Impact of Local Calibration on Pavement Design in Michigan
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 150, Issue 3
Abstract
The global Pavement-mechanistic-empirical (ME) transfer functions have been calibrated using the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) pavement sections at the national level. These functions may need calibration for local conditions for reliable performance predictions. Several calibration studies have been conducted for local conditions, but limited research is available on the impact of calibration on pavement design. This study calibrates and validates the Pavement-ME transfer functions using version 2.6 for Michigan. A total of 256 flexible and 113 rigid sections have been selected based on the performance and availability of Pavement-ME inputs. The authors obtained the Pavement-ME inputs using construction records, plans, job mix formula (JMF), and material testing results. In contrast, the performance data was obtained from the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) pavement management system (PMS) database. The calibrated models were then used for pavement design to estimate the impact of calibration and for comparison with AASHTO93 designs. The paper identifies the controlling distresses for pavement design. A total of 44 new flexible and rigid sections were designed based on the newly calibrated coefficients. The results show a significant improvement in performance prediction after local calibration. A comparison between AASHTO93 and Pavement-ME designs showed a reduction in hot-mix asphalt (HMA) and plain cement concrete (PCC) slab thicknesses for the latter approach. On average, the surface thicknesses using locally calibrated coefficients were thinner by 0.22 in. (0.56 cm) and 0.44 in. (1.12 cm) for flexible and rigid pavements, respectively. Critical design distresses for flexible pavements include bottom-up and thermal cracking. Conversely, transverse cracking and international roughness index (IRI) control the designs for rigid sections. Evaluating the impact of locally calibrated models on pavement designs is essential to obtaining practical and cost-effective design thickness.
Practical Applications
This study provides a framework for the local calibration. Several factors affect the local calibration process, including the field performance data. The recorded performance data may have irregularities due to measurement errors, limitations in distress identification, and conversion to the Pavement-ME units. Therefore, the authors recommend analyzing the raw performance data and filtering it (if required) for practicality. Pavement design is one of the most crucial calibration process steps and is often not considered in practice. It is worth mentioning that pavements were designed based on calibrated models, and based on MDOT feedback, the calibration improved the designs. The authors recommend that the calibration results should not be based only on statistical parameters (SEE, bias, etc.) but also on practical engineering judgments. By understanding which distress types are most relevant to their region, agencies can develop mitigation and maintenance strategies leading to longer pavement service lives. For example, MDOT can mitigate the occurrence of thermal cracking, a critical distress, by using modified and improved binders.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) for providing data and funding for the study (Grant No. 2020-0235).
Disclaimer
This publication is disseminated in the interest of information exchange. The Michigan Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as MDOT) expressly disclaims any liability of any kind or for any reason that might otherwise arise out of any use of this publication or the information or data provided in the publication. MDOT further disclaims any responsibility for typographical errors or accuracy of the information provided or contained within this information. MDOT makes no warranties or representations whatsoever regarding the quality, content, completeness, suitability, adequacy, sequence, accuracy or timeliness of the information and data provided, or that the contents represent standards, specifications, or regulations.
References
AASHTO. 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2010. Guide for the local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Baladi, G., T. Dawson, and C. Sessions. 2009. Pavement subgrade MR design values for Michigan’s seasonal changes, final report. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT, Construction and Technology Division.
Baladi, G. Y., A. Thottempudi, and T. Dawson. 2011. Backcalculation of unbound granular layer moduli. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT.
Dong, S., J. Zhong, S. L. Tighe, P. Hao, and D. Pickel. 2020. “Approaches for local calibration of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide joint faulting model: A case study of Ontario.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 21 (11): 1347–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1545093.
Haider, S. W., et al. 2023. Testing protocol, data storage, and recalibration for pavement-ME design. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT, Research Administration.
Haider, S. W., N. Buch, W. Brink, K. Chatti, and G. Baladi. 2014. Preparation for implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in Michigan, part 3: Local calibration and validation of the pavement-ME performance models. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT, Office of Research Administration.
Haider, S. W., G. Musunuru, N. Buch, and W. C. Brink. 2020. “Local recalibration of JPCP performance models and pavement-ME implementation challenges in Michigan.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B. Pavements 146 (1): 04019037. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000146.
Kang, M., T. Adams, and A. Kang. 2007. “Local calibration for fatigue cracking models used in the Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” In Proc., 2007 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symp. Ames, IO: Iowa State Univ.
Kim, S., H. Ceylan, D. Ma, and K. Gopalakrishnan. 2014. “Calibration of pavement ME design and mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide performance prediction models for Iowa pavement systems.” J. Transp. Eng. 140 (10): 04014052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000704.
Kutay, M. E., and A. Jamrah. 2013. Preparation for implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in Michigan: Part 1–HMA mixture characterization. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT.
Li, Q., D. X. Xiao, K. C. Wang, K. D. Hall, and Y. Qiu. 2011. “Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): A bird’s-eye view.” J. Modern Transp. 19 (2): 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325749.
Ling, M., X. Luo, Y. Chen, F. Gu, and R. L. Lytton. 2020. “Mechanistic-empirical models for top-down cracking initiation of asphalt pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 21 (4): 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1489134.
Masad, A., E. Alrashydah, and A. T. Papagiannakis. 2022. “Preliminary calibration and validation of the Texas mechanistic-empirical flexible pavement design.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 23 (11): 3879–3891. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1926458.
Mu, F., J. W. Mack, and R. A. Rodden. 2018. “Review of national and state-level calibrations of AASHTOWare Pavement ME design for new jointed plain concrete pavement.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 19 (9): 825–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1210804.
Muthadi, N. R., and Y. R. Kim. 2008. “Local calibration of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for flexible pavement design.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2087 (1): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.3141/2087-14.
Nam Tran, P., M. M. Robbins, and C. Rodezno. 2017. Pavement ME design–Impact of local calibration, foundation support, and design and reliability thresholds. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn Univ. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 2004. Guide for mechanistic–Empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Singh, R. R., S. W. Haider, M. E. Kutay, B. Cetin, and N. Buch. 2022. “Impact of climatic data sources on pavement performance prediction in Michigan.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B. Pavements 148 (3): 04022048. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000396.
Tabesh, M., and M. S. Sakhaeifar. 2021. “Local calibration and implementation of AASHTOWARE Pavement ME performance models for Oklahoma pavement systems.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 24 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1924375.
Von Quintus, H. L., and J. S. Moulthrop. 2007. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide flexible pavement performance prediction models for Montana--Volume I executive research summary. Helena, MT: Montana DOT.
Wu, Z., D. X. Xiao, Z. Zhang, and W. H. Temple. 2014. “Evaluation of AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for designing rigid pavements in Louisiana.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 7 (6): 405. https://doi.org/10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(6).405.
You, Z., X. Yang, J. Hiller, D. Watkins, and J. Dong. 2015. Improvement of Michigan climatic files in pavement ME design. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 21, 2023
Accepted: Feb 14, 2024
Published online: May 13, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Asphalt pavements
- Calibration
- Concrete pavements
- Design (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Gravels
- Highway and road design
- Infrastructure
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Measurement (by type)
- Pavement condition
- Pavement design
- Pavements
- Sight distances
- Thickness
- Transportation engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.