Technical Papers
Aug 11, 2021

Improving Resilience of Bus Bunching Holding Strategy through a Rolling Horizon Approach

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Providing public transportation with quality service is critical to attracting more passengers to the system. However, high-demand routes are prone to the so-called bus bunching—a tendency of buses to group as a consequence of variations in travel times and demands. Bus holding is applied to overcome this effect. In this study, we present a novel method for bus holding in which the control law is based only on the buses’ position using a computationally efficient rolling horizon approach. The method uses similar inputs as linear control approaches while not increasing significantly the computational time. On the other hand, the method overcomes a key weakness of the linear control approach thanks to the explicit constraint handling that always ensures the control action effectiveness. Simulation experiments in a validation case and a model-specific for a bus rapid transit line in Curitiba, Brazil, showed a reduced holding time and improved resilience, delivering more than 20% reduction in delay time accounting for the on-board and station delays.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This paper and the work described were sponsored by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) under the Systems and Modeling for Accelerated Research in Transportation 2.0 (SMART 2.0) Mobility Laboratory Consortium, an initiative of the Energy Efficient Mobility Systems (EEMS) Program. The second author is supported by CAPES-Brazil.

References

Andres, M., and R. Nair. 2017. “A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 104 (Oct): 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.013.
Asgharzadeh, M., and Y. Shafahi. 2017. “Real-time bus-holding control strategy to reduce passenger waiting time.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2647 (1): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.3141/2647-02.
Barnett, A. 1974. “On controlling randomness in transit operations.” Transp. Sci. 8 (2): 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.8.2.102.
Bartholdi, J. J., and D. D. Eisenstein. 2012. “A self-coördinating bus route to resist bus bunching.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 46 (4): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.11.001.
Boyd, S., S. P. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe. 2004. Convex optimization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Cats, O., A. N. Larijani, H. N. Koutsopoulos, and W. Burghout. 2011. “Impacts of holding control strategies on transit performance: Bus simulation model analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2216 (1): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2216-06.
Daganzo, C. F. 2009. “A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 43 (10): 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.04.002.
Dai, Z., X. C. Liu, Z. Chen, R. Guo, and X. Ma. 2019. “A predictive headway-based bus-holding strategy with dynamic control point selection: A cooperative game theory approach.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 125 (Jul): 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.001.
de Dios Ortúzar, J., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling transport. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Delgado, F., J. Muñoz, R. Giesen, and A. Cipriano. 2009. “Real-time control of buses in a transit corridor based on vehicle holding and boarding limits.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2090 (1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2090-07.
Delgado, F., J. C. Muñoz, and R. Giesen. 2012. “How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance?” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 46 (9): 1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.04.005.
de Souza, F., R. C. Castelan, and E. R. Müller, and K. Ampountolas. 2020. “Multi-commodity traffic signal control and routing with connected vehicles.” In IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3041436.
Diamond, S., and S. Boyd. 2016. “CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17 (1): 2909–2913.
Domahidi, A., E. Chu, and S. Boyd. 2013. “Ecos: An SOCP solver for embedded systems.” In Proc., 2013 European Control Conf. (ECC), 3071–3076. New York: IEEE.
Eberlein, X. J., N. H. Wilson, and D. Bernstein. 2001. “The holding problem with real–time information available.” Transp. Sci. 35 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.35.1.1.10143.
Furth, P., and T. Muller. 2006. “Part 4: Capacity and quality of service: Service reliability and hidden waiting time: Insights from automatic vehicle location data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1955 (1): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106195500110.
Gkiotsalitis, K., and E. Van Berkum. 2020. “An analytic solution for real-time bus holding subject to vehicle capacity limits.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 121 (10): 102815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102815.
He, S.-X., S.-D. Liang, J. Dong, D. Zhang, J.-J. He, and P.-C. Yuan. 2020. “A holding strategy to resist bus bunching with dynamic target headway.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 140 (Feb): 106237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106237.
Koehler, L. A., W. Kraus, and E. Camponogara. 2011. “Iterative quadratic optimization for the bus holding control problem.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12 (4): 1568–1575. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2164909.
Laskaris, G., O. Cats, E. Jenelius, and F. Viti. 2016. “A real-time holding decision rule accounting for passenger travel cost.” In Proc., 2016 IEEE 19th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2410–2415. New York: IEEE.
Lindau, L. A., D. Hidalgo, and D. Facchini. 2010. “Bus rapid transit in Curitiba, Brazil: A look at the outcome after 35 years of bus-oriented development.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2193 (1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2193-03.
Muñoz, J. C., C. E. Cortés, R. Giesen, D. Sáez, F. Delgado, F. Valencia, and A. Cipriano. 2013. “Comparison of dynamic control strategies for transit operations.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 28 (Mar): 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.010.
Newell, G. F., and R. B. Potts. 1964. “Maintaining a bus schedule.” In Proc., 2nd Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Conf. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Osuna, E., and G. Newell. 1972. “Control strategies for an idealized public transportation system.” Transp. Sci. 6 (1): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.6.1.52.
Petit, A., C. Lei, and Y. Ouyang. 2019. “Multiline bus bunching control via vehicle substitution.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 126 (Aug): 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.009.
Rossiter, J. A. 2018. A first course in predictive control. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sánchez-Martnez, G., H. Koutsopoulos, and N. Wilson. 2016. “Real-time holding control for high-frequency transit with dynamics.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 83 (Jan): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.013.
Sebastiani, M. T., R. Lüders, and K. V. O. Fonseca. 2016. “Evaluating electric bus operation for a real-world BRT public transportation using simulation optimization.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 (10): 2777–2786. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2525800.
Urbanization of Curitiba S/A. 2021. “Descritivo de itineríarios linhas urbanas.” Accessed January 2, 2021. https://www.urbs.curitiba.pr.gov.br/transporte/itinerarios.
Wang, M., W. Daamen, S. P. Hoogendoorn, and B. van Arem. 2014. “Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 40 (Mar): 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.023.
Xuan, Y., J. Argote, and C. F. Daganzo. 2011. “Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: Optimal linear control and performance analysis.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 45 (10): 1831–1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.009.
Zhang, S., and H. K. Lo. 2018. “Two-way-looking self-equalizing headway control for bus operations.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 110 (12): 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Dec 10, 2020
Accepted: Jun 18, 2021
Published online: Aug 11, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Appointee, Division of Energy Systems, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-141X. Email: [email protected]
Mariana Teixeira Sebastiani
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Transportation Studies, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Robust Optimal Control Method to Improve Bus Schedule Adherence Considering Stochastic Bus Operations under Mixed Traffic, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1156, 10, 1, (2024).
  • Robustness and disturbances in public transport, Public Transport, 10.1007/s12469-022-00301-8, 14, 1, (191-261), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share