Safety Implications of Converting Continuous Green T-Intersections Back to Conventional T-Intersections
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 4
Abstract
A continuous green T-intersection (CGT) is an innovative intersection that can improve the through traffic capacity by allowing major-leg vehicles on the top side of the T-intersection to pass through without stopping. Recently, traffic engineers decided to cease CGT operations at several T-intersections in Florida because of traffic safety concerns, conversion to a four-legged intersection, pedestrians’ demands, and non-compliance with the latest Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In this study, safety effects of recent conversions of CGTs back to conventional T-intersections in Florida are explored. An empirical Bayes (EB) before-and-after study method is adopted. The results indicate significant reductions in total, fatal-and-injurious, rear-end, and CGT-related crashes by approximately 30%–50% following the conversion. To validate the results, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted with new data from four states. The results are consistent for total, fatal-and-injurious, and CGT-related crashes with those from the before-and-after study. The results also show that crashes at CGTs can be minimized by providing a physical separation between the acceleration lane for the merging vehicles and the CGT through lane, along with other factors. Because Florida’s T-intersections that were converted back to the conventional design from CGT had no physical separation, the results showed a significant safety improvement following the conversion. Therefore, the decision to cease CGT operations at the Florida study sites was supported from the safety aspect. We concluded that safety at CGTs can be a concern compared to that at non-CGTs; however, it can be significantly improved by providing appropriate countermeasures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Florida Department of Transportation for financially supporting this study (Project No. BDV24-977-27). All opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Florida Department of Transportation.
References
AASHTO. 2010. Highway safety manual. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Durnbin, P. 2014. Review of seagull intersection road safety performance. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Transport Agency, New Zealand Government.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2009. Manual on uniform traffic control devices. Washington, DC: USDOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2010. Continuous green T-intersection intersection safety case study. FHWA-SA-09-016. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fridstrøm, L., J. Ifver, S. Ingebrigtsen, R. Kulmala, and L. K. Thomsen. 1995. “Measuring the contribution of randomness, exposure, weather, and daylight to the variation in road accident counts” Accid. Anal. Prev. 27 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(94)E0023-E.
Gross, F., B. Persaud, and C. Lyon. 2010. A guide to developing quality crash modification factors. FHWA-SA-10-032. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Harper, J., W. Smart, M. De Roos, and M. J. Harper. 2011. “Seagull intersection layout, Island Point Road: A case study.” In Proc., Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conf. Perth, WA, Australia: Perth Convention Exhibition Centre.
Hauer, E. 1997. Observational before/after studies in road safety. Estimating the effect of highway and traffic engineering measures on road safety. Warrington, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Jarem, E. 2004. “Safety and operational characteristics of continuous green through lanes at signalized intersections in Florida.” In ITE 2004 Annual Meeting and Exhibit. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
Meuleners, L., and D. Hendrie. 2008. An evaluation of the state black spot program in Western Australia, 2000-2002. Bentley, WA: Curtin Univ. of Technology.
Miaou, S. P. 1996. Measuring the goodness-of-fit of accident prediction models. FHWA-RD-96-040. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Radalj, T., R. Reveley, S. Sultana, and D. Johnston. 2006. Seagull island evaluation. Perth, WA: Main Roads Western Australia.
Sando, T., D. Chimba, V. Kwigizile, and H. Walker. 2011. “Safety analysis of continuous green through lane intersections.” J. Transp. Res. Forum 50 (1): 5–17.
Tang, J., and S. Levett. 2010. “Driver behaviour and crash profiles at Seagull T-junctions on high speed rural roads” J. Australas. Coll. Road Saf. 21 (2): 27.
Wood, J., and E. T. Donnell. 2016. “Safety evaluation of continuous green T intersections: A propensity scores-genetic matching-potential outcomes approach” Accid. Anal. Prev. 93 (Aug): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.015.
Zhang, M., L. Meuleners, and D. Hendrie. 2014a. An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the state black spot program in Western Australia: 2007–2008. Bentley, WA: Curtin-Monash Accident Research Centre.
Zhang, M., L. Meuleners, and D. Hendrie. 2014b. An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the state black spot program in Western Australia: 2009–2010. Bentley, WA: Curtin-Monash Accident Research Centre.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 25, 2018
Accepted: Aug 26, 2019
Published online: Feb 3, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 3, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.