Technical Papers
Jan 27, 2024

Risk Assessment of Infrastructure Using a Modified Adaptive Neurofuzzy System: Theoretical Application to Sewer Mains

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

Risk assessment lies at the core of decision making practices, relying on the likelihood of failure incidents and their consequential impacts integrated through a set of decision rules. The incorporation of fuzzy inference systems (FIS) into risk assessment has been proven to elevate the management and sustainability of infrastructures by reducing uncertainties in decision making and mimicking human decisions. Its parameters, primarily the fuzzy sets, are conventionally defined heuristically to align with the visions and objectives of decision makers or through clustering methods if data are available. However, utilizing these methods is insufficient for the comprehensive adoption or finetuning of input-output relationships, and it does not adequately address the incorporation of future changes in decision makers’ opinions due to its inability to self train. To overcome this challenge, a Mamdani-based neurofuzzy system is proposed and modified for best practice in risk assessment, and a framework is developed for compiling the required training data set. Additionally, modifications in the training process include adding Lagrange equality constraints to the objective function and testing different optimizers to maintain the fuzzy logic and reduce the computational cost, respectively. The validation of the model’s ability to learn the knowledge base and parameters of fuzzy set membership functions was conducted through training simulation on generic data developed from a predefined knowledge base, as explained in a case study. The data serve as an idealization or simulation of any risk data set that can be generated using the proposed framework. The model has confirmed its ability to learn the knowledge base from which the data are generated and the corresponding parameters of membership functions toward the comprehensive adoption of input-output relationships. This emphasizes the model’s capability to learn the knowledge base from any risk data set developed using the proposed framework. Also, results have shown that the added constraints control the training process efficiently by maintaining proper interactions among fuzzy sets membership functions satisfying fuzzy logic; additionally, the Adam (adaptive momentum estimation) optimizer has reduced the training computational cost by more than 99%. Finally, to explain and validate the flexibility of the neurofuzzy model in risk assessment in adopting changes in the FIS hyperparameters and rules, the model was retrained after inducing three independent possible changes to the decision rules and the fuzzy sets. The model has proved its ability to grasp diverse decision maker requirements, giving more flexibility and broader implementation of FIS in risk assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abraham, A. 2005. “Adaptation of fuzzy inference system using neural learning.” In Vol. 181 of Fuzzy systems engineering: Theory and practice, 53–83. Berlin: Springer.
Abuhishmeh, K., and H. Hojat Jalali. 2023. “Reliability assessment of reinforced concrete sewer pipes under adverse environmental conditions: Case study for the city of Arlington, Texas.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 14 (2): 05023001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1406.
Abuhishmeh, K. S. 2019. “Service life prediction and risk analysis of reinforced concrete gravity flow pipes using reliability theory.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Altarabsheh, A., A. Kandil, and M. Ventresca. 2018. “New multiobjective optimization approach to rehabilitate and maintain sewer networks based on whole lifecycle behavior.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (1): 04017069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000715.
Anbari, M. J., M. Tabesh, and A. Roozbahani. 2017. “Risk assessment model to prioritize sewer pipes inspection in wastewater collection networks.” J. Environ. Manage. 190 (Apr): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.052.
AWWA (American Water Work Association). 2010. Risk and resilience management of water and wastewater systems. AWWA J100. Denver: AWWA.
Benbachir, M., D. Chenaf, and M. Cherrared. 2022. “Fuzzy-FMECA decision-making tool for assessment and analysis of performance of urban sewerage networks.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 13 (1): 04021078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000585.
Chai, Y., L. Jia, and Z. Zhang. 2009. “Mamdani model based adaptive neural fuzzy inference system and its application in traffic level of service evaluation.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 2009 6th Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 555–559. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2009.76.
Charu, C., and K. Chandan. 2014. Data clustering algorithms and applications. Wales, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
Chen, K. T., C. H. Chou, S. H. Chang, and Y. H. Liu. 2008. “Adaptive fuzzy neural network control on the acoustic field in a duct.” Appl. Acoust. 69 (6): 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.11.011.
