Ranking of the Commonly Used Aggregate and Asphalt Binder Systems in Arkansas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 150, Issue 3
Abstract
The Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) Maintenance Division is concerned about the use of certain aggregates in asphalt mixture because of their durability and performance issues. Good performance of the pavements can be ensured by selecting good-quality aggregates along with asphalt binders that can produce compatible aggregate–binder systems. The primary goal of this research was to determine proper asphalt binders and aggregates for the construction of highways in Arkansas. Three performance grade (PG) asphalt binders, namely PG 64-22, PG 70-22, and PG 76-22, prepared from two different crude sources, were investigated. This study also included four types of ARDOT-commissioned aggregates, namely gravel, sandstone, limestone, and dolomite, from four quarries throughout Arkansas. Selected properties of asphalt binders and aggregates (e.g., physical, mechanical, and chemical) were evaluated by performing a series of routine laboratory tests. To evaluate the performance of the asphalt mixtures, work of cohesion, work of adhesion, and boiling resistance tests were conducted. These aggregates, binders, and aggregate–binder systems were ranked based on the properties obtained from laboratory tests. In general, any combination of dolomite or limestone with a stiffer binder such as PG 76-22 or PG 70-22 is expected to be superior to an asphalt mixture with either sandstone or gravel. The outcomes of this research will help highway agencies and pavement professionals in selecting suitable asphalt binders and aggregates for long-lasting pavement construction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the United States Department of Transportation (Grant No. 69A3551747106). The authors are grateful to the ARDOT, and to the suppliers of the binders and aggregates for providing test materials for this study.
Author contributions: The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: Z. Hossain and T. Bagchi: Study conception and Design. Z. Hossain, T. Bagchi, and S. Roy: Data collection Z. Hossain, T. Bagchi, and G. Baumgardner: Analysis and Interpretation of results. Z. Hossain and T. Bagchi: Draft manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
AASHTO. 2014. Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO T 283. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2022a. Standard method of test for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. AASHTO T 96. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2022b. Standard method of test for soundness of aggregate by use of sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate. AASHTO T 104. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Al Alam, M. S. 2017. “Chemical variations and engineering implications of reclaimed asphalt pavement and chemically modified asphalt binders.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Arkansas State Univ.
Al-Rawashdeh, A. S., and S. Sargand. 2014. “Performance assessment of a warm asphalt binder in the presence of water by using surface free energy concepts and nanoscale techniques.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (5): 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000866.
Arabani, M., H. Roshani, and G. H. Hamedi. 2012. “Estimating moisture sensitivity of warm mix asphalt modified with Zycosol as an antistrip agent using surface free energy method.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 24 (7): 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000455.
ASTM. 2007. Standard specification for methyl isobutyl carbinol. ASTM D3625. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for pH of water. ASTM D1293. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bagchi, T. 2020. “Evaluation of compatibility between asphalt binders and mineral aggregates.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Arkansas State Univ.
Bagchi, T., and Z. Hossain. 2021. “Evaluation of compatibility of asphalt binders and aggregates.” In Proc., Tran-SET 2020, 195–204. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baldi-Sevilla, A., J. P. Aguiar-Moya, A. Vargas-Nordcbeck, and L. Loria-Salazar. 2017. “Effect of aggregate–bitumen compatibility on moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (S2): 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1304248.
Bhasin, A., D. N. Little, K. L. Vasconcelos, and E. Masad. 2007. “Surface free energy to identify moisture sensitivity of materials for asphalt mixes.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2001 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2001-05.
Copeland, A. R. 2007. “Influence of moisture on bond strength of asphalt-aggregate systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Vanderbilt Univ.
Cui, S., B. R. K. Blackman, A. J. Kinloch, and A. C. Taylor. 2014. “Durability of asphalt mixtures: Effect of aggregate type and adhesion promoters.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 54 (Oct): 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.05.009.
