Technical Papers
Oct 30, 2020

From Driving Simulator Experiments to Field-Traffic Application: Improving the Transferability of Car-Following Models

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147, Issue 1

Abstract

Over the last few decades, there have been two main streams of data used for driving behavior research: trajectory data collected from the field [such as using video recordings and global positioning systems (GPS)] and experimental data from driving simulators (where the behaviors of the drivers are recorded in controlled laboratory conditions). Previous research has shown that the parameters of car-following models developed using simulator data are not directly transferable to the field. In this research, we investigate the differences in detail and compare alternative methods to overcome the problem. Two types of approaches are tested in this regard: (1) econometric approaches for increasing model transferability—Bayesian updating and combined transfer estimation—and (2) joint estimation using both data sources simultaneously. Car-following models based on a stimulus-response framework are developed in this regard, using experimental data collected at the University of Leeds Driving Simulator (UoLDS) and detailed trajectory data collected at California Interstate 80 (I-80), in the US, and the UK Motorway 1 (M1). The estimation results of the initial models show that car-following models using driving-simulator data are closer to the UK (M1) data than the I-80 data but not directly transferable. Performances of the proposed approaches for improving transferability are evaluated using t-tests for individual parameter equivalence and transferability test statistics (TTS). The results indicate that the transferability can be improved after parameter updating, and the combined transfer estimation is found to outperform the other approaches. The findings of this study will enable a more effective usage of the driving simulator data for the estimation of mainstream mathematical models of driving behavior while the techniques used can be applied to other types of econometric models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies (the field data can be found on the NGSIM website at https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/ngsim.htm). Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (anonymized driving simulator data can be made available based on request).

Acknowledgments

The core part of this research is supported by the Next Generation Driving Behavior Model (NG-DBM) project funded by the FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant of the European Union (PCIG14-GA-2013-631782) and the Economic and Social Research Council, UK. Prof. Stephane Hess’s contribution is supported by the European Research Council through the consolidator Grant No. 615596-DECISIONS. We would like to thank Michael Daly of the UoLDS team for creating the driving simulator scenarios and Dr. Daryl Hibberd for his feedback on the design of the experiments.

