Technical Papers
Feb 20, 2020

Right-Hook Crash Scenario: Effects of Environmental Factors on Driver’s Visual Attention and Crash Risk

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

A right-hook (RH) crash is a common type of bicycle–motor vehicle crash that occurs between a right-turning vehicle and through-moving bicycle at an intersection in right-hand driving countries. Despite the frequency and severity of this crash type, no significant driver-performance based evidence of the causes of RH crashes at signalized intersections was found in the literature. This study examined the driver’s visual attention in a right-turning scenario at signalized intersections with bicycle lanes but no exclusive right-turning lanes while interacting with a bicyclist to develop an understanding of RH crash causality. Fifty-one participants in 21 simulated road scenarios performed a right-turning maneuver at a signalized intersection while conflicting with traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Overall, a total of 820 (41 × 20) observable right-turn maneuvers with visual attention data were analyzed. The results show that in the presence of conflicting oncoming left-turning vehicular traffic, drivers spent less visual attention on the approaching bicyclist, thus, making them less likely to be detected by the driver. The presence of oncoming left-turning traffic and the bicyclist’s speed and relative position, and conflicting pedestrians were found likely to increase the risk of RH crashes. The results of the current study will help identify effective crash mitigation strategies that may include improving the vehicle–human interface or the implementation of design treatments in the road environment to improve driver and bicyclist performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, and code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. Specifically, driver’s visual attention data (number of fixations and durations) for each scenario aggregated by area of interest is available.

Acknowledgments

The material in this paper is supported by the ODOT under Grant No. SPR 767. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ODOT. Additionally, this study was conducted with support from the Oregon State Center for Healthy Aging Research, Life Registry. The authors would like to thank Graduate Research Assistant Hisham Jashami for his assistance in preparing Figs. 1013.

References

Baumann, M. R. K., Rösler, D., and J. F. Krems. 2007. “Situation awareness and secondary task performance while driving.” In Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, edited by D. Harris, 256–263. Berlin: Springer.
Borowsky, A., D. Shinar, and Y. Parmet. 2008. “Sign location, sign recognition, and driver expectancies.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 11 (6): 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.06.003.
Dill, J., C. M. Monsere, and N. McNeil. 2012. “Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 44 (1): 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.030.
Dingus, T. A., et al. 2006. The 100-car naturalistic driving study, phase II—Results of the 100-car field experiment. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Falzetta, M. 2004. “A comparison of driving performance for individuals with and without attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Psychology, Clemson Univ.
Hunter, W. W., W. E. Pein, and J. C. Stutts. 1995. “Bicycle-motor vehicle crash types: The early 1990s.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1502: 65–74.
Hurwitz, S. D., and C. Monsere. 2013. Improved pedestrian safety at signalized intersections operating the flashing yellow arrow. Portland, OR: Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium.
Karsch, H. M., J. H. Hedlund, J. Tison, and W. A. Leaf. 2012. Review of studies on pedestrian and bicyclist safety, 1991–2007. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Knodler, M. A., and D. A. Noyce. 2005. “Tracking driver eye movements at permissive left-turns.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 134–142. Iowa City, IA: Univ. of Iowa.
Korve, M. J., and D. A. Niemeier. 2002. “Benefit-cost analysis of added bicycle phase at existing signalized intersection.” J. Transp. Eng. 128 (1): 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:1(40).
Kothuri, S., A. Kading, A. Schrope, K. White, E. Smaglik, C. Aguilar, and W. Gil. 2018. Eliminating the right hook: Safer intersections for bikes. Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center.
Meyer, M. D. 2009. Transportation planning handbook. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). 2012. “Traffic safety facts 2010: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system.” Accessed May 13, 2013. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811659.pdf.
ODOT (Oregon DOT). 2016. Oregon bicyclist manual. Salem, OR: Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Program.
Oregon State University. 2011. “OSU driving simulator.” Accessed February 10, 2018. http://cce.oregonstate.edu/driving-and-bicycling-simulator.
Räsänen, M., and H. Summala. 1998. “Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: An in-depth study.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 30 (5): 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00007-4.
Summala, H. 1988. “Risk control is not risk adjustment: The zero-risk theory of driver behaviour and its implications.” Ergonomics 31 (4): 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138808966694.
Summala, H., E. Pasanen, M. Räsänen, and J. Sievänen. 1996. “Bicycle accidents and drivers’ visual search at left and right turns.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 28 (2): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(95)00041-0.
Treat, J. R., N. S. Tumbas, S. T. McDonald, D. Shinar, and R. D. Hume. 1979. Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents. executive summary. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Wachtel, A., and D. Lewiston. 1994. “Risk factors for bicycle-motor vehicle collisions at intersections.” ITE J. (Inst. Transp. Eng.) 64 (9): 30–35.
Wang, Y., and N. L. Nihan. 2004. “Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 36 (3): 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00009-5.
Weigand, L. 2008. A review of literature: Intersection treatments to improve bicycle access and safety. Portland, OR: Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Feb 22, 2019
Accepted: Oct 7, 2019
Published online: Feb 20, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 20, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mafruhatul Jannat [email protected]
Saxton Project Manager and Transportation Research Engineer, Leidos, 7876 Tyson Oaks Circle, Vienna, VA 22182. Email: [email protected]
Hagai Tapiro [email protected]
Postdoctoral, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, 97331. Email: [email protected]
Chris Monsere, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State Univ., Portland, OR, 97201. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvalis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-6516. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share