Technical Papers
May 24, 2024

Effects of Degradation of Pipes on Seismic Rehabilitation Decision-Making for Water Distribution Networks

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15, Issue 3

Abstract

Seismic events disrupt the operation of water distribution networks. Proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making methods are necessary to ensure maximum serviceability after a seismic event. Most recent proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making models of water distribution networks are sensitive to network hydraulics and pipe fragilities. Although network hydraulics and pipe fragilities are influenced by pipe degradations, the effects of degradation on proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making have not been studied. The probabilistic nature of the water pipe degradation makes the consideration of degradation challenging. This research aims to investigate the effects of the degradation of pipes on the seismic rehabilitation decision-making of water distribution networks. The methodology includes (1) designing simulation experiments; (2) integrating the effects of inside and outside degradation with seismic rehabilitation decision-making; and (3) conducting statistical analysis to identify the effects of integrating pipe degradation. The simulation experiments were designed to investigate the effects of degradation on the inside surface of pipes and the outside surface of pipes individually and combinedly. A simulated annealing (SA)–based optimization algorithm was used to identify the critical pipes and associated maximum serviceability for each experiment and each budget constraint. To assess the statistical significance of integrating degradation, two statistical tests were performed. The application of the proposed approach was illustrated on a benchmark network. The selected benchmark network consisted of cast iron pipe and ductile iron pipe. Degradation of cast iron pipe was considered in this study. This framework can be used for other materials. This study was based on five rehabilitation constraints with a focus on rehabilitation costs. The optimization algorithm was employed to identify critical pipes corresponding to each rehabilitation constraint. The results for each simulation experiment showed that the identified critical pipes differed. The associated maximum serviceability was reduced for the same budget constraints if outside and inside degradation were considered individually and combinedly. The associated maximum serviceability was reduced by 3%–4% because of the individual effect of outside or inside degradation, and 6%–7% because of the combined effect of inside and outside degradation. The changes in the identified critical pipes and associated maximum serviceability due to the consideration of outside and inside degradation imply the dependency of a proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making model on outside and inside degradation. The statistical test results imply that the degradation of pipes in the water distribution network has an impact on seismic rehabilitation decision-making models of water distribution networks. Therefore, it is recommended to integrate the degradation effect with existing seismic rehabilitation decision-making models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abdel-Monim, Y. K., S. A. Ead, and S. A. Shabayek. 2005. “Effect of time on pipe roughness.” In Proc., 17th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conf. St. Surrey, BC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Ahmadi, N., and M. Shahandashti. 2020. “Characterizing construction demand surge using spatial panel data models.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 21 (2): 04020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000368.
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. Seismic fragility formulations for water systems. Washington, DC: ALA.
Al-Barqawi, H., and T. Zayed. 2006. “Assessment model of water main conditions.” In Pipelines 2006: Service to the owner, 1–8 Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40854(211)27.
Al-Barqawi, H., and T. Zayed. 2008. “Infrastructure management: Integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate municipal water mains’ performance.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14 (4): 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:4(305).
Annus, I., and A. Vassiljev. 2015. “Different approaches for calibration of an operational water distribution system containing old pipes.” Procedia Eng. 119 (Jan): 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.900.
ASCE. 2021. Infrastructure report card: Drinking water. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ballantyne, D. B., and C. Taylor. 1990. Earthquake loss estimation modeling of the Seattle water system using a deterministic approach. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Barton, N. A., S. H. Hallett, S. R. Jude, and T. H. Tran. 2022. “An evolution of statistical pipe failure models for drinking water networks: A targeted review.” Water Supply 22 (4): 3784–3813. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.019.
Boxall, J. B., A. J. Saul, and P. J. Skipworth. 2004. “Modeling for hydraulic capacity.” J. AWWA 96 (4): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2004.tb10607.x.
Caleyo, F., J. C. Velázquez, A. Valor, and J. M. Hallen. 2009. “Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipelines: A Monte Carlo study.” Corros. Sci. 51 (9): 1925–1934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.019.
Christensen, R. T. 2009. Age effects on iron-based pipes in water distribution systems. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.
