State-of-the-Art Reviews
Aug 23, 2024

Integrity and Safety Management Challenges of Supercritical CO2 Pipeline Transportation at Offshore Platforms

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15, Issue 4

Abstract

In response to China’s dual carbon call, the petroleum industry is committed to green transformation, promoting the energy green revolution, focusing on domestic offshore CO2-enriched oil and gas reservoirs, and carrying out offshore platform carbon capture, utilization, and storage–enhanced oil recovery (CCUS-EOR) pilot projects. CO2 continuously displaces crude oil while being injected into deep-sea oil and gas reservoirs for carbon sequestration, achieving an increase in oil recovery and residual oil recovery. However, the implementation of offshore CCUS-EOR technology relies on the safe transportation of supercritical CO2 pipelines. Due to the unique physical and chemical properties of supercritical CO2, the safe transportation of supercritical CO2 pipelines faces multiple threats. This paper focuses on the current status of safe transportation technology for supercritical CO2 pipelines on offshore platforms, and summarizes multiple operational challenges, including obtaining high CO2 gas sources, high construction costs of pipelines, complex phase change of media, and internal and external corrosion of pipelines. The risk factors for failure of supercritical CO2 pipelines on offshore platforms were systematically identified, and the mechanism of leakage hazards of supercritical CO2 pipelines was determined. Based on the six-step cycle of pipeline integrity management, a targeted integrity management method for supercritical CO2 pipelines on offshore platforms is proposed, providing reference for improving the safety transportation technology system of supercritical CO2 pipelines on offshore platforms.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (52074323), the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0708300), and the PetroChina Strategic Cooperation Science and Technology Project (ZLZX2020-05-02). The authors also acknowledge The National Youth Talent Support Program of the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC).

