Free access
Editorial
Apr 22, 2021

It Is Time to Recognize Communications as a Mode of Transportation

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 7
Historically, transportation has enabled the mobility not just of people and goods but also of information. Until the advent of the telegraph, communications and transportation were largely complementary, with travelers and vehicles carrying communications and information. Technology has enabled the transfer of information in new ways that have become substitutes for traditional transport. For example, telegraph and telephone messages replaced letters. Today’s digital communications are still both complementary to and a substitute for transportation. The thesis of this editorial is that communication has become a technology-disrupting form of transportation and so deserves the increased focus of transportation engineers, managers, and educators.
The link between strong communications and strong transportation systems for both economies and societies has long been recognized (Sachs et al. 2001). The link is especially important now as investment in broadband and transportation networks increases across the globe. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a stark digital divide in both rural and urban areas between the residents with access to reliable broadband technology and those without it. Those without adequate or affordable broadband have less—and sometimes no—access to education, employment, commerce, and healthcare services.
Throughout the twentieth century, information and communications technology continued to improve transportation safety and efficiency through intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies, including highway advisory radio, 511 traveler information systems, highway message boards, and traffic management centers. In the last decade, these centralized systems have been eclipsed by decentralized ITS, including smart phone and cloud-based communications networks. These latter systems enable the real-time transfer of data and connection of travelers directly to transportation modes. Examples of these applications include mobility as a service, real-time transit and traffic information, bicycle and scooter sharing, and real-time navigation system aids. Connected vehicle technology, communicating through dedicated short-range communications and 4G and 5G cellular networks, enables a growing number of applications to improve safety, efficiency, and sustainability. This connected-vehicle technology is also evolving with vehicle automation through applications such as truck platooning. As advanced wireless communications infrastructure becomes more common, we expect to see exponentially more internet-of-things (IoT) applications throughout our transportation system.
Transportation engineers have long recognized that strategies of transportation demand management (TDM) are important tools to increase traveler choices and to encourage modal shifts (Meyer 1999). As information and communications technology becomes more sophisticated, these TDM strategies are further enabled. For example, carpooling efforts ramped up in the 1940s in response to conservation efforts for WWII and again in the 1970s during the oil crisis. But public participation did not become mainstream until ride-hailing companies using smart phones were introduced in this last decade. There have been jitney services and taxis for more than one hundred years, but modern communications have made ride hailing much more accessible. Telework has been a longtime strategy of TDM that is now available to vastly more people through cloud computing and online coworking platforms. The COVID-19 pandemic has motivated an expansion of e-commerce, telework, and video conferencing (Hendrickson and Rilett 2020).
Federal, state, and local governments traditionally have invested in transportation infrastructure to enable both commerce and personal mobility in order to connect communities to the world. In the US, these infrastructure investments, which began with ocean and river ports, expanded to include canals, railroads, highways, and airports. Today, broadband technology is the infrastructure investment necessary to connect businesses and citizens to each other and to the world.
Engineers need to design systems with this understanding of communications as a mode of transportation (Saeed et al. 2021). Transportation activities, such as advanced and effective traffic control, rapid incident response, and maintenance require extensive communications. The education system, including the US DOT University Transportation Centers (UTC) Program, can prepare current and future workforces in how to plan, design, build, maintain, secure, and utilize this powerful technology. The UTC program recently awarded a grant to establish a center that focuses on telemobility (Telemobility UTC Consortium 2021). Transportation professionals also need to understand how this disruptive new technology may impact workforces, vulnerable populations, and the environment. We have witnessed disruptions of similar transformations in transportation, including the interstate highway system over fifty years ago and the mass adoption of combustion-engine vehicles a century ago. In communications, major disruptions have been seen with the telegraph, telephones, satellites, cable, fiber optics, and now cellular. Transportation engineers and planners do not need to become experts in communications and computer science. Rather, they need to have the ability to work knowledgeably with the experts in these fields.
Transportation agencies, including state and municipal departments of transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, and transit agencies, need to recognize communications as a core infrastructure investment and develop strategies to engage with private partners who are building the infrastructure and developingthe applications. The communications infrastructure also needs to be engineered and integrated into existing transportation, building, and energy networks. A systems-engineering approach is necessary and is now enabled by digital networks that promote communication among these individual systems and the sharing of information to optimize them. We see daily examples of smart phones and smart speakers coordinating our personal transportation, home security, appliances, temperature control, and other IoT communications applications.
Federal, state, and local government leaders need to coordinate with the communications industry on this infrastructure, as was done with the railroad and aviation industries. It is essential that communications infrastructure be engineered to be effective, efficient, resilient, equitable, and sustainable. This includes exploring the policy framework necessary for industry to effectively deploy these systems.
Congress and the executive branch have an opportunity to recognize and integrate communications as a mode of transportation in the reauthorization of the law for planning and investment in surface transportation. The following are a few options for consideration:
The eligibility of federal transportation funds could be broadened for communications infrastructure and operations to enable state and local agencies to make necessary investments.
A new modal administration could be established and charged with the planning and deployment of communications infrastructure in support of transportation. An example of this structure is the Research and Innovative Technology Administration created in 2005.
Another option is to establish an office under the Secretary of Transportation to coordinate communications infrastructure among all modal administrations and outside agencies such as the FCC. An example of this model is the current Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology. This office could explore policy alternatives for coordinated communications infrastructure deployment in cooperation with industry, state and local governments, and community organizations. Funding could be directed to states and metropolitan planning organizations for the planning and implementation of communications infrastructure.
The US DOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office has been working at the cutting edge of transportation and communications and supports all modes of administrations at DOT. It could also be an effective home for such an initiative.
In summary, the authors believe that recent advances in communication technologies are fundamentally transforming the planning, design, and operation of transportation systems maintenance. For this reason, government and industry leaders should be proactive in further integrating communications into transportation infrastructure and operations. While the focus of this editorial is US options, other countries face the same issues. US transportation systems engineering should be adapted to prepare for this transition with research directed to making it as smooth as possible.
As in the past, the Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems stands ready to publish articles exploring the link between communications and transportation.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Mobility 21 National University Transportation Center and the Mid-America University Transportation Center, both of which are sponsored by the US Department of Transportation, as well as the support of the Hillman Foundation for the Traffic 21 Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.

References

Hendrickson, C., and L. Rilett. 2020. “The COVID-19 pandemic and transportation engineering.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A 146 (7): 01820001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000418.
Meyer, M. D. 1999. “Demand management as an element of transportation policy: Using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 33 (7–8): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00008-7.
Sachs, J. D., A. D. Mellinger, and J. L. Gallup. 2001. “The geography of poverty and wealth.” Sci. Am. 284 (3): 70. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0301-70.
Saeed, T. U., B. N. Alabi, and S. Labi. 2021. “Preparing road infrastructure to accommodate connected and automated vehicles: System-level perspective.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (1): 06020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000593.
Telemobility UTC Consortium. 2021. “Application for Tier 1 UTC addressing ‘Communications Technology and E-Commerce Effects on Travel Demand’ (Opportunity UTCTIER1COMP2020).” Accessed December 2, 2021. https://sites.northwestern.edu/telemobilityutc/.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Feb 14, 2021
Accepted: Feb 18, 2021
Published online: Apr 22, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 22, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Stan Caldwell [email protected]
Adjunct Associate Professor of Transportation and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Email: [email protected]
Chris Hendrickson, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-3580 [email protected]
NAE
Hamerschlag University Professor of Engineering Emeritus, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-3580. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Keith W. Klaasmeyer Chair in Engineering and Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68506. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-5306. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share