Abstract

Origami-based structures have been widely implemented in the design of deployable systems. They possess desirable properties such as easiness in manufacturing, high transportability, programmability, and the capability to fold into complex three-dimensional (3D) structures starting from planar configurations. However, their geometric complexity poses major challenges in developing efficient design methods, in which optimizing their geometries and folding motions remains a challenging task. This paper investigates the motion and shape inverse design of a Miura-based origami deployable system for architectural applications. The proposed structure folds from a flat to different 3D shapes, has 1 degree of freedom, and can fold rigidly being also flat foldable. The capabilities of the structure to fold approximating symmetrical target shapes of different geometries and achieve tailored folding motions are investigated. Furthermore, an inverse computational design workflow is proposed. The structure showed good accuracy in approximating target shapes, folding within desired motion envelopes, and avoiding collisions with surrounding objects. The origami-based system could be designed to deploy in different scenarios at the architectural scale, and could find applications as deployable canopy for improving comfort in outdoor conditions. Although limited to early design stages, the proposed design workflow is a flexible tool that could be applied to shape and motion inverse design tasks by simply variating its objective function. The method could be further applied to different typologies of rigid-foldable origami-based structures at different scales.

Practical Applications

Current studies on origami-based deployable systems mainly cover geometries that can be deployed, function as static systems, and further folded after the end of their operation. Despite possessing desirable characteristics, such designs fail to take advantage of origami properties such as programmability and dynamic adaptability to different scenarios. In addition, the optimization of such structures and the conception of efficient design workflows remain challenging. This paper proposes a design that could be folded and unfolded dynamically adapting to its environment. Furthermore, a computational design workflow for the design of shape and motion is presented. The novel aspects of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) tailored design of complex 3D geometries using two-dimensional (2D) origami patterns, (2) design of both shape and motion, which extends the common only-shape design approach, (3) development of an efficient and flexible computational design workflow that could be adapted to diverse inverse design tasks with different objectives, and (4) development of the workflow in the Grasshopper interface, in which environmental simulations could be carried out. Thermal comfort, wind comfort, and acoustics are some of the topics of interest that could be evaluated without making any change in the proposed parameterization and optimization framework.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Available data: Grasshopper code.

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51822805, 51878147, and U1937202).

