Technical Papers
Nov 30, 2019

Critical Assessment of Microscopic Simulation Models for Simulating Turbulence around Motorway Ramps

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 2

Abstract

In current motorway design practice, microscopic simulation is used to assess the traffic safety and capacity implications of design variants. Many different simulation packages are available, and many researchers have invested effort in improving and calibrating models that describe driving behavior. This paper examines traffic simulation models for merging situations in high traffic volume. Based on a multicriteria analysis, two simulation software packages (VISSIM version 10 and MOTUS) were selected and calibrated using a recently collected set of rich empirical trajectory data from an on-ramp, an off-ramp, and two weaving segments in the Netherlands. The results show that both packages are as yet unable to simulate turbulent traffic around motorway ramps realistically, in terms of lane change locations and headway distribution. This is a drawback when assessing traffic operations for specific designs. The simulated gap acceptance distributions were found to have comparable shapes as they were derived from empirical data. This is an advantage when assessing the traffic safety of a specific design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Rijkswaterstaat, the motorway agency of the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure, and Water Management.

References

Aarts, E., and J. Korst. 1988. Simulated annealing and Boltzmann machines. New York: Wiley.
AASHTO. 2011. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ahmed, K., M. Ben-Akiva, H. Koutsopoulos, and R. Mishalani. 1996. “Models of freeway lane changing and gap acceptance behavior.” Transp. Traffic Theory 13: 501–515.
Ahmed, K. I. 1999. “Modeling drivers’ acceleration and lane changing behavior.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Amin, M., and J. Banks. 2005. “Variation in freeway lane use patterns with volume, time of day, and location.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1934 (1): 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193400114.
Balal, E., R. L. Cheu, and T. Sarkodie-Gyan. 2016. “A binary decision model for discretionary lane changing move based on fuzzy inference system.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 67 (Jun): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.009.
Bando, M., K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama. 1995. “Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation.” Phys. Rev. E 51 (2): 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1035.
Barceló, J., and J. Casas. 2005. Dynamic network simulation with AIMSUN, 57–98. Boston: Springer.
Barceló, J., E. Codina, J. Casas, J. L. Ferrer, and D. García. 2004. “Microscopic traffic simulation: A tool for the design, analysis and evaluation of intelligent transport systems.” J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 41 (2): 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-005-3808-2.
Caliper. 2011. TransModeler user’s guide: Version 2.6. Newton, MA: Caliper.
Cantisani, G., G. D. Serrone, and G. D. Biagio. 2018. “Calibration and validation of and results from a micro-simulation model to explore drivers’ actual use of acceleration lanes.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 89 (Dec): 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.09.007.
Carter, M., H. Rakha, and M. V. Aerde. 1999. “Variability of traffic-flow measures across freeway lanes.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 26 (3): 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1139/l98-065.
Cassidy, M. J., and J. Rudjanakanoknad. 2005. “Increasing the capacity of an isolated merge by metering its on-ramp.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39 (10): 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.12.001.
Chandler, R. E., R. Herman, and E. W. Montroll. 1958. “Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following.” Oper. Res. 6 (2): 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.6.2.165.
Chen, D., and S. Ahn. 2018. “Capacity-drop at extended bottlenecks: Merge, diverge, and weave.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 108 (Feb): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.006.
Chih-Sheng, C., and A. Nichols. 2015. “Deriving a surrogate safety measure for freeway incidents based on predicted end-of-queue properties.” IET Intel. Transport Syst. 9 (1): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0199.
Chong, L., M. M. Abbas, A. Medina Flintsch, and B. Higgs. 2013. “A rule-based neural network approach to model driver naturalistic behavior in traffic.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 32 (Jul): 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.011.
Choudhury, C., V. Ramanujam, and M. Ben-Akiva. 2009. “Modeling acceleration decisions for freeway merges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2124 (1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.3141/2124-05.
Choudhury, C. F. 2007. “Modeling driving decisions with latent plans.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Daamen, W., M. Loot, and S. P. Hoogendoorn. 2010. “Empirical analysis of merging behavior at freeway on-ramp.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2188 (1): 108–118. https://doi.org/10.3141/2188-12.
Daganzo, C. F. 2002a. “A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. I: Long homogeneous freeway sections.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 36 (2): 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00042-4.
Daganzo, C. F. 2002b. “A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. II: Merges and the onset of congestion.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 36 (2): 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00043-6.
Dijker, T., and P. Knoppers. 2006a. FOSIM 5.1 program description. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Dijker, T., and P. Knoppers. 2006b. FOSIM 5.1 user manual. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Dijkstra, A. 2011. “En route to safer roads: How road structure and road classification can affect road safety.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning and Geo Information Management, Univ. of Twente.
DMRB (Design Manual for Roads and Bridges). 1994. Vol. 6 of The design of major interchanges. London: The Highways Agency, Transport Scotland, Transport Wales, Dept. for Regional Development.
Duncan, G. 2000. Paramics technical report: Car-following, lane-changing and junction modeling. Edinburgh, Scotland: Quadstone.
Duret, A., S. Ahn, and C. Buisson. 2011. “Passing rates to measure relaxation and impact of lane-changing in congestion.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 26 (4): 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00675.x.
