Mechanical Performance of Puzzle-Shaped Shear Connectors Subjected to Fully Reversed Cyclic Stress
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 7
Abstract
Recent innovations in composite dowels have led to the realization that robust hybrid systems can provide excellent strength and stiffness. In this contemporary era, puzzle-shaped and modified clothoid-shaped shear connectors are attracting interest, particularly in Europe. Their popularity stems from their outstanding shear capacities and their ease of manufacturing by virtue of having a single cutting line. Moreover, earlier studies based on pushout tests have proven this fact. Composite beams in buildings experience fully reversed cyclic stress between compression and tension during seismic events. When the concrete slab starts to crack under tensile stress, the shear capacity of the composite dowel can deteriorate considerably. Nevertheless, the influence of this cyclically applied stress on mechanical performance remains unclear. This study specifically examined puzzle-shaped shear connectors, with cyclic loading tests conducted using a component model of the composite beam, which can carry the various stress histories to the concrete slab. In all, findings obtained from 14 specimens with several influential factors clarified the cyclic behaviors and stress transfer mechanisms of puzzle-shaped shear connectors. Based on the experimentally obtained results, the applicability of existing evaluation equations was investigated with respect to the ultimate shear strength and shear force–slip displacement relation. Results indicate that those formulas overestimate the mechanical capacities of composite dowels under fully reversed cyclic stress. For that reason, this study has led to an evaluation formulation of mechanical performance that reflects the stress history effects. Ultimately, this study has proven that the proposed equations can assess the ultimate shear strength and shear force–slip displacement accurately while embracing simplicity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 20H00290. We express our deepest gratitude for their support.
References
AIJ. 2010. Design recommendations for composite constructions. [In Japanese.] Tokyo: Maruzen Publishing Co.
AISC. 2016a. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016b. Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
Bursi, O. S., and G. Gramola. 1999. “Behaviour of headed stud shear connectors under low-cycle high amplitude displacements.” Mater. Struct. 32 (4): 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479599.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1-1: Rules for buildings. Eurocode 4. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Christou, G., C. Schmidt, J. Hegger, and M. Classen. 2022. “The effect of concrete fatigue on the cyclic behaviour of composite dowels—Derivation of a design approach based on experimental findings.” Eng. Struct. 253 (Feb): 113743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113743.
Classen, M. 2018. “Limitations on the use of partial shear connection in composite beams with steel T-sections and uniformly spaced rib shear connectors.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 142 (Mar): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.11.023.
Classen, M., and J. Gallwoszus. 2016. “Concrete fatigue in composite dowels.” Struct. Concr. 17 (1): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201400120.
Classen, M., and J. Hegger. 2017a. “Assessing the pry-out resistance of open rib shear connectors in cracked concrete—Engineering model with aggregate interlock.” Eng. Struct. 148 (Oct): 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.050.
Classen, M., and J. Hegger. 2017b. “Shear-slip behaviour and ductility of composite dowel connectors with pry-out failure.” Eng. Struct. 150 (Nov): 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.065.
Classen, M., M. Herbrand, V. Adam, D. Kueres, and M. Sarac. 2018. “Puzzle-shaped rib shear connectors subjected to combined shear and tension.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 145 (Jun): 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.02.036.
El Jisr, H., A. Elkady, and D. G. Lignos. 2020. “Hysteretic behavior of moment-resisting frames considering slab restraint and framing action.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (8): 04020145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002696.
Hawkins, N. M., and D. Mitchell. 1984. “Seismic response of composite shear connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 110 (9): 2120–2136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:9(2120).
JIS (Japan Industrial Standards). 2006a. Method of test for compressive strength of concrete. JIS A 1108. Tokyo: Japan Standard Association.
JIS (Japan Industrial Standards). 2006b. Method of test for splitting tensile strength of concrete. JIS A 1113. Tokyo: Japan Standard Association.
JIS (Japan Industrial Standards). 2011. Metallic materials—Tensile testing method of test at room temperature. JIS Z 2241. Tokyo: Japan Standard Association.
Johnson, R. P. 2000. “Resistance of stud shear connectors to fatigue.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 56 (2): 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00082-6.
JSSC (Japan Society of Steel Construction). 1996. Guideline of standard push-out tests of headed stud and current situation of research on stud shear connectors. [In Japanese.] Tokyo: JSSC.
Kim, S. H., T. Batbold, S. Shah, S. Yoon, and O. Han. 2021. “Development of shear resistance formula for the Y-type perfobond rib shear connector considering probabilistic characteristics.” Appl. Sci. 11 (9): 3877. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093877.
Kim, S. H., K. S. Kim, O. Han, and J. S. Park. 2018. “Influence of transverse rebar on shear behavior of Y-type perfobond rib shear connection.” Constr. Build. Mater. 180 (Aug): 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.002.
Kisaku, T., and C. Fujiyama. 2016. “Modeling the cyclic response of perfobond-rib shear connectors.” Procedia Eng. 171 (Jan): 1317–1324.
