Abstract

Assessing the railway capacity of a rail network wherein a few types of trains operate with various halting patterns is very difficult, because the headway greatly varies depending on the order in which trains of different types and with different halting patterns run. This paper proposes a new headway-based analytical capacity model that considers heterogeneous train traffic. This model is based on the equalized train concept, which is a virtual train type considering the weighted performances of all train types. The equalized train allows us to ignore the heterogeneity caused by different train types and easily calculate the average headway. Additionally, the equalized train coefficient was developed to serve as a measure of traffic heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulation was used to approximate the station headway depending on the sequence of trains with different halting patterns. The results obtained by a case study on a major corridor in the Korean railway network reveal that, compared with previous models, the proposed method can obtain a more consistent capacity in accordance with the simulation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Items include the following:
Korea Railroad data—no restrictions; and
Korea Rail Network Authority data—no restrictions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 2019 Assistant Professor Support Program of Engineering College, Myongji University.

References

Abril, M., F. Barber, L. Ingolotti, M. A. Salido, P. Tormos, and A. Lova. 2008. “An assessment of railway capacity.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 44 (5): 774–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2007.04.001.
Arani, A. A. M., F. Jolai, and M. M. Nasiri. 2019. “A multi-commodity network flow model for railway capacity optimization in case of line blockage.” Int. J. Rail Transp. 7 (4): 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2019.1571450.
Cao, N., and U. Martin. 2017. “A study of homogeneity of operating programs on operation quality considering the occupancy of infrastructure.” J. Rail Transp. Plann. Manage. 7 (1–2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2017.05.002.
Carey, M. 1999. “Ex ante heuristic measures of schedule reliability.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 33 (7): 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00002-8.
Choi, J. B., and J. Lee. 2018. “A study on effectiveness of parallel arrangement of train slots in a section in which train operations reach limit of line capacity.” J. Korean Soc. Railway 21 (1): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2018.21.1.78.
Dingler, M. H., Y. C. Lai, and C. P. Barkan. 2014. “Effect of train-type heterogeneity on single-track heavy haul railway line capacity.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 228 (8): 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713496762.
Gao, M., L. Zhou, and Y. Chen. 2016. “An alternative approach for high speed railway carrying capacity calculation based on multiagent simulation.” Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2016: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4278073.
Harrod, S. 2009. “Capacity factors of a mixed speed railway network.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 45 (5): 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.03.004.
IOT (Institute of Transportation). 2008. Railway capacity manual of Taiwan railway administration. Taiwan: IOT.
Korail. 2014. 2014 statistical yearbook railroad. Daejeon, Korea: Korea Railroad.
KRNA (Korea Rail Network Authority). 2015. Design guideline and handbook of railway. Daejeon, Korea: KRNA.
Krueger, H. 1999. “Parametric modeling in rail capacity planning.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Simulation Conf., 1194–1200. New York: IEEE.
Lai, Y. C., Y. A. Huang, and H. Y. Chu. 2014. “Estimation of rail capacity using regression and neural network.” Neural Comput. Appl. 25 (7–8): 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1694-x.
Lai, Y. C., Y. H. Liu, and T. Y. Lin. 2012. “Development of base train equivalents to standardize trains for capacity analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2289 (1): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.3141/2289-16.
Lai, Y. C., Y. H. Liu, and Y. J. Lin. 2015. “Standardization of capacity unit for headway-based rail capacity analysis.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 57: 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.013.
Lai, Y. C., M. C. Shih, and J. C. Jong. 2010. “Railway capacity model and decision support process for strategic capacity planning.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2197 (1): 19–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2197-03.
Landex, A., A. H. Kaas, and O. A. Nielsen. 2008. Methods to estimate railway capacity and passenger delays. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical Univ. of Denmark.
Lin, T. Y., Y. C. Lin, and Y. C. R. Lai. 2020. “Base train equivalents for multiple train types based on delay-based capacity analysis.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A: Syst. 146 (5): 04020023. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000339.
Oh, S. M. 2018. “Optimization based compression model of train schedule for assessing track capacity.” J. Korean Soc. Railway 21 (3): 316–330. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2018.21.3.316.
Shih, M. C., C. T. Dick, and C. P. L. Barkan. 2017. “A parametric model of the train delay distribution based on traffic conflicts.” In Proc., Int. Association of Railway Operations Research (IAROR) 7th Int. Conf. on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, Delft, Netherlands: International Association of Railway Operations Research.
Sogin, S., Y. C. Lai, C. Dick, and C. P. Barkan. 2013. “Comparison of capacity of single- and double-track rail lines.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2374 (1): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.3141/2374-13.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 1996. Rail transit capacity. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2013. Transit capacity and quality of service manual. Washington, DC: TRB.
UIC (International Union of Railways). 1996. UIC leaflet 405 OR. Paris: UIC.
UIC (International Union of Railways). 2004. UIC code 406 capacity. Paris: UIC.
UIC (International Union of Railways). 2013. UIC code 406 R capacity. Paris: UIC.
Vromans, M. J., R. Dekker, and L. G. Kroon. 2006. “Reliability and heterogeneity of railway services.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 172 (2): 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.10.010.
Yamagishi. 1951. Theory and practice on railway track capacity. Tokyo: Japan National Railway Operation Dept.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Mar 1, 2020
Accepted: Jul 15, 2020
Published online: Sep 19, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Industrial Management and Engineering, Myongji Univ., 116 Myongji-ro, Cheoin-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 17058, South Korea. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-9595. Email: [email protected]
Principle Researcher, Transport Systems Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16105, South Korea. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8201-2915. Email: [email protected]
Suk-Joon Ko, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Researcher, Optimization and Analytics Office, SK Innovation, 26 Jongno, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03188, South Korea. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Railroad Management and Logistics, Korea National Univ. of Transportation, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16106, South Korea (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-3246. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share