Technical Papers
Mar 31, 2021

Diagnostic-Oriented and Evaluation-Driven Framework for Bus Route Performance Improvement

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 6

Abstract

This paper develops a diagnostic-oriented and evaluation-driven framework that can bridge the gap between transit performance evaluation and improvement prioritization at the route level, where the roles of government agencies, transit operators, and passengers are incorporated. In the proposed framework, input and output variables are extracted from multiple data sources to evaluate technical efficiency and service effectiveness of bus routes, and after which, the inefficient bus routes are analyzed through an improvement diagnosing process featured with route categorization and improvement direction identification. Three alternative strategies, namely, adjusting single critical input or output strategy, adjusting multiple critical input or output strategy, and simultaneously controlling both input and output strategy are developed. Recommendations for selecting these strategies are also provided for transit agencies to develop practical solutions. The framework is applied and validated in a case study for the service performance improvement of 23 bus routes in Jinan, China.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data (including bus GPS data and Smart Card data), models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61773293.

References

Awasthi, A., S. S. Chauhan, H. Omrani, and A. Panahi. 2011. “A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 61 (3): 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.019.
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.” Manage. Sci. 30 (9): 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
Barnum, D. T., S. Tandon, and S. McNeil. 2008. “Comparing the performance of bus routes after adjusting for the environment using data envelopment analysis.” J. Transp. Eng. 134 (2): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:2(77).
Boile, M. P. 2001. “Estimating technical and scale inefficiencies of public transit systems.” J. Transp. Eng. 127 (3): 187–194.
Cavana, R. Y., L. M. Corbett, and Y. L. Lo. 2007. “Developing zones of tolerance for managing passenger rail service quality.” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 24 (1): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710720303.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. M. Seiford, and J. Stutz. 1985. “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopman’s efficient empirical production functions.” J. Econom. 30 (1–2): 91–107.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (6): 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
Chen, C. M., J. Du, J. Huo, and J. Zhu. 2012. “Undesirable factors in integer-valued DEA: Evaluating the operational efficiencies of city bus systems considering safety records.” Decis. Support Syst. 54 (1): 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.040.
Chen, Y., and J. Zhu. 2003. “DEA models for identifying critical performance measures.” Ann. Oper. Res. 124 (1–4): 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000004771.11875.9f.
Chiou, Y. C., L. W. Lan, and B. T. H. Yen. 2012. “Route-based data envelopment analysis models.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 48 (2): 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.10.006.
Chu, X., G. J. Fielding, and B. W. Lamar. 1992. “Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 26 (3): 223–230.
De Oña, J., and R. De Oña. 2015a. “Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches.” Transp. Sci. 49 (3): 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2014.0544.
Oña, J. D., R. D. Oña, L. Eboli, and G. Mazzulla. 2013. “Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach.” Transp. Policy 29 (Sep): 219–226.
De Oña, R., and J. De Oña. 2015b. “Analysis of transit quality of service through segmentation and classification tree techniques.” Transportmetrica A: Trans. Sci. 11 (5): 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2014.1003111.
Eboli, L., and G. Mazzulla. 2009. “A new customer satisfaction index for evaluating transit service quality.” J. Public Transp. 12 (3): 21. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.3.2.
Eboli, L., and G. Mazzulla. 2011. “A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view.” Transp. Policy 18 (1): 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2014. “Best practice in evaluating transit performance.” Accessed April 20, 2020. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/content/transit/pages/bestpracticesinevaluatingtransitperformancefinalreport.pdf?sfvrsn=48878730_0.
Fielding, G. J., M. E. Brenner, and K. Faust. 1985. “Typology for bus transit.” Transp. Res. Part A: General 19 (3): 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(85)90015-9.
Friman, M., and M. Fellesson. 2009. “Service supply and customer satisfaction in public transportation: The quality paradox.” J. Public Transp. 12 (4): 57. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.4.
Garcia Sanchez, I. M. 2009. “Technical and scale efficiency in Spanish urban transport: Estimating with data envelopment analysis.” Adv. Oper. Res. 2009: 15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/721279.
Hahn, J. S., D. K. Kim, H. C. Kim, and C. Lee. 2013. “Efficiency analysis on bus companies in Seoul city using a network DEA model.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (6): 1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0467-x.
Hanumappa, D., P. Ramachandran, T. Sitharam, and S. Lakshmana. 2015. “Performance evaluation of Bangalore metropolitan transport corporation: An application of data envelopment analysis.” J. Public Transp. 18 (2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.18.2.1.
Hawas, Y., M. Khan, and N. Basu. 2015. “Evaluating and enhancing the operational performance of public bus systems using GIS-based data envelopment analysis.” J. Public Transp. 15 (2): 19–44. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.15.2.2.
