State-of-the-Art Review of Performance Objectives for Legacy Gas Pipelines with Pipe-in-Pipe Rehabilitation Technologies
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14, Issue 2
Abstract
Legacy gas pipelines experience problems as they age. Pipe rehabilitation and replacement using internal pipes or liners is a trenchless renewal approach to address these issue-prone facilities. Here, a set of performance objectives is identified using data from both the field and the literature. First, observations of recorded pipeline incidents of cast/wrought iron gas distribution mains were analyzed to understand the causes of damage in host pipe systems. Natural force damage, including subsidence, frost-related deformation, and other earth movements, was identified as the leading cause of incidents in such systems. An internal-repair pipe would be expected to withstand such events. Secondly, a literature review of the mechanical behavior of rehabilitating internal pipes or liners was performed. Considerable work has been performed to understand how such systems behave under internal hydrostatic pressure, external pressure, surface loads, and external loads reflective of expected earth movements. Under internal pressure, stresses higher than that expected for an unconfined repair pipe or liner can develop at large holes in the host pipe. Studies to understand earth movements in rehabilitated pipelines often apply bending moments or axial loads to repaired specimens with joints or full-circumferential cracks. The literature demonstrated that the behavior of internal pipes or liners at discontinuities in the host pipe is critical for rehabilitated pipeline performance. Most available studies, however, have focused on nonstructural or semistructural repair systems, which may be unsuitable for full rehabilitation of deteriorating gas pipelines over an extended design life. The set of performance objectives described in this paper will help improve the understanding of structural pipe-in-pipe to enable effective design and implementation of trenchless repair systems for existing natural gas pipelines.
Practical Applications
Aging pipes can be repaired with internal rehabilitating pipes. This review provides insight into the causes of problems in gas distribution mains of cast/wrought iron, an important subset of legacy gas pipelines, by analyzing field observation records from between the years 1970 and 2020. Natural force damage was an important driver of damage; common subtypes of natural force damage are related to flexural deformation. Such deformation needs to be addressed by an internal repair pipe. Many researchers have studied the mechanical response of pipes repaired with internal pipes or liners. In these studies, the major loads are reflective of internal pressure, external pressure, surface loads, and soil movements. Interaction between the aging host pipe and internal rehabilitating pipe is an important factor. Performance objectives for internal rehabilitating pipes are outlined in this paper on the basis of field observations and existing work. The systematic identification of performance objectives most critical to these systems is intended to provide a pathway for future development and to qualify new pipe-in-pipe (PIP) system performance over a desired service life.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The information, data, or work presented herein was funded in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), US Department of Energy under Award No. DE-AR0001327. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
References
Adebola, T., I. Moore, and N. Hoult. 2021. “Use of optical fibers to investigate strength limit states for pressure pipe liners spanning across circular perforations.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (2): 04021006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000523.
Allouche, E., S. Alam, M. Al-Masud, and R. Dulam. 2012. “Experimental examination of selected limit states of structural liners at locations of ring fracture.” In Proc., Pipelines Conf. 2012, 783–794. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412480.072.
Allouche, E., S. Alam, J. Simicevic, R. Sterling, W. Condit, J. Matthews, and A. Selvakumar. 2014. “A pilot study for retrospective evaluation of cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) rehabilitation of municipal gravity sewers.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 39 (Jan): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.002.
Allouche, E. N., K. Bainbridge, and I. D. Moore. 2005. “Laboratory examination of a cured in place pressure pipe liner for potable water distribution system.” In Proc., North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) NO-DIG 2005, 1–10. Bothell, WA: North American Society for Trenchless Technology.
Argyrou, C., D. Bouziou, T. D. O’Rourke, and H. E. Stewart. 2018. “Retrofitting pipelines with cured-in-place linings for earthquake-induced ground deformations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.015.
Argyrou, C., T. D. O’Rourke, H. E. Stewart, and B. P. Wham. 2019. “Large-scale fault rupture tests on pipelines reinforced with cured-in-place linings.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (3): 04019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002018.
ASME. 2018. Article 403 nonmetallic internal line for pipe: Sprayed form for buried pipe. ASME PCC-2-2018. New York: ASME.