References

Aghabayk, K., M. Sarvi, and W. Young. 2012. “Understanding the dynamics of heavy vehicle interactions in car-following.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (12): 1468–1475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000463.
Ahmed, I., D. Xu, N. Rouphail, and A. Karr. 2019. “Lane change rates at freeway weaving sites: Trends in HCM6 and from NGSIM trajectories.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (5): 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119841281.
Ahmed, K. I. 1999. Modeling drivers’ acceleration and lane changing behavior. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Atherton, T. J., and M. Ben-Akiva. 1976. “Transferability and updating of disaggregate travel demand models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 610: 12–18.
Bando, M., K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama. 1995. “Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation.” Phys. Rev. E 51 (2): 1035. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1035.
Bella, F., A. Garcia, F. Solves, and M. Romero. 2007. “Driving simulator validation for deceleration lane design.” In Proc., 86th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Record. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Ben-Akiva, M., and D. Bolduc. 1987. Approaches to model transferability and updating: The combined transfer estimator. Québec: Département d’économique, Université Laval.
Ben-Akiva, M., M. Bradley, T. Morikawa, J. Benjamin, T. Novak, H. Oppewal, and V. Rao. 1994. “Combining revealed and stated preferences data.” Marketing Lett. 5 (4): 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999209.
Brackstone, M., and M. McDonald. 2003. “Driver behavior and traffic modelling. Are we looking at the right issues?” In Paper Presented at the IEEE IV2003 Intelligent Vehicles Symp. Proc. (Cat. No. 03TH8683). New York: IEEE.
Branzi, V., L. Domenichini, and F. La Torre. 2017. “Drivers’ speed behavior in real and simulated urban roads—A validation study.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 49 (Aug): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.001.
Buse, D. S., M. Schettler, N. Kothe, P. Reinold, C. Sommer, and F. Dressler. 2018. “Bridging worlds: Integrating hardware-in-the-loop testing with large-scale VANET simulation.” In Proc., Paper Presented at the 2018 14th Annual Conf. on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS). New York: IEEE.
Campbell, K. L. 2012 “The SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study: Addressing driver performance and behavior in traffic safety.” Tr News 2012: 282.
Chang, D. 2018. Transferability of merging behavior models based on gap acceptance theory. Leeds, UK: Univ. of Leeds.
Chen, S., Y. Chen, S. Zhang, and N. Zheng. 2019. “A novel integrated simulation and testing platform for self-driving cars with hardware in the loop.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 4 (3): 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2019.2919470.
Dey, S. S., and J. D. Fricker. 1994. “Bayesian updating of trip generation data: Combining national trip generation rates with local data.” Transportation 21 (4): 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01110482.
Durrani, U., C. Lee, and H. Maoh. 2016. “Calibrating the Wiedemann’s vehicle-following model using mixed vehicle-pair interactions.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 67: 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.012.
Eenink, R., et al. 2014 “UDRIVE: The European naturalistic driving study.” In Proc., Transport Research Arena. Paris: French Institute of Transport, Planning and Network Sciences and Technologies.
Farah, H., S. Bekhor, A. Polus, and T. Toledo. 2009. “A passing gap acceptance model for two-lane rural highways.” Transportmetrica 5 (3): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128600902721899.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. Interstate 80 freeway dataset. Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology fact sheet. FHWA-HRT-06-137. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fouladinejad, N., N. Fouladinejad, M. A. Jalil, and J. M. Taib. 2011. “Modeling virtual driving environment for a driving simulator.” In Proc., Paper Presented at the 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. on Control System, Computing and Engineering, 27–32. New York: IEEE.
Galbraith, R. A., and D. A. Hensher. 1982. “Intra-metropolitan transferability of mode choice models.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy 16 (1): 7–29.
Gazis, D. C., R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery. 1961. “Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow.” Oper. Res. 9 (4): 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.4.545.
Godley, S. T., T. J. Triggs, and B. N. Fildes. 2002. “Driving simulator validation for speed research.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 34 (5): 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00056-2.
Hadayeghi, A., A. S. Shalaby, B. N. Persaud, and C. Cheung. 2006. “Temporal transferability and updating of zonal level accident prediction models.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 38 (3): 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.12.003.
Halkias, J., and J. Colyar. 2006. NGSIM interstate 80 freeway dataset. FHWA-HRT-06-137. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Hancock, P. 1999. “Is car following the real question—Are equations the answer?” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2 (4): 197–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00006-1.
Herman, R., and R. W. Rothery. 1965. “Car following and steady-state flow.” In Proc., Paper Presented at the 2nd Int. Symp. on the Theory of Traffic Flow, edited by J. Almond, 1–11. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Hoogendoorn, S., and R. Hoogendoorn. 2010. “Calibration of microscopic traffic-flow models using multiple data sources.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 368 (1928): 4497–4517. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0189.
Hoogendoorn, S. P. 2005. “Unified approach to estimating free speed distributions.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39 (8): 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.09.001.
Hou, Y., Y. Zhao, K. F. Hulme, S. Huang, Y. Yang, A. W. Sadek, and C. Qiao. 2014. “An integrated traffic-driving simulation framework: Design, implementation, and validation.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 45 (Aug): 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.004.
Hussain, Q., W. K. Alhajyaseen, A. Pirdavani, N. Reinolsmann, K. Brijs, and T. Brijs. 2019. “Speed perception and actual speed in a driving simulator and real-world: A validation study.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62 (Apr): 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.019.
Jamson, A. H., A. J. Horrobin, and R. A. Auckland. 2007 “Whatever happened to the LADS? Design and development of the new University of Leeds Driving Simulator.” In Proc., Driving Simulation Conf., Driving Simulation Association. Iowa City, IA. https://uolds.leeds.ac.uk/.
Karasmaa, N. 2007. “Evaluation of transfer methods for spatial travel demand models.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 41 (5): 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.009.
Karimi, A., M. Bassani, A. Boroujerdian, and L. Catani. 2020. “Investigation into passing behavior at passing zones to validate and extend the use of driving simulators in two-lane roads safety analysis.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 139 (May): 105487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105487.
