Case Studies
Sep 20, 2023

Factors That Drive Resident Support for Planned Rain Gardens in Urban Neighborhoods

Publication: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract

Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) promises to improve stormwater management while making landscapes more sustainable. The ability of GSI to achieve water quality objectives and provide socioeconomic cobenefits depends in part on public perceptions and support. This study contributes to the literature on public perceptions of top-down, municipal-scale GSI. We examined variation in public support for planned rain gardens and the factors associated with support in a large Midwestern city in the US. We collected survey data (N=588) in two socioeconomically distinct neighborhoods and fit multivariate linear regression models to explore how variables derived from economics, landscape ecology, and outreach and engagement literatures impact support. There was little difference in support between neighborhoods. The expectation of increased property values and improved neighborhood appearance, alignment with personal norms and experience with conservation landscaping, and satisfaction with outreach and engagement programs were significantly associated with higher support. In addition, strong neighborhood identity magnified the effects of several variables. These results suggest that planners should work with communities to identify rain garden designs and locations that balance functionality with aesthetic preferences to minimize potential negative socioeconomic effects while meeting stormwater management objectives. Proactive community engagement that is attentive to local norms and values and identifies appropriate rain garden maintenance plans could improve the long-term effectiveness of GSI by increasing the likelihood of local support.

Practical Applications

Cities are increasingly using technologies called green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) to manage drainage water, including flooding and sewage overflows to waterways. Common examples of GSI in urban areas are rain gardens and permeable pavement. Vegetated with perennial plants, rain gardens potentially offer additional benefits to urban environments such as pollinator habitat, lower summer heat, and improved community aesthetics, which can enhance health and well-being from activities like increased exercise. However, installing rain gardens alters the landscape, which can be viewed positively or negatively by residents. Public views on rain gardens are important because if viewed negatively, fewer people benefit and otherwise-effective GSI programs could fail to be pursued. On the other hand, community support for GSI could lead to long-term viability of the infrastructure and its benefits. We studied public perceptions of GSI in Columbus, Ohio, where the city planned to install rain gardens throughout residential neighborhoods. Residents were more likely to be supportive of planned rain gardens if they (1) felt they would improve their property values and appearance of the neighborhood, (2) felt sufficiently informed by the city about the rain garden plans, and (3) already had experience with conservation landscaping at home.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Leslie Westerfeldt and Matt Repasky from the City of Columbus for their guidance and assistance and two anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the quality of the article. We also thank research assistants Mac McCloy, Dominique Provencher, Connor Kolet, Nicole Bekesz, Jenna Courtot, Grace Gothard, and Isabella Lause for facilitating survey distribution, postcard drop-off, and follow up. This study was funded by Grant No. 102459 from the City of Columbus and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University.