ASTM. 2016a. Standard practice for the application of spray-applied polymeric liners inside pipelines for potable water. F3182-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016b. Standard practice for rehabilitation of existing pipelines and conduits by the inversion and curing of a resin-impregnated tube. F1216-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for rehabilitation of existing pipelines and conduits by pulled- in-place installation of cured-in-place thermosetting resin pipe (CIP). F1743-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard specification for cured-in-place thermosetting resin sewer piping systems. D5813-04. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019a. Standard practice for rehabilitation of existing sewers and conduits with deformed polyethylene (PE) liner. F1606-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019b. Standard specification for cured-in-place pipe lining system for rehabilitation of metallic gas pipe. F2207-06. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for determination of external loading characteristics of plastic pipe by parallel-plate loading. D2412-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
AWWA Committee. 2019. Structural classifications of pressure pipe linings: Suggested protocol for product classification. Denver: AWWA.
Baird, G. M., and S. Folkman. 2018. “Benchmarking your break rates: A review of new findings and trends from North American water main break studies.” In Proc., Pipelines 2018, 408–416. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481653.044.
Barbero, E., and S. Rangarajan. 2005. “Long-term testing of trenchless pipe liners.” J. Test. Eval. 33 (6): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1520/jte11982.
Bontus, G., R. Baxter, and S. McKeefrey. 2019. “Development of a renewed approach to internal reinstatement of services in CIPP lined water mains.” In Proc., Pipelines 2019, 150–158. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482490.016.
Boot, J. C. 1997. “Elastic buckling of cylindrical pipe linings with small imperfections subject to external pressure.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 12 (Jan): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00018-2.
Bouziou, D., B. P. Wham, T. D. O’Rourke, H. E. Stewart, M. C. Palmer, Z. Zhong, A. Filiatrault, and A. Aref. 2012. “Earthquake response and rehabilitation of critical lifelines.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Brown, M. J. P., I. D. Moore, and A. Fam. 2020. “Analysis of a cured-in-place pressure pipe liner spanning circular voids.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 101 (Jul): 103424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103424.
CFR (Code of Federal Regulations). 2021. Code of federal regulations (CFR). CFR 49. Washington, DC: CFR.
Das, S., A. Bayat, L. Gay, M. Salimi, and J. Matthews. 2016. “A comprehensive review on the challenges of cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) installations.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 65 (8): 583–596. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2016.119.
El-Sawy, K., and I. D. Moore. 1998. “Stability of loosely fitted liners used to rehabilitate rigid pipes.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (11): 1350–1357. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1350).
Farrag, K., and M. M. Guerrero. 2021. Procedures for selecting locating and excavation technologies. Des Plaines, IL: Gas Technology Institute.
Fu, G., B. Shannon, S. Rathnayaka, R. Deo, and J. Kodikara. 2020. State of the art literature review on CIPP liners. Melbourne, Australia: Monash Univ.
García, D. B., and I. D. Moore. 2015. “Performance of deteriorated corrugated steel culverts rehabilitated with sprayed-on cementitious liners subjected to surface loads.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 47 (Mar): 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.12.012.
Glock, D. 1977. “Überkritisches Verhalten eines starr ummantelten Kreisrohres bei Wasserdruck von aussen und Temperaturdehnung.” [In German.] Der Stahlbau 46 (7): 212–217.
Ha, S. K., H. K. Lee, and I. S. Kang. 2016. “Structural behavior and performance of water pipes rehabilitated with a fast-setting polyurea-urethane lining.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 52 (Feb): 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.003.
He, X., and S. Kenny. 2019. “Mechanical performance of a pressure pipe CIPP liner with stress concentration effects associated with local defects.” In Proc., Pipelines 2019, 515–527. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482506.054.
Hilberink, A., A. M. Gresnigt, and L. J. Sluys. 2011. “Mechanical behaviour of lined pipe during bending, numerical and experimental results compared.” In Vol. 4B of Proc., ASME 2011 30th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE, 401–412. New York: ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2011-49434.
Jaganathan, A., E. Allouche, and M. Baumert. 2007. “Experimental and numerical evaluation of the impact of folds on the pressure rating of CIPP liners.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 22 (5–6): 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.11.007.
Jeon, S. S., T. D. O’Rourke, and A. N. Neravali. 2004. “Repetitive loading effects on cast iron pipelines with cast-in-place pipe lining systems.” J. Transp. Eng. 130 (6): 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:6(692).
