Technical Papers
Mar 9, 2022

Integrating Skid Resistance and Safety Benefits into Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Surface Treatment Selection

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 148, Issue 2

Abstract

Even though 30% of the annual highway fatalities originate from inferior roadway conditions, crash costs under regular operations have seldomly been included in the life cycle cost analysis (LCCA). Among the various condition indicators, pavement roughness has been the most investigated on roadway safety, while skid resistance has been less studied. This paper presented an integral decision-making process to integrate pavement skid resistance and its corresponding safety benefits into the LCCA for pavement surface treatment selection. Built on the processing of an extensive amount of traffic crash, pavement skid, and surface condition data provided by the Oklahoma DOT (ODOT), friction demands at the investigation and intervention levels were recommended to trigger surface treatments. Later, friction deterioration models were established to evaluate the skid performance of treatments over time. Multivariate analysis results indicated that aggregate properties and treatment types were among the most important factors for pavement friction. Subsequently, an enhanced safety performance function (SPF) was developed to predict expected roadway crashes under different skid levels. Pavement friction was a statistically significant factor and had a negative effect on vehicle crashes. The predicted pavement friction variations and the corresponding safety benefits of surface treatments were calculated and included in a spreadsheet tool developed from this study. A case study was provided to demonstrate the LCCA results with and without considering the safety costs of different treatments. Neglecting crash costs in LCCA would result in agencies adopting alternatives with lower short-term agency costs but underestimating the long-term safety benefits.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the roadway data for the sections under study and codes for the models that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This paper was prepared under the research project “Utilizing Pavement Friction and Texture Data for the Reduction of Traffic Crashes and Delays” sponsored by the ODOT. Special thanks are due to Michael Folsom, Aaron Fridrich, Angel Gonzalez, Virgil Smith, and Matt Romero for providing data for this study. The opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of the facts and data herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the sponsoring agency. This paper does not constitute a standard, regulation, or specification.

