Technical Papers
Dec 8, 2016

Development of Rehabilitation Strategies Based on Structural Capacity for Composite and Flexible Pavements

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 143, Issue 4

Abstract

The selection of long-lasting and cost-effective rehabilitation strategies is crucial to pavement engineers. Development of rehabilitation and preservation decision trees and support tools that involve performance scores are pursued by agencies across the world. However, for the purpose of rehabilitation selection, pavement scores determined from pavement-distress surveys reveal flaws in capturing pavement needs. This paper introduces a rehabilitation methodology based on the application of a damage ratio estimated from falling-weight deflectometer (FWD) data, and a rutting index determined from a distress survey. A detailed project-level investigation was conducted on a series of flexible and composite (asphalt over an existing portland cement concrete layer) pavement sections from a high-traffic-volume interstate highway network. The study includes the evaluation of existing pavements through back-calculation of FWD data and monitoring field-distress data, conducting asphalt mixture laboratory testing as well as mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide and life cycle cost analysis. The results of analyses are used to develop a robust methodology and a series of time-based rehabilitation strategies for a network of flexible and composite pavement sections located in Oklahoma.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Oklahoma Department of Transportation and its personnel for their effort to provide helpful feedback on findings of this study. Gratitude is also expressed to Arizona State University for their contribution in the testing and data analysis.

References

AASHTO. (1993). “AASHTO guide for design of pavement structure.” Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2008). “Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice.” Washington, DC.
Appea, A., and Al-Qadi, I. (2000). “Assessment of falling weight deflectometer data for stabilized flexible pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1709, 19–25.
ARA (Applied Research Associate). (2004). “Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structure.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Applied Research Associates, ERES Consultants Division, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Chen, D., Chen, D. H., and Scullion, T. (2006). “Using nondestructive testing technologies to assist in selecting the optimal pavement rehabilitation strategy.” J. Test. Eval., 35(2), 1–9.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (1997). “Pavement management analysis, multi-year prioritization.”, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2004). “Life-cycle cost analysis RealCost user manual.” Washington, DC.
Flintsch, G., Loulizi, A., and Mcghee, K. (2006). “Determination of the in-place hot-mix asphalt layer modulus for rehabilitation projects using a mechanistic-empirical procedure.”, Virginia Dept. of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
Hall, K., Xiao, D., and Wang, K. (2011). “Calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for flexible pavement design in Arkansas.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2226, 135–141.
Hall, K. T., Correa, C. E., Carpenter, S. H., and Elliot, R. P. (2001). “Rehabilitation strategies for highway pavements.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Kim, S., Ceylan, H., Ma, D., and Gopalakrishnan, K. (2014). “Calibration of pavement ME design and mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide performance prediction models for Iowa pavement systems.” J. Transp. Eng., .
Lamptey, G., Ahmad, M. Z., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2005). “Life cycle cost analysis for INDOT pavement design procedures.”, Indiana Dept. of Transportation, West Lafayette, IN.
Lee, E.-B., Kim, C., and Harvey, J. (2011). “Selection of pavement for highway rehabilitation based on life-cycle cost analysis: Validation of California interstate 710 project, phase 1.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2227, 23–32.
Lewis, M. P., Jeong, D. H., and Khaleghian, H. (2013). “Calibration of controlling input models for pavement management system.”, Oklahoma Transportation Center, Stillwater, OK.
Liu, W., and Scullion, T. (2001). Modulus 6.0 for Windows: User’s manual, Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, TX.
Lytton, R. L. (1987). “Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling.” Proc., 2nd North American Conf. on Managing Pavements, Vol. 2, Ministry of Transportation, ON, Canada, 2.3–2.20.
Mahoney, J. P. (1989). “Mechanistic-based overlay design procedure for Washington state flexible pavements.” Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Seattle, Washington.
Mandapaka, V., Basheer, I., Sahasi, K., Ullidtz, P., Harvey, J. T., and Sivaneswaran, N. (2012). “Mechanistic-empirical and life-cycle cost analysis for optimizing flexible pavement maintenance and rehabilitation.” J. Transp. Eng., 625–633.
Mehta, Y., and Roque, R. (2003). “Evaluation of FWD data for determination of layer moduli of pavements.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 25–31.
MEPDG 1.1 [Computer software]. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Washington, DC.
Modulus 6.0 [Computer software]. Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, TX.
Morian, D., and Cumberledge, G. (1997). “Techniques for selecting pavement rehabilitation strategies: Pennsylvania case studies.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1568, 131–138.
Newcomb, D. E., Lee, S. W., Mahoney, J. P., and Jackson, N. C. (1989). “The use of falling weight deflectometer data in monitoring flexible pavement systems.” Nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.
Nobakht, M., Sakhaeifar, M. S., Newcomb, D., Gudipudi, P., Stempihar, J., and Underwood, S. (2016a). “Development of performance-based and cost-effective rehabilitation strategies for high-traffic-volume flexible pavement.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nobakht, M., Sakhaeifar, M. S., Newcomb, D., and Underwood, S. (2016b). “Mechanistic-empirical methodology for the selection of cost-effective rehabilitation strategy for flexible pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 1–10.
ODOT (Oklahoma Department of Transportation). (2009). 2009 Standard Specification Book, ODOT, Pavement Management Branch, Oklahoma City.
ODOT (Oklahoma Department of Transportation). (2010). “Pavement preservation projects decision tree.” Oklahoma City.
ODOT (Oklahoma Department of Transportation). (2011). “Conditions and performance of pavements on the national highway system in Oklahoma.” Oklahoma City.
ODOT (Oklahoma Department of Transportation). (2016). “Materials and testing e-Guide: Asphalt mix designs.” ⟨http://www.odot.org/materials/acmix-webreps/iMIXID_GRP_PDF.pdf⟩ (Oct. 24, 2016).
Peshkin, D. G., Pierce, P. L. M., and Krstulovich, J. M., Jr. (2009). “Consideration of pavement preservation in mechanistic-empirical design and analysis of pavement structures.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Rahim, A., and George, K. (2003). “Falling weight deflectometer for estimating subgrade elastic moduli.” J.Transp. Eng., 100–107.
Real-Cost 2.5 [Computer software]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC.
Sakhaeifar, M., Brown, E., Tran, N., and Dean, J. (2013). “Evaluation of long-lasting perpetual asphalt pavement with life-cycle cost analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2368, 3–11.
Scullion, T. (1988). “Incorporating a structural strength index into the Texas pavement evaluation system.” Texas State Dept. Highways Public Transportation, Austin, TX.
USGS Groundwater Watch. (2016). “Active groundwater level network: Oklahoma active water level network.” ⟨http://groundwaterwatch.usgs.gov/StateMap.asp?sa=OK&sc=40⟩ (Oct. 24, 2016).
Zaghloul, S., and Elfino, M. (2000). “Pavement rehabilitation selection based on mechanistic analysis and field diagnosis of falling weight deflectometer data: Virginia experience.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1730, 177–186.
Zaghloul, S., He, Z., Vitillo, N., and Kerr, J. (1998). “Project scoping using falling weight deflectometer testing: New Jersey experience.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1643, 34–43.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 143Issue 4April 2017

History

Received: Feb 10, 2016
Accepted: Sep 16, 2016
Published online: Dec 8, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2017
Discussion open until: May 8, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mona Nobakht, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Maryam S. Sakhaeifar [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135. E-mail: [email protected]
David Newcomb [email protected]
Senior Research Scientist, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share