Knight, M. A., K. Awe, A. Abdel-aal, R. Baxter, and G. Bontus. 2019. “Design of CIPP pressure liners using the HDB method.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Pipelines 2019, 109–116. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482483.012.
Knight, M. A., and G. Bontus. 2018. “Pressure testing of CIPP liners to failure.” In Proc., Pipelines 2018, 444–453. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481653.048.
Korky, S. J., M. Najafi, V. Kaushal, and R. Serajiantehrani. 2022. “State-of-the-art review on application of spray-applied pipe linings in gravity stormwater conveyance conduits.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 13 (3): 03122001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000651.
Kouchesfehani, Z. K., A. D. Tehrani, and M. Najafi. 2021. “Culvert renewal with cementitious-geopolymer spray–applied pipe lining: Field data collection and assessment.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (3): 04021028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000555.
Kouchesfehani, Z. K., A. D. Tehrani, M. Najafi, and J. Syar. 2020. “Laboratory testing of invert-cut corrugated metal pipes renewed with polymeric spray applied pipe lining.” Transp. Geotech. 25 (Dec): 100413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100413.
Kozman, D. P. 2020. “Bonded or unbonded liners? How longitudinal bending impacts pipe lining design and performance.” In Proc., Pipelines 2020, 263–270. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483190.030.
Lam, C., and W. Zhou. 2016. “Statistical analyses of incidents on onshore gas transmission pipelines based on PHMSA database.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 145 (Sep): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.06.003.
Law, T. C. M., and I. D. Moore. 2002. “Laboratory investigation on the static response of repaired sewers.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., Pipelines 2002, 1–13. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40641(2002)34.
Li, Z., L. Wang, Z. Guo, and H. Shu. 2012. “Elastic buckling of cylindrical pipe linings with variable thickness encased in rigid host pipes.” Thin-Walled Struct. 51 (Feb): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.11.003.
Li, Z., J. Zheng, and R. Wang. 2019. “Effects of grouting voids on the elastic buckling of confined pipe liners subjected to uniform pressure.” Thin-Walled Struct. 137 (Apr): 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.12.045.
Lu, H., S. Behbahani, M. Azimi, J. C. Matthews, S. Han, and T. Iseley. 2020. “Trenchless construction technologies for oil and gas pipelines: State-of-the-art review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (6): 03120001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001819.
Madryas, C., and A. Szot. 2003. “Structural sensitivity of circular sewer liners to geometrical imperfections.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 18 (4): 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00065-8.
Matthews, J., A. Selvakumar, S. Vaidya, and W. Condit. 2015. “Large-diameter sewer rehabilitation using a spray-applied fiber-reinforced geopolymer mortar.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 20 (4): 04014050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000246.
Matthews, J. C., A. Selvakumar, and W. Condit. 2013. “Current and emerging water main renewal technologies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000121.
Montel, R. 1960. “Formule semi-empirique pour la détermination de la pression extérieure limite d’instabilité des conduites métalliques lisses noyées dans du béton.” [In French.] Houille Blanche 46 (5): 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/1960048.
Moore, I. 2021. “Response of a polymer liner passing across a pressure pipeline joint opening under axial ground movements.” Comput. Geotech. 139 (Nov): 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104429.
Najafi, M. 2005. Trenchless technology: Pipeline and utility design, construction and renewal. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Najafi, M. 2016. Pipeline infrastructure renewal and asset management. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Najafi, M., X. Yu, Z. K. Kouchesfehani, A. D. Tehrani, S. Korky, R. Serajiantehrani, S. Raut, E. Kampbell, and L. Osborn. 2021. Structural design methodology for spray applied pipe liners in gravity storm water conveyance conduits. Arlington, TX: Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1974a. “Pipeline accident report—Missouri Public Service Company, Clinton, Missouri, December 9, 1972.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAR7403.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1974b. “Pipeline accident report—Southern Union Gas Company, El Paso, Texas, April 22, 1973.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAR7402.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1978a. “Brief of accident, pipeline accident DCA-76-FP-030.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAB-78-01.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1978b. “Brief of accident, pipeline accident DCA-77-FP-006.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAB-78-01.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1978c. “Brief of accident, pipeline accident DCA-77-FP-007.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAB-78-01.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1978d. “Brief of accident, pipeline accident DCA-77-FP-028.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAB-78-01.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1979. “Pipeline accident report—Philadelphia gas works natural gas pipeline rupture, explosion, and fire, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 11, 1979.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAR7903.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 1991. “Pipeline accident brief no. DCA90FP001.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/DCA90FP001.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 2016. “Pipeline accident brief—Birmingham public housing gas explosion.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAB1601.pdf.
