State-of-the-Art Reviews
Dec 14, 2022

Integrating Quality Assurance in Balance Mix Designs for Durable Asphalt Mixtures: State-of-the-Art Literature Review

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

Delivering durable asphalt concrete within a reasonable cost is one of the great ambitions of pavement material engineers. This state-of-the-art review article documents the efforts spent in the past two decades to ensure the durability and performance of asphalt mixtures in mix design and production. A perspective with the attempt to integrate laboratory mix design, plant production quality assurance, and field place acceptance is applied in the review. The development of the performance specification and performance mix design is summarized. The paper categorizes performance specification into index-based performance specification and predictive performance specification that include performance-related specification and performance-based specification. The approaches to developing index-based performance mix design/balanced mix design and predictive performance mix design are also compared in the review. The challenges and solutions in incorporating performance tests in asphalt productions are documented and discussed. The challenges include selecting performance testing methods, determining index threshold limits, estimating and incorporating testing variability and uncertainty, determining sampling position and testing frequency, and so forth. The paper also provides suggested areas of future research and implementation activities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Center for Transportation Infrastructure Durability & Life-Extension (TriDurLE). The authors gratefully acknowledge the TriDurLE for their financial support.

References

AASHTO. 2003. Major types of transportation construction specifications: A guideline to understand their evolution and application. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021a. Standard method of test for determining the damage characteristic curve and failure criterion using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT) cyclic fatigue test. AASHTO TP 107-18. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021b. Standard method of test for determining the damage characteristic curve and failure criterion using small specimens in the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT) cyclic fatigue test. AASHTO TP 133-21. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021c. Standard method of test for determining the fatigue life of compacted asphalt mixtures subjected to repeated flexural bending. AASHTO T 321-17. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021d. Standard method of test for determining the fracture potential of asphalt mixtures using the Illinois flexibility index test (I-FIT). AASHTO TP 124-20. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021e. Standard method of test for determining the indirect tensile Nflex factor to assess the cracking resistance of asphalt mixtures. AASHTO TP 141-20. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021f. Standard method of test for determining rutting susceptibility of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA). AASHTO T 340-10. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021g. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). AASHTO T 378-17. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021h. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T 324-19. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021i. Standard method of test for moisture–density relations of soil–cement mixtures. AASHTO TP 134-19. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021j. Standard method of test for determining the creep compliance and strength of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the indirect tensile test device. AASHTO T 322-07. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021k. Standard method of test for abrasion loss of asphalt mixture specimens. AASHTO TP 108-14. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021l. Resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO T 283-21. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AAT (Advanced Asphalt Technologies) and LLC. 2011. Manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Abdalla, A., A. Faheem, A. Hosseini, and H. Titi. 2021. “Performance related asphalt mixtures characterization.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ALDOT (Alabama DOT). 2020. Balanced asphalt mix design for local roads. Birmingham, AL: ALDOT.
Al-Khayat, H., and A. Epps Martin. 2021. “Balanced mix design approach for Superpave hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures with RAP.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Al-Qadi, I. L., I. M. Said, U. M. Ali, and J. R. Kaddo. 2021. “The truth and myth about the cracking mechanism of asphalt concrete.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ARA (Applied Research Associates). 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Ashouri, M., Y. D. Wang, Y. Choi, and Y. R. Kim. 2021. “Development of healing model and simplified characterization test procedure for asphalt concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 271 (Feb): 121515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121515.