References

AASHTO. 2010. Highway safety manual. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2016. Standard method of test for performance-graded asphalt binder. AASHTO M320-16. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdelaty, A., H. D. Jeong, B. Dannen, and F. Todey. 2016. “Enhancing life cycle cost analysis with a novel cost classification framework for pavement rehabilitation projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 34 (10): 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1205206.
Adams, A., and M. Warren. 2017. ODOT 2017 SAFE-T user manual. Oklahoma City: ODOT Traffic Engineering Collison Analysis and Safety Branch.
Agent, K. R., J. G. Pigman, and E. R. Green. 2004. Effect of pavement resurfacing on traffic safety. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center.
Al-Masaeid, H. R. 1997. “Impact of pavement condition on rural road accidents.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 24 (4): 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1139/l97-009.
ASCE. 2021. “2021 report card for America’s infrastructure.” Accessed November 26, 2021. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/.
Babashamsi, P., N. I. Md Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N. G. Md Nor, and H. Salarzadeh Jenatabadi. 2016. “Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: Review and analysis.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 9 (4): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.004.
Blincoe, L., T. R. Miller, E. Zaloshnja, and B. A. Lawrence. 2015. The economic and societal impact of motor vehicle crashes, 2010 (Revised). Washington, DC: National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
Buddhavarapu, P., A. Banerjee, and J. A. Prozzi. 2013. “Influence of pavement condition on horizontal curve safety.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 52 (Mar): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.010.
Chan, A., G. Keoleian, and E. Gabler. 2008. “Evaluation of life-cycle cost analysis practices used by the Michigan Department of Transportation.” J. Transp. Eng. 134 (6): 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:6(236).
Chen, S., T. U. Saeed, S. D. Alqadhi, and S. Labi. 2019. “Safety impacts of pavement surface roughness at two-lane and multi-lane highways: Accounting for heterogeneity and seemingly unrelated correlation across crash severities.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 15 (1): 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2017.1378281.
Chen, S., T. U. Saeed, and S. Labi. 2017. “Impact of road-surface condition on rural highway safety: A multivariate random parameters negative binomial approach.” Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 16 (Dec): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2017.09.001.
Chen, W., and M. Zheng. 2021. “Multi-objective optimization for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making: A critical review and future directions.” Autom. Constr. 130 (Oct): 103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103840.
de León Izeppi, E., S. W. Katicha, G. W. Flintsch, and K. K. McGhee. 2016. “Pioneering use of continuous pavement friction measurements to develop safety performance functions, improve crash count prediction, and evaluate treatments for Virginia roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2583 (1): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.3141/2583-11.
Demos, G. P. 2006. Life cycle cost analysis and discount rate on pavements for the Colorado Department of Transportation. Denver: Colorado DOT.
Farah, H., S. M. J. G. Erkens, T. Alkim, and B. van Arem. 2018. “Infrastructure for automated and connected driving: State of the art and future research directions.” Road Veh. Autom. 4: 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60934-8_16.
Ferreira, A., and J. Santos. 2013. “Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at the project level: Sensitivity analysis to the discount rate.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 14 (7): 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2012.719618.
FHWA. 2002. Life-cycle cost analysis primer. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA.
FHWA. 2016. Pavement friction. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA.
Flintsch, G. W., K. K. McGhee, E. Izeppi, and S. Najafi. 2012. The little book of tire pavement friction. Pavement surface properties consortium, 1–22. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
Greer, M. 2015. “Evaluation of AIMS-II and Micro-Deval for friction characteristics of aggregates.” Master thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Auburn Univ.
Hall, J., K. L. Smith, L. Titus-Glover, J. C. Wambold, T. J. Yager, and Z. Rado. 2009. Guide for pavement friction. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23038.
Han, D.-S., M.-S. Do, S.-H. Kim, and J.-H. Kim. 2007. “Life cycle cost analysis of pavement maintenance standard considering user and socio-environmental cost.” J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 27 (6D): 727–740.
Hauer, E. 1996. “Statistical test of difference between expected accident frequencies.” Trans. Res. Rec. 1542 (1): 24–29. https://doi.org/10/gpfsjt.
Henry, J. J. 2000. Vol. 291 of Evaluation of pavement friction characteristics. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Huang, M., Q. Dong, F. Ni, and L. Wang. 2021. “LCA and LCCA based multi-objective optimization of pavement maintenance.” J. Cleaner Prod. 283 (Feb): 124583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124583.
Jawad, D., and K. Ozbay. 2006. “The discount rate in life cycle cost analysis of transportation projects.” In Proc., 85th Annual TRB Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kim, C., E.-B. Lee, J. T. Harvey, A. Fong, and R. Lott. 2015. “Automated sequence selection and cost calculation for maintenance and rehabilitation in highway life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA).” Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 4 (1): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1260/2046-0430.4.1.61.
Kogbara, R. B., E. A. Masad, E. Kassem, A. T. Scarpas, and K. Anupam. 2016. “A state-of-the-art review of parameters influencing measurement and modeling of skid resistance of asphalt pavements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 114 (Jul): 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.002.
