Technical Papers
Aug 24, 2024

Extending Service Life of Stormwater Drainage Pipes with Proactive Maintenance Tools

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15, Issue 4

Abstract

Aging infrastructure is a significant concern to many system operators who might struggle to operate, maintain, and improve systems and infrastructure assets due to spatially buried assets over a large area, uncertainty about their condition, and lack of a comprehensive planning. These challenges often lead to a reactive approach to maintenance, causing emergency situations due to unexpected asset failures. This study proposes a suite of risk-based asset management plan tools to extend the service life of a drainage pipe network with a length of 580 km managed by a city council in Australia. The proposed management plan tools are based on a reactive–proactive approach to manage risk in which proactive condition monitoring is applied to critical and important pipes for detecting failure conditions in a timely manner. A sample of critical closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspected pipes selected from pipe network is used to predict the current and future condition of the pipe network using a Markov deterioration model. The predicted condition is used to support various implementation tasks of an asset management plan and accounting requirements. The key findings of the case study include a calibrated Markov deterioration curve showing slow rate of deterioration for a drainage network, average service life estimation (120–180 years) for drainage pipes, lowest-cost inspection interval determination (i.e., 7–14 years) for detecting poor condition, and estimated annual inspection and replacement cost for a drainage network.

Practical Applications

A significant number of local governments and city councils around the world manage drainage pipe networks as high capital asset value. Extending the service life of drainage pipes with reduced life-cycle cost and managed failure risk is a challenge and an essential task for asset management. This study introduces a proactive–reactive asset management strategy and a suite of decision support tools to assist in achieving such challenging tasks. For example, instead of using the common design service life of 80–100 years for asset renewal planning, this study demonstrates, through a case study, that service life can be extended to 120–180 years, resulting in significant savings of capital investment. To control failure risk and reduce life-cycle cost during the extended service life, a suite of decision support models including an optimal inspection model, a failure risk model, and others can be used to justify annual maintenance funding, timely detecting poor condition, and suggesting appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation planning. The results show that the inspection interval can be 7–14 years, and the Markov deterioration model predicted that the current network has 7% of pipe in a failure condition, which will increase by 1.67% over the next 10 years, which can justify renewal funding.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request

Acknowledgments

This project is under Australian Research Council (ARC) Industrial Transformation Research Hub (ITRH) Scheme (Project ID: IH180100010).

