Technical Papers
Nov 8, 2023

Probabilistic Analysis of Pipelines in Geohazard Zones Using a Novel Approach for Strain Calculation

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper presents an approach for probabilistic analysis of pipelines buried through geohazard-prone areas that induce permanent ground movements potentially. In this approach, an easy-to-implement response prediction tool based on the finite-difference method is integrated with simple but robust Monte Carlo simulation methods. The probability of strain capacity exceedance is calculated when a pipeline is subjected to the ground movement of different magnitudes. In the strain-based limit state function, the strain capacity is determined using existing equations in the literature, and the strain demand is calculated using an accurate and efficient tool based on the finite-difference method. After obtaining the conditional probabilities of failure of pipes at given magnitudes of ground movement, the probability of failure of pipes as a function of time is also calculated considering the probability of ground movement initiation. The proposed approach is demonstrated through a case study of pipelines subjected to landslides.

Practical Applications

Pipelines are crucial components of lifeline infrastructure systems that facilitate the transportation of diverse gas and fluid substances. The vulnerability of pipelines buried in geohazard-prone areas necessitates a proactive approach to risk mitigation. This study introduces a methodology for assessing pipeline safety through probabilistic analysis. The methodology considers the probability of the pipeline’s resistance to ground movements, as well as the likelihood of potential geohazards like slope creep and landslides. An innovative approach is employed to calculate the probability of the pipeline’s resistance to ground movement, providing relatively accurate results while minimizing time requirements. The probability of slope creep and landslide events is derived from relevant guidelines and engineering reports. The final result, represented by the probability of failure, serves as a quantifiable measure to determine the safety level of the pipeline. This study can be referenced during decision-making processes related to pipeline design and maintenance, ultimately enhancing pipeline system safety.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council under Grant No. CSC201906440175; Mitacs Accelerate program under Enbridge Liquids Pipelines; and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