Daradkeh, A. M., and H. Hojat Jalali. 2023. “Finite element modeling aspects of buried large diameter steel pipe–butterfly valve interaction.” Modelling 4 (4): 548–566. https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling4040031.
Duc, D. M., N. D. Hoang, and L. H. Nguyen. 2006. “Lagrange multipliers theorem and saddle point optimality criteria in mathematical programming.” J. Math. Anal. 323 (1): 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.10.038.
Duchi, J., E. Hazan, and Y. Singer. 2011. “Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (7): 2121–2159.
Ebrahimi, M., and H. Hojat Jalali. 2022a. “Automated condition assessment of sanitary sewer pipes using LiDAR inspection data.” In Proc., UESI/ASCE Pipelines 2022 Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ebrahimi, M., and H. Hojat Jalali. 2022b. “Spatial variability effects of wall erosion on assessment of reinforced concrete sanitary sewer pipes (RCSSPs).” In Proc., Tran-SET 2022. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484609.035.
Ebrahimi, M., H. H. Jalali, and S. Sabatino. 2023. “Probabilistic condition assessment of reinforced concrete sanitary sewer pipelines using LiDAR inspection data.” Autom. Constr. 150 (Jun): 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104857.
Elmasry, M., T. Zayed, and A. Hawari. 2019. “Multi-objective optimization model for inspection scheduling of sewer pipelines.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001599.
Elsawah, H., M. Guerrero, and O. Moselhi. 2014. “Decision support model for integrated intervention plans of municipal infrastructure.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Sustainable Infrastructure 2014. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784478745.098.
Genter, E. 2018. “2M gallons of raw sewage flows into Nantucket Harbor.” The Providence Journal, January 6, 2018.
Gheibi, M., R. Moezzi, H. Taghavian, S. Wacławek, N. Emrani, M. Mohtasham, M. Khaleghiabbasabadi, J. Koci, C. S. Yeap, and J. Cyrus. 2023. “A risk-based soft sensor for failure rate monitoring in water distribution network via adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference systems.” Sci. Rep. 13 (1): 12200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38620-w.
Halfawy, M. R., L. Dridi, and S. Baker. 2008. “Integrated decision support system for optimal renewal planning of sewer networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 22 (6): 360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2008)22:6(360).
Hojat Jalali, H., and M. Ebrahimi. 2021. “Residual life and reliability assessment of underground RC sanitary sewer pipelines under uncertainty.” Accessed July 10, 2023. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/transet_pubs.
Hosseinpour, M., A. S. Yahaya, S. M. Ghadiri, and J. Prasetijo. 2013. “Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for road accident prediction.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (7): 1761–1772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0036-3.
Jamshidi, A., A. Yazdani-Chamzini, S. H. Yakhchali, and S. Khaleghi. 2013. “Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 (1): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.10.010.
Kaur, A., and A. Kaur. 2012. “Comparison of Mamdani-type and Sugeno-type fuzzy inference systems for air conditioning system.” Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. 2 (2): 323–325.
Kim, J., and N. Kasabov. 1999. “HyFIS: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and their application to nonlinear dynamical systems.” Neural Networks 12 (9): 1301–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(99)00067-2.
Kingma, D. P., and J. Ba. 2014. “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.” Preprint, submitted December 22, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
Kolathayar, S., I. Pal, and S. V. Ganni. 2022. “Disaster risk reduction and civil engineering—An introduction.” In Civil engineering for disaster risk reduction, 1–14. Singapore: Springer.
Kothamasu, R., and S. H. Huang. 2007. “Adaptive Mamdani fuzzy model for condition-based maintenance.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158 (24): 2715–2733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2007.07.004.
Kuliczkowska, E. 2016. “Risk of structural failure in concrete sewers due to internal corrosion.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 66 (Aug): 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.026.
Li, J., and P. X. Zou. 2011. “Fuzzy AHP-based risk assessment methodology for PPP projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1205–1209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000362.
Liu, Y., and Y. Bao. 2022. “Review on automated condition assessment of pipelines with machine learning.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 53 (Aug): 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101687.
Liu, Y., and Y. Bao. 2023. “Automatic interpretation of strain distributions measured from distributed fiber optic sensors for crack monitoring.” Measurement 211 (Apr): 112629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112629.
Mamdani, E. H., and S. Assilian. 1975. “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.” Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 7 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.