References

Alves, A., J. Patiño Gómez, Z. Vojinovic, A. Sánchez, and S. Weesakul. 2018. “Combining co-benefits and stakeholders perceptions into Green infrastructure selection for flood risk reduction.” Environments 5 (2): 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5020029.
Ando, A. W., C. L. Cadavid, N. R. Netusil, and B. Parthum. 2020. “Willingness-to-volunteer and stability of preferences between cities: Estimating the benefits of stormwater management.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 99 (Jan): 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102274.
Anguelovski, I., J. Connolly, and A. L. Brand. 2018. “From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life.” City 22 (3): 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126.
Baptiste, A. K., C. Foley, and R. Smardon. 2015. “Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: A case study of Syracuse, NY.” Landscape Urban Plann. 136 (Apr): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012.
Barnett, J., S. Graham, T. Quinn, W. N. Adger, and C. Butler. 2021. “Three ways social identity shapes climate change adaptation.” Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (12): 124029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac36f7.
Brent, D. A., L. Gangadharan, A. Lassiter, A. Leroux, and P. A. Raschky. 2017. “Valuing environmental services provided by local stormwater management.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (6): 4907–4921. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019776.
Brown, H. L., D. G. Bos, C. J. Walsh, T. D. Fletcher, and S. RossRakesh. 2016. “More than money: How multiple factors influence householder participation in at-source stormwater management.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 59 (1): 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.984017.
Brown, J. A., K. L. Larson, S. B. Lerman, D. L. Childers, R. Andrade, H. L. Bateman, S. J. Hall, P. S. Warren, and A. M. York. 2020. “Influences of environmental and social factors on perceived bio-cultural services and disservices.” Front. Ecol. Evol. 8 (Oct): 569730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.569730.
Carmichael, C. E., and M. H. McDonough. 2019. “Community stories: Explaining resistance to street tree-planting programs in Detroit, Michigan, USA.” Soc. Nat. Resour. 32 (5): 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1550229.
Chaffin, B. C., W. D. Shuster, A. S. Garmestani, B. Furio, S. L. Albro, M. Gardiner, M. Spring, and O. O. Green. 2016. “A tale of two rain gardens: Barriers and bridges to adaptive management of urban stormwater in Cleveland, Ohio.” J. Environ. Manage. 183 (Mar): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.025.
City of Columbus. 2015. “The City of Columbus’ integrated plan and 2015 wet weather management program update report.” City of Columbus, Dept. of Public Utilities. https://www.columbus.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=83176.
Curran, W., and T. Hamilton. 2012. “Just green enough: Contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn.” Local Environ. 17 (9): 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.729569.
Elands, B., et al. 2019. “Biocultural diversity: A novel concept to assess human-nature interrelations, nature conservation and stewardship in cities.” Urban For. Urban Greening 40 (Apr): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.006.
Everett, G., J. Lamond, A. T. Morzillo, F. K. S. Chan, and A. M. Matsler. 2016. “Sustainable drainage systems: Helping people live with water.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 169 (2): 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.14.00076.
Everett, G., J. E. Lamond, A. T. Morzillo, A. M. Matsler, and F. K. S. Chan. 2018. “Delivering Green Streets: An exploration of changing perceptions and behaviours over time around bioswales in Portland, Oregon.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 11 (2): S973–S985.
Faehnle, M., P. Backlund, L. Tyrvainen, J. Niemela, and V. Yli-Pelkonen. 2014. “How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case Finland.” Landscape Urban Plann. 130 (Oct): 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012.
Ferenchik, M. 2017. “Some North Linden residents join those concerned.” In Columbus dispatch, The (OH): Web edition. Columbus, OH: Gannett.
Gifford, R., and A. Nilsson. 2014. “Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review.” Int. J. Psychol. 49 (3): 141–157.
Gobster, P. H., J. I. Nassauer, T. C. Daniel, and G. Fry. 2007. “The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?” Landscape Ecol. 22 (7): 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x.
Grabowski, Z. J., T. McPhearson, and S. T. A. Pickett. 2023. “Transforming US urban green infrastructure planning to address equity.” Landscape Urban Plann. 229 (Jan): 104591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104591.
Heckert, M., and C. D. Rosan. 2016. “Developing a green infrastructure equity index to promote equity planning.” Urban For. Urban Greening 19 (Mar): 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.011.
Herreros-Cantis, P., and T. McPhearson. 2021. “Mapping supply of and demand for ecosystem services to assess environmental justice in New York City.” Ecol. Appl. 31 (6): e02390.
Hoover, F.-A., S. Meerow, Z. J. Grabowski, and T. McPhearson. 2021. “Environmental justice implications of siting criteria in urban green infrastructure planning.” J. Environ. Policy Plan. 23 (5): 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1945916.
Inglehart, R. 1995. “Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies.” PS: Political Sci. Polit. 28 (1): 57–72.
Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2010. Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Taylor & Francis.
Irvin, R., and J. Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?” Public Administration Rev. 64 (1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
Jackson-Smith, D., C. Flint, M. Dolan, C. Trentelman, G. Holyoak, B. Thomas, and G. Ma. 2016. “Effectiveness of the drop-off/pick-up survey methodology in different neighborhood types.” J. Rural Soc. Sci. 31 (3): 3.
Kaplowitz, M. D., and F. Lupi. 2012. “Stakeholder preferences for best management practices for non-point source pollution and stormwater control.” Landscape Urban Plann. 104 (3–4): 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.013.
Keeley, M., A. Koburger, D. Dolowitz, D. Medearis, D. Nickel, and W. Shuster. 2013. “Perspectives on the use of Green infrastructure for stormwater management in Cleveland and Milwaukee.” Environ. Manage. 51 (6): 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0032-x.
Kempton, W., J. Firestone, J. Lilley, T. Rouleau, and P. Whitaker. 2005. “The offshore wind power debate: Views from Cape Cod.” Coastal Manage. 33 (2): 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750590917530.
Knudsen, J. K., L. C. Wold, O. Aas, J. J. K. Haug, S. Batel, P. Devine-Wright, M. Qvenild, and G. B. Jacobsen. 2015. “Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK.” Land Use Policy 48 (Nov): 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.031.