Fellendorf, M., and P. Vortisch. 2010. Microscopic traffic flow simulator VISSIM, 63–93. New York: Springer.
Fritzsche, H.-T. 1994. “Amodel for traffic simulation.” Traffic Eng. Control 35 (5): 317–321.
Garber, N. J., and M. Fontaine. 1999. Final report-guidelines for preliminary selection of the optimum interchange type for a specific location. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Gazis, D. C., R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery. 1961. “Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow.” Oper. Res. 9 (4): 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.4.545.
Gazis, D. C., R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery. 1963. “Analytical methods in transportation: Mathematical car-following theory of traffic flow.” J. Eng. Mech. Dev. 89 (6): 29–46.
Gipps, P. G. 1981. “A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 15 (2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0.
Gipps, P. G. 1986. “A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 20 (5): 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(86)90012-3.
Golob, T. F., W. W. Recker, and V. M. Alvarez. 2004. “Freeway safety as a function of traffic flow.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 36 (6): 933–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2003.09.006.
Halati, A., H. Lieu, and S. Walker. 1997. “CORSIM-corridor traffic simulation model.” In Traffic Congestion and Traffic Safety in the 21st Century: Challenges, Innovations, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Hamdar, S. H., H. S. Mahmassani, and M. Treiber. 2015. “From behavioral psychology to acceleration modeling: Calibration, validation, and exploration of drivers’ cognitive and safety parameters in a risk-taking environment.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 78 (Aug): 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.011.
HCM (Highway Capacity Manual). 2016. A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hidas, P. 2005. “Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 13 (1): 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2004.12.003.
Hill, C., L. Elefteriadou, and A. Kondyli. 2015. “Exploratory analysis of lane changing on freeways based on driver behavior.” J. Transp. Eng. 141 (4): 04014090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000758.
Holm, P., D. Tomich, J. Sloboden, and C. Lowrance. 2007. Traffic analysis toolbox volume iv: Guidelines for applying corsim microsimulation modeling software. Washington, DC: ITT Industries.
Kesting, A., M. Treiber, and D. Helbing. 2007. “General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1999 (1): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.3141/1999-10.
Kim, S., and B. Coifman. 2013. “Driver relaxation impacts on bottleneck activation, capacity, and the fundamental relationship.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 36 (Nov): 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.016.
Knoop, V. L., A. Duret, C. Buisson, and B. Van Arem. 2010. “Lane distribution of traffic near merging zones influence of variable speed limits.” In Proc., 13th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Kondyli, A., and L. Elefteriadou. 2011. “Modeling driver behavior at freeway-ramp merges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2249 (1): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3141/2249-05.
Kondyli, A., and L. Elefteriadou. 2012. “Driver behavior at freeway-ramp merging areas based on instrumented vehicle observations.” Transp. Lett. 4 (3): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2012.04.03.129-141.
Kusuma, A., R. Liu, C. Choudhury, and F. Montgomery. 2015. “Lane-changing characteristics at weaving section.” In Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Lee, C., B. Hellinga, and F. Saccomanno. 2003a. “Proactive freeway crash prevention using real-time traffic control.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 30 (6): 1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1139/l03-040.
Lee, C., B. Hellinga, and F. Saccomanno. 2003b. “Real-time crash prediction model for the application to crash prevention in freeway traffic.” Transp. Res. Board 1840 (1): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.3141/1840-08.
Lownes, N., and R. Machemehl. 2006. “Sensitivity of simulated capacity to modification of VISSIM driver behavior parameters.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1988 (1): 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198800113.
Martínez, M. P., A. Garcia, and A. T. Moreno. 2011. “Traffic microsimulation study to evaluate freeway exit ramps capacity.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 16: 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.437.
Mathew, T. V., and P. Radhakrishnan. 2010. “Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 136 (1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(59).
McKay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. 1979. “Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics 21 (2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755.
Michaels, R. 1963. “Perceptual factors in car following.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2018. “MITSIMlab web page.” Accessed January 16, 2018. https://its.mit.edu/software/mitsimlab.
MOTUS. 2018. “MOTUS.” Accessed January 24, 2018. http://homepage.tudelft.nl/05a3n/.
Park, B., and H. Qi. 2005. “Development and evaluation of a procedure for the calibration of simulation models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1934 (1): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193400122.
PTV. 2017. PTV VISSIM 10 user manual. Karlsruhe, Germany: PTV.
Punzo, V., M. Montanino, and B. Ciuffo. 2015. “Do we really need to calibrate all the parameters? Variance-based sensitivity analysis to simplify microscopic traffic flow models.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16 (1): 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2331453.
RAA (Richtlinie für die anlage von autobahnen). 2008. Richtlinie für die anlage von autobahnen. Köln, Germany: Forschungsgesellschaft für strassen- and Verkehrswesen.
Rijkswaterstaat. 1992. Richtlijnen voor het Ontwerpen van Autosnelwegen. Utrecht, Netherlands: Rijkswaterstaat.
Rijkswaterstaat. 2017. Richtlijn Ontwerp Autosnelwegen 2017. Utrecht, Netherlands: Rijkswaterstaat.
RVV (Reglement verkeersregels en verkeerstekens). 1990. Reglement verkeersregels en verkeerstekens. Hague, Netherlands: RVV.
Schakel, W., B. van Arem, H. van Lint, and G. Tamminga. 2013. “A modular approach for exchangeable driving task models in a microscopic simulation framework.” In Proc., 16th Int. IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems. New York: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Society.
