Abstract

A limited amount of data exists on the cyclic behavior of concrete-filled steel deck diaphragms, and the few historical testing programs that have been conducted used specimens that may not be representative of modern floor assemblies typical in North America. As part of a larger research project, the Steel Diaphragm Innovation Initiative, an experimental program was conducted to fill critical knowledge gaps related to the behavior and design of concrete-filled steel deck diaphragms leading to a better understanding of the seismic performance of steel buildings utilizing these types of diaphragms. The experimental program included eight diaphragm specimens that were approximately 4 m by 5 m, tested in a cantilever test setup wherein one edge is restrained against translation while the opposing edge is subjected to an in-plane cyclic displacement history. Parameters that were varied included deck height (51 mm and 76 mm), concrete cover over the deck (51 mm to 115 mm), concrete type (normal weight and lightweight), configuration of perimeter headed shear studs, and the presence and amount of reinforcing steel. Specimen behavior was quantified including initial stiffness, peak shear strength, ductility, and energy dissipation and qualitatively connected to observed cracking and deformations. The results of this experimental program, combined with tests from the literature were used to develop proposed expressions for peak shear strength and initial stiffness. The proposed expressions reasonably capture the experimental results and are suitable for design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data from the experiments is publicly available through DesignSafe (Schafer et al. 2021).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants Nos. 1562669 and 1562821, and the Steel Diaphragm Innovation Initiative which was funded by the American Institute of Steel Construction, American Iron and Steel Institute, Steel Deck Institute, Steel Joist Institute, and the Metal Building Manufacturers Association. In-kind funding was provided by Verco Decking Inc., Nelson Fastener Systems, and Banker Steel Company. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the other sponsors.

