Dantec. 2016a. “Comparison of smartphone-based cyclist GPS data sources.” In Proc., TRB 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, 5. Washington, DC: Tranportation Research Board.
Watkins, K., R. Ammanamanchi, J. LaMondia, and C. A. Le Dantec. 2016b. Comparison of smartphone-based cyclist GPS data sources. Washington, DC: Tranportation Research Board.
Weather History & Data Archive. 2021. “Weather history & data archive | weather underground.” Accessed March 27, 2021. https://www.wunderground.com/history.
Wendel-Vos, G. C. W., A. J. Schuit, R. De Niet, H. C. Boshuizen, W. H. M. Saris, and D. Kromhout. 2004. “Factors of the physical environment associated with walking and bicycling.” Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 36 (4): 725–730. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000121955.03461.0A.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Apr 7, 2021
Accepted: Oct 8, 2021
Published online: Dec 28, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-3896. Email: [email protected]
Kate Kyung Hyun [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]
Stephen P. Mattingly, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]
Adjunct Research Associate, Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State Univ., Portland, OR 97201. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-501X. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State Univ., Portland, OR 97201. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-9794. Email: [email protected]
Sirisha Kothuri [email protected]
Senior Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State Univ., Portland, OR 97201. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A review of bike volume prediction studies, Transportation Letters, 10.1080/19427867.2024.2310831, (1-28), (2024).
  • Using emerging mobility data to advocate equitable micromobility infrastructure in underserved communities, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103613, 117, (103613), (2023).
  • Effects of data aggregation (buffer) techniques on bicycle volume estimation, Transportation, 10.1007/s11116-023-10452-7, (2023).
  • Estimation of daily bicycle traffic using machine and deep learning techniques, Transportation, 10.1007/s11116-022-10290-z, 50, 5, (1631-1684), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share