Proposal to Improve AISI S100 DSM Design Standards for Cold-Formed Steel Built-Up Closed Cross-Section Columns Subjected to Local–Global Interaction Buckling

This paper presents an improved design approach based on the direct strength method (DSM) in American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) design specification S100 for cold-formed steel (CFS) built-up closed cross-section columns subjected to local, global, and local–global interaction buckling modes. Initially, the failure mode and load data corresponding to various design parameters such as intermediate fastener connection spacing, boundary conditions, material properties, slenderness, and cross sections from various researchers are collected, including the authors’ test results. The design predictions using the current DSM design provisions are compared with the collected test results. The results show that the current DSM approach requires improvisation to adequately predict the axial compression load. The data are then analyzed to understand the behavioral features of the built-up closed cross-section column such as limit for interaction buckling, erosion of strength due to arrant interaction buckling, and increase in strength due to flange or web overlapping effect. The interpretation methods used to improve the current design approach are presented. The original DSM design procedure is improved by failure mode classification and modified slenderness to account for increase and erosion in strength. Finally, the safety (accuracy and reliability) of the design predictions from the improved DSM-based approach is assessed using the large amount of data collected.

Since the introduction of the direct strength method to the North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members (AISI S100) in 2001, it has gained traction among design engineers due to its simplicity, advantages over other design methods, and specific design curves for individual buckling modes. To implement the DSM for CFS built-up members, several researchers have proposed different design approaches, and research is still happening. This study is also aimed toward the same objective but is specific to the local–global interaction in built-up members. It is demonstrated why the DSM prediction is unsafe for CFS built-up members with larger intermediate fastener connection spacing and excessively safe for CFS built-up members with closer intermediate fastener connection spacing. An intermediate fastener connection spacing limit that separates the local–global interaction buckling and element overlapping effect is determined. A design proposal for limiting the interaction buckling mode and considering the overlapping effect of elements in the DSM design method is suggested. More specifically, the proposed design method is in line with the current AISI approach so the designer need not confuse how to use this new design approach in practice. Therefore, for further ease of understanding, two design examples for built-up closed cross-section columns—(1) subjected to local–global interaction buckling; and (2) subjected to element overlapping effect—are included in this paper. It is also recommended that future research may focus on further classifying the AISI main specification sections, E2 and F2 (simple classifications based on the global failure modes), based on the interaction buckling modes in built-up cross-section members.