Schakel, W. J. 2015. “Development, simulation and evaluation of In-car advice on headway, speed and lane.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering and Geo Sciences, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Schakel, W. J., V. L. Knoop, and B. van Arem. 2012. “Integrated lane change model with relaxation and synchronization.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2316 (1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.3141/2316-06.
Sparmann, U. 1979. “The importance of lane-changing on motorways.” Traffic Eng. Control 20 (6): 320–323.
Sun, D., and L. Elefteriadou. 2010. “Research and implementation of lane-changing model based on driver behavior.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2161 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2161-01.
Sun, D. J., and A. Kondyli. 2010. “Modeling vehicle interactions during lane-changing behavior on arterial streets.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 25 (8): 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00679.x.
Tarko, A. P. 2012. “Use of crash surrogates and exceedance statistics to estimate road safety.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 45 (Mar): 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.008.
Toledo, T. 2003. “Integrated driving behavior modeling.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Toledo, T., H. N. Koutsopoulos, and M. Ben-Akiva. 2007. “Integrated driving behavior modeling.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 15 (2): 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.02.002.
Treiber, M., A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing. 2000. “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations.” Physical Rev. E 62 (2): 1805. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805.
Van Beinum, A. 2018. Empirical trajectory data. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Van Beinum, A., H. Farah, F. Wegman, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2016. “Critical assessment of methodologies for operations and safety evaluations of freeway turbulence.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2556 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3141/2556-05.
Van Beinum, A., H. Farah, F. Wegman, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2018. “Driving behaviour at motorway ramps and weaving segments based on empirical trajectory data.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 92 (Jul): 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.018.
Van Beinum, A., M. Hovenga, V. Knoop, H. Farah, F. Wegman, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2017. “Macroscopic traffic flow changes around ramps.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 14 (7): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2017.1415997.
Van Lint, H., W. Schakel, G. Tamminga, P. Knoppers, and A. Verbraeck. 2016. “Getting the human factor into traffic flow models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2561 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/2561-04.
Vermijs, R., and H. Schuurman. 1994. “Evaluating capacity of freeway weaving sections and on-ramps using the microscopic simulation model FOSIM.” In Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity. Vermont South, VIC, Australia: Australian Road Research Board.
Wan, X., P. J. Jin, and B. Ran. 2014. “Modeling vehicle interactions during freeway ramp merging in congested weaving section.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wang, X., M. Hadiuzzaman, T. Z. Qiu, and X. Yan. 2014. “Sensitivity analysis of freeway capacity at a complex weaving segment.” In CICTP 2014: Safe, Smart, and Sustainable Multimodal Transportation Systems. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Wiedemann, R. 1974. “Simulation des Straßenverkehrsflusses.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Traffic Engineering, Univ. of Karlsruhe, Univ. Institut für Verkehrswesen.
Wiedemann, R. 1991. “Modelling of RTI-elements on multi-lane roads.” In Advanced Telematics in Road Transport. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Willmann, G. 1978. Zustandsformen des Verkehrsablaufs auf Autobahnen. Karlsruhe, Germany: Dept. of Traffic Engineering, Univ. of Karlsruhe.
Yang, Q. I., and H. N. Koutsopoulos. 1996. “A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 4 (3): 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00006-X.
Young, W., A. Sobhani, M. G. Lenné, and M. Sarvi. 2014. “Simulation of safety: A review of the state of the art in road safety simulation modelling.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 66 (May): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.008.
Zhang, L., S. Cai, Y. Zhang, and M. Zhang. 2010. “Comparison of lane changing algorithms between NGSIM and CORSIM.” In Proc., 71st Vehicular Technology Conf. New York: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Society.
Zheng, Z. 2014. “Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 60 (Feb): 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.11.009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146Issue 2February 2020

History

Received: Jul 9, 2018
Accepted: Jun 14, 2019
Published online: Nov 30, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Apr 30, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Dept. of Transport and Planning, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA, Delft, Netherlands (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-7378. Email: [email protected]
Project Engineer, Dept. of Traffic and Roads, Witteveen+Bos, Van Twickelostraat 2, P.O. Box 233, 7400 AE, Deventer, Netherlands. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1021-702X. Email: [email protected]
Haneen Farah [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Dept. of Transport and Planning, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA, Delft, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Wouter Schakel [email protected]
Postdoctoral, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Dept. of Transport and Planning, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA, Delft, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Fred Wegman [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Dept. of Transport and Planning, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA, Delft, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Serge Hoogendoorn [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Dept. of Transport and Planning, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA, Delft, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share