Time-Lapse Resistivity Monitoring of a Simulated Runoff Test in a Bioswale, Philadelphia
Publication: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Volume 9, Issue 1
Abstract
As part of the reconstruction of Interstate-95 in Philadelphia, a series of vegetated stormwater infiltration basins (bioswales) have been installed to manage highway runoff. To assess these bioswales, we used simulated runoff tests (SRTs), where the bioswale is flooded from a fire hydrant to simulate a major storm event. SRT monitoring relies on point measurements of inflow, outflow, and soil moisture to determine the volume of stormwater the bioswale can handle and the time to recovery. To provide better spatial coverage for site assessment, we tested the use of time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) during a SRT. Using an onsite geophysical monitoring station, we performed ERT surveys every 4 h before, during, and after the SRT test. Inflow and outflow measurements taken during the SRT found that a majority of the water did not exit the bioswale via the outlet box. The time-lapse inversion results indicated that runoff uniformly spread throughout the basin before infiltrating into the heterogeneous urban soil below. The ERT demonstrated that the underlying native soil contributed to the overall performance of the bioswale, a contribution which was previously assumed to be minimal. Recovery to pretest soil moisture levels took roughly 2–3 days, according to both soil moisture sensors and time-lapse geophysical data. The SRT results were consistent with natural storm events recorded by our geophysical monitoring station, which have been monitored continuously for over a year. Use of ERT during SRTs characterize the pattern of infiltration and recovery rate of the soil beneath a stormwater control. Additionally, the heterogeneous infiltration observed during the SRT suggested that ERT surveys preconstruction may improve future planning of stormwater controls by guiding the location of infiltration measurements.
Practical Applications
To assess green infrastructure performance, we conducted a simulated runoff test by flooding a bioswale designed to accept highway runoff with water from a nearby fire hydrant to simulate a major storm. It is common during simulated runoff tests to monitor soil moisture using buried sensors, but point measurements provide limited spatial coverage. We tested an alternative method for tracking changes in soil moisture, namely time-lapse electrical resistivity, to see whether the continuous spatial coverage provided by resistivity cross sections would improve bioswale performance assessment. Resistivity decreases with increasing soil water content; hence, we saw a significant decrease in resistivity during the test. Our main finding was that water infiltrated past the bioswale fill and into the urban soil below. The bioswale was designed assuming that the urban soil would impede infiltration, but our results showed the bioswale was larger than necessary. We suggest conducting more infiltration tests on the native soil before green infrastructure is constructed because this could lead to smaller, less costly designs. For existing green infrastructure, using time-lapse resistivity imaging during simulated runoff test can provide better spatial coverage within and beneath the fill material than soil sensors alone.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on CUAHSI Hydroshare: www.hydroshare.org (DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0001003).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Pennsylvanian Department of Transportation under Contract No. 4400011166. Villanova University College of Engineering Center for Resilient Water Systems set up the SRT and provided inflow and outflow data for both the SRT and past rain events.
References
AGI (Advanced Geosciences, Inc.). 2008. Instruction manual for EarthImager 2D Version 2.4. 0 resistivity and IP inversion software. Austin, TX: AGI.
Archie, G. E. 1942. “The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics.” Trans. AIME 146 (1): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G.
Asleson, B. C., R. S. Nestingen, J. S. Gulliver, R. Hozalski, and J. L. Nieber. 2009. “Performance assessment of rain gardens.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 45 (4): 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00344.x.
Carey, A. M., G. B. Paige, B. J. Carr, and M. Dogan. 2017. “Forward modeling to investigate inversion artifacts resulting from time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography during rainfall simulations.” J. Appl. Geophys. 145 (Sep): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.08.002.
Cederkvist, K., M. B. Jensen, and P. E. Holm. 2017. “Method for assessment of stormwater treatment facilities—Synthetic road runoff addition including micro-pollutants and tracer.” J. Environ. Manage. 198 (7): 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.097.
De Carlo, L., M. C. Caputo, R. Masciale, M. Vurro, and I. Portoghese. 2020. “Monitoring the drainage efficiency of infiltration trenches in fractured and Karstified limestone via time-lapse hydrogeophysical approach.” Water 12 (7): 2009. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12072009.