Hefer, A. W., A. Bhasin, and D. N. Little. 2006. “Bitumen surface energy characterization using a contact angle approach.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 18 (6): 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(759).
Hossain, Z., B. Bairgi, and M. Belshe. 2015. “Investigation of moisture damage resistance of GTR-modified asphalt binder by static contact angle measurements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 95 (Oct): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.032.
Hossain, Z., A. Elsayed, T. Bagchi, and S. Roy. 2020. “Assessment of compatibility of mineral aggregates and binders used in highway construction and maintenance projects.” Accessed November 22, 2020. https://repository.lsu.edu/transet_pubs/72.
Howson, J., E. A. Masad, A. Bhasin, V. C. Branco, E. Arambula, R. Lytton, and D. Little. 2007. System for the evaluation of moisture damage using fundamental material properties. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ.
Jamal, H. 2017. “Desirable properties of road aggregates.” Accessed July 20, 2021. https://www.aboutcivil.org/properties-of-road-aggregates.html.
Kennedy, T. W., F. L. Roberts, and J. N. Anagnos. 1984. Texas boiling test for evaluating moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Kittu, A. T., R. Bulut, and S. Harimkar. 2014. “Comparison of surface energy values of limestone with respect to different 3D surface roughness measurements.” In Pavement materials, structures, and performance, 39–47. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Koc, M., and R. Bulut. 2014. “Assessment of a sessile drop device and a new testing approach measuring contact angles on aggregates and asphalt binders.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (3): 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000852.
Little, D. N., and A. Bhasin. 2006. Using surface energy measurements to select materials for asphalt pavement. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Masad, E., C. Zollinger, R. Bulut, D. Little, R. Lytton, H. Khalid, R. Davis, T. Scarpas, E. Fini, and A. Guarin. 2006. “Characterization of HMA moisture damage using surface energy and fracture properties.” In Vol. 75 of Proc., Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proc. Technical Sessions, 713–754. Savannah, GA: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies.
Masson, J. F. 2008. “A brief review of the chemistry of polyphosphoric acid (PPA) and bitumen.” Energy Fuels 22 (4): 2637–2640. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800120x.
Rassafi, A. A., M. Zarei, and A. Dadashi. 2021. “Application of multi-criteria decision-making in achieving the right mix asphalt mixtures.” Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 21 (Nov): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.21291.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2004. Soundness of aggregate using sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate. Tex-411-A. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
van Oss, C. J., M. K. Chaudhury, and R. J. Good. 1987. “Monopolar surfaces.” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 28 (Jan): 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(87)80008-8.
Wasiuddin, N. M., C. M. Fogle, M. M. Zaman, and E. A. O’Rear. 2007. “Effect of antistrip additives on surface free energy characteristics of asphalt binders for moisture-induced damage potential.” J. Test. Eval. 35 (1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE100290.
Wu, Y., F. Parker, and P. S. Kandhal. 1998. “Aggregate toughness/abrasion resistance and durability/soundness tests related to asphalt concrete performance in pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1638 (1): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.3141/1638-10.
Yu, X., N. A. Burnham, R. B. Mallick, and M. Tao. 2013. “A systematic AFM-based method to measure adhesion differences between micron-sized domains in asphalt binders.” Fuel 113 (Nov): 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.084.
Zarei, M., A. A. Kordani, A. Salehikalam, F. Akbarinia, M. Karimi, and S. Javadi. 2021. “The application of the best-worst method to gain the premier modified asphalt mixtures.” Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 21 (Nov): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.21292.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 2, 2023
Accepted: Apr 23, 2024
Published online: Jul 12, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Aggregates
- Asphalt pavements
- Binders (material)
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction industry
- Construction management
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Infrastructure
- Infrastructure construction
- Laboratory tests
- Management methods
- Materials characterization
- Materials engineering
- Mixtures
- Pavements
- Practice and Profession
- Ratings
- Tests (by type)
- Transportation engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.