References

Abuhishmeh, K., and H. H. Jalali. 2023. “Reliability assessment of reinforced concrete sewer pipes under adverse environmental conditions: Case study for the city of Arlington, Texas.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 14 (2): 05023001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1406.
Abuhishmeh, K., and H. H. Jalali. 2024. “Risk assessment of infrastructure using a modified adaptive neurofuzzy system: Theoretical application to sewer mains.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 15 (2): 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1560.
Abuhishmeh, K. S. 2019. “Service life prediction and risk analysis of reinforced concrete gravity flow pipes using reliability theory.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Aljafari, N., M. Burrow, G. Ghataora, M. K. Torbaghan, and J. Raja. 2022. “Condition modeling of railway drainage pipes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 28 (4): 04022031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000708.
ASCE. 2021. Report card on America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATAP (Australian Transport Assessment and Planning). 2016. Australian transport assessment and planning (ATAP) guidelines: PV2 road parameter values. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth Dept. of Infrastructure and Regional Development.
Ayu, K., and A. Yunusa-Kaltungo. 2020. “A holistic framework for supporting maintenance and asset management life cycle decisions for power systems.” Energies 13 (8): 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081937.
Ba, Z., J. Fu, J. Liang, K. Liang, and M. Wang. 2021. “Risk assessment method of drainage network operation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation combined with analytic network process.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (2): 04021009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000543.
Baik, H. S., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
Bhardwaj, U., A. P. Teixeira, and C. G. Soares. 2020. “Reliability assessment of a subsea pipe-in-pipe system for major failure modes.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 188 (Dec): 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104177.
Brown, M. 2008. Culvert tragedy: Coroner blames council. North Sydney, NSW, Australia: Sydney Morning Herald.
Bruère, V. M., N. Bouchonneau, R. S. Motta, S. M. B. Afonso, R. B. Willmersdorf, P. R. M. Lyra, J. V. S. Torres, E. Q. De Andrade, and D. J. S. Cunha. 2019. “Failure pressure prediction of corroded pipes under combined internal pressure and axial compressive force.” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41 (Apr): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1674-2.
Buncle, J. 2024. “Eastern Road: Southern Water apologises as sewer pipe bursts and blocks road-how long the closure will last.” Accessed February 8, 2024. https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/eastern-road-southern-water-apologises-as-sewer-pipe-bursts-and-blocks-road-how-long-the-closure-will-last-4465423.
Cai, X., H. Shirkhani, and A. Mohammadian. 2020. “Risk-informed framework for sewerage system rehabilitation management.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (2): 04020075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000525.
Collins, L., and H. Neter. 2023. “Burst pipe leaves sewage in Sussex gardens again.” Accessed February 8, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9rew21y30ro.
CPAA (Concrete Pipe Association of Australasia). 2024. “Manufacturers of steel reinforced concrete pipe and associated products.” Accessed March 5, 2023. https://cpaa.asn.au/.
Dalla Rosa, F., L. Liu, and N. G. Gharaibeh. 2017. “IRI prediction model for use in network-level pavement management systems.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B. Pavements 143 (1): 4017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000003.
Ebrahimi, M., H. H. Jalali, and S. Sabatino. 2023. “Probabilistic condition assessment of reinforced concrete sanitary sewer pipelines using LiDAR inspection data.” Autom. Constr. 150 (Jun): 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104857.
Ékes, C. 2021. “Inspecting Twin 42" reinforced concrete pipes with pipe penetrating radar supplemented by LiDAR.” In ASCE Pipeline 2021. Virtual Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Fereshtehnejad, E., and A. Shafieezadeh. 2018. “A multi-type multi-occurrence hazard lifecycle cost analysis framework for infrastructure management decision making.” Eng. Struct. 167 (Dec): 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.049.
Hajibabaei, M., S. Nazif, and F. Tavanaei Sereshgi. 2018. “Life cycle assessment of pipes and piping process in drinking water distribution networks to reduce environmental impact.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 43 (Dec): 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.014.
Hallen, M. E., A. Goodchild, and J. Drescher. 2014. Travel cost associated with flood closures of state highways near Centralia/Chehalis Washington. Washington, DC: Washington Univ.
Infrastructure Australia. 2017. Project evaluation summary: Haughton River Floodplain upgrade project (Bruce Highway). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Infrastructure Australia.
IPWEA (Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia). 2015. Practice note 5: Stormwater drainage. North Sydney, NSW, Australia: Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia.
Jiang, R., S. Rathnayaka, B. Shannon, X. L. Zhao, J. Ji, and J. Kodikara. 2019. “Analysis of failure initiation in corroded cast iron pipes under cyclic loading due to formation of through-wall cracks.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 103 (Dec): 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.031.
Li, Y., K. Azuma, and K. Hasegawa. 2019. “Failure bending moment of pipes containing multiple circumferential flaws with complex shape.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 171 (Jun): 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.02.021.
Mays, L. 2005. Water resources engineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Melchers, R. E. 1999. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Mishra, M., V. Keshavarzzadeh, and A. Noshadravan. 2019. “Reliability-based lifecycle management for corroding pipelines.” Struct. Saf. 76 (Dec): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.06.007.
Mohseni, H., S. Setunge, G. Zhang, and R. Wakefield. 2017. “Markov process for deterioration modeling and asset management of community buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001272.
Nassiri, S., M. H. Shafiee, and A. Bayat. 2013. “Development of roughness prediction models using Alberta transportation’s pavement management system.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 6 (6): 714–720.
NIEIR (National Institute of Economic and Industry Research) Report. 2017. The Newell Highway closure in 2016 from flooding: The direct and indirect effects. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: National Institute of Economic and Industry Research.
Ranjith, S., S. Setunge, R. Gravina, and S. Venkatesan. 2013. “Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311.
Ross, S. 2012. Simulation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Sati, A. S., S. Abu Dabous, and W. Zeiada. 2020. “Pavement deterioration model using Markov chain and international roughness index.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 812 (1): 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/812/1/012012.
Srikanth, I., and M. Arockiasamy. 2022. “Development of non-parametric deterioration models for risk and reliability assessments of concrete and timber bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 36 (1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001692.
Standards Australia. 2007. Design for installation of buried concrete pipes. AS 3725. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Standards Australia.
Thomas, O., and J. Sobanjo. 2013. “Comparison of Markov chain and semi-Markov models for crack deterioration on flexible pavements.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000112.
Tran, H., S. Setunge, and L. Shi. 2021. “Markov chain–based inspection and maintenance model for stormwater pipes.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (11): 04021077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001469.
Tran, H. D. 2007. “Investigation of deterioration models for stormwater pipe systems.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Architectural, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Victoria Univ.
Tran, H. D. 2014. “Reliability-based structural design of concrete pipes.” J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14 (Dec): 818–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9894-3.
Tran, H. D. 2016. “Markov-based reliability assessment for hydraulic design of concrete stormwater pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (7): 06016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001130.
Tran, H. D., B. J. C. Perera, and A. W. M. Ng. 2010. “Markov and neural network models for prediction of structural deterioration of storm-water pipe assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (2): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000025.
USEPA. 2007. Asset management programs for stormwater and wastewater systems: Overcoming barriers to development and implementation. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Wang, Y., F. Su, P. Li, W. Wang, H. Yang, and L. Wang. 2023. “Microbiologically induced concrete corrosion in the cracked sewer pipe under sustained load.” Constr. Build. Mater. 369 (Jun): 130521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130521.
Whitsunday Regional Council. 2018. Asset management plan stormwater. Proserpine, QLD, Australia: Whitsunday Regional Council.
Wu, M., T. Wang, K. Wu, and L. Kan. 2020. “Microbiologically induced corrosion of concrete in sewer structures: A review of the mechanisms and phenomena.” Constr. Build. Mater. 239 (Dec): 117813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117813.
Xiong, J., J. Zhu, Y. He, S. Ren, W. Huang, and F. Lu. 2020. “The application of life cycle assessment for the optimization of pipe materials of building water supply and drainage system.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 60 (Sep): 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102267.
Yu, Y., A. Safari, X. Niu, B. Drinkwater, and K. V. Horoshenkov. 2021. “Acoustic and ultrasonic techniques for defect detection and condition monitoring in water and sewerage pipes: A review.” Appl. Acoust. 183 (Dec): 108282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108282.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Nov 17, 2023
Accepted: May 21, 2024
Published online: Aug 24, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 24, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Huu Tran, Ph.D.
Research Fellow, School of Engineering, RMIT Univ., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Associate Professor, School of Engineering, RMIT Univ., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5686-7055. Email: [email protected]
Sujeeva Setunge, Ph.D.
Professor, School of Engineering, RMIT Univ., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share