Improved Design Limit for Antiram Bollard Systems Subjected to Truck Impact
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 143, Issue 11
Abstract
Antiram bollard systems (ABS) can effectively prevent vehicle bombs from approaching protected areas and thus reduce the damage from blasts and debris. This paper presents an assessment of the current design limits for determining whether the designed ABS can prevent truck penetration successfully according to SD-STD-02.01, Revision A. Four available crash tests and 69 numerical experiments were assembled for the evaluation. Assessment results showed that the current design limits for either residual angle of inclination of bollard or residual height of bollard present poor performances. Numerical investigations showed the failed ABS were penetrated by trucks in two failure modes, and Failure Modes I and II can be determined by and , respectively. On this basis, an improved design limit is proposed in terms of both and . In addition, an analytical model for predicting and is developed. Two plastic-hinge patterns of ABS were considered in this model. Comparisons between the predictions and experimental results from crash tests and numerical simulations indicate that the improved design limit combined with the developed analytical model predicts the performances of all the ABS accurately and can be used for the structural design of ABS.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51408175.
References
Adobe Photoshop 13.0 [Computer software]. Adobe Systems, San Francisco.
ASTM. (2015). “Standard test method for crash testing of vehicle security barriers.” ASTM F2656/F2656M-15, West Conshohocken, PA.
Atahan, A. O., and Ross, H. E. (2004). “Computer simulation of recycled content guardrail post impacts.” J. Transp. Eng., 733–741.
BSI (British Standards Institution). (2007). “Specification for vehicle security barriers.” BS PAS 68:2007, London.
Campbell, K. L. (1974). “Energy basis for collision severity.” SAE Technical Paper 740565, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2114–2126.
Chen, L., Xiao, Y., Xiao, G., Liu, C. L., and Agrawal, A. K. (2015). “Test and numerical simulation of truck collision with anti-ram bollards.” Int. J. Impact Eng., 75(1), 30–39.
Coughlin, A. M., Musselman, E. S., Schokker, A. J., and Linzell, D. G. (2010). “Behavior of portable fiber reinforced concrete vehicle barriers subject to blasts from contact charges.” Int. J. Impact Eng., 37(5), 521–529.
Hampton, C. E., and Gabler, H. C. (2010). “Evaluation of the accuracy of NASS/CDS delta-V estimates from the enhanced WinSmash algorithm.” Ann. Adv. Automot. Med., 54(54), 241–252.
Hampton, C. E., and Gabler, H. C. (2013). “Development of a missing post repair guideline for longitudinal barrier crash safety.” J. Transp. Eng., 549–555.
Hu, B., Li, G. Q., Chen, S. W., and Shi, W. L. (2011). “State-of-the-art review on anti-ram bollards.” Appl. Mech. Mater., 90–93, 3206–3213.
Hu, B., Li, G. Q., and Sun, J. Y. (2014). “Numerical investigation of K4-rating shallow footing fixed anti-ram bollard system subjected to vehicle impact.” Int. J. Impact Eng., 63(1), 72–87.
Itoh, Y., Liu, C., and Kusama, R. (2007). “Modeling and simulation of collisions of heavy trucks with concrete barriers.” J. Transp. Eng., 462–468.
KARCO Engineering. (2005a). “Crash test report for perimeter barriers and gates tested to SD-STD-02.01.”, Adelanto, CA.
KARCO Engineering. (2005b). “Crash test report for perimeter barriers and gates tested to SD-STD-02.01.”, Adelanto, CA.
KARCO Engineering. (2006). “Crash test report for perimeter barriers and gates tested to SD-STD-02.01.”, Adelanto, CA.
LS-DYNA 971 [Computer software]. Livermore Software Technology, Livermore, CA.
NCAC (National Crash Analysis Center). (2011). “Finite element model archive.” ⟨http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html⟩ (Dec. 1, 2012).
Pennsylvania Transportation Institute. (2005). “Crash testing of RSA/KC anti-ram foundation bollard pad in accordance with U.S. Department of State Diplomatic Security SD-STD-02.01.”, University Park, PA.
USDOS (U.S. Department of State). (2003). “Test method for vehicle crash testing of perimeter barriers and gates.”, Revision A, Washington DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 18, 2016
Accepted: May 16, 2017
Published online: Sep 13, 2017
Published in print: Nov 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Feb 13, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.