Lamptey, G., M. Z. Ahmad, S. Labi, and K. C. Sinha. 2005. Life cycle cost analysis for INDOT pavement design procedures. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Lee, E.-B., D. Thomas, and D. Alleman. 2018. “Incorporating road user costs into integrated life-cycle cost analysis for infrastructure sustainability: A case study on Sr-91 Corridor improvement project (Ca).” Sustainability 10 (2): 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010179.
Li, J. Q., D. Pittenger, K. Wang, and M. M. Zaman. 2019. Development of aggregate characteristics-based preventive maintenance treatments using 3D laser imaging and aggregate imaging technology for optimized skid resistance of pavements. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma DOT.
Li, J. Q., and K. Wang. 2020. Continuous friction measurement equipment (CFME) for highway safety management in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma DOT.
Li, J. Q., K. Wang, W. Liu, and W. Yu. 2021. Utilizing pavement friction and texture data for the reduction of traffic crashes and delays. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma DOT.
Li, J. Q., and W. Yu. 2021. “Enhanced safety performance function for highway segments in Oklahoma.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (3): 04021018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000616.
Li, Y., C. Liu, and L. Ding. 2013. “Impact of pavement conditions on crash severity.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 59 (Oct): 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.028.
Lord, D., and F. Mannering. 2010. “The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives.” Trans. Res. Part A. 44 (5): 291–305. https://doi.org/10/bqsv4t.
Lord, D., X. Qin, and S. R. Geedipally. 2021. Highway safety analytics and modeling. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Lyon, C., B. Persaud, and D. Merritt. 2016. “Quantifying the safety effects of pavement friction improvements—Results from a large-scale study.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 19 (2): 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1172709.
Mataei, B., H. Zakeri, M. Zahedi, and F. M. Nejad. 2016. “Pavement friction and skid resistance measurement methods: A literature review.” Open J. Civ. Eng. 6 (4): 537. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.64046.
Okte, E., I. L. Al-Qadi, and H. Ozer. 2019. “Effects of pavement condition on LCCA user costs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (5): 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119836776.
Ozbay, K., N. A. Parker, and D. Jawad. 2003. Guidelines for life cycle cost analysis. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey DOT.
Pranav, C., and Y.-C. Tsai. 2021. “High friction surface treatment deterioration analysis and characteristics study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2675 (12): 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211029648.
Ronghe, S. S., A. R. Arsade, and K. P. Nichat. 2020. “Impacts of accident due to road pavement.” Int. Res. J. Modernization Eng. Technol. Sci. 2 (6): 362–366.
Santos, A., E. Freitas, S. Faria, J. R. M. Oliveira, and A. M. A. C. Rocha. 2014. “Degradation prediction model for friction in highways.” In Computational science and its applications, 606–614. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Santos, A., E. F. Freitas, S. Faria, J. R. M. Oliveira, and A. M. A. C. Rocha. 2021. “Prediction of friction degradation in highways with linear mixed models.” Coatings 11 (2): 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11020187.
Susanna, A., M. Crispino, F. Giustozzi, and E. Toraldo. 2017. “Deterioration trends of asphalt pavement friction and roughness from medium-term surveys on major Italian roads.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 10 (5): 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.07.002.
TRIP (Transportation Research Nonprofit). 2020. Key facts about the U.S. surface transportation system. Washington, DC: TRIP.
Walls, J., III, and M. R. Smith. 1998. Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design-interim technical bulletin. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Wang, H., I. L. Al-Qadi, and I. Stanciulescu. 2012. “Simulation of tyre–pavement interaction for predicting contact stresses at static and various rolling conditions.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 13 (4): 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.565767.
Wang, H., and Z. Wang. 2013. “Evaluation of pavement surface friction subject to various pavement preservation treatments.” Constr. Build. Mater. 48 (Nov): 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.048.
Yang, G., Q. J. Li, Y. Zhan, Y. Fei, and A. Zhang. 2018a. “Convolutional neural network–based friction model using pavement texture data.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (6): 04018052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000797.
Yang, G., Q. J. Li, Y. Zhan, W. Yu, K. C. Wang, and Y. Peng. 2019. “Field performance evaluation of high friction surface treatments (HFST) in Oklahoma.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 46 (12): 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0521.
Yang, G., Q. J. Li, Y. J. Zhan, K. C. Wang, and C. Wang. 2018b. “Wavelet based macrotexture analysis for pavement friction prediction.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (1): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1165-x.
Zimmerman, K. A., and R. Larson. 2005. “Improving safety as part of a pavement preservation program.” In Proc., 1st National Conf. on Pavement Preservation, 159–172. Kansas City, MO: Transportation Research Board, Citeseer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 148Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Aug 20, 2021
Accepted: Jan 4, 2022
Published online: Mar 9, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, School of Civil Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-4956
Associate Professor/Williams Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2632-7808. Email: [email protected]
Xue Yang
Regents Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078.
Ph.D. Student, School of Civil Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-2848
Wenying Yu
Research Engineer, Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Science, Beijing 100080, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Integrated Life Cycle Analysis of Cost and CO2 Emissions from Vehicles and Construction Work Activities in Highway Pavement Service Life, Atmosphere, 10.3390/atmos14020194, 14, 2, (194), (2023).
  • Long-Term Performance and Safety Implications of High-Friction Surfacing Treatments, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1073, 149, 1, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share