References

ABK (Agbabian Associates, S.B. Barnes Associates, and Kariotis & Associates). 1981. Methodology for mitigation of seismic hazards in existing unreinforced masonry buildings: Diaphragm testing. El Segundo, CA: ABK.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
AISC. 2016a. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016b. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute). 2013. Test standard for cantilever test method for cold-formed steel diaphragms. AISI S907-13. Washington, DC: AISI.
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute). 2017. Test standard for determining the strength and stiffness of cold-formed steel diaphragms by the cantilever test method. Washington, DC: AISI.
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute). 2020. North American standard for the design of profiled steel diaphragms. AISI S310-20. Washington, DC: AISI.
ASCE. 2022. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE standard). ASCE 7-22. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard specification for general requirements for steel sheet, metallic-coated by the hot-dip process. ASTM A924/A924M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Avellaneda-Ramirez, R. E., M. R. Eatherton, W. S. Easterling, B. Schafer, and J. Hajjar. 2021. Cantilever testing of concrete-filled steel deck composite diaphragms using various types of steel reinforcing. cold-formed steel research consortium report series. Baltimore: Cold-Formed Steel Research Consortium.
Avellaneda-Ramirez, R. E., M. R. Eatherton, W. S. Easterling, B. Schafer, and J. Hajjar. 2022. Stiffness of concrete-filled steel deck composite diaphragms. Cold-formed steel research consortium report series. Baltimore: Cold-Formed Steel Research Consortium.
Briggs, N. E., J. H. Hajjar, B. W. Schafer, W. S. Easterling, and M. R. Eatherton. 2022. Steel Diaphragm innovation initiative, Year 5, final report *addendum*. Washington, DC: American Iron and Steel Institute.
Davies, J., and J. Fisher. 1979. “The diaphragm action of composite slabs.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 67 (4): 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1979.2780.
Dodd, S. M. 1986. “Effect of edge fasteners on the seismic resistance of composite floor diaphragms.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Iowa State Univ.
Easterling, W. S., and M. Porter. 1994a. “Steel-deck-reinforced concrete diaphragms. I.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (2): 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:2(560).
Easterling, W. S., and M. Porter. 1994b. “Steel-deck-reinforced concrete diaphragms. II.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (2): 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:2(577).
Eatherton, M. R., P. E. O’Brien, and W. S. Easterling. 2020. “Examination of ductility and seismic diaphragm design force-reduction factors for steel deck and composite diaphragms.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (11): 04020231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002797.
FEMA. 2007. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components. FEMA 461. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fischer, A. W., and B. W. Schafer. 2021. “Wall-diaphragm interactions in seismic response of single-story building systems.” Eng. Struct. 247 (Nov): 113150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113150.
Fleischman, R. B., and K. T. Farrow. 2001. “Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral-system structures with flexible diaphragms.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (5): 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.36.
Fukuda, Y., S. Watanabe, T. Togawa, H. Kami, K. Yoshimura, K. Kikuchi, and K. Yoshida. 1991. “Seismic in-plane resistance of steel-deck concrete composite slabs with a bottomless trench duct.” In Proc., from the 3rd Int. Conf. on Steel-Concrete Composite Structures, 473–478. Bradford, UK: Association for Steel-Concrete Composite Structures.
Johnson, R. P., and H. Yuan. 1997. Resistance of stud shear connectors in troughs of profiled sheeting. Coventry, UK: Univ. of Warwick.
Koliou, M., A. Filiatrault, D. J. Kelly, and J. Lawson. 2016. “Distributed yielding concept for improved seismic collapse performance of rigid wall-flexible diaphragm buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (2): 04015137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001386.
Lloyd, R. M., and H. D. Wright. 1990. “Shear connection between composite slabs and steel beams.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 15 (4): 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(90)90050-Q.
Luttrell, L. 1971. “Shear diaphragms with lightweight concrete fill.” In Proc., 1st Int. Specialty Conf. on Cold Formed Steel Structures, 111–117. Rolla, MO: Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-formed Steel Structures.
Porter, M., and W. Easterling. 1988. Behavior, analysis, and design of steel-deck-reinforced concrete diaphragms. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Porter, M., and L. Greimann. 1980. Seismic resistance of composite floor diaphragms. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Rezaeian, H., G. C. Clifton, G. A. MacRae, and J. B. P. Lim. 2020. “In-plane cyclic behaviour of composite floor slab diaphragm interfaces under high-shear demand.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 167 (Apr): 105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105838.
Schafer, B. W., W. S. Easterling, R. Sabelli, M. R. Eatherton, and J. F. Hajjar. 2019. Steel diaphragm innovation initiative workshop report. Baltimore: Cold-Formed Steel Research Consortium.
Schafer, B. W., M. Eatherton, and J. Hajjar. 2021. “Cantilever diaphragm testing of concrete-filled steel deck specimens.” In Transforming building structural resilience through innovation in steel diaphragms. Austin, TX: DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-zay3-j189.
SDII (Steel Diaphragm Innovation Initiative). 2023. “SDII—Innovation in steel systems.” Accessed January 1, 2023. http://www.steeli.org/.
Wei, G., M. R. Eatherton, H. Foroughi, S. Torabian, and B. W. Schafer. 2020. Seismic behavior of steel BRBF buildings including consideration of diaphragm inelasticity, cold-formed steel research consortium report series. Baltimore: Cold-Formed Steel Research Consortium.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 150Issue 2February 2024

History

Received: Mar 9, 2023
Accepted: Sep 20, 2023
Published online: Nov 29, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 29, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. E. Avellaneda-Ramirez
Design Engineer, Magnusson Klemencic Associates, 1302 Fifth Ave., Suite 3200, Seattle, WA 98101.
Professor, Virginia Tech, 105A Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-0099. Email: [email protected]
W. S. Easterling, Dist.M.ASCE
Dean, College of Engineering, Iowa State Univ., 4100 Marston Hall, Ames, IA 50011.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Systems Engineering, John Hopkins Univ., 201P Latrobe Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-3511
J. F. Hajjar, F.ASCE
Professor and Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ., 400 Snell Engineering Center, Boston, MA 02115.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share