Mehr, A. D., E. Tas, and E. Kahya. 2020. “Risk assessment of fuel supply pipelines: Kalecik power plant case study.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 11 (4): 05020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000496.
Navarro-Almanza, R., M. A. Sanchez, J. R. Castro, O. Mendoza, and G. Licea. 2022. “Interpretable Mamdani neuro-fuzzy model through context awareness and linguistic adaptation.” Expert Syst. Appl. 189 (Mar): 116098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116098.
Nesterov, Y. 1983. “A method for unconstrained convex minimization problem with the rate of convergence O (1/k^ 2).” Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 269 (3): 543–547.
Parvizsedghy, L., and T. Zayed. 2016. “Consequence of failure: Neurofuzzy-based prediction model for gas pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (4): 04015073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000817.
Phan, H. C., and H. T. Duong. 2021. “Predicting burst pressure of defected pipeline with principal component analysis and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 189 (Feb): 104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104274.
Qian, N. 1999. “On the momentum term in gradient descent learning algorithms.” Neural Networks 12 (1): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00116-6.
Raeihagh, H., A. Behbahaninia, and M. M. Aleagha. 2020. “Risk assessment of sour gas inter-phase onshore pipeline using ANN and fuzzy inference system—Case study: The south pars gas field.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 68 (Nov): 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104238.
Rainy, J. 2022. “Sewer line in Carson that failed, forcing beach closures in two counties, was near replacement.” The Los Angeles Times, January 2, 2022.
Ross, T. 2017. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Salman, B., and O. Salem. 2012. “Risk assessment of wastewater collection lines using failure models and criticality ratings.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 3 (3): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000100.
Sekar, V. R., and S. K. Sinha. 2011. “Web based risk assessment of water and wastewater pipeline failures.” In Proc., Pipelines 2011: A Sound Conduit for Sharing Solutions 2011, 1393–1402. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shepherd, W., S. Mounce, G. Sailor, J. Gaffney, N. Shah, N. Smith, A. Cartwright, and J. Boxall. 2023. “Cloud-based artificial intelligence analytics to assess combined sewer overflow performance.” J. Water Resour. Res. 149 (10): 04023051. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5859.
Shoaib, M., A. Y. Shamseldin, B. W. Melville, and M. M. Khan. 2016. “Hybrid wavelet neuro-fuzzy approach for rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (1): 04014125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000457.
Siddique, N. 2013. Intelligent control: A hybrid approach based on fuzzy logic, neural networks and genetic algorithms. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Soltanianfard, M. A., K. Abuhishmeh, and H. Hojat Jalali. 2023. “Sustainable concrete made with wastewater at different stages of filtration.” Constr. Build. Mater. 409 (Dec): 133894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133894.
Sugeno, M. 1985. Industrial applications of fuzzy control. New York: Elsevier.
Tavakoli, R., A. Sharifara, and M. Najafi. 2020. “Artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy models to predict remaining useful life of water pipelines.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2020, 191–204. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Tran, D., J. Mashford, R. May, and D. Marlow. 2012. “Development of a fuzzy risk ranking model for prioritizing manhole inspection.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 26 (4): 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000162.
Urbina, A. G., and A. Aoyama. 2017. “Measuring the benefit of investing in pipeline safety using fuzzy risk assessment.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 45 (Jan): 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.018.
Vladeanu, G. J., and J. C. Matthews. 2019. “Consequence-of-failure model for risk-based asset management of wastewater pipes using AHP.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 10 (2): 04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000370.
Wang, L. X., and J. M. Mendel. 1992. “Generating fuzzy rules by learning from examples.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22 (6): 1414–1427. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.199466.
Zadeh, L. A. 1996. “On fuzzy algorithms.” Inf. Control 12 (2): 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(68)90211-8.
Zeiler, M. D. 2012. “Adadelta: An adaptive learning rate method.” Preprint, submitted December 22, 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701.
Zhang, W., T. Lai, and Y. Li. 2022. “Risk assessment of water supply network operation based on ANP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 13 (1): 04021068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000602.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15Issue 2May 2024

History

Received: Aug 4, 2023
Accepted: Dec 12, 2023
Published online: Jan 27, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-0932. Email: [email protected]
Himan Hojat Jalali, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share