Christodoulou, S., P. Aslani, and A. Vanrenterghem. 2003. “A risk analysis framework for evaluating structural degradation of water mains in urban settings, using neurofuzzy systems and statistical modeling techniques.” In Proc., World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2003, 1–9. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Christodoulou, S. E., and M. Fragiadakis. 2015. “Vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks considering performance data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (2): 04014040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000224.
Clark, R. M., C. L. Stafford, and J. A. Goodrich. 1982. “Water distribution systems: A spatial and cost evaluation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. Div. 108 (3): 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRDDC.0000257.
Colebrook, C. F., and C. M. White. 1937a. “Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes.” Proc. R. Soc. 161 (906): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1937.0150.
Colebrook, C. F., and C. M. White. 1937b. “The reduction of carrying capacity of pipes with age.” J. Inst. Civ. Eng. 7 (1): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijoti.1937.14682.
Davis, P., D. D. Silva, D. Marlow, M. Moglia, S. Gould, and S. Burn. 2008. “Failure prediction and optimal scheduling of replacements in asbestos cement water pipes.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. 57 (4): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2008.035.
Deb, A. K. 2002. Prioritizing water main replacement and rehabilitation. Reston, VA: American Water Works Association.
Deb, A. K., Y. J. Hasit, F. M. Grablutz, and R. K. Herz. 1998. Quantifying future rehabilitation and replacement needs of water mains. West Chester, PA: Weston, Inc.
Didier, M., M. Broccardo, S. Esposito, and B. Stojadinovic. 2018. “Seismic resilience of a water distribution network.” In Proc., 16th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (16ECEE), 11261. Istanbul, Turkey: European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Eidinger, J. 1998. “Water distribution system—The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989—Lifelines.” In USGS professional paper 1552-A, edited by A. J. Schiff. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Farshad, M. 2004. “Two new criteria for the service life prediction of plastics pipes.” Polym. Test. 23 (8): 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.04.010.
Fragiadakis, M., S. E. Christodoulou, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2013. “Reliability assessment of urban water distribution networks under seismic loads.” Water Resour. Manage. 27 (10): 3739–3764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0378-0.
Goulter, I., J. Davidson, and P. Jacobs. 1993. “Predicting water-main breakage rates.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 119 (4): 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:4(419).
Goulter, I. C., and A. Kazemi. 1988. “Spatial and temporal groupings of water main pipe breakage in Winnipeg.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 15 (1): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1139/l88-010.
Gustafson, J. M., and D. V. Clancy. 1999. “Modeling the occurrence of breaks in cast iron water mains using methods of survival analysis.” In Proc., AWWA Annual Conf. Denver: American Water Works Association.
Herwig, H., D. Gloss, and T. Wenterodt. 2008. “A new approach to understanding and modelling the influence of wall roughness on friction factors for pipe and channel flows.” J. Fluid Mech. 613 (Oct): 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008003534.
Herz, R. K. 1996. “Ageing processes, rehabilitation needs and strategies for drinking water distribution network.” J. Water Supply: Res. Technol.-AQUA 45 (5): 221–231.
Honegger, D. G., and R. T. Eguchi. 1992. Determination of the relative vulnerabilities to seismic damage for San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) water transmission pipelines. Washington, DC: FEMA.
IPC (International Plumbing Code). 2015. “International Plumbing Code.” Accessed March 25, 2023. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IPC2015P4/copyright.
Jaćimović, N., M. Stamenić, P. Kolendić, D. Đorđević, B. Radanov, and L. Vladić. 2015. “A novel method for the inclusion of pipe roughness in the Hazen-Williams equation.” FME Trans. 43 (1): 35–39. https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1501035J.
Jacobs, P., and B. Karney. 1994. “GIS development with application to cast iron water main breakage rate.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Water Pipeline Systems, 53–62. Edinburgh, Scotland: BHR Group.
Jeon, S. S., and T. D. O’Rourke. 2005. “Northridge earthquake effects on pipelines and residential buildings.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 (1): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040020.
Ji, J., D. J. Robert, C. Zhang, D. Zhang, and J. Kodikara. 2017. “Probabilistic physical modelling of corroded cast iron pipes for lifetime prediction.” Struct. Saf. 64 (Jan): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.09.004.
Kettler, A. J., and I. C. Goulter. 1985. “An analysis of pipe breakage in urban water distribution networks.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 12 (2): 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1139/l85-030.