Asphalt Institute. 2015. MS-2 asphalt mix design methods. 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for evaluation of asphalt mixture cracking resistance using the semi-circular bend test (SCB) at intermediate temperatures. ASTM D8044-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for determination of cracking tolerance index of asphalt mixture using the indirect tensile cracking test at intermediate temperature. ASTM D8225-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021a. Standard test method for determining fatigue failure of asphalt-aggregate mixtures with the four-point beam fatigue device. ASTM D8237-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021b. Standard test method for determining fracture energy of asphalt mixtures using the disk-shaped compact tension geometry. ASTM D7313-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2022. Standard test method for determination of rutting tolerance index of asphalt mixture using the ideal rutting test. Work Item 71466. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bennert, T. 2020. “New York’s State’s balanced mixture design (BMD) research efforts.” In Proc., Conf. Northeast Asphalt Users Producer Group (NEAUPG). Storrs, CT: Univ. of Connecticut.
Bennert, T., E. Sheehy, R. Blight, S. Gresavage, and F. Fee. 2014. Implementation of performance-based specifications for asphalt mix design and production quality control for New Jersey: Circular number E-C189. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Buttlar, W. G., B. Jahangiri, P. Rath, H. Majidifard, L. Urrar, J. Meister, and H. Brown. 2021. Development of performance-related asphalt mix design specification for the Illinois Tollway. Downers Grove, IL: Illinois State Toll Highway Authority.
Buttlar, W. G., L. Urra-Contreras, B. Jahangiri, P. Rath, and H. Majidifard. 2020. Support for balanced asphalt mixture design specification development in Missouri. Springfield, MO: Missouri DOT.
Christensen, D. W., Jr., and R. F. Bonaquist. 2006. Volumetric requirements for Superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Coleri, E., S. Sreedhar, and I. A. Obaid. 2020. Development of a balanced mix design method in Oregon. Salem, OR: Oregon DOT.
Cross, S., and J. Li. 2019. Implement balanced asphalt mix design in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma DOT.
Daniel, J. S., M. Corrigan, C. Jacques, R. Nemati, E. Dave, and A. Congalton. 2018. “Comparison of asphalt mixture specimen fabrication methods and binder tests for cracking evaluation of field mixtures.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 20 (5): 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1431148.
Diffenderfer, S. D., and B. Bowers. 2019. “Initial approach to performance (balanced) mix design: The Virginia experience.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (2): 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118823732.
Diffenderfer, S. D., I. Boz, and J. Habbouche. 2021. Balanced mix design for surface asphalt mixtures: Phase I: Initial roadmap development and specification verification. Virginia Beach, VA: Virginia DOT.
Ding, J., Y. D. Wang, S. Gulzar, Y. R. Kim, and B. S. Underwood. 2020. “Uncertainty quantification of simplified viscoelastic continuum damage fatigue mode using the Bayesian inference-based Markov chain Mont-Carlo method.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (4): 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120910149.
Epps, J. A., A. Hand, S. Seeds, T. Schulz, S. Alavi, C. Ashmore, C. L. Monismith, J. A. Deacon, J. T. Harvey, and R. Leahy. 2002. Recommended performance-related specification for hot-mix asphalt construction: Results of the Westrack project. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Etheridge, R. A., Y. D. Wang, S. S. Kim, and Y. R. Kim. 2019. “Evaluation of fatigue cracking resistance of asphalt mixtures using apparent damage capacity.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (11): 04019257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002870.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019. Performance engineered pavements. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fugro Consultants, Inc. and Arizona State University. 2011. A performance-related specification for hot-mixed asphalt. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Garcia-Ruiz, J., and S. Sargand. 2021. “Rational approach to evaluate asphalt concrete base course design for improving construction quality and performance.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
Golalipour, A., V. Veginati, and D. Mensching. 2021. “Evaluation of asphalt mixture performance using cracking and durability tests at a full-scale pavement facility.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Harvey, J., R. Wu, J. Signore, I. Basheer, S. Holikatti, P. Vacura, and T. J. Holland. 2014. Performance-based specification: California experience to date: Circular number E-C189. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Hughes, C. 2005. State construction quality assurance programs. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Hughes, C. S., J. S. Moulthrop, S. Tayabji, R. M. Weed, and J. L. Burati. 2012. Quality-related pay adjustment factors for pavements. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
IDOT (Illinois DOT). 2021. Special provision for hot-mix-asphalt—Mixture design verification and production (modified for I-FIT). Chicago: IDOT.
Jeong, J., Y. D. Wang, A. Ghanbari, C. Nash, D. Nener-Plante, B. S. Underwood, and Y. R. Kim. 2020. “Pavement performance predictions using performance-volumetric relationship and evaluation of construction variability: Example of MaineDOT shadow project for the development of performance-related specification.” Constr. Build. Mater. 263 (2020): 120150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120150.