Hensher, D. A., P. Stopher, and P. Bullock. 2003. “Service quality––Developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 37 (6): 499–517.
Karlaftis, M. G. 2004. “A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152 (2): 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00029-8.
Karlaftis, M. G., J. Golias, and E. Papadimitriou. 2001. “Transit quality as an integrated traffic management strategy: Measuring perceived service.” J. Public Transp. 4 (1): 27. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.4.1.2.
Karlaftis, M. G., and D. Tsamboulas. 2012. “Efficiency measurement in public transport: Are findings specification sensitive?” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 46 (2): 392–402.
Kittelson and Associates, United States, Federal Transit Administration, Transit Cooperative Research Program, and Transit Development Corporation. 2003. Vol. 88 of A guidebook for developing a transit performance-measurement system. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Li, X., Y. Liu, Y. Wang, and Z. Gao. 2016. “Evaluating transit operator efficiency: An enhanced DEA model with constrained fuzzy-AHP cones.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (English Edition) 3 (3): 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2016.05.004.
Li, X., J. Yu, J. Shaw, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Route-level transit operational-efficiency assessment with a bootstrap super-data-envelopment analysis model.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 143 (3): 04017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000388.
Mahmoud, M., and J. Hine. 2013. “Using AHP to measure the perception gap between current and potential users of bus services.” Transp. Plann. Technol. 36 (1): 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2012.745316.
MBTA (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority). 2018. “Better bus project.” Accessed April 20, 2020. https://www.mbta.com/projects/better-bus-project.
Metropolitan Council. 2019. “Transit system performance evaluation: Twin cities metropolitan region.” Accessed April 10, 2020. https://www1.nyc.gov/html/brt/downloads/pdf/better-buses-action-plan-2019.pdf.
Minocha, I., P. S. Sriraj, P. Metaxatos, and P. Thakuriah. 2008. “Analysis of transit quality of service and employment accessibility for the Greater Chicago, Illinois, Region.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2042 (1): 20–29. https://doi.org/10.3141/2042-03.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Transit capacity and quality of service manual. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Transit capacity and quality of service manual. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
New York City. 2019. “Better buses action plan.” Accessed March 1, 2020. https://www1.nyc.gov/html/brt/downloads/pdf/better-buses-action-plan-2019.pdf.
Rodier, C., and E. Issac. 2016. Transit performance measures in California. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
Ryus, P., J. Ausman, D. Teaf, M. Cooper, and M. Knoblauch. 2000. “Development of Florida’s transit level-of-service indicator.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1731 (1): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.3141/1731-15.
Sánchez Pérez, M., J. Carlos Gázquez Abad, G. María Marín Carrillo, and R. Sánchez Fernández. 2007. “Effects of service quality dimensions on behavioural purchase intentions: A study in public-sector transport.” Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 17 (2): 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710735164.
Sheth, C., K. Triantis, and D. Teodorović. 2007. “Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 43 (4): 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.010.
Tran, K. D., A. Bhaskar, J. Bunker, and B. Lee. 2017. “Data envelopment analysis (DEA) based transit routes performance evaluation.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
TriMet. 2017. “Better bus service.” Accessed April 19, 2020. https://trimet.org/betterbus/#future.
Tyrinopoulos, Y., and C. Antoniou. 2008. “Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications.” Transp. Policy 15 (4): 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002.
Viton, P. A. 1997. “Technical efficiency in multi-mode bus transit: A production frontier analysis.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 31 (1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00019-7.
Xin, Y., L. Fu, and F. F. Saccomanno. 2005. “Assessing transit level of service along travel corridors: Case study using the transit capacity and quality of service manual.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1927 (1): 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192700129.
Yu, M. M., and C. K. Fan. 2009. “Measuring the performance of multimode bus transit: A mixed structure network DEA model.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 45 (3): 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.10.001.
Zhu, J. 2014. Vol. 213 of Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. New York: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: Apr 21, 2020
Accepted: Dec 30, 2020
Published online: Mar 31, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 31, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., 4800 Cao’an Rd., Shanghai 201804, China; Visiting Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, P.O. Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53211. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-6956. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, P.O. Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53211 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Xiaoguang Yang [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., 4800 Cao’an Rd., Shanghai 201804, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share