National Transportation Safety Board. 2019. “Pipeline accident report—Overpressurization of natural gas distribution system, explosions, and fires in Merrimack Valley, Massachusetts, September 13, 2018.” Accessed August 23, 2022. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/PAR1902.pdf.
Netravali, A. N., T. D. O’Rourke, K. I. Gerretisen, Y. P. Singh, S. S. Jeon, and D. Zhao. 2000. Advanced pipeline support and stabilized backfill for gas mains affected by excavations—Part 2: Cast-in-place pipe lining systems for cast iron and steel gas mains. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Netravali, A. N., T. D. O’Rourke, S. K. Shaw, and T. Bond. 2003. Evaluation of Starline 2000-PSE cured-in-place lining system for cast iron gas distribution pipelines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2022. “Investigation report.” Accessed August 5, 2021. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/Reports.aspx?mode=Pipeline.
Nuruddin, M., K. DeCocker, S. M. T. Sendesi, A. J. Whelton, J. P. Youngblood, and J. A. Howarter. 2020. “Influence of aggressive environmental aging on mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of ultra violet (UV) cured in place pipe liners.” J. Compos. Mater. 54 (23): 3365–3379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320913988.
Omara, A. M. 1997. “Analysis of cured-in-place pipes (CIPP) installed in circular and oval deteriorated host pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Louisiana Tech Univ.
Omara, A. M., L. K. Guice, W. T. Straughan, and F. A. Akl. 1997. “Buckling models of thin circular pipes encased in rigid cavity.” J. Eng. Mech. 123 (12): 1294–1301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:12(1294).
O’Rourke, T. D., A. N. Netravali, S. M. Pendharkar, A. Tokinson, D. Chaudhuri, and S. Toprak. 1996. Evaluating service life of anaerobic joint sealing products and techniques. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
O’Rourke, T. D., J. E. Strait, N. Mottl, B. A. Berger, B. P. Wham, H. E. Stewart, and D. Price. 2021. Performance evaluation of aqua-pipe under earthquake-induced ground deformation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Pipeline Infrastructure Committee. 2021. “Design of close-fit liners for the rehabilitation of gravity pipes.” In Design of close-fit liners for the rehabilitation of gravity pipes, edited by N. E. Kampbell and J. Simicevic. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415801.
Ra, K., S. M. T. Sendesi, M. Nuruddin, N. N. Zyaykina, E. N. Conkling, B. E. Boor, C. T. Jafvert, J. A. Howarter, J. P. Youngblood, and A. J. Whelton. 2019. “Considerations for emission monitoring and liner analysis of thermally manufactured sewer cured-in-place-pipes (CIPP).” J. Hazard. Mater. 371 (May): 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.097.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rui, Z., and X. Wang. 2013. “A comprehensive analysis of natural gas distribution pipeline incidents.” Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Technol. 6 (5): 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2013.056105.
Shou, K. J., and B. C. Chen. 2018. “Numerical analysis of the mechanical behaviors of pressurized underground pipelines rehabilitated by cured-in-place-pipe method.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71 (Jun): 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.005.
Singh, P. R., V. Pericoli, A. Kanvinde, and S. Narasimhan. 2020. “Framework for analyzing cast iron water main fractures due to moisture-induced soil expansion.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (3): 04020015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000460.
Sirimanna, C. S., A. C. Manalo, W. Karunasena, S. Banerjee, and L. McGarva. 2015. “Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) repair systems for corroded steel pipelines.” In Rehabilitation of pipelines using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, 267–285. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Woodhead. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-85709-684-5.00013-8.
Spasojevic, A. D., R. J. Mair, and J. E. Gumbel. 2007. “Centrifuge modelling of the effects of soil loading on flexible sewer liners.” Géotechnique 57 (4): 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.4.331.
Stewart, H. E., T. D. O’Rourke, B. P. Wham, A. N. Netravali, C. Argyrou, X. Zeng, and T. K. Bond. 2015. Performance testing of field-aged cured-in-place liners (CIPL) for cast iron piping. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Stewart, H. E., S. Weinberg, B. A. Berger, and J. E. Strait. 2019. Slow cooling of cured-in-place liners for cast iron and steel gas pipelines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Straughan, W. T., L. K. Guice, and C. Mal-Duraipandian. 1995. “Long-term structural behavior of pipeline rehabilitation systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (4): 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:4(214).