Johanneck, L., J. Geib, D. Van Deusen, J. Garrity, C. Hanson, and E. Dave. 2015. DCT low Temperature fracture testing pilot project. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.
Kim, Y. R., C. Castorena, M. Elwardany, F. Fousefi Rad, S. Underwood, A. Gundla, P. Gudipudi, M. Farrar, and R. Glaser. 2018. Long-term aging of asphalt mixtures for performance testing and prediction. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kim, Y. R., M. Guddati, Y. Choi, D. Kim, A. Norouzi, Y. D. Wang, B. Keshavarzi, M. Ashouri, A. Ghabari, and A. D. Wargo. 2022a. Hot-mix asphalt performance-related specification based on viscoelastoplastic continuum damage (VEPCD) models. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
Kim, Y. R., B. S. Underwood, M. N. Guddati, A. Ghanbari, Y. D. Wang, B. Keshavarzi, J. Jeong, D. Mocelin, F. Pivetta, and N. Saleh. 2022b. Development and deploy performance related specifications (PRS) for asphalt pavement construction. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
Ksaibati, K., and N. Butts. 2003. Evaluating the impact of QC/QA programs on asphalt mixture variability. MPC Rep. No. 03-146. Fargo, ND: Mountain-Plains Consortium.
LADOTD. 2014. Evaluation of asphalt mixture crack propagation using the semi-circular bend test (SCB). LADOTD TR 330. West Conshohocken, PA: LADOTD.
LDOTD (Louisiana DOT and Development). 2016. Louisiana standard specifications for roads and bridges. Baton Rouge, LA: LDOTD.
Lee, J., J. E. Haddock, D. Alvarez, and R. R. Rastegar. 2020. Quality control and quality assurance of asphalt mixture using laboratory rutting and cracking test. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Liu, J., S. Zhao, and S. Saboundjian. 2017. “Variability of composition, volumetric, and mechanic properties of hot mix asphalt for quality assurance.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (2): D4015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001481.
Maupin, G. W. 2003. Additional asphalt to increase the durability of Virginia’s Superpave surface mixes. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
McCarthy, L. M., J. Callans, R. Quigley, and S. V. Scott III. 2016. Performance specifications for asphalt mixtures: A synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
McDaniel, R. S., R. B. Leahy, G. Huber, J. S. Moulthrop, and T. Ferragut. 2011. The Superpave mix design system: Anatomy of a research program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.17226/22812.
MoDOT (Missouri DOT). 2021a. Balanced mix design performance testing and increased density. Jefferson City, MO: MoDOT.
MoDOT (Missouri DOT). 2021b. Balanced mix design performance testing for job mix approval. Jefferson City, MO: MoDOT.
Mogawer, W. S., A. J. Austerman, R. Kluttz, and M. Roussel. 2012. “High-performance thin-lift overlays with high reclaimed asphalt pavement content and warm-mix asphalt technology: Performance and workability characteristics.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2293 (1): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2293-03.
Mohammad, L., M. Kim, and H. Challa. 2016a. Development of performance-based specification for Louisiana asphalt mixtures. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
Mohammad, L. N., M. A. Elseifi, S. B. Cooper, C. S. Hughes, J. W. Button, and L. D. Ervin Jr. 2016b. Comparing the volumetric and mechanical properties of laboratory and field specimens of asphalt concrete. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Montoya, M. A., M. R. Pouranian, and J. E. Haddock. 2018. “Increasing asphalt pavement density through mixture design: A field project.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. https://doi.org/10.12783/aapt2018/33800.
NAPA (National Asphalt Pavement Association). 2019. “Market facts.” Accessed August 8, 2019. https://www.asphaltpavement.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=891.
Newcomb, D. 2018. Balanced design of asphalt mixtures. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.
Newcomb, D. E., E. Arambula, F. Yin, J. Zhang, A. Bhasin, W. Li, and Z. Arega. 2015. Properties of foamed asphalt for warm mix asphalt applications. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
NJDOT (New Jersey Department of Transportation). 2007. Overlay test for determining crack resistance of HMA. NJDOT B-10. Ewing Township, NJ: NJDOT.
NJDOT (New Jersey DOT). 2011. “NJDOT survey on dust to binder ratio for Superpave.” Accessed June 16, 2019. https://www.pavementinteractive.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/SuperpaveDBRatioSurvey.pdf.
Nsengiyumva, G., Y. Kim, and J. Hu. 2020. Feasibility and implementation of balanced mix design in Nebraska. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ.
Paye, B. 2014. “WisDOT pilot high recycle mixes.” Accessed September 1, 2015. https://www.wispave.org/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/Breakout-2014-Paye-High-Recycle.pdf.
Scott, S. 2019. Improving durability of asphalt mixtures. Denver: Colorado DOT.
Tran, N., F. Yin, F. Leiva, C. Rodezno, G. Huber, and B. Pine. 2016. Adjustments to the Superpave volumetric mixture design procedure for selecting optimum asphalt content. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2005. Glossary of highway quality assurance terms: Transportation research circular, number E-C074. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2018. Glossary of transportation construction quality assurance terms: Transportation research circular, number E-C235. 7th ed. Washington, DC: TRB.