Kopp, M., K. Wolters, M. Classen, J. Hegger, M. Gundel, J. Gallwoszus, S. Heinemeyer, and M. Feldmann. 2018. “Composite dowels as shear connectors for composite beams—Background to the design concept for static loading.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 147 (Aug): 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.013.
Kraus, D., and O. Wurzer. 1997. “Bearing capacity of concrete dowels.” In Composite construction—Conventional and innovative, 133–138. Innsbruck, Austria: IABSE.
Lee, P.-G., C. S. Shim, and S. P. Chang. 2005. “Static and fatigue behavior of large stud shear connectors for steel-concrete composite bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 61 (9): 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.01.007.
Lin, W., T. Yoda, N. Taniguchi, H. Kasano, and J. He. 2014. “Mechanical performance of steel-concrete composite beams subjected to a hogging moment.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (1): 04013031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000800.
Lin, W. W., T. Yoda, and N. Taniguchi. 2013. “Fatigue tests on straight steel-concrete composite beams subjected to hogging moment.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 80 (1): 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.009.
Liu, L., L. Zhang, L. Zhu, J. Li, Y. Yang, and L. Hao. 2023. “Study on mechanical properties of stud connectors in steel-lightweight aggregate concrete composite structures.” Structures 47 (Jan): 1072–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.145.
Liu, Y., H. Xin, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Experimental and analytical study of shear mechanism of rubber-ring perfobond connector.” Eng. Struct. 197 (Oct): 109382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109382.
Lorenc, W. 2020. “Concrete failure of composite dowels under cyclic loading during full-scale tests of beams for the ‘Wierna Rzeka’ bridge.” Eng. Struct. 209 (Apr): 110199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110199.
Lorenc, W., M. Kozuch, and S. Rowinski. 2014a. “The behaviour of puzzle-shaped composite dowels—Part I: Experimental study.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 101 (Oct): 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.013.
Lorenc, W., M. Kozuch, and S. Rowinski. 2014b. “The behaviour of puzzle-shaped composite dowels—Part II: Theoretical investigations.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 101 (Oct): 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.012.
Lorenc, W., W. Kurz, and G. Seidl. 2022. “Hybrid steel–concrete sections for bridges: Definition and basis for design.” Eng. Struct. 270 (Nov): 114902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114902.
Lu, K., L. Du, Q. Xu, Y. Yao, and J. Wang. 2023. “Fatigue performance of stud shear connectors in steel-concrete composite beam with initial damage.” Eng. Struct. 276 (Feb): 115381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115381.
Ollgaard, J. G., R. G. Slutter, and J. W. Fisher. 1971. “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete.” AISC Eng. J. 8: 55–64.
Seidl, G., E. Viefhues, J. Berthellemy, I. Mangerig, R. Wagner, W. Lorenc, M. Kozuch, J.-M. Franssen, D. Janssen, J. Ikaheimonen, R. Lundmark, O. Hechler, and N. Popa. 2013. Prefabricated enduring composite beams based on innovative shear transmission. Brussels: European Commission.
Suzuki, A., K. Abe, and Y. Kimura. 2020. “Restraint performance of stud connection during lateral–torsional buckling under synchronized in-plane displacement and out-of-plane rotation.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (4): 04020029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002582.
Suzuki, A., K. Abe, K. Suzuki, and Y. Kimura. 2021a. “Cyclic behavior of perfobond-shear connectors subjected to fully reversed cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (3): 04020355. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002955.
Suzuki, A., T. Fujita, and Y. Kimura. 2021b. “Identifying damage mechanism of gymnasium structure damaged by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake based on biaxial excitation.” Structures 35 (Jan): 1321–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.010.
Suzuki, A., and Y. Kimura. 2019. “Cyclic behavior of component model of composite beam subjected to fully reversed cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (4): 04019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002294.
Suzuki, A., and Y. Kimura. 2021. “Mechanical performance of stud connection in steel–concrete composite beam under reversed stress.” Eng. Struct. 249 (Dec): 113338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113338.
Suzuki, A., and Y. Kimura. 2023. “Rotation capacity of I-shaped beam failed by local buckling in buckling-restrained braced frames with rigid beam-column connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 149 (2): 04022243. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11745.
Suzuki, A., K. Suzuki, and Y. Kimura. 2021c. “Ultimate shear strength of perfobond shear connectors subjected to fully reversed cyclic loading.” Eng. Struct. 248 (Dec): 113240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113240.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 16, 2022
Accepted: Mar 9, 2023
Published online: May 3, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 3, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Beams
- Composite beams
- Composite materials
- Construction engineering
- Construction methods
- Continuum mechanics
- Dowels
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Engineering mechanics
- Fastening
- Forces (type)
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Shear forces
- Shear strength
- Shear stress
- Solid mechanics
- Strength of materials
- Stress (by type)
- Stress history
- Structural analysis
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Tensile strength
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Atsushi Suzuki, Yoshihiro Kimura, Yoriyuki Matsuda, Kazuhiko Kasai, Rotation Capacity of I-Shaped Beams with Concrete Slab in Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12550, 150, 1, (2024).