Abstract

Wind fragility curves for roof sheathing were developed for single-family building models to investigate the effects of roof shape and roof pitch on the wind performance of roof sheathing. For gable roofs, it was found that more complex roof shapes are more likely to suffer roof sheathing damage when subjected to high winds. The probability of no roof sheathing failure can be up to 36% higher for a simple gable roof than for a complex gable roof. For hip roofs with different configurations, variation in roof shape has minimal effect on roof sheathing fragility. Roof pitch effects were also evaluated for 10 pitch angles, ranging from 14° to 45°. Results suggest that for roof pitches smaller than 27°, the effects of this angle are more substantial on the performance of gable roofs than on hip roofs. For gable roofs, the probability of no roof sheathing failure can be up to 23% higher for a 23° roof pitch than that for an 18° roof pitch. Furthermore, the inclusion of complex roof shapes in a regional hurricane loss model for New Hanover County, North Carolina, accounted for a 44% increase in estimated annual expected losses from roof sheathing damages compared to a scenario in which all roofs are assumed to have rectangular roof shapes. Therefore, to avoid an underestimation of roof damages due to high-wind impact, the inclusion of complex roof geometries in hurricane loss modeling is strongly recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) (Awards 1830511 and 2209190). Some of the building metadata used in this study were provided by Zillow through the Zillow Transaction and Assessment Dataset (ZTRAX). More information on accessing the data can be found at http://www.zillow.com/ztrax. The results and opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect the position of NSF or the Zillow Group.