References

Abuhishmeh, K., and H. Hojat Jalali. 2024. “Risk assessment of infrastructure using a modified adaptive neurofuzzy system: Theoretical application to sewer mains.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 15 (2): 04024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1560.
ASME. 2022. Managing system integrity of gas pipelines. ASME B31.8S-2022. New York: ASME.
Cao, X., Z. Xie, and W. Peng. 2021. “Research progress of erosion in multiphase pipelines.” Oil Gas Storage Transp. 40 (10): 1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.10.002.
Cavanagh, A., and P. Ringrose. 2014. “Improving oil recovery and enabling CCS: A comparison of offshore gas-recycling in Europe to CCUS in North America.” Energy Procedia 63 (Jun): 7677–7684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.801.
Central People’s Government of the Peopl’s Republic of China. 2011. “Order of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China.” Accessed March 3, 2011. https://www.gov.cn/flfg/2011-03/11/content_1822902.htm.
Chen, L. 2016. “Sinopec carbon dioxide pipeline transportation technology and practice.” Pet. Eng. Constr. 42 (4). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2206.2016.04.002.
China National Standards. 2011. Risk assessment for buried steel pipeline. GB/T 27512-2011. Beijing: China National Standards.
China National Standards. 2018. Specifications for engineering of carbon dioxide pipeline transportation. SH/T 3202-2018. Beijing: China National Standards.
Chinese Medical Encyclopedia. 1982. Chinese medical encyclopedia: Toxicology. Beijing: China Union Medical University Press.
de Visser, E., C. Hendriks, M. Barrio, M. J. Mølnvik, G. de Koeijer, S. Liljemark, and Y. Le Gallo. 2008. “Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (4): 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006.
Ding, H., Y. Zhang, Y. Dong, C. Wen, and Y. Yang. 2023. “High-pressure supersonic carbon dioxide (CO2) separation benefiting carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technology.” Appl. Energy 339 (Apr): 120975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120975.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2010. Design and operation of CO2 pipelines. Bærum, Norway: DNV.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2021a. Design and operation of carbon dioxide pipelines. DNV-RP-F104. Bærum, Norway: DNV.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2021b. Submarine pipeline systems. DNV-ST-F101. Bærum, Norway: DNV.
Drilling Contractor. 2021. “DNV updates carbon capture and storage RP.” Accessed July 17, 2024. https://drillingcontractor.org/dnv-updates-carbon-capture-and-storage-rp-59869.
Duan, J., S. Ma, and Y. Huang. 2001. “Study on regional seabed sediment induced corrosion.” Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol. 2001 (1): 37–41.
Duguid, A., J. Hawkins, and L. Keister. 2022. “CO2 Pipeline risk assessment and comparison for the midcontinent United States.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 116 (Apr): 103636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103636.
Edouard, M. N., C. J. Okere, C. Ejike, P. Dong, and M. A. M. Suliman. 2023. “Comparative numerical study on the co-optimization of CO2 storage and utilization in EOR, EGR, and EWR: Implications for CCUS project development.” Appl. Energy 347 (Jun): 121448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121448.
El-Kady, A. H., M. T. Amin, F. Khan, and M. M. El-Halwagi. 2024. “Analysis of CO2 pipeline regulations from a safety perspective for offshore carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS).” J. Cleaner Prod. 439 (Sep): 140734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140734.
Fang, Y., Y. Gao, Y. Gong, and S. Xia. 2024. “A review of the viscosity of carbon dioxide expanded liquids in enhanced oil recovery.” Chem. Ind. Eng. 41 (1): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.13353/j.issn.1004.9533.20220108.
Hang, Z., J. Shuai, H. Xu, and T. Zhang. 2021. “Efficiency evaluation method on integrity management of urban gas pipeline.” Supplement, J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 17 (S1): 165–171. https://doi.org/10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.S1.029.
Hattori, T., H. Nam, and A. Chapman. 2022. “Multilateral energy technology cooperation: Improving collaboration effectiveness through evidence from International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Programmes.” Energy Strategy Rev. 43 (Apr): 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100920.
Hu, Y., X. Yan, L. Chen, S. Yu, C. Liu, and J. Yu. 2022. “Leakage hazard distance of supercritical CO2 pipelines through experimental and numerical studies.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 119 (Feb): 103730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103730.
Hua, Y., R. Barker, and A. Neville. 2014. “Effect of temperature on the critical water content for general and localised corrosion of X65 carbon steel in the transport of supercritical CO2.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 31 (Mar): 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.09.026.
Jiang, B., and M. Y. Raza. 2023. “Research on China’s renewable energy policies under the dual carbon goals: A political discourse analysis.” Energy Strategy Rev. 48 (Jun): 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101118.
Jiang, R. 2022. “Status analysis and prospect of domestic and foreign CCUS projects.” Saf. Health Environ. 2022 (4): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7932.2022.04.001.
Kent, W. 2005. Pipeline risk management manual. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Li, J. 2022. “Accelerate the offshore CCUS to carbon-neutral China.” In Fundamental research. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Li, K., Y. Zeng, and J. Luo. 2021. “Influence of H2S on the general corrosion and sulfide stress cracking of pipelines steels for supercritical CO2 transportation.” Corros. Sci. 190 (May): 109639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109639.
Li, K., X. Zhou, R. Tu, Q. Xie, and X. Jiang. 2014. “The flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical CO2 leakage from a pipeline.” Energy 71 (Jun): 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.005.
Li, K., X. Zhou, R. Tu, Q. Xie, J. Yi, and X. Jiang. 2016. “An experimental investigation of supercritical CO2 accidental release from a pressurized pipeline.” J. Supercrit. Fluids 107 (Sep): 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2015.09.024.
Li, Y., W. Wang, Z.-F. Chen, and Y.-X. Li. 2023. “Integrity assessment of supercritical CO2 transport pipelines.” Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 221 (Jan): 211355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211355.
Liu, M., and Y. Li. 2014. “Analysis of the influence of parameters on the process of supercritical carbon dioxide pipeline economy.” Guangzhou Chem. Ind. 2014 (20): 421–423.
Liu, Y., and X. Chen. 2010. “Miscible conditions of CO2 flooding technology used in low permeability reservoirs.” Pet. Explor. Dev. 37 (4): 466–470.
Løvseth, S. W., H. G. J. Stang, A. Austegard, S. F. Westman, R. Span, and R. Wegge. 2016. “Measurements of CO2-rich mixture properties: Status and CCS needs.” Energy Procedia 86 (Apr): 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.048.
Lyons, C. J., J. M. Race, B. Wetenhall, E. Chang, H. F. Hopkins, and J. Barnett. 2019. “Assessment of the applicability of failure frequency models for dense phase carbon dioxide pipelines.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 87 (Dec): 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.014.
Marbun, B. T. H., et al. 2021. “Improvement of borehole and casing assessment of CO2-EOR/CCUS injection and production well candidates in Sukowati Field, Indonesia in a well-based scale.” Energy Rep. 7 (Nov): 1598–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.019.