Kim, S., B. Abediniangerabi, and M. Shahandashti. 2020. “Forecasting pipeline construction costs using time series methods.” In Pipelines 2020, 198–209. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kim, S., B. Abediniangerabi, and M. Shahandashti. 2021a. “Forecasting pipeline construction costs using recurrent neural networks.” In Pipelines 2021, 325–335. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kim, S., B. Abediniangerabi, and M. Shahandashti. 2021b. “Pipeline construction cost forecasting using multivariate time series methods.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (3): 04021026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000553.
Knight, B. 2017. “Mexico City earthquake reconnaissance—Day 3.” Accessed October 20, 2019. https://www.wrkengrs.com/mexico-city-earthquake-reconnaissance-day-4/.
Mamrelli, E. S., and L. Streicher. 1962. “Loss in capacity of water mains: California Section Committee report.” J. AWWA 54 (10): 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1962.tb00955.x.
Markov, I., M. Grigoriu, and T. O’Rourke. 1994. An evaluation of seismic serviceability of water supply networks with application to the San Francisco Auxiliary Water Supply System. New York: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Mavin, K. 1996. Predicting the failure performance of individual water mains. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Urban Water Research Association of Australia.
Mazumder, R. K., X. Fan, A. M. Salman, Y. Li, and X. Yu. 2020a. “Framework for seismic damage and renewal cost analysis of buried water pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (4): 04020038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000487.
Mazumder, R. K., A. M. Salman, Y. Li, and X. Yu. 2019. “Reliability analysis of water distribution systems using physical probabilistic pipe failure method.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 145 (2): 04018097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001034.
Mazumder, R. K., A. M. Salman, Y. Li, and X. Yu. 2020b. “Seismic functionality and resilience analysis of water distribution systems.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (1): 04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000418.
McMullen, L. D. 1982. “Advanced concepts in soil evaluation for exterior pipeline corrosion.” In Proc., AWWA Annual Conf. Denver: American Water Works Association.
Ormsbee, L., and T. Walski. 2016. “Darcy-Weisbach versus Hazen-Williams: No calm in West Palm.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016, 455–464. Reston, VA: ASCE.
O’Rourke, T. D. 1996. “Lessons learned for lifeline engineering from major urban earthquakes.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. of Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
O’Rourke, T. D., S. S. Jeon, S. Toprak, M. Cubrinovski, M. Hughes, S. Van Ballegooy, and D. Bouziou. 2014. “Earthquake response of underground pipeline networks in Christchurch, NZ.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1193/030413EQS062M.
Pouri, Z., and M. Heidarimozaffar. 2022. “Spatial analysis and failure management in water distribution networks using fuzzy inference system.” Water Resour. Manage. 36 (6): 1783–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03104-5.
Pudasaini, B., and M. Shahandashti. 2020. “Topological surrogates for computationally efficient seismic robustness optimization of water pipe networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 35 (10): 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12566.
Pudasaini, B., and M. Shahandashti. 2021. “Seismic rehabilitation optimization of water pipe networks considering spatial variabilities of demand criticalities and seismic ground motion intensities.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (4): 04021028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000638.
Pudasaini, B., and S. M. Shahandashti. 2018. “Identification of critical pipes for proactive resource-constrained seismic rehabilitation of water pipe networks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (4): 04018024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000439.
Punurai, W., and P. Davis. 2017. “Prediction of asbestos cement water pipe aging and pipe prioritization using Monte Carlo simulation.” Eng. J. 21 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.2.1.
Rajeev, P., J. Kodikara, D. Robert, P. Zeman, and B. Rajani. 2014. “Factors contributing to large diameter water pipe failure.” Water Asset Manage. Int. 10 (3): 9–14.
Robert, D. J., P. Rajeev, J. Kodikara, and B. Rajani. 2016. “Equation to predict maximum pipe stress incorporating internal and external loadings on buried pipes.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (8): 1315–1331. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0500.
Roy, A., B. Pudasaini, and M. Shahandashti. 2021. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of water pipe networks under network uncertainties.” In Pipelines 2021, 171–179. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Roy, A., J. M. Rosenberger, and M. Shahandashti. 2023. “Impact of water network uncertainties on seismic rehabilitation decision-making for water pipelines.” In Pipelines 2023, 364–372. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Roy, A., M. Shahandashti, and J. M. Rosenberger. 2022. “Effects of network uncertainty on seismic vulnerability assessment of water pipe networks.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 13 (3): 04022016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000652.