De Carlo, L., K. Perkins, and M. C. Caputo. 2021. “Evidence of preferential flow activation in the vadose zone via geophysical monitoring.” Sensors 21 (4): 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041358.
Grebel, J. E., S. K. Mohanty, A. A. Torkelson, A. B. Boehm, C. P. Higgins, R. M. Maxwell, K. L. Nelson, and D. L. Sedlak. 2013. “Engineered infiltration systems for urban stormwater reclamation.” Environ. Eng. Sci. 30 (8): 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2012.0312.
Haaken, K., A. Furman, N. Weisbrod, and A. Kemna. 2016. “Time-lapse electrical imaging of water infiltration in the context of soil aquifer treatment.” Vadose Zone J. 15 (11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0028.
LaBrecque, D. J., and X. Yang. 2001. “Difference inversion of ERT data: A fast inversion method for 3-D in situ monitoring.” J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 6 (2): 83–89. https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG6.2.83.
Li, M. H., M. Swapp, M. H. Kim, K. H. Chu, and C. Y. Sung. 2014. “Comparing bioretention designs with and without an internal water storage layer for treating highway runoff.” Water Environ. Res. 86 (5): 387–397. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143013X13789303501920.
Loke, M. H., I. Acworth, and T. Dahlin. 2003. “A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys.” Explor. Geophys. 34 (3): 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG03182.
Lucke, T., M. A. K. Mohamed, and N. Tindale. 2014. “Pollutant removal and hydraulic reduction performance of field grassed swales during runoff simulation experiments.” Water 6 (7): 1887–1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6071887.
Meter Group, Inc. 2018. “Teros 11/12 user manual.” Accessed October 15, 2021. https://publications.metergroup.com/Manuals/20587_TEROS11-12_Manual_Web.pdf.
Nyquist, J., et al. 2021. I-95 girard avenue interchange stormwater project annual report: Sept 2019 to Sept 2020. Philadelphia: Temple Univ.
Oldenburg, D. W., and Y. Li. 1999. “Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys.” Geophysics 64 (2): 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444545.
Philadelphia Water Department. 2020. “Philadelphia stormwater management guidance manual.” Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.pwdplanreview.org/manual-info/guidance-manual.
Reynolds, J. M. 2011. An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Sendrós, A., M. Himi, R. Lovera, L. Rivero, R. Garcia-Artigas, A. Urruela, and A. Casas. 2020. “Geophysical characterization of hydraulic properties around a managed aquifer recharge system over the Llobregat River alluvial aquifer (Barcelona metropolitan area).” Water 12 (12): 3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123455.
Shuster, W. D., S. Dadio, P. Drohan, R. Losco, and J. Shaffer. 2014. “Residential demolition and its impact on vacant lot hydrology: Implications for the management of stormwater and sewer system overflows.” In Landscape and urban planning, 48–56. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Shuster, W. D., S. D. Dadio, C. E. Burkman, S. R. Earl, and S. J. Hall. 2015. “Hydropedological assessments of parcel-level infiltration in an arid urban ecosystem.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 79 (2): 398–406. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.05.0200.
Silberstein, R. P. 2006. “Hydrological models are so good, do we still need data?” Environ. Modell. Software 21 (9): 1340–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.019.
Spraakman, S., and J. A. P. Drake. 2021. “Hydrologic and soil properties of mature bioretention cells in Ontario, Canada.” Water Sci. Technol. 84 (12): 3541–3560. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.464.
Waxman, M. H., and L. J. M. Smits. 1968. “Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands.” Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 8 (2): 107–122. https://doi.org/10.2118/1863-A.
White, S., T. Krechmer, T. Heffernan, N. Manna, E. Mannarino, C. Bergerson, M. Olson, and J. Cruz. 2017. “Green infrastructure performance model in the real world: Modeling natural and simulated runoff events.” In Proc., Int. Low Impact Development Conf. 2016, 163–172. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 16, 2021
Accepted: Jun 27, 2022
Published online: Oct 10, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 10, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Claire J. Oswald, Christa Kelleher, Sarah H. Ledford, Kristina G. Hopkins, Anneliese Sytsma, Doerthe Tetzlaff, Laura Toran, Carolyn Voter, Integrating urban water fluxes and moving beyond impervious surface cover: A review, Journal of Hydrology, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129188, 618, (129188), (2023).