Technical Papers
Oct 28, 2019

Data Fusion Approach for Evaluating Route Choice Models in Large-Scale Complex Urban Rail Transit Networks

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146, Issue 1

Abstract

With the increases in both the urban rail transit (URT) network scale and complexity, a route choice model that was previously developed may not function properly anymore and therefore must be constantly evaluated if possible and updated whenever necessary. This paper develops and uses a posterior approach that fuses multisource data from both the automatic fare collection (AFC) and automatic train supervision (ATS) systems to provide accurate and intelligent evaluation of route choice models, especially for large-scale complex URT networks. A method to rebuild passengers’ journey one by one is put forward that makes the proposed approach work in a more disaggregate manner. Then, observed travel time (OTT), and simulated travel time (STT), which are deduced by fusing multisource data from AFC and ATS systems, are defined. Instead of using traditional manual-based methods, the evaluation of route choice models is conducted by comparing and testing the distributions of both OTTs and STTs, and two nonparametric statistical techniques (NPSTs) are adopted. Pilot case studies are conducted on the Beijing subway network and the results obtained clearly show that the approach can disaggregately evaluate the route choice model and can also be easily incorporated into an automatic evaluation procedure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71701152), the Research Program of Science and Technology Commission in Shanghai (18510745800), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (22120180067). The authors also wish to acknowledge Beijing Subway Co., Ltd, for providing basic data during the research.

References

Asakura, Y., T. Iryo, Y. Nakajima, T. Kusakabe, Y. Takagi, and M. Kashiwadani. 2008. “Behavioural analysis of railway passengers using smart card data.” In Urban transport XIV urban transport & the environment in century, 599–608. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Ben-Elia, E., R. D. Pace, G. N. Bifulco, and Y. Shiftan. 2013. “The impact of travel information’s accuracy on route-choice.” Transp. Res. Part C 26 (1): 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.07.001.
Bovy, P. H. L., and S. Hoogendoorn-Lanser. 2005. “Modelling travel route choice behaviour in multi-modal transport networks.” Transportation 32 (4): 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7963-2.
Coldren, G. M., and F. S. Koppelman. 2005. “Modeling the competition among air-travel itinerary shares: GEV model development.” Transp. Res. Part A 39 (4): 345–365.
Fay, M. P., and M. A. Proschan. 2010. “Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules.” Stat. Surv. 4: 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS051.
Friedrich, M., I. Hofsass, and S. Wekeck. 2001. “Timetable-based transit assignment using branch and bound.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1752 (1): 100–107. https://doi.org/10.3141/1752-14.
Fung, S. W. C., C. O. Tong, and S. C. Wong. 2005. “Validation of a conventional metro network model using real data.” J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Technol. Plann. Oper. 9 (2): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450590934624.
Gong, L., and W. Fan. 2017. “Applying travel-time reliability measures in identifying and ranking recurrent freeway bottlenecks at the network level.” J. Transp. Eng. 143 (8): 04017042. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000072.
Hurk, E. V. D., L. Kroon, G. Maróti, and P. Vervest. 2015. “Deduction of passengers’ route choices from smart card data.” IEEE. Trans. Intell. Transp. 16 (1): 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2333583.
Kato, H., Y. Kaneko, and M. Inoue. 2010. “Comparative analysis of transit assignment: Evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo metropolitan area.” Transportation 37 (5): 775–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9295-8.
Kusakabe, T., T. Iryo, and Y. Asakura. 2010. “Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behavior with smart card transaction data.” Transportation 37 (5): 731–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9290-0.
Leurent, F., and X. Y. Xie. 2017. “Exploiting smartcard data to estimate distributions of passengers’ walking speed and distances along an urban rail transit line.” Transp. Res. Procedia 22: 45–54.
Lo, S. M., and Z. Fang. 2000. “A spatial-grid evacuation model for buildings.” J. Fire Sci. 18 (5): 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/073490410001800503.
Lu, Y. L., J. Z. He, J. An, and G. J. Miao. 2011. “Research on rules for eliminating outliers and its application to target prediction.” [In Chinese.] Command Control Simul. 33 (4): 98–102.
Monterola, C., E. F. Legara, D. Pan, K. K. Lee, and G. G. Hung. 2016. “Non-invasive procedure to probe the route choices of commuters in rail transit systems.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 80: 2387–2391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.459.
Nielsen, O. A. 1996. “Do stochastic traffic assignment models consider differences in road users’ utility functions?” In Proc., 24th PTRC Conf. 1996 Seminar M. London: PTRC Education and Research Services.
Nielsen, O. A. 2002. “Croucher workshop on advanced modeling for transit operations and service planning.” In Timetable-based transit assignment with error components in the utility function. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ.
O’Connor, P. D. T. 2002. Practical reliability engineering. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Poon, M. H., C. O. Tong, and S. C. Wong. 2004. “Validation of a schedule-based capacity restraint transit assignment model for a large-scale network.” J. Adv. Transp. 38 (1): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670380103.
Prato, C. G., and S. Bekhor. 2006. “Applying branch-and-bound technique to route choice set generation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1985 (1): 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198500103.
Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. 2002. Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ramming, M. S. 2002. “Network knowledge and route choice.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Smirnov, N. 1948. “Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions.” Ann. Math. Stat. 19 (2): 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730256.
Sun, L., Y. Lu, J. G. Jin, D-H. Lee, and K. W. Axhausen. 2015. “An integrated Bayesian approach for passenger flow assignment in metro networks.” Transp. Res. Part C 52 (3): 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.001.
Tavassoli, A., M. Mesbah, and M. Hickman. 2018. “Application of smart card data in validating a large-scale multi-modal transit assignment model.” Public Transp. 10 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-017-0171-1.
Van der Waerden, P., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. 2004. “Choice set composition in the context of pedestrian’s route choice modeling.” In Proc., 83rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Van Der Zijpp, N. J., and S. Fiorenzo-Catalano. 2005. “Path enumeration by finding the constrained K-shortest paths.” Transp. Res. Part B 39 (6): 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.004.
Vuk, G., and C. O. Hansen. 2006. “Validating the passenger traffic model for Copenhagen.” Transportation 33 (4): 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-005-4335-5.
Xu, R. H., Q. Luo, and P. Gao. 2009. “Passenger flow distribution model and algorithm for urban rail transit network based on multi-route choice.” [In Chinese.] J. China Railway Soc. 31 (2): 110–114.
Zhao, J., A. Rahbee, and N.H.M. Wilson. 2007. “Estimating a rail passenger trip origin-destination matrix using automatic data collection systems.” Comput. -Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 22 (5): 376–387.
Zhu, W., H. Hu, and Z. Huang. 2014. “Calibrating rail transit assignment models with genetic algorithm and automated fare collection data.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 29 (7): 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12075.
Zhu, W., W. Wang, and Z. Huang. 2017. “Estimating train choices of rail transit passengers with real timetable and automatic fare collection data.” J. Adv. Transp. 1–12.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 146Issue 1January 2020

History

Received: Nov 2, 2018
Accepted: Apr 24, 2019
Published online: Oct 28, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Transportation Engineering, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Research Assistant, College of Transportation Engineering, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, PR China. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Director of USDOT Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education and Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, EPIC Bldg., Room 3261, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-710X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share