Tsai, B. W., R. Wu, J. Harvey, and C. Monismith. 2012. Development of fatigue performance specification and its relation to mechanistic–empirical pavement design using four-point bending beam test results. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC/Balkema.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2007. Test procedure for overlay test. Tex-248-F. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2019. Superpave mixtures—Balanced mix design. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Underwood, B. S., C. Baek, and Y. R. Kim. 2012. “Simplified viscoelastic continuum damage model as platform for asphalt concrete fatigue analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2296 (1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2296-04.
VAA (Virginia Asphalt Association). 2021. “BMD round robin: Phase 2 begins.” Accessed August 10, 2021. https://vaa.mynewscenter.org/bmd-round-robin-phase-2-begins/.
VTrans (Vermont Agency of Transportation). 2019. Superpave bituminous concrete pavement, performance engineered method. Montpelier, VT: VTrans.
Wang, Y. D. 2019. “Development of the framework of performance-engineered mixture design for asphalt concrete.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, North Carolina State Univ.
Wang, Y. D., A. Ghanbari, B. S. Underwood, and R. Y. Kim. 2021a. “Development of framework of the predictive performance-engineered mix design procedure for asphalt mixtures.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. (Jun): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1938044.
Wang, Y. D., A. Ghanbari, B. S. Underwood, and Y. R. Kim. 2019. “Development of a performance-volumetric relationship for asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (6): 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119845364.
Wang, Y. D., A. Ghanbari, B. S. Underwood, and Y. R. Kim. 2021b. “Development of preliminary transfer functions for FlexPAVE™.” Constr. Build. Mater. 266 (Part B): 121182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121182.
Wang, Y. D., B. Keshavarzi, and Y. R. Kim. 2018. “Fatigue performance predictions of asphalt pavements using FlexPAVETM with the S-VECD model and DR failure criterion.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (40): 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756873.
Wang, Y. D., and Y. R. Kim. 2017. “Development of a pseudo strain energy-based fatigue failure criterion for asphalt mixtures.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (10): 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1394100.
Wang, Y. D., A. Norouzi, and Y. R. Kim. 2016. “Comparison of fatigue cracking performance of asphalt pavements predicted by pavement ME and LVECD programs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2590 (1): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.3141/2590-06.
Wang, Y. D., B. S. Underwood, and Y. R. Kim. 2020. “Development of a fatigue index parameter, Sapp, for asphalt mixes using viscoelastic continuum damage theory.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 23 (2): 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1751844.
West, R., C. Rodezno, F. Leiva, and F. Yin. 2018. Development of a framework for balanced mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Williams, R. C., D. Hill, M. Zelenock, and J. Bausano. 2004. Development of laboratory performance test procedures and trial specifications for hot mix asphalt: Final report. Detroit: Michigan DOT.
Yin, F., and R. West. 2021. Balanced mix design resource guide. Greenbelt, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
Zhou, F., S. Hu, and D. Newcomb. 2020. “Development of a performance-related framework for production quality control with ideal cracking and rutting tests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 261 (Nov): 120549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120549.
Zhou, F., S. Hu, T. Scullion, M. Mikhail, and L. F. Walubita. 2007. “A balanced HMA mix design procedure for overlays.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 76 (Nov): 823–850.
Zhou, F., R. Steger, and W. Mogawer. 2021. “Development of a coherent framework for balanced mix design and production quality control and quality acceptance.” Constr. Build. Mater. 287 (Jun): 123020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123020.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 149Issue 1March 2023

History

Published online: Dec 14, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 14, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Associate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5149-9898. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70808. Email: [email protected]
James A. Heidman Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-1438. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Performance Assessment of Waste Cooking Oil-Modified Asphalt Mixtures, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app14031228, 14, 3, (1228), (2024).
  • A performance-related design for hot-mix asphalt (HMA) incorporating multiple design parameters, Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10.1080/14680629.2023.2299826, (1-16), (2024).
  • Evaluation of Factors Influencing the High Temperature Viscoelastic Response of a Fine Aggregate Matrix Using a Modified Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1560, 150, 4, (2024).
  • Characterization of Intermediate Temperature Fracture Properties of Asphalt Mixtures as Measured with Different Tests, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1384, 150, 1, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share