Tehrani, A. D. 2020. “Development of a structural design methodology for cementitious sprayed applied pipe linings in gravity storm water conveyance conduits.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Thépot, O. 2000. “A new design method for non-circular sewer linings.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 15 (Mar): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00064-X.
Trickey, S. A., I. D. Moore, and M. Balkaya. 2016. “Parametric study of frost-induced bending moments in buried cast iron water pipes.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 51 (Jan): 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.028.
USDOT PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2021a. “Distribution, transmission & gathering, LNG, and liquid accident and incident | PHMSA.” Accessed May 18, 2021. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline/distribution-transmission-gathering-lng-and-liquid-accident-and-incident-data.
USDOT PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2021b. “Gas distribution cast/wrought iron pipelines.” Accessed July 1, 2021. https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPDMPublicWebsite%2FCIMiles%2FGD_Cast_Iron.
USDOT PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2021c. “Gas distribution, gas gathering, gas transmission, hazardous liquids, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and underground natural gas storage (UNGS) annual report data.” Accessed March 12, 2021. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline/gas-distribution-gas-gathering-gas-transmission-hazardous-liquids.
USDOT PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2021d. “Pipeline miles and facilities 2010+.” Accessed June 28, 2021. https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?Portalpages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPDMPublicWebsite%2F_portal%2FPublicReports&Page=Infrastructure.
USDOT PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2021e. “Pipeline replacement background | PHMSA.” Accessed May 3, 2021. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline-replacement/pipeline-replacement-background.
Vasilikis, D., and S. A. Karamanos. 2009. “Stability of confined thin-walled steel cylinders under external pressure.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 51 (1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.11.006.
Vasilikis, D., and S. A. Karamanos. 2012. “Mechanical behavior and wrinkling of lined pipes.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 49 (23–24): 3432–3446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.07.023.
Vladeanu, G., and J. C. Matthews. 2018. “Analysis of risk management methods used in trenchless renewal decision making.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 72 (Feb): 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.025.
Weimer, C. 2015. “How old is too old? A look at aging transmission pipeline infrastructure issues.” Accessed May 3, 2022. https://pstrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Weimer-Old-Pipes.pdf.
Wham, B. P., C. Argyrou, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2016. “Jointed pipeline response to tunneling-induced ground deformation1.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (11): 1794–1806. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0054.
Wham, B. P., and C. A. Davis. 2019. “Buried continuous and segmented pipelines subjected to longitudinal permanent ground deformation.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 10 (4): 04019036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000400.
Williams, D. A., and A. K. Glasmeier. 2022. “Evaluation of error across natural gas pipeline incidents.” Risk Anal. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13981.
Yang, K., H. Fang, J. Bu, X. Zhang, B. Li, X. Du, and Z. Zhang. 2021a. “Full-scale experimental investigation of the mechanical characteristics of corroded buried concrete pipes after cured-in-place-pipe rehabilitation.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 117 (Nov): 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104153.
Yang, K., B. Xue, H. Fang, X. Du, B. Li, and J. Chen. 2021b. “Mechanical sensitivity analysis of pipe-liner composite structure under multi-field coupling.” In Vol. 29 of Structures, 484–493. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.036.
Zhao, J. Q., and B. B. Rajani. 2002. Construction and rehabilitation costs for buried pipe with a focus on trenchless technologies construction and rehabilitation costs for buried pipe with a focus on trenchless technologies.. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
Zhong, Z., A. Filiatrault, and A. Aref. 2017. “Experimental performance evaluation of pipelines rehabilitated with cured-in-place pipe liner under earthquake transient ground deformations.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (2): 04016036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000326.
Zhong, Z., S. Wang, M. Zhao, X. Du, and L. Li. 2018. “Performance of ductile iron push-on joints rehabilitated with CIPP liner under repetitive and seismic loadings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.031.
Zhou, W., C. Li, B. Ma, and M. Najafi. 2016. “Buckling strength of a thin-wall stainless steel liner used to rehabilitate water supply pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 7 (1): 04015017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000212.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14 • Issue 2 • May 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 23, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 23, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.