Li, J., and J. I. Nassauer. 2020. “Cues to care: A systematic analytical review.” Landscape Urban Plann. 201 (Sep): 103821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103821.
Mas-Colell, A., M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. 1995. Vol. 1 of Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
McGarity, A., F. Hung, C. Rosan, B. Hobbs, M. Heckert, and S. Szalay. 2015. “Quantifying benefits of green stormwater infrastructure in Philadelphia.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015, 409–420. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Moore, C. W. 2014. The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. New York: Wiley.
Nassauer, J. I. 1995a. “Culture and changing landscape structure.” Landscape Ecol. 10 (4): 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129257.
Nassauer, J. I. 1995b. “Messy ecosystems, orderly frames.” Landscape J. 14 (2): 161–170. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.14.2.161.
Nassauer, J. I. 1997. Cultural sustainability: Aligning aesthetics and ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Netusil, N. R., Z. Levin, V. Shandas, and T. Hart. 2014. “Valuing green infrastructure in Portland, Oregon.” Landscape Urban Plann. 124 (Apr): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.002.
OEPA (Ohio Environmental Protection Agency). 2005. Total maximum daily loads for the Big Walnut Creek watershed. Columbus, OH: OEPA.
OEPA (Ohio Environmental Protection Agency). 2007. Total maximum daily loads for the Olentangy River watershed. Columbus, OH: OEPA.
Parks, K. 2018. “Blueprint Columbus: Rain gardens move south, with plenty of ‘headsup’.” The Columbus Dispatch. August 27, 2018.
Prudencio, L., and S. E. Null. 2018. “Stormwater management and ecosystem services: A review.” Environ. Res. Lett. 13 (3): 033002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a.
Reed, M. S. 2008. “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review.” Biol. Conserv. 141 (10): 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
Rogge, E., J. Dessein, and H. Gulinck. 2011. “Stakeholders perception of attitudes towards major landscape changes held by the public: The case of greenhouse clusters in Flanders.” Land Use Policy 28 (1): 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.014.
Schifman, L. A., D. L. Herrmann, W. D. Shuster, A. Ossola, A. Garmestani, and M. E. Hopton. 2017. “Situating Green infrastructure in context: A framework for adaptive socio-hydrology in cities.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (12): 10139–10154. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020926.
Shandas, V., A. Nelson, C. Arendes, and C. Cibor. 2010. Tabor to the river: An evaluation of outreach efforts and opportunities for engaging residents in stormwater management. Portland, OR: Bureau of Environmental Services.
Shin, D. W., and L. McCann. 2018. “Enhancing adoption studies: The case of residential stormwater management practices in the Midwest.” Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 47 (1): 32–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2017.3.
Spahr, K. M., M. Smith Jessica, E. McCray John, and S. Hogue Terri. 2021. “Reading the green landscape: Public attitudes toward green stormwater infrastructure and the perceived nonmonetary value of its co-benefits in three US cities.” J. Sustainable Water Built Environ. 7 (4): 04021017. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000963.
Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, T. Abel, G. A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof. 1999. “A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism.” Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6 (2) 81–97.
Suppakittpaisarn, P., L. Larsen, and W. C. Sullivan. 2019. “Preferences for green infrastructure and green stormwater infrastructure in urban landscapes: Differences between designers and laypeople.” Urban For. Urban Greening 43 (May): 126378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126378.
Thurston, H. W., M. A. Taylor, W. D. Shuster, A. H. Roy, and M. A. Morrison. 2010. “Using a reverse auction to promote household level stormwater control.” Environ. Sci. Policy 13 (5): 405–414.
Travaline, K., F. Montalto, and C. Hunold. 2015. “Deliberative policy analysis and policy-making in urban stormwater management.” J. Environ. Plann. Policy Manage. 17 (5): 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1026593.
Tzoulas, K., K. Korpela, S. Venn, V. Yli-Pelkonen, A. Kaźmierczak, J. Niemela, and P. James. 2007. “Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review.” Landscape Urban Plann. 81 (3): 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
US Census Bureau. 2018a. “DP05 ACS 5-year demographic and housing estimates: ZCTAS 43214.” Census.gov. Accessed August 15, 2023. https://data.census.gov/table?g=860XX00US43214&y=2018&tid=ACSDP5Y2018.DP05.
US Census Bureau. 2018b. “DP05 ACS 5-year demographic and housing estimates: ZCTAS 43224.” Census.gov. Accessed August 15, 2023. https://data.census.gov/table?q=ZCTA5+43224&y=2018&tid=ACSDP5Y2018.DP05.
USEPA. 2004. Impacts and control of CSOs and SSOs, report to Congress. EPA 833-R-04-001. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2007. Using green infrastructure to protect water quality in stormwater, CSO, nonpoint source and other water programs (policy memo 3-5-2007). Washington, DC: USEPA.
Venkataramanan, V., D. Lopez, D. J. McCuskey, D. Kiefus, R. I. McDonald, W. M. Miller, A. I. Packman, and S. L. Young. 2020. “Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review.” Sci. Total Environ. 720 (Jun): 137606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137606.
Wang, R., H. Wu, and R. Chiles. 2022. “Ecosystem benefits provision of green stormwater infrastructure in Chinese sponge cities.” Environ. Manage. 69 (3): 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01565-9.
Wild, K., A. Woodward, A. Field, and A. Macmillan. 2018. “Beyond ‘bikelash’: Engaging with community opposition to cycle lanes.” Mobilities 13 (4): 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1408950.
Williams, D. R. 2014. “Making sense of ‘place’: Reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research.” Landscape Urban Plann. 131 (Nov): 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 10Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Feb 1, 2023
Accepted: Jul 12, 2023
Published online: Sep 20, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrew Bahrou [email protected]
School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210. Email: [email protected]
Douglas L. Bessette, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Community Sustainability, Michigan State Univ., 480 Wilson Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824. Email: [email protected]
School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9615-1852. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share