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 2015. Catalogue of hazardous chemicals. Beijing: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.
Pourahmadi, M., and M. Saybani. 2022. “Reliability analysis with corrosion defects in submarine pipeline case study: Oil pipeline in Ab-khark island.” Ocean Eng. 249 (Oct): 110885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110885.
Qin, J., Q. Zhong, Y. Tang, Z. Rui, S. Qiu, and H. Chen. 2023. “CO2 storage potential assessment of offshore saline aquifers in China.” Fuel 341 (Dec): 127681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127681.
Ren, B., F. Male, and I. J. Duncan. 2022. “Economic analysis of CCUS: Accelerated development for CO2 EOR and storage in residual oil zones under the context of 45Q tax credit.” Appl. Energy 321 (Jul): 119393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119393.
Rodríguez-Romero, A., M. D. Basallote, M. R. De Orte, T. Á. DelValls, I. Riba, and J. Blasco. 2014. “Simulation of CO2 leakages during injection and storage in sub-seabed geological formations: Metal mobilization and biota effects.” Environ. Int. 68 (Mar): 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.008.
Romeo, L., R. Thomas, M. Mark-Moser, A. Bean, J. Bauer, and K. Rose. 2022. “Data-driven offshore CO2 saline storage assessment methodology.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 119 (Apr): 103736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103736.
Safety and Environmental Protection Bureau of China Petrochemical Corporation. 2011. Handbook for the protection of hazardous substances. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press.
Shirley, P., and P. Myles. 2019. Quality guidelines for energy system studies: CO2 impurity design parameters. Washington, DC: DOE. https://doi.org/10.2172/1566771.
Sim, S., I. S. Cole, F. Bocher, P. Corrigan, R. P. Gamage, N. Ukwattage, and N. Birbilis. 2013. “Investigating the effect of salt and acid impurities in supercritical CO2 as relevant to the corrosion of carbon capture and storage pipelines.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 17 (May): 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.013.
Sun, H., H. Wang, Y. Zeng, and J. Liu. 2023. “Corrosion challenges in supercritical CO2 transportation, storage, and utilization—A review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 179 (Jun): 113292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113292.
Tamburini, F., S. Bonvicini, and V. Cozzani. 2024. “Consequences of subsea CO2 blowouts in shallow water.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 183 (Aug): 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.008.
Teng, L., X. Liu, X. Li, Y. Li, and C. Lu. 2021. “An approach of quantitative risk assessment for release of supercritical CO2 pipelines.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 94 (Sep): 104131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104131.
Wang, L. 2019. “Prevention measures and cause analysis of a submarine pipeline.” Chem. Eng. Equip. 2019 (10): 66–68.
Wang, Q. 2018. “Research status of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation.” Yunnan Chem. Technol. 45 (12): 120–121.
Wang, S. 2015. “Effect of water content of crude oil on corrosion behavior of oil and gas tubular goods steel in supercritical CO2 system.” Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol. 27 (1): 73–77.
Wang, W., X. He, Y. Li, and J. Shuai. 2022. “Risk analysis on corrosion of submarine oil and gas pipelines based on hybrid Bayesian network.” Ocean Eng. 260 (Apr): 111957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111957.
Wang, Y., L. Xu, J. Sun, and Y. Cheng. 2021. “Mechano-electrochemical interaction for pipeline corrosion: A review.” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 1 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.01.002.
Xie, Q., R. Tu, X. Jiang, K. Li, and X. Zhou. 2014. “The leakage behavior of supercritical CO2 flow in an experimental pipeline system.” Appl. Energy 130 (Feb): 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.088.
Xue, Y., J. Li, J. Liu, and L. Ding. 2024. “Simulation study on the rock-breaking behavior of a straight-swirling mixed supercritical CO2 jet.” Appl. Therm. Eng. 243 (Jan): 122551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122551.
Yang, J., C. Yang, Q. Gu, C. Zhu, M. Luo, and P. Zhong. 2023. “Economic evaluation and influencing factors of CCUS-EOR technology: A case study from a high water-bearing oilfield in Xinjiang, China.” Energy Rep. 10 (Jul): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.013.
Yu, J., Q. Zeng, Y. Yu, S. Wu, H. Ding, H. Gao, and J. Yang. 2022. “An intuitionistic fuzzy probabilistic Petri net method for risk assessment on submarine pipeline leakage failure.” Ocean Eng. 266 (Feb): 112788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112788.
Yu, Y., J. Xu, B. Liu, T. Chai, and C. Sun. 2023. “Selective corrosion behavior of X80 steel heat affected zone by SRB in coastal saline soil.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 203 (Aug): 104924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.104924.
Zanobetti, F., S. Martynov, V. Cozzani, and H. Mahgerefteh. 2023. “Multi-objective economic and environmental assessment for the preliminary design of CO2 transport pipelines.” J. Cleaner Prod. 411 (May): 137330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137330.
Zeng, Y., and K. Li. 2020. “Influence of SO2 on the corrosion and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of supercritical CO2 transportation pipelines.” Corros. Sci. 165 (Feb): 108404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.108404.
Zhang, Q., Y. Yang, X. Zhang, S. Liu, W. Bi, G. Zhang, and S. Jia. 2023. “Technology status and challenge of integrity management of supercritical carbon dioxide pipeline.” Oil Gas Storage Transp. 42 (2): 152–160.
Zheng, J., O. Zhao, and P. Chen. 2023. “Experimental study on feasibility of CO2-WAG flooding in offshore low permeability oilfield.” Adv. Fine Petrochemicals 24 (2): 31–34.
Zhu, W., D. Sun, F. Xie, M. Wu, Y. Xu, and S. Ren. 2023. “Effects of corrosion defect growth on submarine pipeline under operating pressure and axial displacement.” Ocean Eng. 267 (Feb): 113297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113297.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15Issue 4November 2024

History

Published online: Aug 23, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 23, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, College of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China Univ. of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Safety and Emergency Technology, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 102249, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Laibin Zhang [email protected]
Professor, College of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China Univ. of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Safety and Emergency Technology, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 102249, China. Email: [email protected]
Shangrui Xiao [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, College of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China Univ. of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Safety and Emergency Technology, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 102249, China. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Student, College of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China Univ. of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Safety and Emergency Technology, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 102249, China. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Co., Building D, International Investment Building, No. 6-1 Fuchengmen North St., Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Co., Building D, International Investment Building, No. 6-1 Fuchengmen North St., Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share