References

ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baumgard, A., M. Beaupre, and M. Leir. 2016. “Implementing a quantitative geohazard frequency analysis framework as a component of risk assessment of new pipelines.” In Proc., 11th Int. Pipeline Conf., V002T07A020. New York: ASME.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2007. Oil and gas pipeline systems. CSA Z662-07. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Oil and gas pipeline systems. CSA Z662:19. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
Dorey, A. B., D. W. Murray, and J. R. Cheng. 2006. “Critical buckling strain equations for energy pipelines—A parametric study.” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 128 (3): 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2199561.
Fairchild, D. P., M. L. Macia, S. Kibey, X. Wang, V. R. Krishnan, F. Bardi, H. Tang, and W. Cheng. 2011. “A multi-tiered procedure for engineering critical assessment of strain-based pipelines.” In Proc., 21st Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf., ISOPE-I. Richardson, TX: OnePetro.
Guthrie, R., and E. Reid. 2018. “Estimating landslide induced probability of failure to pipelines using a structured reductionist approach.” In Proc., 12th Int. Pipeline Conf., V002T07A004. New York: ASME.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America. 2020. Guidelines for management of landslide hazards for pipelines. Washington, DC: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, and G. P. Kouretzis. 2007. “Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (3): 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.08.001.
Kennedy, R. P., R. A. Williamson, and A. W. Chow. 1977. “Fault movement effects on buried oil pipeline.” Transp. Eng. J. ASCE 103 (5): 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1061/TPEJAN.0000659.
Liu, A.-W., Y.-X. Hu, F.-X. Zhao, X.-J. Li, S. Takada, and L. Zhao. 2004. “An equivalent-boundary method for the shell analysis of buried pipelines under fault movement.” Acta Seismol. Sin. 17 (Nov): 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-004-0078-1.
Liu, M., Y.-Y. Wang, Y. Song, D. Horsley, and S. Nanney. 2012. “Multi-tier tensile strain models for strain-based design: Part 2—Development and formulation of tensile strain capacity models.” In Proc., 9th Int. Pipeline Conf., 415–425. New York: ASME.
Liu, M., Y.-Y. Wang, F. Zhang, and K. Kotian. 2013. Realistic strain capacity models for pipeline construction and maintenance. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Liu, X., and M. J. O’Rourke. 1997. “Behaviour of continuous pipeline subject to transverse PGD.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26 (10): 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199710)26:10%3C989::AID-EQE688%3E3.0.CO;2-P.
Liu, X., H. Zhang, M. Xia, J. Liu, and Q. Zheng. 2021. “An improved analytical strain analysis method for buried steel pipelines subjected to abrupt permanent ground displacement.” In Proc., 13th Int. Pipeline Conf., V002T06A012. New York: ASME.
Liu, X., Q. Zheng, K. Wu, Y. Yang, Z. Zhao, and H. Zhang. 2020. “Development of a novel approach for strain demand prediction of pipes at fault crossings on the basis of multi-layer neural network driven by strain data.” Eng. Struct. 214 (Jul): 110685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110685.
Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall. 1975. “Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement.” In Proc., US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 416–425. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
O’Rourke, M. J. 1989. “Approximate analysis procedures for permanent ground deformation effects on buried pipelines.” In Proc., 2nd US-Japan Workshop on Liquefaction, Large Ground Deformation and Their Effects on Lifelines, 336–347. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
O’Rourke, M. J., X. Liu, and R. Flores-Berrones. 1995. “Steel pipe wrinkling due to longitudinal permanent ground deformation.” J. Transp. Eng. 121 (5): 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:5(443).
Porter, M., G. Ferris, M. Leir, M. Leach, and M. Haderspock. 2016. “Updated estimates of frequencies of pipeline failures caused by geohazards.” In Proc., 11th Int. Pipeline Conf., V002T07A003. New York: ASME.
Porter, M., J. Van Hove, and P. Barlow. 2022. “Analysis of dynamic system risks where pipelines cross slow-moving landslides.” In Proc., 14th Int. Pipeline Conf., V001T07A007. New York: ASME.
PRCI (Pipeline Research Council International). 2009. Guidelines for constructing natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines through areas prone to landslide and subsidence hazards. Chantilly, VA: PRCI.
Read, R. R., and M. Rizkalla. 2015. “Bridging the gap between qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative risk assessment of pipeline geohazards: The role of engineering judgment.” In Proc., Int. Pipeline Geotechnical Conf., V001T02A004. New York: ASME.
Sen, M., and S. Hassanien. 2019. “On estimating pipelines reliability at slope crossings.” In Proc., Asset Integrity Management-Pipeline Integrity Management under Geohazard Conditions, 81–92. New York: ASME.
Timms, C. M., D. D. DeGeer, M. R. Chebaro, and Y. Tsuru. 2009. “Compressive strain limits of large diameter X80 UOE linepipe.” In Proc., 19th Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf., ISOPE-I. Richardson, TX: OnePetro.
Trifonov, O. V., and V. P. Cherniy. 2012. “Elastoplastic stress strain analysis of buried steel pipelines subjected to fault displacements with account for service loads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (1): 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.001.
Wang, L. R., and Y. H. Yeh. 1986. “Seismic design of buried pipeline for fault movement effects.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 108 (2): 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3264770.
Wang, L. R.-L., and Y.-A. Yeh. 1985. “A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 13 (1): 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130109.
Wang, Y.-Y., D. Rudland, R. Denys, and D. Horsley. 2002. “A preliminary strain-based design criterion for pipeline girth welds.” In Proc., 4th Int. Pipeline Conf., 415–427. New York: ASME.
Xie, J., L. Zhang, Q. Zheng, X. Liu, S. Dubljevic, and H. Zhang. 2021. “Strain demand prediction of buried steel pipeline at strike-slip fault crossings: A surrogate model approach.” Earthquake Struct. 20 (1): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.109.
Yoosef-Ghodsi, N. 2015. “Strain-based design of pipelines.” In Oil and gas pipelines integrity and safety handbook, 37–48. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Yoosef-Ghodsi, N., J. Zhou, and D. W. Murray. 2008. “A simplified model for evaluating strain demand in a pipeline subjected to longitudinal ground movement.” In Proc., 7th Int. Pipeline Conf., 657–664. New York: ASME.
Zahid, U., A. Godio, and S. Mauro. 2020. “An analytical procedure for modelling pipeline-landslide interaction in gas pipelines.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 81 (Sep): 103474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103474.
Zheng, Q., L. Graf-Alexiou, Y. Li, N. Yoosef-Ghodsi, M. Fowler, M. Kainat, and S. Adeeb. 2021a. “Strain demand of elastic pipes subjected to permanent ground displacements using the finite difference method.” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 1 (2): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.06.001.
Zheng, Q., Y. Li, N. Yoosef-Ghodsi, M. Fowler, M. Kainat, and S. Adeeb. 2022. “A finite difference-based approach for strain demand prediction of inelastic pipes subjected to permanent ground displacements.” Eng. Struct. 273 (Dec): 115072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115072.
Zheng, Q., X. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Gu, M. Fang, L. Wang, and S. Adeeb. 2021b. “Reliability evaluation method for pipes buried in fault areas based on the probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 85 (Jan): 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103698.
Zhou, W. 2012. “Reliability of pressurised pipelines subjected to longitudinal ground movement.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (12): 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.505244.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Apr 16, 2023
Accepted: Sep 19, 2023
Published online: Nov 8, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 8, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5685-3713. Email: [email protected]
Ismael Allouche
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3.
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3304-8827
Yong Li
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3.
Nader Yoosef-Ghodsi
Engineering Specialist, Enbridge Liquids Pipelines, 0175 101 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 0H3.
Matt Fowler
Senior Reliability Engineer, Enbridge Liquids Pipelines, 0175 101 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 0H3.
Samer Adeeb
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share