Koppelman, F. S., and C. G. Wilmot. 1982. “Transferability analysis of disaggregate choice models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 895 (1): 18–24.
Koutsopoulos, H. N., and H. Farah. 2012. “Latent class model for car following behavior.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 46 (5): 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.01.001.
Kusuma, A. 2015. Modelling driving behavior at motorway weaving sections. Leeds, UK: Univ. of Leeds.
Laagland, J. 2005. “How to model aggressive behavior in traffic simulation.” In Proc., Paper Presented at the Twente Student Conf. on IT. Enschede, Netherlands: Univ. of Twente.
Lee, H. C. 2003. “The validity of driving simulator to measure on-road driving performance of older drivers.” Transp. Eng. Aust. 8: 89–100.
McGehee, D. V., E. N. Mazzae, and G. S. Baldwin. 2000. “Driver reaction time in crash avoidance research: Validation of a driving simulator study on a test track.” In Vol. 44 of Paper Presented at the Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles: Sage.
Mercat, J., N. E. Zoghby, G. Sandou, D. Beauvois, and G. P. Gil. 2019. “Inertial single vehicle trajectory prediction baselines and applications with the NGSIM dataset.” Preprint, submitted August 29, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11472.
Montanino, M., and V. Punzo. 2013. “Making NGSIM data usable for studies on traffic flow theory: Multistep method for vehicle trajectory reconstruction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2390 (1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.3141/2390-11.
Papadimitriou, S., and C. F. Choudhury. 2017. “Transferability of car-following models between driving simulator and field traffic.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2623 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.3141/2623-07.
Paschalidis, E., C. F. Choudhury, and S. Hess. 2019. “Combining driving simulator and physiological sensor data in a latent variable model to incorporate the effect of stress in car-following behavior.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 22 (Jun): 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2019.02.001.
Punzo, V., M. T. Borzacchiello, and B. Ciuffo. 2011. “On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program data.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 19 (6): 1243–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.007.
Risto, M., and M. H. Martens. 2014. “Driver headway choice: A comparison between driving simulator and real-road driving.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 25 (Jul): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.001.
Rossi, R., C. Meneguzzer, and M. Gastaldi. 2013. “Transfer and updating of Logit models of gap-acceptance and their operational implications.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 28 (Mar): 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.05.019.
Saifuzzaman, M., and Z. Zheng. 2014. “Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recent developments and research needs.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 48 (Nov): 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.008.
Santoso, D. S., and K. Tsunokawa. 2005. “Transferability and updating analysis of mode choice model between two developing countries—Predictive performance point of view.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 6: 173–185. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.6.173.
Santoso, D. S., and K. Tsunokawa. 2010. “Comparison of updating techniques in transferability analysis of work trip mode choice models in developing countries.” J. Adv. Transp. 44 (2): 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.112.
Sikder, S., A. R. Pinjari, S. Srinivasan, and R. Nowrouzian. 2013. “Spatial transferability of travel forecasting models: A review and synthesis.” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Appl. Math. 5 (2–3): 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12572-013-0090-6.
Toledo, T. 2007. “Driving behaviour: Models and challenges.” Transp. Rev. 27 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600823940.
Treiber, M., A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing. 2000. “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations.” Phys. Rev. E 62 (2): 1805. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805.
Van Hinsbergen, C., W. Schakel, V. Knoop, J. van Lint, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2015. “A general framework for calibrating and comparing car-following models.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 11 (5): 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2015.1006157.
Van Winsum, W. 1999. “The human element in car following models.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2 (4): 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00008-5.
Wilmot, C. G. 1995. “Evidence on transferability of trip-generation models.” J. Transp. Eng. 121 (5): 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:5(405).
Yan, X., M. Abdel-Aty, E. Radwan, X. Wang, and P. Chilakapati. 2008. “Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 40 (1): 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.007.
Yun, M., J. Zhao, J. Zhao, X. Weng, and X. Yang. 2017. “Impact of in-vehicle navigation information on lane-change behavior in urban expressway diverge segments.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 106 (Sep): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.025.
Zhao, M., S.-H. Wang, D. Sun, and X.-J. Wang. 2019. “A car-following model considering preceding vehicle’s lane-changing process.” IEEE Access 7: 89913–89923. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924659.
Zhao, Y., A. Wagh, Y. Hou, K. Hulme, C. Qiao, and A. W. Sadek. 2016. “Integrated traffic-driving-networking simulator for the design of connected vehicle applications: Eco-signal case study.” J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 20 (1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2014.889920.
Zhao, Y., A. Wagh, K. Hulme, C. Qiao, A. W. Sadek, H. Xu, and L. Huang. 2012. “Integrated traffic-driving-networking simulator: A unique R&D tool for connected vehicles.” In Proc., Paper Presented at the 2012 Int. Conf. on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE). New York: IEEE.
Zheng, Z. 2014. “Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 60 (Feb): 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.11.009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 147Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Oct 3, 2019
Accepted: Aug 7, 2020
Published online: Oct 30, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 30, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Evangelos Paschalidis [email protected]
Research Fellow, Choice Modelling Centre, Institute for Transport Studies, Univ. of Leeds, 36–40 University Rd., Leeds LS2 9JT, UK (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Charisma F. Choudhury [email protected]
Associate Professor, Choice Modelling Centre, Institute for Transport Studies, Univ. of Leeds, 36–40 University Rd., Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Email: [email protected]
Stephane Hess [email protected]
Professor, Choice Modelling Centre, Institute for Transport Studies, Univ. of Leeds, 36–40 University Rd., Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share