References

Akitaya, H., E. D. Demaine, T. Horiyama, T. C. Hull, J. S. Ku, and T. Tachi. 2020. “Rigid foldability is NP-hard.” J. Comput. Geom. 11 (1): 93–124. https://doi.org/10.20382/jocg.v11i1a4.
Ando, K., B. Izumi, M. Shigematsu, H. Tamai, J. Matsuo, Y. Mizuta, T. Miyata, J. Sadanobu, K. Suto, and T. Tachi. 2020. “Lightweight rigidly foldable canopy using composite materials.” SN Appl. Sci. 2 (Dec): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03846-0.
Babilio, E., R. Miranda, and F. Fraternali. 2019. “On the kinematics and actuation of dynamic sunscreens with tensegrity architecture.” Front. Mater. 6 (Feb): 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.00007.
Brown, N., J. I. F. De Oliveira, J. Ochsendorf, and C. Mueller. 2016. “Early-stage integration of architectural and structural performance in a parametric multi-objective design tool.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Structures and Architecture, edited by P. J. S. Cruz, 1103–1111. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Cai, J., X. Deng, Y. Xu, and J. Feng. 2015. “Geometry and motion analysis of origami-based deployable shelter structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 06015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001238.
Cai, J., X. Deng, Y. Xu, and J. Feng. 2016. “Motion analysis of a foldable barrel vault based on regular and irregular Yoshimura origami.” J. Mech. Rob. 8 (2): 021017. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031658.
Curletto, G. 2016. “Rigid foldable origami structures: Parametric modelling with Grasshopper. Geometric and structural issues.” In Proc., Conf. Architecture In-Play, 1–10. Lisbon, Portugal: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
Curletto, G., and L. Gambarotta. 2015. “Rigid foldable origami structures: Integrated parametric design and structural analysis.” In Proc., Int. Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symp., 1–12. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures.
Curletto, G., and L. Gambarotta. 2016. “Design of a composed origami-inspired deployable shelter: Modeling and technological issues.” In Proc., IASS Annual Symp.: 2016 Spatial Structures in the 21st Century—Origami, edited by K. Kawaguchi, M. Ohsaki, and T. Takeuchi, 1–10. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures.
Dang, X., F. Feng, P. Plucinsky, R. D. James, H. Duan, and J. Wang. 2022. “Inverse design of deployable origami structures that approximate a general surface.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 234 (Jan): 111224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111224.
Delahaye, D., S. Chaimatanan, and M. Mongeau. 2019. “Simulated annealing: From basics to applications.” In Vol. 272 of Handbook of metaheuristics: International series in operations research & management science, edited by M. Gendreau and J. Y. Potvin. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91086-4_1.
De Temmerman, I. A. N., M. Mollaert, I. A. T. Van Mele, and I. A. L. De Laet. 2007. “Design and analysis of a foldable mobile shelter system.” Int. J. Space Struct. 22 (3): 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1260/026635107782218868.
Dudte, L. H., E. Vouga, T. Tachi, and L. Mahadevan. 2016. “Programming curvature using origami tessellations.” Nat. Mater. 15 (5): 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4540.
Fang, H., S. Li, H. Ji, and K. W. Wang. 2017. “Dynamics of a bistable Miura-origami structure.” Phys. Rev. E 95 (5): 052211. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052211.
Fiorito, F., M. Sauchelli, D. Arroyo, M. Pesenti, M. Imperadori, G. Masera, and G. Ranzi. 2016. “Shape morphing solar shadings: A review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 55 (Mar): 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.086.
Francis, K. C., L. T. Rupert, R. J. Lang, D. C. Morgan, S. P. Magleby, and L. L. Howell. 2014. “From crease pattern to product: Considerations to engineering origami-adapted designs.” In Proc., ASME 2014 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., V05BT08A030. New York: ASME.
Garcia-Mora, C. J., and J. Sanchez-Sanchez. 2021. “Actuation methods for deployable scissor structures.” Autom. Constr. 131 (Nov): 103894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103894.
Gattas, J. M., W. Wu, and Z. You. 2013. “Miura-base rigid origami: Parameterizations of first-level derivative and piecewise geometries.” J. Mech. Des. 135 (11): 111011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025380.
Gattas, J. M., and Z. You. 2015. “Geometric assembly of rigid-foldable morphing sandwich structures.” Eng. Struct. 94 (Jul): 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.019.
Greenberg, H. C., M. L. Gong, S. P. Magleby, and L. L. Howell. 2011. “Identifying links between origami and compliant mechanisms.” Mech. Sci. 2 (2): 217–225. https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-2-217-2011.
Hull, T. 1994. “On the mathematics of flat origamis.” Congressus Numerantium 100: 215–224.
Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt Jr., and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science 220 (4598): 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
Krousti, A., A. Snijder, and M. Turrin. 2018. “Kinematics of folded glass plate structures: Study of a deployable roof system.” In Proc., Challenging Glass 6: Proc., Conf. on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, 53–70. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
Lang, R. J. 2009. Origami 4. 1st ed. New York: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10653.
Lang, R. J. 2011. Origami design secrets: Mathematical methods for an ancient art. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11074.
Lang, R. J., K. A. Tolman, E. B. Crampton, S. P. Magleby, and L. L. Howell. 2018. “A review of thickness-accommodation techniques in origami-inspired engineering.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 70 (1): 010805. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039314.