Sadiq, R., B. Rajani, and Y. Kleiner. 2004. “Probabilistic risk analysis of corrosion associated failures in cast iron water mains.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 86 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2003.12.007.
Seica, M. V., and J. A. Packer. 2004. “Finite element evaluation of the remaining mechanical strength of deteriorated cast iron pipes.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 126 (1): 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1631027.
Seica, M. V., and J. A. Packer. 2006. “Simplified numerical method to evaluate the mechanical strength of cast iron water pipes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (1): 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(60.
Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S., O. Bozorg Haddad, M. H. Omid, and M. A. Mariño. 2013. “Effects of pipe roughness uncertainty on water distribution network performance during its operational period.” Water Resour. Manage. 27 (5): 1581–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0259-6.
Shaban, I. A., A. E. Eltoukhy, and T. Zayed. 2023. “Systematic and scientometric analyses of predictors for modelling water pipes deterioration.” Autom. Constr. 149 (May): 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104710.
Shahandashti, M., B. Abediniangerabi, E. Zahed, and S. Kim. 2023. Construction analytics: Forecasting and investment valuation. Berlin: Springer.
Shahandashti, S. M., and B. Pudasaini. 2019. “Proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making for water pipe networks using simulated annealing.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 20 (2): 04019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000328.
Shamir, U., and C. D. Howard. 1979. “An analytic approach to scheduling pipe replacement.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 71 (5): 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1979.tb04345.x.
Sharp, W. W., and T. M. Walski. 1988. “Predicting internal roughness in water mains.” J. AWWA 80 (11): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1988.tb03132.x.
Sharveen, S., A. Roy, and M. Shahandashti. 2022. “Risk-averse proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making for water distribution systems.” In Pipelines 2022, 81–90. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shi, P. 2006. Seismic response modeling of water supply systems. New York: Cornell Univ.
Shin, H., C. Joo, and J. Koo. 2016. “Optimal rehabilitation model for water pipeline systems with genetic algorithm.” Procedia Eng. 154 (Jan): 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.497.
Song, Z., W. Liu, and S. Shu. 2022. “Resilience-based post-earthquake recovery optimization of water distribution networks.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 74 (May): 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102934.
St. Clair, A. M., and S. Sinha. 2012. “State-of-the-technology review on water pipe condition, deterioration and failure rate prediction models!” Urban Water J. 9 (2): 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2011.644566.
Tavakoli, R., A. Sharifara, and M. Najafi. 2020. “Artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy models to predict remaining useful life of water pipelines.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020: Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater and Water Desalination and Reuse, 191–204. Reston, VA: ASCE.
USGS. 2018a. “Unified hazard tool.” Accessed January 1, 2023. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/.
USGS. 2018b. U.S. quaternary faults and folds database. Washington, DC: USGS.
Walski, T. M., and A. Pelliccia. 1982. “Economic analysis of water main breaks.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 74 (3): 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1982.tb04874.x.
Wang, L. R. L. 1990. A new look into the performance of water pipeline systems from 1987 Whittier Narrows, California earthquake. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion Univ.
Wang, W., W. Shi, and C. Q. Li. 2019. “Time dependent reliability analysis for cast iron pipes subjected to pitting corrosion.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 175 (Aug): 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.103935.
Wang, Y., S.-K. Au, and Q. Fu. 2010. “Seismic risk assessment and mitigation of water supply systems.” Earthquake Spectra 26 (1): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3276900.
Watson, T. G., C. D. Christian, A. J. Mason, M. H. Smith, and R. Meyer. 2004. “Bayesian-based pipe failure model.” J. Hydroinf. 6 (4): 259–264. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2004.0019.
Williams, G. S., and A. Hazen. 1960. Hydraulic tables. New York: Wiley.
Zahed, S. E., S. M. Shahandashti, and J. D. Diltz. 2020. “Investment valuation of underground freight transportation systems under uncertainty.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (3): 04020029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000568.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15Issue 3August 2024

History

Received: Oct 29, 2023
Accepted: Feb 23, 2024
Published online: May 24, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 24, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Abhijit Roy, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 416 S. Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 416 S. Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-7596. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share