References

Amini, M. O., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2014. “Quantitative insight into rational tornado design wind speeds for residential wood-frame structures using fragility approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (7): 04014033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000914.
Apivatanagul, P., R. Davidson, B. Blanton, and L. Nozick. 2011. “Long-term regional hurricane hazard analysis for wind and storm surge.” Coastal Eng. 58 (6): 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.01.015.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Brown-Giammanco, T. M., I. M. Giammanco, and H. Pogorzelski. 2018. Hurricane Harvey wind damage investigation. Richburg, SC: Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety.
Crandell, J. H., M. Nowak, E. M. Laatsch, A. van Overeem, C. Barbour, R. Dewey, H. Reigel, and H. Angleton. 1993. Assessment of damage to single-family homes caused by Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki. Upper Marlboro, MD: US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Policy Development and Research.
Datin, P. L., D. O. Prevatt, and W. Pang. 2011. “Wind-uplift capacity of residential wood roof-sheathing panels retrofitted with insulating foam adhesive.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000034.
Deierlein, G. G., F. McKenna, A. Zsarnóczay, T. Kijewski-Correa, A. Kareem, W. Elhaddad, L. Lowes, M. J. Schoettler, and S. Govindjee. 2020. “A cloud-enabled application framework for simulating regional-scale impacts of natural hazards on the built environment.” Front. Built Environ. 6 (Nov): 558706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.558706.
Dev Sarma, H., I. Zisis, and M. Matus. 2023. “Effect of roof shape on wind vulnerability of roof sheathing panels.” Struct. Saf. 100 (Jan): 102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102283.
Ellingwood, B. R., D. V. Rosowsky, Y. Li, and J. H. Kim. 2004. “Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (12): 1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921).
Ellingwood, B. R., and P. B. Tekie. 1999. “Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (4): 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(453).
El Merabet, Y., C. Meurie, Y. Ruichek, A. Sbihi, and R. Touahni. 2015. “Building roof segmentation from aerial images using a line-and region-based watershed segmentation technique.” Sensors 15 (2): 3172–3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150203172.
FEMA. 1992. Building performance: Hurricane Andrew in Florida. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2021. Hazus–MH 4.2: Hurricane model technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gao, Y., L. Nozick, J. Kruse, and R. Davidson. 2016. “Modeling competition in a market for natural catastrophe insurance.” J. Insur. Issues 39 (1): 38–68.
Gavanski, E., B. Kordi, G. A. Kopp, and P. J. Vickery. 2013. “Wind loads on roof sheathing of houses.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 114 (Mar): 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.011.
Gurley, K., J. P. Pinelli, C. Subramanian, A. Cope, L. Zhang, J. Murphree, A. Artiles, P. Misra, S. Culati, and E. Simiu. 2005. Florida public hurricane loss projection model engineering team final report. Miami: Florida International Univ.
Hamid, S. S. 2019. Florida public hurricane loss model, version 8.1. Miami: Florida International Univ.
He, W. X., and H. P. Hong. 2012. “Probabilistic characterization of roof panel uplift capacity under wind loading.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 39 (12): 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1139/l2012-114.
Kashani, A. G., A. J. Graettinger, and T. Dao. 2016. “Lidar-based methodology to evaluate fragility models for tornado-induced roof damage.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 17 (3): 04016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000224.
Lee, K. H., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2005. “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions.” Eng. Struct. 27 (6): 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.017.
Li, Y. 2005. “Fragility methodology for performance-based engineering of wood-frame residential construction.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Liu, H., and P. J. Saathoff. 1981. “Building internal pressure: Sudden change.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 107 (2): 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002707.
Marshall, R. D. 1975. “A study of wind pressures on a single-family dwelling in model and full scale.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1 (Jan): 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(75)90013-6.
Masoomi, H., M. R. Ameri, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2018. “Wind performance enhancement strategies for residential wood-frame buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (3): 04018024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001172.
Nofal, O. M., J. W. van De Lindt, T. Q. Do, G. Yan, S. Hamideh, D. T. Cox, and J. C. Dietrich. 2021. “Methodology for regional multihazard hurricane damage and risk assessment.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (11): 04021185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003144.
NRC (National Research Council). 1991. Hurricane Elena, Gulf Coast: August 29-September 2, 1985. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Peng, J. 2013. “Modeling natural disaster risk management: Integrating the roles of insurance and retrofit and multiple stakeholder perspectives.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware.
Peng, J., X. G. Shan, Y. Gao, Y. Kesete, R. A. Davidson, L. K. Nozick, and J. Kruse. 2014. “Modeling the integrated roles of insurance and retrofit in managing natural disaster risk: A multi-stakeholder perspective.” Nat. Hazards 74 (2): 1043–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1231-3.
Pinelli, J.-P., K. Gurley, C. Subramanian, S. Hamid, and G. Pita. 2008. “Validation of a probabilistic model for hurricane insurance loss projections in Florida.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (12): 1896–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.017.
Pinelli, J.-P., G. Pita, K. Gurley, B. Torkian, S. Hamid, and C. Subramanian. 2011. “Damage characterization: Application to Florida public hurricane loss model.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 12 (4): 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000051.
Pinelli, J.-P., E. Simiu, K. Gurley, C. Subramanian, L. Zhang, A. Cope, J. J. Filliben, and S. Hamid. 2004. “Hurricane damage prediction model for residential structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (11): 1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1685).
Qin, H., and M. G. Stewart. 2019. “System fragility analysis of roof cladding and trusses for Australian contemporary housing subjected to wind uplift.” Struct. Saf. 79 (Jul): 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.03.005.
Shao, S., T. Stathopoulos, Q. Yang, and Y. Tian. 2018. “Wind pressures on 4:12-sloped hip roofs of L- and T-shaped low-rise buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (7): 04018088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002077.
Sparks, P. R., S. D. Schiff, and T. A. Reinhold. 1994. “Wind damage to envelopes of houses and consequent insurance losses.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 53 (1–2): 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90023-X.
Stewart, M. G., J. D. Ginger, D. J. Henderson, and P. C. Ryan. 2018. “Fragility and climate impact assessment of contemporary housing roof sheeting failure due to extreme wind.” Eng. Struct. 171 (Sep): 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.125.
van de Lindt, J. W., and T. N. Dao. 2009. “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(169).
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, J. Lin, L. A. Twisdale Jr., M. A. Young, and F. M. Lavelle. 2006. “HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 7 (2): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94).
Wang, D., R. A. Davidson, L. K. Nozick, J. E. Trainor, and J. L. Kruse. 2020. “Computational framework to support government policy-making for hurricane risk management.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 21 (1): 04019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000348.
Zillow. 2020. “ZTRAX: Zillow transaction and assessor dataset, 2020-Q3.” Accessed December 8, 2021. https://www.zillow.com/ztrax/.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Jul 7, 2022
Accepted: Mar 1, 2023
Published online: May 12, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Shuochuan Meng, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-6896
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-6896
Caroline J. Williams, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-7664
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-7664
Rachel A. Davidson, A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-5985
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-5985
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-1210. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share