Alternative Methods for Estimating Seasonal Factors and Accuracy of Daily Volumes They Yield
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 4
Abstract
The Federal Highway Administration requires each state department of transportation to have a traffic monitoring program for estimation of among others annual average daily traffic (AADT), a performance measure that guides fund-allocation to the states. Determination of AADT for each road section theoretically requires year-round counts to be made at all sections of a state’s monitored road network. Because this is not cost-effective, counts are made for a short duration on the majority of road sections, and these are adjusted to AADT estimates using seasonal factors (SFs) developed from data collected at the small number of road sections, called automatic traffic recorder (ATR) stations, at which year-round counts are made. Alternative methods exist for developing the SFs. One method makes use of only the most recent calendar years’ ATR data. A second makes use of multiple calendar years of ATR data, determining the final SFs as a simple mean of SFs from each of the calendar years. A third method, developed in this research, called the weighted-factor method, also makes use of multiple calendar years of ATR data but combines SFs from these calendar years taking into consideration their respective variances. The three methods were empirically investigated for the accuracy of the AADT estimates they yield, and the weighted-factor method found to yield the most accurate AADT-estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party (traffic volume data collected at permanent count stations). Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Tennessee Department of Transportation for providing the data collected at their permanent traffic count stations as part of a research project on traffic monitoring which had Contract No. RES2016-01. The authors also thank the Federal Highway Administration for access to the traffic volume data reported by US states since 2011, and to Maryland Department of Transportation for providing the traffic volume data collected at their continuous count stations in 2010. Finally, the authors thank the Center for Energy Systems Research (CESR) at Tennessee Technological University for funding support for the first author.
References
Badoe, D. A., S. Click, J. Oswalt, M. Edwards, and E. Humphreys. 2018. The traffic monitoring program research project: Comparison of TDOT practices with those of selected states. Cookeville, TN: Tennessee DOT, Tennessee Technological Univ.
Bassan, S. 2009. “A statistical practical methodology of statewide traffic pattern grouping and precision analysis.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 36 (3): 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1139/L08-137.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 2008. Update of guidelines and operating procedures for the traffic census program. Sacramento, CA: California DOT.
El Esawey, M. 2016. “Toward a better estimation of annual average daily bicycle traffic: Comparison of methods for calculating daily adjustment factors.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2593 (1): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2593-04.
FDOT (Florida DOT). 2007. Traffic monitoring handbook. Tallahassee, FL: Transportation Statistics Office.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. Traffic monitoring guide. Washington, DC: USDOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. “Special tabulations.” Accessed December 15, 2017. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/tables/tmasdata/.
Georgia DOT Office of Transportation Data. 2018. Georgia’s traffic monitoring guide. Atlanta: GDOT.
MDOT (Maryland DOT). 2016. Maryland traffic monitoring system handbook. Hanover, MD: MDOT.
Monney, M. G. 2018. “Alternative methods for estimating seasonal factors and their accuracy in prediction of annual average daily traffic from short period traffic counts.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Technological Univ.
Nosal, T., L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and Z. Krstulic. 2014. “Incorporating weather: Comparative analysis of annual average daily bicyclist traffic estimation methods.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2468 (1): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-12.
NTSDOT (New York State DOT). 2011. 2011 traffic data report for New York state. New York: NYSDOT.
ODOT (Ohio DOT). 2017. “Traffic monitoring.” Accessed May 17, 2017. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/TechServ/traffic/Pages/SeaAdjFctrs.aspx.
Ritchie, S. G. 1986. “A statistical approach to statewide traffic counting.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1090 (Mar): 14–21.
TDOT (Tennessee DOT). 2015. Tennessee traffic monitoring guide. Nashville, TN: TDOT.
WDOT (Washington DOT). 2016. Short count factoring guide. Washington, DC: WDOT.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 9, 2019
Accepted: Aug 28, 2019
Published online: Jan 22, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.