Lee, T.-U., and J. M. Gattas. 2016. “Geometric design and construction of structurally stabilized accordion shelters.” J. Mech. Rob. 8 (3): 031009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032441.
Li, S., H. Fang, S. Sadeghi, P. Bhovad, and K. W. Wang. 2019. “Architected origami materials: How folding creates sophisticated mechanical properties.” Adv. Mater. 31 (5): 1805282. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805282.
Martínez-Martín, F. J., and A. P. Thrall. 2014. “Honeycomb core sandwich panels for origami-inspired deployable shelters: Multi-objective optimization for minimum weight and maximum energy efficiency.” Eng. Struct. 69 (Jun): 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.012.
McNeel, R. 2021. “Rhinoceros: Design, model, present, analyze, realize.” Accessed June 5, 2021. https://www.rhino3d.com/.
Meloni, M., J. Cai, Q. Zhang, D. Sang-Hoon Lee, M. Li, R. Ma, T. E. Parashkevov, and J. Feng. 2021. “Engineering origami: A comprehensive review of recent applications, design methods, and tools.” Adv. Sci. 8 (13): 2000636. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202000636.
Ning, X., X. Wang, Y. Zhang, X. Yu, D. Choi, N. Zheng, D. S. Kim, Y. Huang, Y. Zhang, and J. A. Rogers. 2018. “Assembly of advanced materials into 3D functional structures by methods inspired by origami and kirigami: A review.” Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5 (13): 1800284. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201800284.
Peraza-Hernandez, E. A., D. J. Hartl, R. J. Malak Jr., and D. C. Lagoudas. 2014. “Origami-inspired active structures: A synthesis and review.” Smart Mater. Struct. 23 (9): 094001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/094001.
Pérez-Valcárcel, J., M. Muñoz-Vidal, F. Suárez-Riestra, I. R. López-César, and M. J. Freire-Tellado. 2021. “Deployable cylindrical vaults with reciprocal linkages for emergency buildings.” In Structures, 4461–4474. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.094.
Pesenti, M., G. Masera, and F. Fiorito. 2018. “Exploration of adaptive origami shading concepts through integrated dynamic simulations.” J. Archit. Eng. 24 (4): 04018022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000323.
Rutten, D. 2013. “Galapagos: On the logic and limitations of generic solvers.” Archit. Des. 83 (2): 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1568.
Rutten, D. 2014. “Navigating multi-dimensional landscapes in foggy weather as an analogy for generic problem solving.” Accessed June 5, 2021. https://ieatbugsforbreakfast.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/manuscript-david-rutten.pdf.
Rutten, D. 2021. “Grasshopper: Algorithmic modeling for Rhino.” Accessed June 5, 2021. https://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
Savchenko, M., V. Savchenko, A. Abe, I. Hagiwara, and P. T. Thai. 2020. “A study on an origami-based structure for use as a sun umbrella.” SN Appl. Sci. 2 (Jul): 1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3018-3.
Schenk, M., and S. D. Guest. 2013. “Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (9): 3276–3281. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217998110.
Silverberg, J. L., A. A. Evans, L. McLeod, R. C. Hayward, T. Hull, C. D. Santangelo, and I. Cohen. 2014. “Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials.” Science 345 (6197): 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252876.
Song, K., X. Zhou, S. Zang, H. Wang, and Z. You. 2017. “Design of rigid-foldable doubly curved origami tessellations based on trapezoidal crease patterns.” Proc. R. Soc. A 473 (2200): 20170016. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0016.
Tachi, T. 2010. “Geometric considerations for the design of rigid origami structures.” In Proc., Int. Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symp. 2010. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Thün, G., K. Velikov, C. Ripley, L. Sauvé, and W. McGee. 2012. “Soundspheres: Resonant chamber.” Leonardo 45 (4): 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00409.
Vlachaki, E., and K. A. Liapi. 2021. “Folded surface elements coupled with planar scissor linkages: A novel hybrid type of deployable structures.” Curved Layered Struct. 8 (1): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/cls-2021-0013.
Wortmann, T. 2017. “Model-based optimization for architectural design: Optimizing daylight and glare in Grasshopper.” Technol. Archit. Des. 1 (2): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2017.1354615.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 12December 2023

History

Received: Apr 18, 2022
Accepted: Nov 29, 2022
Published online: Oct 4, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 4, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures of Ministry of Education, National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9886-2404. Email: [email protected]
Emil Ballegaard [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Architecture and Technology, School of Architecture, Design and Conservation, Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Copenhagen 1435, Denmark. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures of Ministry of Education, National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-5787. Email: [email protected]
Jinming Zhang [email protected]
General Manager, Zhuhai CRCC Building Estate Co., Ltd., 280 Rongyue Rd., Hengqin New District, Zhuhai City 519030, Guangdong Province, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures of Ministry of Education, National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]
Jianguo Cai, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures of Ministry of Education, National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share