Technical Papers
Sep 27, 2024

Adaptive Bridge Condition Forecasting through a Cluster-Based Exploration

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38, Issue 6

Abstract

Transportation networks in the United States contain more than 615,000 bridges. Federal regulations require routine inspections of these infrastructure systems at least every 24 months. However, recent studies have suggested that this approach is costly, inefficient, and, in some cases, risky. An essential element in developing customizable alternatives for condition assessment plans is the design of precise and robust forecasting models for bridge deterioration, capable of sustaining acceptable predictive accuracy even when operating with small subsets of data. The overarching objective of this research is to introduce a novel forecasting method for bridge deterioration conditions, augmented with an exploration mechanism to identify a subset of bridges crucial for maintaining the predictive power of the model in subsequent years. The proposed method comprises two main components. Firstly, a forecasting model for bridge deterioration conditions was designed, formulated, and developed based on a novel framework for ordinal extreme gradient boosting. Secondly, an exploration mechanism is employed using a new multidimensional clustering method that integrates K-means clustering and dynamic time wrapping. The proposed method is applied using historical condition assessment data from bridges in the three neighboring states of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. The outcomes validate the performance of the proposed method, demonstrating that the forecasting model accurately predicts future bridge conditions. Additionally, the clustering component successfully identifies a small subset of bridges essential for maintaining the predictive power of the forecasting model. The findings of this study will assist transportation agencies in utilizing their bridge inspection resources more efficiently and in customizing their condition assessment operations based on bridge characteristics and expected deterioration levels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Bellman, R., and S. Dreyfus. 2010. “Dynamic programming.” In Princeton landmarks in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chen, T., and C. Guestrin. 2016. “Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system.” In Proc., 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Dangeti, P. 2017. Statistics for machine learning: Techniques for exploring supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning models with Python and R. Birmingham, UK: Packt.
Farahani, R. V., and D. Penumadu. 2016. “Damage identification of a full-scale five-girder bridge using time-series analysis of vibration data.” Eng. Struct. 115 (May): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.008.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nations bridges. Washington, DC: DOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2022. “National bridge inspection standards.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-09512/p-600.
Friedman, J. H. 2001. “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.” In Annals of statistics, 1189–1232. Beachwood, OH: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
Harrison, M. 2023. Effective XGBoost: Optimizing, tuning, understanding, and deploying classification models. Salt Lake City, UT: Metasnake.
Hasan, S., and E. Elwakil. 2020. “Prediction model of deck condition for steel bridge.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering, Science and Technology 2020, 1–8. Monument, CO: ISTES Organization.
Ilbeigi, M., and M. Ebrahimi Meimand. 2020. “Statistical forecasting of bridge deterioration conditions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (1): 04019104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001347.
Ilbeigi, M., and B. Pawar. 2020. “A probabilistic model for optimal bridge inspection interval.” Infrastructures 5 (6): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060047.
Kendall, M. G. 1938. “A new measure of rank correlation.” Biometrika 30 (1–2): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81.
Kumar, A., S. Singla, A. Kumar, A. Bansal, and A. Kaur. 2022. “Efficient prediction of bridge conditions using modified convolutional neural network.” Wireless Pers Commun. 125 (1): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09539-8.
Liu, H., and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Bridge condition rating data modeling using deep learning algorithm.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (10): 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1712610.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2020. “A smart bridge data analytics framework for enhanced bridge deterioration prediction.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2020, 1194–1202. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Manafpour, A., I. Guler, A. Radlińska, F. Rajabipour, and G. Warn. 2018. “Stochastic analysis and time-based modeling of concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (9): 04018066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001285.
Masum, M., N. Anjum, M. J. Hossain Faruk, H. Shahriar, N. Sakib, M. Valero, M. A. Karim, A. Rahman, F. Wu, and A. Cuzzocrea. 2022. “A novel machine learning based framework for bridge condition analysis.” In Proc., 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. on Big Data (Big Data), 5530–5535. New York: IEEE.
Mia, M. M., and S. Kameshwar. 2023. “Machine learning approach for predicting bridge components’ condition ratings.” Front. Built Environ. 9 (Oct): 1254269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1254269.
Müller, M. 2007. “Dynamic time warping.” In Information retrieval for music and motion, 69–84. Berlin: Springer.
Nasrollahi, M., and G. Washer. 2015. “Estimating inspection intervals for bridges based on statistical analysis of national bridge inventory data.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (9): 04014104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000710.
Nguyen, T. T., and K. Dinh. 2019. “Prediction of bridge deck condition rating based on artificial neural networks.” J. Sci. Technol. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2019-13(3)-02.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 1968. Collapse of U.S. 35 highway bridge, point pleasant, West Virginia, December 15, 1967. Washington, DC: NTSB.
Rajkumar, M., S. Nagarajan, and M. Arockiasamy. 2023. “Bridge infrastructure management system: Autoencoder approach for predicting bridge condition ratings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 29 (1): 04022042. https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2123.
Ranjith, S., S. Setunge, R. Gravina, and S. Venkatesan. 2013. “Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311.
Reising, R. S. 2014. Risk-based bridge inspection practices. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Saremi, S. G., D. Goulias, and Y. Zhao. 2023. “Alternative sequence classification of neural networks for bridge deck condition rating.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 37 (4): 04023025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4390.
Sobanjo, J., P. Mtenga, and M. Rambo-Roddenberry. 2010. “Reliability-based modeling of bridge deterioration hazards.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (6): 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000074.
Sun, T., and J. Vatn. 2024. “A phase-type maintenance model considering condition-based inspections and maintenance delays.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 243 (Jun): 109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109836.
Tabatabai, H., C.-W. Lee, and M. A. Tabatabai. 2015. “Reliability of bridge decks in the United States.” Bridge Struct. 11 (3): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.3233/BRS-150091.
USDOT BTS. 2023. “National bridge inventory element data.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://geodata.bts.gov/datasets/usdot::national-bridge-inventory-element-data/about.
Washer, G., R. Connor, M. Nasrollahi, and J. Provines. 2016. “New framework for risk-based inspection of highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (4): 04015077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000818.
Wu, J. 2012. “Cluster analysis and K-means clustering: An introduction.” In Advances in K-means clustering: A data mining thinking, 1–16. Berlin: Springer.
Xin, J., J. Zhou, S. X. Yang, X. Li, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Bridge structure deformation prediction based on GNSS data using Kalman-ARIMA-GARCH model.” Sensors 18 (1): 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010298.
Yang, Y. N., M. M. Kumaraswamy, H. J. Pam, and H. M. Xie. 2013. “Integrating semiparametric and parametric models in survival analysis of bridge element deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000115.
Zulifqar, A., M. Cabieses, A. Mikhail, and N. Khan. 2014. Design of a bridge inspection system (BIS) to reduce time and cost. Farifax, VA: George Mason Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38Issue 6December 2024

History

Received: Apr 15, 2024
Accepted: Jul 1, 2024
Published online: Sep 27, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 27, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Hojat Behrooz, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07086. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07086 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-3808. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share